the U.S. District Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C. disallowed the method that had been established by the U.S. Department of Interior (DOl) for determining what a corporation would pay in the case of injury to an ecosystem from hazardous waste spills [Ohio v. Interior 1989].The DOl method was based on neoclassical methodology and appraisal techniques.The Court ruled that "restoration is the proper remedy for injury to property where measurement of damages by some other method will fail to compensate fully for the injury," and that "natural resources have value that is not readily measured by traditional means" [Ohio v. Interior 1989, pp.456-57].One traditional means that the courts found would not compensate fully for injury is the utilization of market prices.As the court stated, "it is unreasonable to view market price as the exclusive factor, or even the predominant