The direct transmission of microscopically visible unbalanced chromosome abnormalities (UBCAs) is rare and usually has phenotypic consequences. Here we report four families in which a normal phenotype was initially found in one or more family members. Each UBCA was interpreted with regard to overlapping examples and factors previously associated with transmitted imbalances including incidental ascertainment, low gene density, benign copy number variation (CNV) content, and gene relatedness. A 4.56 Mb deletion of 8p23.1-p23.2 was thought to be causal in the affected proband but showed incomplete penetrance in her mother and sibling (Family 1). Incomplete penetrance was also associated with a 10.88 Mb duplication of 13q21.31-q22.1 (Family 3) and dosage insensitivity with a 17.6 Mb deletion of 22pter-q11.21 (Family 4) that were both ascertained at prenatal diagnosis and each found in 4 unaffected family members. The 22pter-q11.21 deletion is part of a region with high benign CNV content and supports the mapping of cat eye syndrome to a 600 kb interval of 22q11.1-q11.21. Low gene densities of less than 2.0 genes/Mb were found in each of these three families but only after segmentally duplicated genes were excluded from the deletions of 8p and 22q. In contrast, gene density was average and variable expressivity associated with a 3.59 Mb duplication of 8p23.1 incidentally ascertained for paternal infertility (Family 2). Our results indicate that a greater degree of direct parental transmission, incomplete penetrance, and variable expression are features of both sub-microscopic CNVs and UBCAs with relatively low gene and high benign CNV content.

BACKGROUND:Pallister-Killian syndrome is a rare, sporadic condition caused by mosaic tetrasomy of the short arm of chromosome 12 (12p). The main features are intellectual disability, seizures, dysmorphic features and a variety of congenital malformations. Most available information comes from individual case reports. We report the results of a British study into Pallister-Killian syndrome, which is the first to provide comprehensive data on a population-based sample.METHOD:A detailed phenotypical study was carried out in Great Britain. All individuals with Pallister-Killian syndrome were eligible to participate. Each participant underwent a structured history, developmental assessment and clinical examination. Buccal mucosal samples were analysed by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and blood samples by array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). Genotype-phenotype correlations were sought in these tissues and existing skin biopsy reports.RESULTS:Twenty-two patients with Pallister-Killian syndrome, ranging from 4 months to 31 years were recruited and comprehensive data on each obtained. The birth incidence was 5.1 per million live births. Array CGH only suggested the diagnosis in 15.8% but buccal FISH could have made the diagnosis in 75.0%. There was no genotype-phenotype correlation in any of the tissues studied. This study shows that the high birth weights and profound intellectual disability classically described in Pallister-Killian syndrome are not universal. Mild or moderate intellectual disability was present in 27.6% of this cohort and all birth weights were within 2.67SD of the mean. New features which have not previously been recognised as part of Pallister-Killian syndrome include anhydrosis/hypohydrosis and episodic hyperventilation, suggesting involvement of the autonomic system.

The 8p23.1 duplication syndrome is a relatively rare genomic condition that has been confirmed with molecular cytogenetic methods in only 11 probands and five family members. Here, we describe another prenatal and five postnatal patients with de novo 8p23.1 duplications analyzed with oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization (oaCGH). Of the common features, mild or moderate developmental delays and/or learning difficulties have been found in 11/12 postnatal probands, a variable degree of mild dysmorphism in 8/12 and congenital heart disease (CHD) in 4/5 prenatal and 3/12 postnatal probands. Behavioral problems, cleft lip and/or palate, macrocephaly, and seizures were confirmed as additional features among the new patients, and novel features included neonatal respiratory distress, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), ocular anomalies, balance problems, hypotonia, and hydrocele. The core duplication of 3.68 Mb contains 31 genes and microRNAs of which only GATA4, TNKS, SOX7, and XKR6 are likely to be dosage sensitive genes and MIR124-1 and MIR598 have been implicated in neurocognitive phenotypes. A combination of the duplication of GATA4, SOX7, and related genes may account for the variable penetrance of CHD. Two of the duplications were maternal and intrachromosomal in origin with maternal heterozygosity for the common inversion between the repeats in 8p23.1. These additional patients and the absence of the 8p23.1 duplications in published controls, indicate that the 8p23.1 duplication syndrome may now be considered a pathogenic copy number variation (pCNV) with an estimated population prevalence of 1 in 58,000.

Chromosome 16 contains multiple copy number variations (CNVs) that predispose to genomic disorders. Here, we differentiate pathogenic duplications of 16p11.2–p12.2 from microscopically similar euchromatic variants of 16p11.2. Patient 1 was a girl of 18 with autism, moderate intellectual disability, behavioural difficulties, dysmorphic features and a 7.71-Mb (megabase pair) duplication (16:21 521 005–29 233 146). Patient 2 had a 7.81-Mb duplication (16:21 382 561–29 191 527), speech delay and obsessional behaviour as a boy and, as an adult, short stature, macrocephaly and mild dysmorphism. The duplications contain 65 coding genes of which Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) has the highest likelihood of being haploinsufficient and, by implication, a triplosensitive gene. An additional 1.11-Mb CNV of 10q11.21 in Patient 1 was a possible modifier containing the G-protein-regulated inducer of neurite growth 2 (GPRIN2) gene. In contrast, the euchromatic variants in Patients 3 and 4 were amplifications from a 945-kb region containing non-functional immunoglobulin heavy chain (IGHV), hect domain pseudogene (HERC2P4) and TP53-inducible target gene 3 (TP53TG3) loci in proximal 16p11.2 (16:31 953 353–32 898 635). Paralogous pyrosequencing gave a total copy number of 3–8 in controls and 8 to >10 in Patients 3 and 4. The 16p11.2–p12.2 duplication syndrome is a recurrent genomic disorder with a variable phenotype including developmental delay, dysmorphic features, mild to severe intellectual disability, autism, obsessive or stereotyped behaviour, short stature and anomalies of the hands and fingers. It is important to differentiate pathogenic 16p11.2–p12.2 duplications from harmless, microscopically similar euchromatic variants of proximal 16p11.2, especially at prenatal diagnosis.

BACKGROUND:The 8p23.1 duplication syndrome and copy number variation of the 8p23.1 defensin gene cluster are cytogenetically indistinguishable but distinct at the molecular level. To our knowledge, the 8p23.1 duplication syndrome has been described at prenatal diagnosis only once and we report our experience with four further apparent duplications ascertained at prenatal diagnosis.METHODS:Additional material at band 8p23.1 was detected using conventional G-banded cytogenetics in each case. Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) or Fluorescence In Situ Hybridisation (FISH) were used depending on whether only DNA (Cases 1 and 4) or cytogenetic preparations (Cases 2 and 3) were available from the laboratory of origin. The extent of the duplication in Case 1 was retrospectively determined using array Comparative Genomic Hybridisation (array CGH).RESULTS:Three cases of 8p23.1 duplication syndrome were found (Cases 1 to 3). Two were de novo and continued to term and the third, a paternally transmitted duplication, was terminated because of a previous child with psychomotor delay and 8p23.1 duplication syndrome. Case 1 was ascertained with a hypoplastic left heart but the ventricular septal and interventricular defects, in Cases 2 and 3 respectively, were found after ascertainment for advanced maternal age. By contrast, case 4 was a maternally transmitted copy number variation of the defensin cluster with normal outcome.CONCLUSIONS:Our data underline the need to differentiate 8p23.1 duplications from copy number variation of the defensin cluster using FISH, MLPA or array CGH. Cardiac defects were ascertained by ultrasound in only one of the three duplication 8p23.1 pregnancies but were visible in two of the three at 21 to 22 weeks gestation. Our results provide further evidence that both deletion and duplication of the GATA4 transcription factor can give rise to a variety of conotruncal heart defects with variable penetrance and expressivity.

American Journal of Medical Genetics Part AVolume 149A, Issue 4 p. 793-797 Research Letter Inverted duplication of 1q32.1 to 1q44 characterized by array CGH and review of distal 1q partial trisomy† Meena Balasubramanian, Corresponding Author Meena Balasubramanian [email protected] Wessex Clinical Genetics Service, Southampton University Hospitals Trust, Princess Anne Hospital, Southampton, UKWessex Clinical Genetics Service, Southampton University Hospitals Trust, Princess Anne Hospital, Coxford Road, Southampton SO16 5YA, UK.Search for more papers by this authorJohn C.K. Barber, John C.K. Barber Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, Salisbury NHS Foundation Trust, Salisbury District Hospital, Salisbury, UK National Genetics Reference Laboratory (Wessex), Salisbury NHS Foundation Trust, Salisbury District Hospital, Salisbury, UK Human Genetics Division, Southampton University Hospitals Trust, Southampton, UKSearch for more papers by this authorMorag N. Collinson, Morag N. Collinson Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, Salisbury NHS Foundation Trust, Salisbury District Hospital, Salisbury, UKSearch for more papers by this authorShuwen Huang, Shuwen Huang National Genetics Reference Laboratory (Wessex), Salisbury NHS Foundation Trust, Salisbury District Hospital, Salisbury, UKSearch for more papers by this authorViv K. Maloney, Viv K. Maloney National Genetics Reference Laboratory (Wessex), Salisbury NHS Foundation Trust, Salisbury District Hospital, Salisbury, UKSearch for more papers by this authorDave Bunyan, Dave Bunyan Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, Salisbury NHS Foundation Trust, Salisbury District Hospital, Salisbury, UKSearch for more papers by this authorNicki Foulds, Nicki Foulds Wessex Clinical Genetics Service, Southampton University Hospitals Trust, Princess Anne Hospital, Southampton, UKSearch for more papers by this author Meena Balasubramanian, Corresponding Author Meena Balasubramanian [email protected] Wessex Clinical Genetics Service, Southampton University Hospitals Trust, Princess Anne Hospital, Southampton, UKWessex Clinical Genetics Service, Southampton University Hospitals Trust, Princess Anne Hospital, Coxford Road, Southampton SO16 5YA, UK.Search for more papers by this authorJohn C.K. Barber, John C.K. Barber Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, Salisbury NHS Foundation Trust, Salisbury District Hospital, Salisbury, UK National Genetics Reference Laboratory (Wessex), Salisbury NHS Foundation Trust, Salisbury District Hospital, Salisbury, UK Human Genetics Division, Southampton University Hospitals Trust, Southampton, UKSearch for more papers by this authorMorag N. Collinson, Morag N. Collinson Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, Salisbury NHS Foundation Trust, Salisbury District Hospital, Salisbury, UKSearch for more papers by this authorShuwen Huang, Shuwen Huang National Genetics Reference Laboratory (Wessex), Salisbury NHS Foundation Trust, Salisbury District Hospital, Salisbury, UKSearch for more papers by this authorViv K. Maloney, Viv K. Maloney National Genetics Reference Laboratory (Wessex), Salisbury NHS Foundation Trust, Salisbury District Hospital, Salisbury, UKSearch for more papers by this authorDave Bunyan, Dave Bunyan Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, Salisbury NHS Foundation Trust, Salisbury District Hospital, Salisbury, UKSearch for more papers by this authorNicki Foulds, Nicki Foulds Wessex Clinical Genetics Service, Southampton University Hospitals Trust, Princess Anne Hospital, Southampton, UKSearch for more papers by this author First published: 24 March 2009 https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.32463Citations: 14 † How to cite this article: Balasubramanian M, Barber JCK, Collinson MN, Huang S, Maloney VK, Bunyan D, Foulds N. 2009. Inverted duplication of 1q32.1 to 1q44 characterized by array CGH and review of distal 1q partial trisomy. Am J Med Genet Part A 149A:793–797. Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Citing Literature Volume149A, Issue4April 2009Pages 793-797 RelatedInformation

Rankin, Julia; Allwood, Alex; Canham, Natalie; Delmege, Catherine; Crolla, John; Maloney, Viv Author Information

BACKGROUNDDuplications and deletions in the human genome can cause disease or predispose persons to disease. Advances in technologies to detect these changes allow for the routine identification of submicroscopic imbalances in large numbers of patients.METHODSWe tested for the presence of microdeletions and microduplications at a specific region of chromosome 1q21.1 in two groups of patients with unexplained mental retardation, autism, or congenital anomalies and in unaffected persons.RESULTSWe identified 25 persons with a recurrent 1.35-Mb deletion within 1q21.1 from screening 5218 patients. The microdeletions had arisen de novo in eight patients, were inherited from a mildly affected parent in three patients, were inherited from an apparently unaffected parent in six patients, and were of unknown inheritance in eight patients. The deletion was absent in a series of 4737 control persons (P=1.1x10(-7)). We found considerable variability in the level of phenotypic expression of the microdeletion; phenotypes included mild-to-moderate mental retardation, microcephaly, cardiac abnormalities, and cataracts. The reciprocal duplication was enriched in nine children with mental retardation or autism spectrum disorder and other variable features (P=0.02). We identified three deletions and three duplications of the 1q21.1 region in an independent sample of 788 patients with mental retardation and congenital anomalies.CONCLUSIONSWe have identified recurrent molecular lesions that elude syndromic classification and whose disease manifestations must be considered in a broader context of development as opposed to being assigned to a specific disease. Clinical diagnosis in patients with these lesions may be most readily achieved on the basis of genotype rather than phenotype.

The majority of constitutional reciprocal translocations appear to be unique rearrangements arising from independent events. However, a small number of translocations are recurrent, most significantly the t(11;22)(q23;q11). Among large series of translocations there may be multiple independently ascertained cases with the same cytogenetic breakpoints. Some of these could represent additional recurrent rearrangements, alternatively they could be identical by descent (IBD) or have subtly different breakpoints when examined under higher resolution. We have used molecular breakpoint mapping and haplotyping to determine the origin of three pairs of reciprocal constitutional translocations, each with the same cytogenetic breakpoints. FISH mapping showed one pair to have different breakpoints and thus to be distinct rearrangements. Another pair of translocations were IBD with identical breakpoint intervals and highly conserved haplotypes on the derived chromosomes. The third pair, t(4;11)(p16.2;p15.4), had the same breakpoint intervals by aCGH and fosmid mapping but had very different haplotypes, therefore they represent a novel recurrent translocation. Unlike the t(11;22)(q23;q11), the formation of the t(4;11)(p16.2;p15.4) may have involved segmental duplications and sequence homology at the breakpoints. Additional examples of recurrent translocations could be identified if the resources were available to study more translocations using the approaches described here. However, like the t(4;11)(p16.2;p15.4), such translocations are likely to be rare with the t(11;22) remaining the only common recurrent constitutional reciprocal translocation.

We report the analyses of breakpoints in 31 phenotypically normal and 14 abnormal carriers of balanced translocations. Our study assesses the differences between balanced translocations in normal carriers and those in abnormal carriers, focusing on the presence of genomic imbalances at the breakpoints or elsewhere in the genome, presence of cryptic chromosome rearrangements, and gene disruption. Our hypothesis is that all four features will be associated with phenotypic abnormalities and absent or much less frequent in a normal population. In the normal cohort, we identified neither genomic imbalances at the breakpoints or elsewhere in the genome nor cryptic chromosome rearrangements. In contrast, we identified candidate disease-causing imbalances in 4/14 abnormal patients. These were three breakpoint associated deletions and three deletions unrelated to the breakpoints. All six de novo deletions originated on the paternally inherited chromosome. Additional complexity was also present in one of these cases. Gene disruption by the breakpoints was present in 16/31 phenotypically normal individuals and in 5/14 phenotypically abnormal patients. Our results show that translocations in phenotypically abnormal patients are molecularly distinct from those in normal individuals: the former are more likely to be associated with genomic imbalances at the breakpoints or elsewhere and with chromosomal complexity, whereas the frequency of gene disruption is similar in both normal and abnormal translocation carriers.

Duplications of distal 8p with and without significant clinical phenotypes have been reported and are often associated with an unusual degree of structural complexity. Here, we present a duplication of 8p23.1-8p23.2 ascertained in a child with speech delay and a diagnosis of ICD-10 autism. The same duplication was found in his mother who had epilepsy and learning problems. A combination of cytogenetic, FISH, microsatellite, MLPA and oaCGH analysis was used to show that the duplication extended over a minimum of 6.8 Mb between 3 539 893 and 10 323 426 bp. This interval contains 32 novel and 41 known genes, of which only microcephalin (MCPH1) is a plausible candidate gene for autism at present. The distal breakpoint of the duplicated region interrupts the CSMD1 gene in 8p23.2 and the medial breakpoint lies between the MSRA and RP1L1 genes in 8p23.1.An interchromosomal insertion between a normal and polymorphically inverted chromosome 8 is proposed to explain the origin of this duplication. Further mapped imbalances of distal 8p are needed to determine whether the autistic component of the phenotype in this family results from the cumulative imbalance of many genes or dosage imbalance of an individual susceptibility gene.

We present a 12-year-old with a de novo interstitial deletion of approximately 2.3 Mb in chromosome band 17q24.2eq24.3, which was identified by array CGH. The most characteristic features in this case are posterior laryngeal cleft and the presence of numerous freckles and lentigines in childhood. Growth restriction, microcephaly and moderate mental retardation are also prominent features but are frequently seen with other chromosomal anomalies. The microdeletion causes haploinsufficiency of PRKAR1A (protein kinase, cAMP-dependent, regulatory 1a), which is known to cause Carney Complex but this diagnosis alone does not account for all of her problems and she therefore has ‘Carney Complex plus’. This report illustrates the practical benefits associated with a clear cytogenetic diagnosis, as regular endocrinological and cardiac screening is required. 2008 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

We present a 12-year-old with a de novo interstitial deletion of approximately 2.3Mb in chromosome band 17q24.2–q24.3, which was identified by array CGH. The most characteristic features in this case are posterior laryngeal cleft and the presence of numerous freckles and lentigines in childhood. Growth restriction, microcephaly and moderate mental retardation are also prominent features but are frequently seen with other chromosomal anomalies. The microdeletion causes haploinsufficiency of PRKAR1A (protein kinase, cAMP-dependent, regulatory 1α), which is known to cause Carney Complex but this diagnosis alone does not account for all of her problems and she therefore has ‘Carney Complex plus’. This report illustrates the practical benefits associated with a clear cytogenetic diagnosis, as regular endocrinological and cardiac screening is required.

The 8p23.1 deletion syndrome is established but not an equivalent duplication syndrome. Here, we report five patients; a de novo prenatal case and two families in which 8p23.1 duplications have been directly transmitted from mothers to children. Dual-colour fluorescent in situ hybridisation, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification analysis and customised oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridisation (oaCGH) indicated an ∼3.75 Mb duplication of most of band 8p23.1 between the olfactory receptor/defensin repeats (ORDRs) in all cases. However, oaCGH revealed an additional duplication of 500 kb adjacent to the proximal ORDR in Family 1 and an additional deletion of 3.14 Mb within the Nablus Mask-Like Facial Syndrome region of 8q22.1 in Family 2. Copy number variation at introns 4–5 of the GATA4 gene was also identified. This 8p23.1 duplication syndrome is associated with a characteristic facial phenotype including a prominent forehead and arched eyebrows. Adrenal insufficiency, Tetralogy of Fallot, partial 2/3 syndactyly of the toes and cleft palate in some individuals may be explained by ascertainment bias, incomplete penetrance and/or the presence of the microdeletion in Family 2. The duplication is compatible with normal early childhood development but, although our adult cases live independent lives with varying degrees of support, learning difficulties have been experienced by some family members. We conclude that the 8p23.1 duplication syndrome is a genomic condition with an emerging but variable phenotype that may be under-diagnosed. Our results demonstrate that direct transmission does not distinguish genuine duplications from euchromatic variants and illustrate the power of array CGH to reveal unexpected additional imbalances in affected patients.

John C.K. Barber,* Viv K. Maloney, Maria Kirchhoff, N. Simon Thomas, Tracy A. Boyle, and Bruce Castle Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, Salisbury NHS Foundation Trust, Salisbury District Hospital, Salisbury National Genetics Reference Laboratory (Wessex), Salisbury NHS Foundation Trust, Salisbury District Hospital, Salisbury Human Genetics Division, Southampton University Hospitals Trust, Southampton Cytogenetic Laboratory, Department of Clinical Genetics, Juliane Marie Centre, University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark Wessex Clinical Genetics Service, Southampton University Hospitals Trust, Princess Anne Hospital, Coxford Road, Southampton

It is well-known that Aspergillus terreus harbors higher MIC for amphotericin B and in the past couple of years the body of evidence showing azole-resistant Aspergillus spp. is increasing. Clinicians are treating more high-risk populations, and prophylactic therapy in clinical practice has a growing impact influencing the epidemiological data. In Candida disease there seems to be shift from Candida albicans to non-albicans Candida species. In ICUs, there is evidence that patients with non-albicans infection have a nearly seven-fold mortality compared with those with C. albicans. The global epidemiology is variable, with C. glabrata most common in North America and northern Europe (16%-24%), C. tropicalis most frequent in southeast Asia and South America (20%-35%), and C. parapsilosis seen most in Spain, South America, Turkey, and Australia (20%-32%). In invasive Aspergillus disease voriconazole is highly recommended by many scientific societies including ESCMID. The new azole isavuconazole received high recommendations as well, followed by a weaker recommendation for liposomal amphotericn B due to its higher incidence of nephrotoxicity. Since diagnostic procedures remain challenging, antifungal prophylaxis appears a worthy alternative. From an infectious diseases standpoint, prophylaxis is always second best to targeted treatment, however posaconazole prophylaxis has been shown to provide a better chance of survival for patients in AML induction/remission and allogeneic HSCT with GVHD. All three available echinocandins are strongly recommended for targeted initial treatment of candidaemia, while liposomal amphotericin B and voriconazole are supported with moderate, and fluconazole with marginal strength by ESCMID. Further studies demonstrated that delayed start of caspofungin treatment delivers a worse outcome. Acquired resistance appears rare, however there is ongoing discussion whether echinocandins are appropriate for treating Candida parapsilosis.

A novel transmitted 2-3 Mb deletion of 2q14.1-q14.2 was found in an affected boy from a consanguineous family with a possible diagnosis of PEHO syndrome (OMIM 260565). BAC FISH showed that the deletion included a minimum of 20 genes including the homeobox engrailed 1 gene (EN1). However, the same deletion was also found in his phenotypically normal father and brother (family 1). The phenotype of the proband may, therefore, have been coincidental to the deletion, a result of a recessive condition within or outside the deleted segment or possibly due to variable dosage compensation of EN1 by the paralogous EN2 gene at 7q36. BAC FISH also showed that this deletion overlapped with a previously reported transmitted deletion of 2q13-q14.1 that had no phenotypic consequences (family 2). The deleted regions contained a total of 32 genes and comprise the final 5.25 Mb of the ancestral chromosome 2B from which chromosome 2 was formed in man. These families provide further evidence that heterozygous deletions of regions of low gene density are compatible with a normal phenotype.

The underlying cause of the multiple congenital anomalies/mental retardation syndrome Kabuki syndrome (KS, OMIM 147920) has not yet been established. We identified seven patients who fulfilled the classical clinical criteria for this syndrome and undertook a detailed clinical, ophthalomological and molecular cytogenetic review. Three of the seven patients had previously undetected ocular anomalies including myopia, ptosis, strabismus and tilted discs. The identification of preventable causes of loss of vision underlines the value of detailed ophthalmologic examination of KS patients. Using BAC fluorescence in situ hybridisation, there was no evidence of the duplication of 8p recently reported by Milunsky and Huang. We conclude that the cause of KS has yet to be established.

It has been proposed that duplications of 8p23.1 are either euchromatic variants of the 8p23.1 defensin domain with no phenotypic consequences or true duplications associated with developmental delay and heart defects. Here, we provide evidence for both alternatives in two new families. A duplication of most of band 8p23.1 (circa 5 Mb) was found in a girl of 8 years with pulmonary stenosis and mild language delay. BAC fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) and multiplex amplifiable probe hybridisation (MAPH) showed that the two copies of the duplicated segment were sited, in an alternating fashion, between three copies of a circa 300–450 kb segment from 8p23.1 distal to REPD. Copy number of the variable 8p23.1 defensin domain was consistent with duplication but within the normal range. Duplication of the GATA-binding protein 4 gene (GATA4) in this patient and others with and without heart defects, suggests it is a dosage-sensitive gene with variable penetrance. A cytogenetically similar duplication of 8p23.1 was found at prenatal diagnosis in a fetus, father and grandmother. There was no duplication using BAC FISH but MAPH showed 11 copies of the 360 kb variable defensin domain which is within the expanded range found in previous euchromatic variant carriers. Semiquantitative FISH (SQ-FISH) was consistent with a simultaneous expansion of the adjacent olfactory receptor repeats. These results distinguish duplications of 8p23.1 with clinically significant consequences from benign copy number variants, which have not yet been associated with qualitative or quantitative traits.

Leri-Weill dyschondrosteosis (LWD) and Langer mesomelic dysplasia (LMD) are caused by muta- tions in the SHOX gene. LWD results from hap- loinsufficiency and is dominantly inherited, while the more severe LMD results from the homozy- gous loss of SHOX. We describe a family and fetus with twoSHOX mutations. Several relatives carry an approximately 200 kb interstitial deletion that includes the whole SHOX gene. Their condition is mild, with no Madelung deformity, and was origi- nally diagnosed as hypochondroplasia (HCH). This deletion was also transmitted to a female fetus. However, unlike her carrier relatives, the ultrasound scan of the fetus and subsequent auto- psy were consistent with LMD. The fetus inherited an additional Xp deletion (Xpter-Xp22.12) that also included the SHOX gene from her chromoso- mally normal father. This represents a unique molecular condition for LMD: the fetus is a compound heterozygote with two independent deletions, one inherited and one arising from a