SUMMARYThe peripheral tissue thyroid status of 12 patients receiving thyroxine replacement therapy was investigated both when pituitary secretion of TSH was suppressed and later, when on a lower dose of thyroxine that restored thyrotroph responsiveness. Heart rate and various analytes in serum known to be sensitive to thyroid status were measured in addition to TSH by immunoradiometric assay. Initially, the serum T4 concentration was raised in seven patients and free T4 raised in nine; all patients had normal T3 concentrations. Later, on the lower dose of thyroxine, most patients had concentrations of thyroid hormones within reference limits. Concentrations of the liver‐specific form of glutathione S‐transferase (GST) in serum decreased (P< 001) after the reduction in thyroxine dose; abnormally high GST levels, found in eight patients when TSH was suppressed, returned to normal in six of these patients when normal basal and TRH‐stimulated TSH concentrations had been restored. The response of the pituitary to excess thyroxine may be more representative of other tissues (e.g. the liver) than previously thought.

Using a highly sensitive and specific immunoradiometric assay for thyrotropin, we studied thyrotroph function in 232 new patients referred to a thyroid clinic and in 13 patients after treatment for hyperthyroidism. Significant thyrotroph responsiveness to thyroliberin (thyrotropin-releasing hormone, TRH) was found in all patients with values for basal thyrotropin greater than 0.1 milli-int unit/L. In no overtly hyperthyroid patient was any increment in thyrotropin recorded at 20 min after thyroliberin administration. In seven patients, four subclinically hyperthyroid and three who had received treatment, increments in thyrotropin from undetectable basal values were recorded, consistent with incomplete thyrotroph suppression. By use of assays with even higher sensitivity, one may be able to distinguish these patients from overtly hyperthyroid patients.

This study was undertaken to compare the sensitivity of the thyrotrophs to that of other tissues to T4 treatment in hypothyroid patients. To do so, we measured serum total and free thyroid hormones and TSH, in addition to several serum markers of peripheral tissue response to thyroid status, in 21 hypothyroid patients treated with 50-micrograms increments of T4 to a maximum of 200 micrograms daily (group I) and in 104 clinically euthyroid patients receiving a long term constant replacement dose (group II). In group I patients, dose-dependent increases (P less than 0.05) in serum glutathione S-transferase, sex hormone-binding globulin, and angiotensin-converting enzyme occurred, whereas serum T4-binding globulin, creatine kinase, and creatinine levels decreased (P less than 0.05). In both patient groups, abnormally high levels of glutathione S-transferase, sex hormone-binding globulin, angiotensin-converting enzyme, alanine aminotransferase, and gamma-glutamyl transferase were found in some patients during treatment. One or more of these biochemical abnormalities suggestive of hyperthyroidism occurred in 15 (71%) group I patients and 27 (26%) group II patients. These were associated with an undetectable serum TSH (less than 0.1 microU/ml) and raised free T4 concentrations in 13, and raised free T3, T4, and T3 concentrations in only 8, 6, and 1 group I patients, respectively. In group II patients, they were more closely associated with an undetectable TSH (67%) or raised free T4 (85%) level than with raised concentrations of free T3 (33%), T4 (26%), or T3 (0%). The use of high sensitivity TSH assays will permit more accurate adjustment of T4 replacement and minimize abnormalities in peripheral tissue biochemistry indicative of overtreatment.

We have compared the results of serum thyrotrophin (TSH) measurements using a sensitive immunoradiometric assay (IRMA) with those of conventional thyroid function tests in 299 hospital inpatients with a range of non-thyroidal illnesses. Levels of total thyroxine (T4), free T4, total tri-iodothyronine (T3) and free T3 in the hypothyroid range were recorded in 8%, 15%, 19% and 49% of patients, respectively, whereas TSH (IRMA) was abnormally low in 1%. Furthermore, basal TSH (IRMA) accurately predicted the result of the thyrotrophin-releasing hormone test in 72 of the 74 patients in whom this test was performed and, unlike thyroid hormone measurement, identified patients with subclinical thyroid disease. It would appear that a single basal TSH (IRMA) measurement is the most appropriate screening test for thyroid dysfunction in patients with concomitant acute or chronic illness.

The authors used a new protocol, based upon a supersensitive TSH assay, to examine the thyroid status of 1720 patients. Based upon the serum hormone levels, the patients were divided into different clinical groups. The biochemical relationship between the different hormone levels, and the rate of occurrence of various thyroid diseases were studied. 76.1% of the new patients hadn't received any previous treatment. 15.5% of those patients who had received treatment had hyperthyroidism, while 8.4% of those had hypothyroidism. 76% of the new patients, 38.3% of those who had hyperthyroidism, and only 29.7% of those who had hypothyroidism, were euthyroid. Undetectable TSH levels (< 0.03 mU/L) where observed in 51.8% of the new hyperthyroid patients, and in 33.8% of those who had subclinical hyperthyroidism. Similar results were obtained with those who had been previously treated for hyperthyroidism. The new protocol has the following advantages: it's more convenient to the patients, it's quick, it's economical. With this method it is possible to reduce the assays per patient by 31%. The algorithm was supplemented with results of free hormone levels. By doing this the authors were able to measure free-T4 and T3 hormone levels of 150 more patients. According to the authors, the free-T4 test is more informative than the free-T4-index, especially in the border-line cases and in treated hyperthyroidism. Primarily the free-T3 test is most necessary when examining patients treated with methimasol.

Sensitive immunoradiometric assays (IRMA) for TSH and radioimmunoassay (RIA) kits for free thyroid hormones (fT4, fT3) are becoming increasingly used for routine thyroid investigations. We have assessed these tests in 93 euthyroid pregnant women. Mean fT4 and fT3 values decreased with gestation by 24-27% and 14-35%, respectively, using several analogue RIA kits. Some patients had free hormone values which fell below the reference range derived from non-pregnant euthyroid patients. By contrast, the fT4 concentrations measured by direct equilibrium dialysis fell by only 16% with all values within the reference range. Serum non-esterified fatty acid (NEFA) levels (non-fasting) did not correlate with fT4 and fT3 but a spurious effect of serum albumin levels on the free hormone kits was suggested. TSH results showed that the majority of subjects had lower values measured by IRMA than by RIA. Three patients had basal TSH (IRMA) below the mean detection limit of the assay; this could have been falsely interpreted as indicating hyperthyroidism. We conclude that, as with longer established thyroid function tests, special care must be taken in interpreting results of these new thyroid function tests in pregnancy.

The value as a thyroid function test of a new, rapid, and highly sensitive immunoradiometric assay for thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) was assessed in 188 consecutive new patients with suspected hyperthyroidism. The diagnosis was made on clinical grounds and on the basis of serum total triiodothyronine and thyroxine concentrations and the response of TSH to thyrotrophin releasing hormone (TRH) as measured by radioimmunoassay. In all except one patient the basal TSH concentration by immunoradiometric assay predicted the response of TSH by radioimmunoassay to TRH, an undetectable value being recorded in patients with a subnormal response and a measurable value in those with a normal test result. This clear relation was not observed for basal TSH concentrations as measured by radioimmunoassay. In a series of 39 hospital inpatients with acute or chronic non-thyroidal illness, of whom 11 had low concentrations of total thyroxine or triiodothyronine, or both, basal TSH concentrations were detectable by both radioimmunoassay and immunoradiometric assay in all cases and were associated with normal responses to TRH. The immunoradiometric assay for TSH, which is commercially available, may therefore obviate the need for the more time consuming TRH test and simplify the approach to thyroid function testing in patients with suspected hyperthyroidism.