Bromodomain-containing 4 (BRD4) is a histone modification reader and transcriptional regulator that has been reported to interact with acetylated lysine histone motifs transcription factors (TFs), transcription co-activators and RNA polymerase II. The selective small molecule inhibitor JQ1, which binds competitively to bromodomains, has been reported to exhibit anti-proliferative effects in various types of cancer. Previous studies on the mechanism of action of JQ1 mostly focused on a specific tumor type or disease; however, the general mechanism through which JQ1 affects various tumors remains to be determined. In the present study, chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing data for BRD4 and its expression profiles in six cancer cell lines were integrated and analyzed systematically. The results indicated that BRD4 binds to enhancers with histone H3 acetylated at lysine 27 (H3K27Ac) and mediator complex subunit 1 in a cell type-specific manner, as well as binds to promoter regions with the oncogenic TFs MYC and E2F1 in a cell type-common manner. The cell type-common sites across the six cell types investigated were found to be functionally important for tumorigenesis, whereas the cell type-specific sites were functionally enriched with the cell identity, all of which were sensitive to JQ1 treatment. Furthermore, a core set of JQ1-regulated BRD4 binding genes were obtained, which were significantly inhibited by JQ1 in various cancer cell lines and contributed to hallmarks of cancer. These results implied a common mechanism underlying the therapeutic effects of JQ1 and suggested its potential suitability as an anti-cancer drug targeting BRD4-mediated transcriptional regulation.

Bromodomain-containing 4 (BRD4) has been considered as an important requirement for disease maintenance and an attractive therapeutic target for cancer therapy. This protein can be targeted by JQ1, a selective small-molecule inhibitor. However, few studies have investigated whether BRD4 influenced acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), and whether BRD4 had interaction with promyelocytic leukemia-retinoic acid receptor α (PML/RARα) fusion protein to some extent. Results from cell viability assay, cell cycle analysis, and Annexin-V/PI analysis indicated that JQ1 inhibited the growth of NB4 cells, an APL-derived cell line, and induced NB4 cell cycle arrest at G1 and apoptosis. Then, we used co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) assay and immunoblot to demonstrate the endogenous interaction of BRD4 and PML/RARα in NB4 cells. Moreover, downregulation of PML/RARα at the mRNA and protein levels was observed upon JQ1 treatment. Furthermore, results from the RT-qPCR, ChIP-qPCR, and re-ChIP-qPCR assays showed that BRD4 and PML/RARα co-existed on the same regulatory regions of their target genes. Hence, we showed a new discovery of the interaction of BRD4 and PML/RARα, as well as the decline of PML/RARα expression, under JQ1 treatment.

S100A9, a calcium-binding protein, participates in the inflammatory process and development of various tumors, thus attracting much attention in the field of cancer biology. This study aimed to investigate the regulatory mechanism of S100A9 and its function involvement in APL. We used real-time quantitative PCR to determine whether PML/RARα affects the expression of S100A9 in NB4 and PR9 cells upon ATRA treatment. ChIP-based PCR and dual-luciferase reporter assay system were used to detect how PML/RARα and PU.1 regulate S100A9 promoter activity. CCK-8 assay and flow cytometry were employed to observe the viability and apoptosis of NB4 cells when S100A9 was overexpressed. Results showed that S100A9 was an ATRA-responsive gene, and PML/RARα was necessary for the ATRA-induced expression of S100A9 in APL cells. In addition, PU.1 could bind to the promoter of S100A9, especially when treated with ATRA in NB4 cells, and promote its activity. More importantly, overexpression of S100A9 induced the apoptosis of NB4 cells and inhibited cell growth. Collectively, our data indicated that PML/RARα and PU.1 were necessary for the ATRA-induced expression of S100A9 in APL cells. Furthermore, S100A9 promoted apoptosis in APL cells and affected cell growth.

Previous transcriptomic analysis revealed a 393-transcript signature (PTBsig), which is dominated by interferon inducible genes, in whole blood of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) patients. Comparisons with a limited set of interferon-driven genes among separated monocytes, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, and neutrophils indicated that the signature is due to changes in neutrophils, the overwhelmingly predominant cell type. By extending the analysis to the entire 393 transcripts of PTBsig and by switching the cell proportions between separated monocytes, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, and neutrophils, we create putative PTBsig for whole blood (pPTBsig) in which CD4+ or CD8+ T cells or monocytes predominated or in which the cell proportions were unchanged. These putative signatures are then compared to the actual reported PTBsig. We show that, because of their predominance in peripheral blood and their larger transcriptional responses, neutrophils were indeed almost exclusively responsible for PTBsig. We caution that the functional significance of changes in other cell types might escape notice in transcriptome analysis that is based upon whole blood.

All-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) binds the promyelocytic leukemia/retinoic acid receptor α (PML/RARα) fusion protein and is an effective oncogene-targeted therapy for acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). However, the molecular basis of PML/RARα-mediated transcriptional control during ATRA-induced differentiation is unclear. Previous studies have shown that the PML/RARα fusion protein behaves as a type II nuclear receptor, binding to DNA regardless of ligand status. Here, we performed a series of chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-quantitative PCR (qPCR) experiments, demonstrating that there is an additional mode of action of PML/RARα, wherein PML/RARα does not bind DNA in the absence of ATRA but binds DNA and activates adjacent genes in the presence of ATRA. This mode of action is similar to that of a type I nuclear receptor and is highlighted by activation of G0/G1 switch gene 2 (G0S2) during ATRA-induced neutrophil differentiation of leukemia cell lines (NB4 and PR9) and primary human APL cells. C/EBPε occupancy of the G0S2 promoter was elevated in parallel with recruitment of PML/RARα in ATRA-treated NB4, PR9, and primary APL cells. Furthermore, we verified that the p30 isoform of C/EBPε is crucial for activation of G0S2 and that PML/RARα interacts physically and cooperates functionally with C/EBPε to up-regulate G0S2 Our data not only demonstrate a new mode of action of PML/RARα but also suggest a novel model in which PML/RARα synergizes with C/EBPε to reactivate the C/EBPε target G0S2, thereby contributing to ATRA-mediated APL differentiation and potentially, clinical remission.

Objective: To study the role of transcription factor c-Myb in the pathogenesis of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). Methods: Through analyzing microarray data of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients, we compared the levels of c-Myb expressions in APL cells and normal promyelocytic cells. Through inducing the differentiation of NB4 with ATRA and the expression of PML-RARα in PR9 cells with ZnSO4, we investigated whether c-Myb was involved in the pathogenesis of APL. Using RNAi, we researched whether knocking down c-Myb could rescue APL. Results: The levels of c-Myb expression in APL cells were higher than those in normal promyelocytic cells. The expression of c-Myb gradually declined along with the differentiation of NB4, and gradually rose along with the expression of PML-RARα in PR9. The knockdown of c-Myb could rescue the blocked differentiation of NB4, which increased the positive rate of CD11b of NB4 cells to about 20%. Conclusion: The level of c-Myb expression in APL is higher than that in normal promyelocytic cells, which indicates that c-Myb has an important role in the pathogenesis of APL. The knockdown of c-Myb can partly reverse APL.