Background The COVID-19 pandemic has challenged the mental health of health care workers, increasing the rates of stress, moral distress (MD), and moral injury (MI). Virtual reality (VR) is a useful tool for studying MD and MI because it can effectively elicit psychophysiological responses, is customizable, and permits the controlled study of participants in real time. Objective This study aims to investigate the feasibility of using an intervention comprising a VR scenario and an educational video to examine MD among health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic and to use our mobile app for longitudinal monitoring of stress, MD, and MI after the intervention. Methods We recruited 15 participants for a compound intervention consisting of a VR scenario followed by an educational video and a repetition of the VR scenario. The scenario portrayed a morally challenging situation related to a shortage of life-saving equipment. Physiological signals and scores of the Moral Injury Outcome Scale (MIOS) and Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) were collected. Participants underwent a debriefing session to provide their impressions of the intervention, and content analysis was performed on the sessions. Participants were also instructed to use a mobile app for 8 weeks after the intervention to monitor stress, MD, and mental health symptoms. We conducted Wilcoxon signed rank tests on the PSS and MIOS scores to investigate whether the VR scenario could induce stress and MD. We also evaluated user experience and the sense of presence after the intervention through semi–open-ended feedback and the Igroup Presence Questionnaire, respectively. Qualitative feedback was summarized and categorized to offer an experiential perspective. Results All participants completed the intervention. Mean pre- and postintervention scores were respectively 10.4 (SD 9.9) and 13.5 (SD 9.1) for the MIOS and 17.3 (SD 7.5) and 19.1 (SD 8.1) for the PSS. Statistical analyses revealed no significant pre- to postintervention difference in the MIOS and PSS scores (P=.11 and P=.22, respectively), suggesting that the experiment did not acutely induce significant levels of stress or MD. However, content analysis revealed feelings of guilt, shame, and betrayal, which relate to the experience of MD. On the basis of the Igroup Presence Questionnaire results, the VR scenario achieved an above-average degree of overall presence, spatial presence, and involvement, and slightly below-average realism. Of the 15 participants, 8 (53%) did not answer symptom surveys on the mobile app. Conclusions Our study demonstrated VR to be a feasible method to simulate morally challenging situations and elicit genuine responses associated with MD with high acceptability and tolerability. Future research could better define the efficacy of VR in examining stress, MD, and MI both acutely and in the longer term. An improved participant strategy for mobile data capture is needed for future studies. Trial Registration ClinicalTrails.gov NCT05001542; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05001542 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) RR2-10.2196/32240

Due to the constraints of the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare workers have reported acting in ways that are contrary to their moral values, which may result in moral distress and injury. The purpose of this work is to create a digital phenotype profile (DPP) tool to automate and evaluate the distress of participants in the COVID-19 VR Healthcare Simulation for Moral Distress dataset (NCT05001542). The dataset collected passive physiological signals and active mental health questionnaires. This paper focuses on correlating electrocardiogram, respiration, photoplethysmography and galvanic skin response with moral injury outcome scale (Brief MIOS). The DPP tool uses data-driven techniques to create a robust evaluation of distress among participants. To accomplish this, we applied pre-processing techniques which involved normalization, data sanitation, segmentation, and windowing. During feature analysis, we extracted statistical and heart rate variability features, followed by feature selection techniques to rank the importance of features. Prior to classification, we used k-means clustering to cluster the Brief MIOS scores to low, moderate, and high moral distress as the Brief MIOS is yet to have an established cut-off scores. We then classified the separation of the Brief MIOS scores using weighted support vector machine with leave-one-subject-out-cross-validation to achieve an accuracy of 98.67±0.87%. Various machine learning ablation tests were performed to support our results and further enhance the understanding of the predictive model. Our findings suggest that the proposed DPP tool could be used as an automated tool to examine moral distress. With further replication and validation, it could be used as a potential AI-based clinical decision-making tool to expedite and validate mental health treatments.

Due to the constraints of the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare workers have reported behaving in ways that are contrary to their values, which may result in distress and injury. This work is the first of its kind to evaluate the presence of stress in the COVID-19 VR Healthcare Simulation for Distress dataset. The dataset collected passive physiological signals and active mental health questionnaires. This paper focuses on correlating electrocardiogram, respiration, photoplethysmography, and galvanic skin response with the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)-10 questionnaire. The analysis involved data-driven techniques for a robust evaluation of stress among participants. Low-complexity pre-processing and feature extraction techniques were applied and support vector machine and decision tree models were created to predict the PSS-10 scores of users. Imbalanced data classification techniques were used to further enhance our understanding of the results. Decision tree with oversampling through Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique achieved an accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 of 93.50%, 93.41%, 93.31%, and 93.35%, respectively. Our findings offer novel results and clinically valuable insights for stress detection and potential for translation to edge computing applications to enhance privacy, longitudinal monitoring, and simplify device requirements.

Background: Stress, anxiety, distress, and depression are high among health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic, and they have reported acting in ways that are contrary to their moral values and professional commitments that degrade their integrity. This creates moral distress and injury due to constraints they have encountered, such as limited resources. Objective: The purpose of this study is to develop and show the feasibility of digital platforms (a virtual reality and a mobile platform) to understand the causes and ultimately reduce the moral distress of health care providers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: This will be a prospective, single cohort, pre- and posttest study examining the effect of a brief informative video describing moral distress on perceptual, psychological, and physiological indicators of stress and decision-making during a scenario known to potentially elicit moral distress. To accomplish this, we have developed a virtual reality simulation that will be used before and after the digital intervention for monitoring short-term impacts. The simulation involves an intensive care unit setting during the COVID-19 pandemic, and participants will be placed in morally challenging situations. The participants will be engaged in an educational intervention at the individual, team, and organizational levels. During each test, data will be collected for (1) physiological measures of stress and after each test, data will be collected regarding (2) thoughts, feelings and behaviors during a morally challenging situation, and (3) perceptual estimates of psychological stress. In addition, participants will continue to be monitored for moral distress and other psychological stresses for 8 weeks through our Digital intervention/intelligence Group mobile platform. Finally, a comparison will be conducted using machine learning and biostatistical techniques to analyze the short- and long-term impacts of the virtual reality intervention. Results: The study was funded in November 2020 and received research ethics board approval in March 2021. The study is ongoing. Conclusions: This project is a proof-of-concept integration to demonstrate viability over 6 months and guide future studies to develop these state-of-the-art technologies to help frontline health care workers work in complex moral contexts. In addition, the project will develop innovations that can be used for future pandemics and in other contexts prone to producing moral distress and injury. This project aims to demonstrate the feasibility of using digital platforms to understand the continuum of moral distress that can lead to moral injury. Demonstration of feasibility will lead to future studies to examine the efficacy of digital platforms to reduce moral distress.