Background: PD-1 inhibitors have been approved for the first-line treatment of patients with advanced gastric cancer, gastroesophageal junction cancer, or esophageal adenocarcinoma. However, the results of several clinical trials are not entirely consistent, and the dominant population of first-line immunotherapy for advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer still needs to be precisely determined. Objective: This objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy in advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma patients through a systematic review and meta-analysis of relevant clinical trials. Method: The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library electronic databases were searched up to August 1, 2022, for clinical trials of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy for the first-line treatment of advanced gastroesophageal cancer. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for overall survival, progression-free survival, and objective response rates were extracted and pooled for meta-analysis. Prespecified subgroups included the following: agent type, PD-L1 expression, and high microsatellite instability. Results: This study analyzed 5 RCTs involving 3,355 patients. Compared with the chemotherapy group, the combined immunotherapy group had a significantly higher objective response rate (OR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.55–0.72, p < 0.00001) and prolonged overall survival (HR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.76–0.88, p < 0.00001) and progression-free survival (HR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.69–0.82, p < 0.00001). The combination of immunotherapy and chemotherapy prolonged OS in both MSI-H (HR = 0.38, p = 0.002) and MSS (HR = 0.78, p < 0.00001) populations, but there was a significant difference between groups (p = 0.02). However, in improving ORR, the benefit of ICI combined with chemotherapy in the MSS group and MSI-H group was not significantly different between groups (p = 0.52). Combination therapy with ICIs was more effective than chemotherapy alone in prolonging OS in the subgroup with a high CPS, regardless of the CPS cutoff for PD-L1. However, when the cutoff of CPS was 1, the difference between subgroups did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.12), while the benefit ratio of the MSI-H group was higher when the cutoff was 10 (p = 0.004) than when the cutoff value was 5 (p = 0.002). Conclusions: For first-line treatment of advanced gastroesophageal cancer, an ICI combination strategy is more effective than chemotherapy. The subgroup of patients with a CPS ≥10 has a more significant benefit, and CPS ≥10 has the potential to be used as an accurate marker of the dominant population of immuno-combined therapy.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Gastric cancer (GC) is a major cancer type characterized by high heterogeneity in both tumor cells and the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME). One intractable GC subtype is gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma (GSRCC), which is associated with poor prognosis. However, it remains unclear what the GSRCC TIME characteristics are and how these characteristics may contribute to clinical outcomes.METHODS: We enrolled 32 patients with advanced GC of diverse subtypes and profiled their TIME using an immune targeted single-cell profiling strategy, including (1) immune targeted single-cell RNA sequencing (n = 20 patients) and (2) protein expression profiling by a targeted antibody panel for mass cytometry (n = 12 patients). We also generated matched V(D)J (variable, diversity, and joining gene segments) sequencing of T and B cells along CD45+ immunocytes.RESULTS: We found that compared to non-GSRCC, the GSRCC TIME appears to be quiescent, where both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells are difficult to be mobilized, which further impairs the proper functions of B cells. CXCL13, mainly produced by follicular helper T cells, T helper type 17, and exhausted CD8+ T cells, is a central coordinator of this transformation. We show that CXCL13 expression can predict the response to immune checkpoint blockade in GC patients, which may be related to its effects on tertiary lymphoid structures.CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides a comprehensive molecular portrait of immune cell compositions and cell states in advanced GC patients, highlighting adaptive immune irresponsiveness in GSRCC and a mediator role of CXCL13 in TIME. Our targeted single-cell transcriptomic and proteomic profiling represents a powerful approach for TIME-oriented translational research.

Background Gastric cancer (GC), the most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide with poor 5-year survival rate in advanced stages. Although immune-related and survival-related biomarkers, which typically comprise aberrantly expressed long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and genes, have been identified, there are no reports of immune-related lncRNA pair (IRLP) signatures for GC. Methods In this study, we acquired lncRNA expression profiles from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and used the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox proportional hazards model (iteration = 1000) to develop a IRLP prognostic signature. The area under curve (AUC) was used to assess the prognosis predictive power. The multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to identify whether this signature was an independent prognostic factor. The immune cell infiltration analysis was performed between the two risk groups. Last, molecular experiments were performed to explore LINC01082 is involved in the development of GC. Results We acquired lncRNA expression profiles and used the LASSO Cox model to develop an 18-IRLP signature with a strong prognostic predictive power. The 5-year AUC values of the training, validation, and overall TCGA datasets were 0.77, 0.86, and 0.80, respectively. The different prognostic outcomes between the high- and low-risk groups were determined using our 18-IRLP signature. Moreover, our 18-IRLP signature was an independent prognostic factor as per the multivariate Cox regression analysis, and showed better prognostic evaluation than the traditional TNM staging system as well as other clinical features. We also found differences in cancer-associated fibroblast and macrophage M2 infiltration and the expression of PD-L1, CTLA4, LAG3, and HLA were also observed between the two risk groups (P < 0.05). Analysis of biological functions revealed that target genes of the lncRNAs in the IRLP signature were enriched in focal adhesion and regulation of actin cytoskeleton. Finally, as one of significant candidates of IRLP signature, overexpression of LINC01082 suppressed the invasion ability of GC cells as well as PD-L1 expression profiles. Conclusions Our novel 18-IRLP signature provides new insights regarding immunological biomarkers, imparts a better understanding of the tumor immune microenvironment, and can be used for predicting prognosis and evaluating immune response in GC.

Background The incidence rate of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction (AEG) has significantly increased over the past decades, with a steady increase in morbidity. The aim of this study was to explore a variety of clinical factors to judge the survival outcomes of AEG patients. Methods We first obtained the clinical data of AEG patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database. Univariate and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression models were used to build a risk score system. Patient survival was analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. The specificity and sensitivity of the risk score were determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Finally, the internal validation set from the SEER database and external validation sets from our center were used to validate the prognostic power of this model. Results We identified a risk score system consisting of six clinical features that can be a good predictor of AEG patient survival. Patients with high risk scores had a significantly worse prognosis than those with low risk scores (log-rank test, P -value < 0.0001). Furthermore, the areas under ROC for 3-year and 5-year survival were 0.74 and 0.75, respectively. We also found that the benefits of chemotherapy and radiotherapy were limited to stage III/IV AEG patients in the high-risk group. Using the validation sets, our novel risk score system was proven to have strong prognostic value for AEG patients. Conclusions Our results may provide new insights into the prognostic evaluation of AEG.