Background: Stroma AReactive Invasion Front Areas (SARIFA) is a novel prognostic histopathologic biomarker measured at the invasive front in haematoxylin & eosin (H&E) stained colon and gastric cancer resection specimens. The aim of the current study was to validate the prognostic relevance of SARIFA-status in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and investigate its association with the luminal proportion of tumour (PoT). Methods: We established the SARIFA-status in 164 CRC resection specimens. The relationship between SARIFA-status, clinicopathological characteristics, recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and PoT was investigated. Results: SARIFA-status was positive in 22.6% of all CRCs. SARIFA-positivity was related to higher pT, pN, pTNM stage and high grade of differentiation. SARIFA-positivity was associated with shorter RFS independent of known prognostic factors analysing all CRCs (RFS: hazard ratio (HR) 2.6, p = 0.032, CSS: HR 2.4, p = 0.05) and shorter RFS and CSS analysing only rectal cancers. SARIFA-positivity, which was measured at the invasive front, was associated with PoT-low (p = 0.009), e.g., higher stroma content, and lower vessel density (p = 0.0059) measured at the luminal tumour surface. Conclusion: Here, we validated the relationship between SARIFA-status and prognosis in CRC patients and provided first evidence for a potential prognostic relevance in the subgroup of rectal cancer patients. Interestingly, CRCs with different SARIFA-status also showed histological differences measurable at the luminal tumour surface. Further studies to better understand the relationship between high luminal intratumoural stroma content and absence of a stroma reaction at the invasive front (SARIFA-positivity) are warranted and may inform future treatment decisions in CRC patients.

Background: Microsatellite instability (MSI)/mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) is a key genetic feature which should be tested in every patient with colorectal cancer (CRC) according to medical guidelines. Artificial intelligence (AI) methods can detect MSI/dMMR directly in routine pathology slides, but the test performance has not been systematically investigated with predefined test thresholds. Method: We trained and validated AI-based MSI/dMMR detectors and evaluated predefined performance metrics using nine patient cohorts of 8343 patients across different countries and ethnicities. Results: Classifiers achieved clinical-grade performance, yielding an area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of up to 0.96 without using any manual annotations. Subsequently, we show that the AI system can be applied as a ruleout test: by using cohort-specific thresholds, on average 52.73% of tumors in each surgical cohort [total number of MSI/ dMMR = 1020, microsatellite stable (MSS)/ proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) = 7323 patients] could be identified as MSS/pMMR with a fixed sensitivity at 95%. In an additional cohort of N = 1530 (MSI/dMMR = 211, MSS/pMMR = 1319) endoscopy biopsy samples, the system achieved an AUROC of 0.89, and the cohort-specific threshold ruled out 44.12% of tumors with a fixed sensitivity at 95%. As a more robust alternative to cohort-specific thresholds, we showed that with a fixed threshold of 0.25 for all the cohorts, we can rule-out 25.51% in surgical specimens and 6.10% in biopsies. Interpretation: When applied in a clinical setting, this means that the AI system can rule out MSI/dMMR in a quarter (with global thresholds) or half of all CRC patients (with local fine-tuning), thereby reducing cost and turnaround time for molecular profiling.

The proportion of epithelial and stromal cells in tumours is thought to have an important role in the progression of epithelial malignancy. We aimed to determine whether the relative proportion of tumour (PoT) was related to survival in colorectal cancer. The PoT at the luminal surface was measured by point counting using virtual tissue sections in a series of 145 colorectal cancer cases. The relationship of PoT to clinicopathological parameters including cancer-specific survival was analysed. Modified receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine the optimum cut off points to dichotomise the data for survival analyses. Tumours with PoT-low (⩽47%) were associated with significantly lower cancer-specific survival when compared to PoT-high (hazard ratio (HR)=2.087, 95% CI=1.088–4.003, P=0.024). On sub-analysis, the prognostic effect remained significant in colonic tumours (HR=2.474, 95% CI=1.132–5.408, P=0.019) and tumour, node, metastasis stage III disease (HR=3.480, 95% CI=0.325–9.136, P=0.007). Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that PoT was an independent prognostic marker when adjusted for age, T stage, N stage and extramural vascular invasion (P=0.017). This study suggests that a low proportion of tumour cells in colorectal cancer is related to poor cancer-specific survival. A relatively quick, inexpensive and well-established method such as point counting on diagnostic tissue sections could be used to identify a subset of patients who may benefit from adjuvant therapy.

Purpose: The double-strand break (DSB) is the major DNA lesion leading to chromosomal aberrations and faithful repair is crucial for maintaining genomic instability. Very little is known about the expression of DNA DSB repair proteins in colorectal cancer. To address this issue, we examined the expression pattern of DSB repair key proteins ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, Ku70, and Ku80 and their putative role in patients survival in a large series of colorectal cancer.Experimental Design: 342 sporadic colorectal cancer were subjected to immunohistochemistry by using specific antibodies for the various proteins investigated. Staining results were compared with clinicopathologic data, patient survival, as well as expression of mismatch repair proteins MLH1 and MSH2.Results: The expression pattern of both ATM and BRCA1 predicted survival in all colorectal cancer patients as well as in the small subgroup of patients that received adjuvant therapy. Low expression of ATM and BRCA1 was associated with loss of MLH1 or MSH2 expression.Conclusions: This is the first study to show a relationship between the expression of DNA DSB repair proteins ATM and BRCA1 and survival in colorectal cancer patients. Studies in tumors from large randomized trials are now necessary to validate our pilot data and establish the clinical usefulness of the immunohistochemical assay in predicting response to a particular adjuvant therapy regimen. Furthermore, our results indicate a possible link between expression of DNA mismatch repair and DNA DSB repair proteins in sporadic colorectal cancer, which warrants further investigation.

A receptor tyrosine kinase for ephrin ligands, EphB2 is expressed in colorectal cancer and has been proposed as a target for immunoconjugate therapy. The aim of this study was to perform a detailed histologic analysis of EphB2 expression in normal and neoplastic colorectal tissues. In addition, we sought to evaluate EphB2 expression as a prognostic factor in colorectal cancer. Expression of EphB2 was examined in normal colon (n = 28), colorectal cell lines (n = 20), colorectal adenomas (n = 148), primary cancers (n = 28), and metastases (n = 39) using immunohistochemistry. In addition, a series of primary cancers and matched normal (n = 342) with outcome data were profiled in tissue microarrays. The intensity of EphB2 expression was assessed in the entire series by immunohistochemistry, and in a subset by in situ hybridization. Overall survival and recurrence-free survival were correlated with EphB2 protein expression in retrospective subset analyses. Epithelial EphB2 expression was shown at all stages of colorectal tumorigenesis, including the base of all normal crypts, 77% of adenomas, 82% of primary cancers, and 64% of metastases. Although homogeneous expression was observed in adenomas, the pattern of staining was focal (mean 25%) in most malignant lesions. Patients whose tumor stained 2+ for EphB2 expression (versus 0/1+) exhibited significantly prolonged overall survival: mean duration of survival, 2,514 versus 1,044 days; hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.18 to 0.95 (P = 0.035). In summary, EphB2 is expressed in normal crypts, colorectal adenomas, primary cancers, and metastases. High levels of EphB2 expression are associated with a longer mean duration of survival in colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND:Testing microsatellite instability seems to be a useful tool for the initial screening of putative non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), preceding analysis of germ-line mutations of DNA mismatch repair genes. However, diagnosis of microsatellite instability becomes complicated when highly-damaged DNA from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue specimens has to be investigated.MATERIALS AND METHODS:A new methodical approach was established based on special multiplex PCR regimes (e.g., on touch-up cycling conditions), allowing both sufficient, as well as specific, amplification of the Bethesda reference panel loci with low quality DNA as template.RESULTS:By applying our new method, microsatellite instability could be analyzed successfully in 75 out of 84 investigated tumors (89%), whereas, by using standard PCR protocols, microsatellite analysis failed in 36% of the investigated cases.CONCLUSION:Our new methodical approach should be recommended for the use of archival material since it allows an efficient and accurate amplification of the Bethesda marker fragments and is less dependent on the DNA quality.