The diagnosis of refractory angina has conventionally been limited to patients with angina and ischaemia secondary to obstructive atherosclerotic epicardial coronary disease who experience persistent symptoms despite optimal pharmacological and revascularization therapies. It is now well-established that angina may also be caused by ischaemia resulting from coronary microcirculatory disorders, coronary vasospasm, and bridging in the absence of obstructive epicardial coronary disease or after "successful" revascularization. This increasingly prevalent and symptomatic group of patients, with both angina and demonstrable ischaemia, have been excluded from the conventional definition of refractory angina. In patients with obstructive epicardial coronary disease, disturbed microcirculatory and vasomotor function, amongst other ischaemic mechanisms, may account for continuing symptoms despite revascularization. Under-recognition of these mechanisms results in inadequate treatment and symptom persistence. In this review, a redefinition of refractory angina is proposed to include the full spectrum of patients experiencing persistent angina despite current maximal guideline-directed medical and revascularization therapies. Systematic approaches for comprehensive investigation are suggested to identify underlying mechanisms of ischaemia and stratify treatments accordingly. The complex needs of patients with refractory angina are likely best addressed by an inter-disciplinary Angina Heart Team with the aim of improving patient symptoms, quality of life, and clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS:Skeletal muscle (SM) fat infiltration, or intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT), reflects muscle quality and is associated with inflammation, a key determinant in cardiometabolic disease. Coronary flow reserve (CFR), a marker of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), is independently associated with body mass index (BMI), inflammation and risk of heart failure, myocardial infarction, and death. The relationship between SM quality, CMD, and cardiovascular outcomes is not known. METHODS:Consecutive patients (n = 669) undergoing evaluation for coronary artery disease with cardiac stress positron emission tomography demonstrating normal perfusion and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction were followed over a median of 6 years for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), including death and hospitalization for myocardial infarction or heart failure. Coronary flow reserve was calculated as stress/rest myocardial blood flow. Subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), SM, and IMAT areas (cm2) were obtained from simultaneous positron emission tomography attenuation correction computed tomography using semi-automated segmentation at the 12th thoracic vertebra level. RESULTS:Median age was 63 years, 70% were female, and 46% were nonwhite. Nearly half of patients were obese (46%, BMI 30-61 kg/m2), and BMI correlated highly with SAT and IMAT (r = .84 and r = .71, respectively, P < .001) and moderately with SM (r = .52, P < .001). Decreased SM and increased IMAT, but not BMI or SAT, remained independently associated with decreased CFR (adjusted P = .03 and P = .04, respectively). In adjusted analyses, both lower CFR and higher IMAT were associated with increased MACE [hazard ratio 1.78 (95% confidence interval 1.23-2.58) per -1 U CFR and 1.53 (1.30-1.80) per +10 cm2 IMAT, adjusted P = .002 and P < .0001, respectively], while higher SM and SAT were protective [hazard ratio .89 (.81-.97) per +10 cm2 SM and .94 (.91-.98) per +10 cm2 SAT, adjusted P = .01 and .003, respectively]. Every 1% increase in fatty muscle fraction [IMAT/(SM + IMAT)] conferred an independent 2% increased odds of CMD [CFR <2, odds ratio 1.02 (1.01-1.04), adjusted P = .04] and a 7% increased risk of MACE [hazard ratio 1.07 (1.04-1.09), adjusted P < .001]. There was a significant interaction between CFR and IMAT, not BMI, such that patients with both CMD and fatty muscle demonstrated highest MACE risk (adjusted P = .02). CONCLUSIONS:Increased intermuscular fat is associated with CMD and adverse cardiovascular outcomes independently of BMI and conventional risk factors. The presence of CMD and SM fat infiltration identified a novel at-risk cardiometabolic phenotype.

Abstract Heart disease is the number-one cause of death in women worldwide, and important sex differences in the rates of diagnosis, utilization of care, response to therapy and clinical outcomes have been described. Conventional diagnostic testing approaches in the evaluation of ischemic heart disease, which were designed primarily for identification of obstructive CAD, can lead to under- or over-testing in women without differentiating those most at risk. Unique factors related to the presentation, diagnosis, and underlying pathophysiology of ischemic heart disease in women underscore the need for a more tailored risk assessment strategy. Extensive evidence supports that MPI with SPECT and PET can effectively risk stratify women with ischemic heart disease. This chapter reviews how advances in nuclear cardiology techniques, including the addition of (1) absolute quantification of coronary blood flow and reserve, (2) multiparametric imaging approaches with MPI and CT, and (3) strategies to reduce radiation dose with the use of ultra-low-dose protocols involving stress-only imaging, solid-state detector SPECT, and PET, are being applied to better capture pathologic phenotypes prevalent in women, including ischemia with no obstructive CAD and coronary microvascular dysfunction, which may be important contributors to their morbidity and mortality.

BACKGROUND Body mass index (BMI) is a controversial marker of cardiovascular prognosis, especially in women. Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is prevalent in obese patients and a better discriminator of risk than BMI, but its association with body composition is unknown. OBJECTIVES The authors used a deep learning model for body composition analysis to investigate the relationship between CMD, skeletal muscle (SM), subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), and visceral adipose tissue (VAT), and their contribution to adverse outcomes in patients referred for evaluation of coronary artery disease. METHODS Consecutive patients (n = 400) with normal perfusion and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction on cardiac stress positron emission tomography were followed (median, 6.0 years) for major adverse events, including death and hospitalization for myocardial infarction or heart failure. Coronary flow reserve (CFR) was quantified as stress/rest myocardial blood flow from positron emission tomography. SM, SAT, and VAT cross-sectional areas were extracted from abdominal computed tomography at the third lumbar vertebra using a validated automated algorithm. RESULTS Median age was 63, 71% were female, 50% non-White, and 50% obese. Compared with the nonobese, patients with obesity (BMI: 30.0-68.4 kg/m(2)) had higher SAT, VAT, and SM, and lower CFR (all P < 0.001). In adjusted analyses, decreased SM but not increased SAT or VAT was significantly associated with CMD (CFR <2; OR: 1.38; 95% CI: 1.08-1.75 per -10 cm(2)/m(2) SM index; P < 0.01). Both lower CFR and SM, but not higher SAT or VAT, were independently associated with adverse events (HR: 1.83; 95% CI: 1.25-2.68 per -1 U CFR and HR: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.20-1.96 per -10 cm(2)/m(2) SM index, respectively; P < 0.002 for both), especially heart failure hospitalization (HR: 2.36; 95% CI: 1.31-4.24 per -1 U CFR and HR: 1.87; 95% CI: 1.30-2.69 per -10 cm(2)/m(2) SM index; P < 0.004 for both). There was a significant interaction between CFR and SM (adjusted P = 0.026), such that patients with CMD and sarcopenia demonstrated the highest rate of adverse events, especially among young, female, and obese patients (all P < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS In a predominantly female cohort of patients without flow -limiting coronary artery disease, deficient muscularity, not excess adiposity, was independently associated with CMD and future adverse outcomes, especially heart failure. In patients with suspected ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease, characterization of lean body mass and coronary microvascular function may help to distinguish obese phenotypes at risk for cardiovascular events. (J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2024;17:179-191) (c) 2024 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Journal Article Leveraging global coronary flow assessments to inform revascularization benefit in chronic coronary disease: time to test total heart flow Get access Viviany R Taqueti Viviany R Taqueti Cardiovascular Imaging Program, Departments of Radiology and Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA Corresponding author. Tel: +1 617 732 6291, Email: vtaqueti@bwh.harvard.edu, Twitter: @VTaqMD, @BrighamResearch, @harvardmed https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0136-3781 Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar European Heart Journal, Volume 45, Issue 3, 14 January 2024, Pages 195–197, https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehad812 Published: 28 December 2023

Tragically, preeclampsia is a leading cause of pregnancy-related complications and is linked to a heightened risk for morbid and fatal cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes. Although the mechanism connecting preeclampsia to CVD risk has yet to be fully elucidated, evidence suggests distinct pathways of early and late preeclampsia with shared CV risk factors but with profound differences in perinatal and postpartum risk to the mother and infant. In early preeclampsia, <34 weeks of gestation, systemic vascular dysfunction contributes to near-term subclinical myocardial damage. Hypertrophy and diastolic abnormalities persist postpartum and contribute to early onset heart failure (HF). This HF risk remains elevated decades later and contributes to premature death. Black women are at the highest risk of preeclampsia and HF. These findings support closer monitoring of women postpartum, especially for those with early and severe preeclampsia to control chronic hypertension and reduce the potentially preventable sequelae of heightened CVD and HF risk.

The process of peer review has been the gold standard for evaluating medical science, but significant pressures from the recent COVID-19 pandemic, new methods of communication, larger amounts of research, and an evolving publication landscape have placed significant pressures on this system. A task force convened by the American College of Cardiology identified the 5 most significant controversies associated with the current peer-review process: the effect of preprints, reviewer blinding, reviewer selection, reviewer incentivization, and publication of peer reviewer comments. Although specific solutions to these issues will vary, regardless of how scientific communication evolves, peer review must remain an essential process for ensuring scientific integrity, timely dissemination of information, and better patient care. In medicine, the peer-review process is crucial because harm can occur if poor-quality data or incorrect conclusions are published. With the dramatic increase in scientific publications and new methods of communication, high-quality peer review is more important now than ever.

Angina with nonobstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA) is increasingly recognized and may affect nearly one-half of patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography for suspected ischemic heart disease. This working diagnosis encompasses coronary microvascular dysfunction, microvascular and epicardial spasm, myocardial bridging, and other occult coronary abnormalities. Patients with ANOCA often face a high burden of symptoms and may experience repeated presentations to multiple medical providers before receiving a diagnosis. Given the challenges of establishing a diagnosis, patients with ANOCA frequently experience invalidation and recidivism, possibly leading to anxiety and depression. Advances in scientific knowledge and diagnostic testing now allow for routine evaluation of ANOCA noninvasively and in the cardiac catheterization laboratory with coronary function testing (CFT). CFT includes diagnostic coronary angiography, assessment of coronary flow reserve and microcirculatory resistance, provocative testing for endothelial dysfunction and coronary vasospasm, and intravascular imaging for identification of myocardial bridging, with hemodynamic assessment as needed.

AIM:The "2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease" provides an update to and consolidates new evidence since the "2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease" and the corresponding "2014 ACC/AHA/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Focused Update of the Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease."METHODS:A comprehensive literature search was conducted from September 2021 to May 2022. Clinical studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and other evidence conducted on human participants were identified that were published in English from MEDLINE (through PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline.STRUCTURE:This guideline provides an evidenced-based and patient-centered approach to management of patients with chronic coronary disease, considering social determinants of health and incorporating the principles of shared decision-making and team-based care. Relevant topics include general approaches to treatment decisions, guideline-directed management and therapy to reduce symptoms and future cardiovascular events, decision-making pertaining to revascularization in patients with chronic coronary disease, recommendations for management in special populations, patient follow-up and monitoring, evidence gaps, and areas in need of future research. Where applicable, and based on availability of cost-effectiveness data, cost-value recommendations are also provided for clinicians. Many recommendations from previously published guidelines have been updated with new evidence, and new recommendations have been created when supported by published data.

Angina pectoris and dyspnea in patients with normal or nonobstructive coronary vessels remains a diagnostic challenge. Invasive coronary angiography may identify up to 60% of patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), of whom nearly two-thirds may, in fact, have coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) that may account for their symptoms. Positron emission tomography (PET) determined absolute quantitative myocardial blood flow (MBF) at rest and during hyperemic vasodilation with subsequent derivation of myocardial flow reserve (MFR) affords the noninvasive detection and delineation of CMD. Individualized or intensified medical therapies with nitrates, calcium-channel blockers, statins, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II type 1-receptor blockers, beta-blockers, ivabradine, or ranolazine may improve symptoms, quality of life, and outcome in these patients. Standardized diagnosis and reporting criteria for ischemic symptoms caused by CMD are critical for optimized and individualized treatment decisions in such patients. In this respect, it was proposed by the cardiovascular council leadership of the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging to convene thoughtful leaders from around the world to serve as an independent expert panel to develop standardized diagnosis, nomenclature and nosology, and cardiac PET reporting criteria for CMD. This consensus document aims to provide an overview of the pathophysiology and clinical evidence of CMD, its invasive and noninvasive assessment, standardization of PET-determined MBFs and MFR into "classical" (predominantly related to hyperemic MBFs) and "endogen" (predominantly related to resting MBF) normal coronary microvascular function or CMD that may be critical for diagnosis of microvascular angina, subsequent patient care, and outcome of clinical CMD trials.

Management of stable coronary artery disease (CAD) has been based on the assumption that flow-limiting atherosclerotic obstructions are the proximate cause of angina and myocardial ischemia in most patients and represent an important target for revascularization. However, the role of revascularization in reducing long-term cardiac events in these patients has been limited mainly to those with left main disease, 3-vessel disease with diabetes, or decreased ejection fraction. Mounting evidence indicates that nonepicardial coronary causes of angina and ischemia, including coronary microvascular dysfunction, vasospastic disorders, and derangements of myocardial metabolism, are more prevalent than flow-limiting stenoses, raising concerns that many important causes other than epicardial CAD are neither considered nor probed diagnostically. There is a need for a more inclusive management paradigm that uncouples the singular association between epicardial CAD and revascularization and better aligns diagnostic approaches that tailor treatment to the underlying mechanisms and precipitants of angina and ischemia in contemporary clinical practice.

Background: Skeletal muscle (SM) fat infiltration, or intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT), reflects muscle quality and is associated with inflammation, a key determinant in cardiometabolic disease. Coronary flow reserve (CFR), a marker of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), is independently associated with BMI, inflammation and risk of heart failure, myocardial infarction and death. We sought to investigate the relationship between skeletal muscle quality, CMD and cardiovascular outcomes. Methods: Consecutive patients (N=669) undergoing evaluation for CAD with cardiac stress PET demonstrating normal perfusion and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction were followed over median 6 years for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including death and hospitalization for myocardial infarction or heart failure. CFR was calculated as stress/rest myocardial blood flow and CMD defined as CFR<2. Subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), SM and IMAT areas (cm 2 ) were obtained from simultaneous PET attenuation correction CTs using semi-automated segmentation at the twelfth thoracic vertebra (T12) level. Results: Median age was 63 years, 70% were female and 46% nonwhite. Nearly half of patients were obese (46%, BMI 30-61) and BMI correlated highly with SAT and IMAT (r=0.84 and 0.71, respectively, p<0.001) and moderately with SM (r=0.52, p<0.001). Decreased SM and increased IMAT, but not BMI or SAT, remained independently associated with decreased CFR (adjusted p=0.03 and p=0.04, respectively). In adjusted analyses, both lower CFR and higher IMAT were associated with increased MACE [HR 1.78 (1.23-2.58) per -1U CFR and 1.53 (1.30-1.80) per +10 cm 2 IMAT, adjusted p=0.002 and p<0.0001, respectively], while higher SM and SAT were protective [HR 0.89 (0.81-0.97) per +10 cm 2 SM and 0.94 (0.91-0.98) per +10 cm 2 SAT, adjusted p=0.01 and 0.003, respectively]. Every 1% increase in fatty muscle fraction [IMAT/(SM+IMAT)] conferred an independent 2% increased odds of CMD [CFR<2, OR 1.02 (1.01-1.04), adjusted p=0.04] and a 7% increased risk of MACE [HR 1.07 (1.04-1.09), adjusted p<0.001]. There was a significant interaction between CFR and IMAT, not BMI, such that patients with both CMD and fatty muscle demonstrated highest MACE risk (adjusted p=0.02). Conclusion: Increased intermuscular fat is associated with CMD and adverse cardiovascular outcomes independently of BMI and conventional risk factors. The presence of CMD and skeletal muscle fat infiltration identified a novel at-risk cardiometabolic phenotype.

Angina pectoris and dyspnea in patients with normal or nonobstructive coronary vessels remains a diagnostic challenge. Invasive coronary angiography may identify up to 60% of patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), of whom nearly two-thirds may, in fact, have coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) that may account for their symptoms. Positron emission tomography (PET) determined absolute quantitative myocardial blood flow (MBF) at rest and during hyperemic vasodilation with subsequent derivation of myocardial flow reserve (MFR) affords the noninvasive detection and delineation of CMD. Individualized or intensified medical therapies with nitrates, calcium-channel blockers, statins, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II type 1-receptor blockers, beta-blockers, ivabradine, or ranolazine may improve symptoms, quality of life, and outcome in these patients. Standardized diagnosis and reporting criteria for ischemic symptoms caused by CMD are critical for optimized and individualized treatment decisions in such patients. In this respect, it was proposed by the cardiovascular council leadership of the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging to convene thoughtful leaders from around the world to serve as an independent expert panel to develop standardized diagnosis, nomenclature and nosology, and cardiac PET reporting criteria for CMD. This consensus document aims to provide an overview of the pathophysiology and clinical evidence of CMD, its invasive and noninvasive assessment, standardization of PET-determined MBFs and MFR into "classical" (predominantly related to hyperemic MBFs) and "endogen" (predominantly related to resting MBF) normal coronary microvascular function or CMD that may be critical for diagnosis of microvascular angina, subsequent patient care, and outcome of clinical CMD trials.

Advances in cancer therapeutics have led to dramatic improvements in survival, now inclusive of nearly 20 million patients and rising. However, cardiovascular toxicities associated with specific cancer therapeutics adversely affect the outcomes of patients with cancer. Advances in cardiovascular imaging have solidified the critical role for robust methods for detecting, monitoring, and prognosticating cardiac risk among patients with cancer. However, decentralized evaluations have led to a lack of consensus on the optimal uses of imaging in contemporary cancer treatment (eg, immunotherapy, targeted, or biological therapy) settings. Similarly, available isolated preclinical and clinical studies have provided incomplete insights into the effectiveness of multiple modalities for cardiovascular imaging in cancer care. The aims of this scientific statement are to define the current state of evidence for cardiovascular imaging in the cancer treatment and survivorship settings and to propose novel methodological approaches to inform the optimal application of cardiovascular imaging in future clinical trials and registries. We also propose an evidence-based integrated approach to the use of cardiovascular imaging in routine clinical settings. This scientific statement summarizes and clarifies available evidence while providing guidance on the optimal uses of multimodality cardiovascular imaging in the era of emerging anticancer therapies.

Centers specializing in coronary function testing are critical to ensure a systematic approach to the diagnosis and treatment of angina with nonobstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA). Management leveraging lifestyle, pharmacology, and device-based therapeutic options for ANOCA can improve angina burden and quality of life in affected patients. Multidisciplinary care teams that can tailor and titrate therapies based on individual patient needs are critical to the success of comprehensive programs. As coronary function testing for ANOCA is more widely adopted, collaborative research initiatives will be fundamental to improve ANOCA care. These efforts will require standardized symptom assessments and data collection, which will propel future large-scale clinical trials.