BACKGROUND:Reduction mammoplasty is an established treatment for symptomatic macromastia. Understanding risk factors associated with complications is essential for counseling and patient selection. The modified frailty index (mFI-5) has been proposed as a simple tool to assess risk in surgical candidates. OBJECTIVES:We sought to determine if the mFI-5 can accurately predict wound healing complications following reduction mammoplasty. METHODS:A retrospective review was performed of primary bilateral reduction mammoplasty cases between 2017 and 2019 at one institution. MFI-5 scores were calculated for each patient. 30-day wound healing complications were defined as incisional dehiscence, T-point breakdown, nipple-areolar complex necrosis, and fat necrosis. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to evaluate predictive value. RESULTS:474 patients were stratified into three age groups: 15-30, 31-50, and over 51. Twenty-six percent of patients developed 1 wound healing problem. On univariate analysis, ages 31-50 and 51+ (OR 2.75 and 3.16) and mFI score of 1 (OR 2.07) were associated with an increased risk of wound healing complications. Adjusted multivariate analysis indicated that age greater than 51 years significantly predicted wound healing issues (OR 2.89; p=0.001) when controlled for American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, smoking, and body mass index (BMI). The mFI-5 did not significantly predict wound healing issues when controlled for age, ASA, BMI, or smoking. CONCLUSIONS:In our population, the mFI-5 was not a statistically significant predictor of wound healing complications following reduction mammoplasty. When controlling for confounders, advanced age alone seems to place patients at higher risk for wound healing complications.

BACKGROUND:Breast reduction mammaplasty is among the most common procedures in plastic surgery, with a 1% to 7% postoperative hematoma incidence reported. Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been shown to reduce perioperative bleeding and need for transfusion when administered intravenously or topically, but it remains underused in plastic surgery. This study aims to investigate whether topical administration of topical TXA reduces postoperative hematoma following breast reduction mammaplasty. METHODS:A double-blind randomized controlled trial of 98 patients (196 breasts) undergoing bilateral primary reduction mammaplasty at a single academic institution was performed. Patients were used as internal matched controls, with one breast randomized to receive 1000 mg of topical TXA before closure, and the other receiving saline. All members of the surgical team and the patient were blinded as to which breast received the study drug. Postoperative complications, including hematoma within 30 days of surgery, drain outputs, and duration of drain use, were compared between treatment and placebo breasts. RESULTS:The overall hematoma rate was 1.5%. There was no significant association between application of TXA and development of a hematoma ( P = 0.56) or other complications. The hematoma rate of patients enrolled in the trial was similar to the overall rate of hematoma during the study period (1.5% versus 2.4%; P = 0.511). In a multivariate model, TXA was not significantly associated with differences in drain output after controlling for resection weight, age, and duration of drain use ( P = 0.799). No adverse effects or thromboembolic events from TXA were observed. CONCLUSION:Topical application of TXA does not decrease the incidence of hematoma following reduction mammaplasty. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Therapeutic, I.

Breast ptosis presents challenges for implant-based reconstruction due to the large skin envelope. Skin-reducing mastectomy reduces the envelope but must consider many other factors including complications. Limited data exist on incision impact on outcomes. We compare oblique-elliptical and Wise-pattern incisions on complications and patient-reported quality of life in immediate implant-based reconstruction. A retrospective review of patients who underwent immediate implant-based skin-reducing mastectomy at a single institution from 2015 to 2021 was done and was divided into two cohorts: wise and oblique incisions. Demographics, complications, and patient-reported outcomes (BREAST-Q) were compared. Descriptive, t test, and chi-square test analyses, followed by adjusted linear and logistic regression models, were performed to compare complication rates and BREAST-Q scores. Eighty-nine patient breasts were analyzed, 39 (43.8%) in the oblique (OI) and 50 (56.2%) in the wise (WI) cohort. No differences in demographics or preoperative comorbidities between groups were found. The oblique incision patients had significantly more mean total complications (OI 1.46 vs WI 0.88; P = 0.048), as well as increased incidence of explantation (OI 15 vs WI 3; P = 0.003) and cellulitis (OI 14 vs WI 3; P = 0.020) compared to wise group. Linear regression analysis revealed that incision choice was a significant predictor of complication rate (beta = -1.06, 95% CI [-1.63--0.50], P = <0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed that incision was a significant predictor of specific complications such as explantation (odds ratio = 0.10, 95% CI [0.02-0.52], P = 0.006) and cellulitis (odds ratio = 0.16, 95% CI [0.03-0.73], P = 0.018), with decreased risk of choosing wise incision. There was no difference in BREAST-Q results. Ptotic patients with oblique incision are associated with higher rates of postoperative complications compared to wise incisions. These findings suggest that incision choice is an important factor in postoperative complication development and emphasizes the need for further investigation and discussion with patients during preoperative planning.

Background Microsurgical reconstruction for bilateral mastectomy defects after unilateral radiation often results in asymmetry, despite both flap tissues never being radiated.Methods Photos of 16 patients who received prior radiation to one breast and underwent bilateral abdominal free flap reconstruction were taken postoperatively. Layperson and expert assessment were attained via online crowdsourcing and a panel of attending surgeons and senior residents. Stratification by interflap weight differences was done for subanalysis.Results A total of 399 laypersons responded, with the majority (57.3%) reporting that the radiated breast appeared smaller than the nonradiated breast. When the photos were stratified by interflap weight differences, the photos with the radiated side flap weight over 3% more than nonradiated side were significantly more likely to be perceived by laypersons as the same size (odds ratio [OR] = 2.7; p < 0.001) and of similar aesthetic (OR = 1.9; p < 0.001) when compared with photos with same-sized flaps. Of the expert responses ( n = 16), the radiated side was perceived as smaller 72.3% of the time and the nonradiated side appeared more aesthetic 52.7% of the time. Contrary to layperson responses, the experts tend to report the radiated side as smaller despite varying flap weight. Interestingly, expert raters were significantly more likely to rate the flaps of equal aesthetics when the radiated side has a flap larger by 3% or more (OR = 3.6; p < 0.001).Conclusion Higher aesthetic scores were noted when larger flaps were inset to the radiated envelope by both laypersons and experts, suggesting potential technical refinement in reconstructive outcomes.

BACKGROUND:The iPhone contains a high-fidelity 3-dimensional (3D) scanner and is widely distributed in the United States. Presently, 3D analysis of the breast necessitates ownership of cost-prohibitive cameras and software packages such as the Vectra (Canfield Scientific Inc., Parsippany, NJ) system. OBJECTIVES:We compared the accuracy of 3D photographs of the breast obtained with the iPhone X 3D scanner (Apple Inc., Cupertino, CA) with the Canfield Vectra H2 in an effort to expand access to 3D technology in plastic surgery. METHODS:Twenty breasts (n = 20) were 3D photographed with the iPhone X and the Vectra H2 and compared by colormap analysis and by measuring distances across the models between key anatomical landmarks. These distances included sternal notch to nipple (SN-N), midchest to nipple (M-N), nipple to midinframammary fold (N-IMF), and inframammary fold width (IMF). Statistical tests included the Bland-Altman plot analysis. RESULTS:When comparing absolute differences in distances between key anatomical landmarks, the average discrepancy in measurements between the iPhone and Vectra image pairs were the following: SN-N: 0.94 mm, M-N: 0.81 mm, N-IMF 0.91 mm, and IMF 0.98 mm. Colormap analysis demonstrated an average error of 1.53 mm, mean of 0.53 mm, and standard deviation of ±1.81 mm. Bland-Altman plot revealed a mean difference of 0.13 mm and an agreement interval between -1.90 and 2.17 mm. CONCLUSIONS:The iPhone is capable of capturing 3D photographs with a high level of fidelity when compared with the Vectra. Three-dimensional scans obtained with the iPhone may be helpful for planning nipple position, measuring the breast footprint, choosing implants, and performing other functions with 3D technology that are typically performed with the more expensive systems. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5:

Background:Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (OBCS) has demonstrated superior cosmetic outcomes to traditional breast-conserving surgery (BCS) while maintaining oncologic safety. While prior studies have compared OBCS to mastectomy, there is a scarcity of literature on the impact of social determinants of health on outcomes. Furthermore, although traditionally tumors larger than 5 cm and multifocal disease were treated with mastectomy, the literature has now shown OBCS to be safe in treating such disease. As a result, patients with large or multifocal tumors could be eligible for both mastectomy and OBCS, which prompts the need for comparison between the two. Thus, the aim of our study was to compare OBCS and mastectomy with reconstruction using BREAST-Q and oncologic outcome measures, as well as stratify these outcomes based on race, ethnicity, and body mass index (BMI).Methods:A retrospective chart review was performed for 57 patients treated with OBCS and 204 patients treated with mastectomy with reconstruction from 2015 to 2021. Variables including age, race, ethnicity, BMI, insurance status, surgery type, pathology, recurrence, and complications were recorded. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were recorded using BREAST-Q pre- and post-operatively.Results:Despite having a higher BMI (P<0.001), OBCS yielded higher "satisfaction with breast" and "satisfaction with outcome" than mastectomy (P=0.02 and P=0.02, respectively). When stratified by race, there were no statistical differences in the PROs between the two surgeries for Hispanic nor African American patients. OBCS had a significantly lower rate of infection and fewer additional surgeries than mastectomy (P=0.004 and P<0.001, respectively). There were no differences in positive margin rate or recurrence rate between the groups.Conclusions:In our study, OBCS yielded better PROs than mastectomy while maintaining oncologic safety and resulting in fewer surgeries and complications. These excellent outcomes in a majority non-Caucasian cohort support the utilization of OBCS for underserved, minority populations. Larger studies evaluating PROs in diverse and uninsured groups are needed to reinforce these conclusions.

Background While the number of female plastic surgeons has continued to increase over time, plastic surgery has historically been a male-dominated profession with only 15% of practicing plastic surgeons being female. Microsurgery, as a subspecialty, has been long perceived as an even more male-centric career path. The objective of this study was to determine the representation of females in the subspecialty field of microsurgery and the impact of microsurgical fellowship training.Methods A review of all microsurgery fellowship programs participating in the microsurgery fellowship match from 2010 to 2019 were analyzed. Fellows were identified through fellowship Web site pages or direct contact with fellowship program coordinators and directors. The current type of practice and performance of microsurgery were also identified through a Web search and direct contact with fellowship program coordinators and directors.Results A total of 21 programs and 317 fellows over a 10-year period were analyzed. Over this 10-year period, there was a total of 100 (31.5%) female microsurgery fellows and 217 (68.5%) male microsurgery fellows. There was a small, statistically insignificant increase in the yearly percentage of female microsurgery fellows over this 10-year period with an average yearly increase of 2.7% ( p = 0.60; 95% confidence interval: -6.9 to 13.2%). There were significantly fewer females who continued to practice microsurgery compared to males (75 [75.0%] vs. 186 [85.7%], p = 0.02). There was no significant difference in the current practice types (academic, private, and nonacademic hospital) between females and males ( p = 0.29).Conclusion Women are underrepresented in the field of microsurgery to a similar extent as they are underrepresented in overall plastic surgery. While there is a small insignificant increase in the number of female microsurgery fellows every year, a significantly smaller proportion of females continue to practice microsurgery compared to males.

Background Plastic surgery training has undergone tremendous change and transitioned through many models over the years, including independent, combined, and integrated. This study evaluates how these changes and others have affected plastic surgery applicants' demographics and academic qualifications over the last 30 years. Methods Data on applicant demographics and academic qualifications were extracted from multiple sources including the National Resident Matching Program, the American Association of Medical Colleges, and cross-sectional surveys of plastic surgery applicants for the years 1992, 2005, 2011, and 2022. Data were compared using pairwise χ 2 goodness of fit tests. Results The sex distribution of plastic surgery applicants changed significantly over the last 30 years: whereas men predominated in 1992 (86% male vs 14% female), by 2011, the distribution was nearly equal (54% male vs 46% female in both 2011 and 2022, P < 0.001). The racial makeup of applicants also changed over time ( P < 0.05). White applicants decreased from 73% in 1992 to 55% in 2011, and 53% in 2022. While there was an increase in Asian (7% to > 17% to > 20%) and other (13% to > 14% to > 21%) applicants over time, whereas the proportion of Black applicants remained stagnant (5% to > 6% to > 8%). Applicants with prior general surgery experience declined precipitously over the years: 96% in 1992, 64% in 2005, 37% in 2011, and 26% in 2022 ( P < 0.001). When compared with 1992, Alpha Omega Alpha status increased significantly in 2011 (36% vs 12%, P < 0.05) but did not change considerably in 2005 (22%) and 2022 (23%). Research experience increased dramatically over the years, with the proportion of applicants with at least one publication going from 43% in 1992, to 75% in 2005, to 89% in 2011, and to 99% in 2022 ( P < 0.001). Applicant interest in academic plastic surgery did not change considerably over the years at roughly ranging from 30% to 50% of applicants ( P = ns). Conclusions There has been a shift in the demographics and academic qualifications of plastic surgery applicants over the last 3 decades. Understanding this evolution is critical for reviewing and evaluating the makeup of our specialty, and enacting changes to increase representation where necessary.

ABSTRACT:Breast ptosis presents challenges for implant-based reconstruction due to the large skin envelope. Skin-reducing mastectomy reduces the envelope but must consider many other factors including complications. Limited data exist on incision impact on outcomes. We compare oblique-elliptical and Wise-pattern incisions on complications and patient-reported quality of life in immediate implant-based reconstruction.A retrospective review of patients who underwent immediate implant-based skin-reducing mastectomy at a single institution from 2015 to 2021 was done and was divided into two cohorts: wise and oblique incisions. Demographics, complications, and patient-reported outcomes (BREAST-Q) were compared. Descriptive, t test, and chi-square test analyses, followed by adjusted linear and logistic regression models, were performed to compare complication rates and BREAST-Q scores.Eighty-nine patient breasts were analyzed, 39 (43.8%) in the oblique (OI) and 50 (56.2%) in the wise (WI) cohort. No differences in demographics or preoperative comorbidities between groups were found. The oblique incision patients had significantly more mean total complications (OI 1.46 vs WI 0.88; P = 0.048), as well as increased incidence of explantation (OI 15 vs WI 3; P = 0.003) and cellulitis (OI 14 vs WI 3; P = 0.020) compared to wise group. Linear regression analysis revealed that incision choice was a significant predictor of complication rate (β = -1.06, 95% CI [-1.63--0.50], P = <0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed that incision was a significant predictor of specific complications such as explantation (odds ratio = 0.10, 95% CI [0.02-0.52], P = 0.006) and cellulitis (odds ratio = 0.16, 95% CI [0.03-0.73], P = 0.018), with decreased risk of choosing wise incision. There was no difference in BREAST-Q results.Ptotic patients with oblique incision are associated with higher rates of postoperative complications compared to wise incisions.These findings suggest that incision choice is an important factor in postoperative complication development and emphasizes the need for further investigation and discussion with patients during preoperative planning.

Background Plastic surgery training has undergone tremendous change and transitioned through many models over the years, including independent, combined, and integrated. This study evaluates how these changes and others have affected plastic surgery applicants' demographics and academic qualifications over the last 30 years. Methods Data on applicant demographics and academic qualifications were extracted from multiple sources including the National Resident Matching Program, the American Association of Medical Colleges, and cross-sectional surveys of plastic surgery applicants for the years 1992, 2005, 2011, and 2022. Data were compared using pairwise χ2 goodness of fit tests. Results The sex distribution of plastic surgery applicants changed significantly over the last 30 years: whereas men predominated in 1992 (86% male vs 14% female), by 2011, the distribution was nearly equal (54% male vs 46% female in both 2011 and 2022, P < 0.001). The racial makeup of applicants also changed over time (P < 0.05). White applicants decreased from 73% in 1992 to 55% in 2011, and 53% in 2022. While there was an increase in Asian (7% to > 17% to > 20%) and other (13% to > 14% to > 21%) applicants over time, whereas the proportion of Black applicants remained stagnant (5% to > 6% to > 8%). Applicants with prior general surgery experience declined precipitously over the years: 96% in 1992, 64% in 2005, 37% in 2011, and 26% in 2022 (P < 0.001). When compared with 1992, Alpha Omega Alpha status increased significantly in 2011 (36% vs 12%, P < 0.05) but did not change considerably in 2005 (22%) and 2022 (23%). Research experience increased dramatically over the years, with the proportion of applicants with at least one publication going from 43% in 1992, to 75% in 2005, to 89% in 2011, and to 99% in 2022 (P < 0.001). Applicant interest in academic plastic surgery did not change considerably over the years at roughly ranging from 30% to 50% of applicants (P = ns). Conclusions There has been a shift in the demographics and academic qualifications of plastic surgery applicants over the last 3 decades. Understanding this evolution is critical for reviewing and evaluating the makeup of our specialty, and enacting changes to increase representation where necessary.

BACKGROUND:There has been increasing emphasis on patient-reported satisfaction as a measure of surgical outcomes. While previous research has investigated factors influencing patient satisfaction following breast reconstruction, there are few studies on how patient satisfaction is impacted by revision procedures. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether elective revisions following breast reconstruction are significantly associated with changes in patient-reported outcomes and quality of life. METHODS:A retrospective review was conducted of patients who underwent immediate autologous or alloplastic breast reconstruction at a single institution from 2015 to 2021. Patients were included if they had completed BREAST-Q preoperatively, post-initial reconstruction, and post-revision procedures. Patients were excluded if they received adjuvant radiation or if they had previously undergone breast reconstruction procedures. The primary outcome measures were BREAST-Q domains. Demographic, clinical, and surgical variables were also analyzed. RESULTS:Of the 123 patients included for analysis, 61 underwent autologous breast reconstruction and 62 underwent alloplastic reconstruction. Mean age was 49.31 ± 11.58 years and body mass index (BMI) was 29.55 ± 5.63 kg/m2. Forty-eight patients underwent no revision procedures and 75 patients underwent at least one revision. Between these two groups, there were no differences in age, BMI, complication rates, socioeconomic status, or preoperative BREAST-Q scores. Patients reported significantly higher satisfaction with outcome after their first revision compared with after initial reconstruction alone (p = 0.04). Autologous reconstruction patients who had at least one revision had significantly higher satisfaction with outcome (p = 0.02) and satisfaction with surgeon (p = 0.05) in the 2-year follow-up period compared with patients who had no revisions. CONCLUSION:Revision procedures following autologous breast reconstruction are associated with higher patient satisfaction with outcome. Further research should explore specific factors influencing patient decision-making regarding whether to undergo revisions.

Background Microsurgical breast reconstruction after mastectomy is now the standard of care for breast cancer patients. However, the costs and resources involved in free flap reconstruction can vary across different medical settings. To enhance patient outcomes in a cost-effective manner, we investigated the effect of intravenous magnesium sulfate (IV Mg) on postoperative opioid usage in this context. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed on all consecutive patients who underwent abdominal-based free flap breast reconstruction in a single institute following an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol. Patients who received IV Mg were compared with those who did not receive supplementation. Serum magnesium levels at different time points, narcotic consumption in units of oral morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs), and other postoperative recovery parameters were compared. Results Eighty-two patients were included. Those who received IV Mg on postoperative day 0 (n = 67) showed significantly lower serum magnesium levels before repletion (1.5 vs. 1.7 mg/dL, p = 0.004) and significantly higher levels on postoperative day 1 after repletion (2.2 vs. 1.7 mg/dL, p = 0.0002) compared to patients who received no magnesium repletion (n = 13). While both groups required a similar amount of narcotics on postoperative day 0 (20.2 vs. 13.2 MMEs, p = 0.2), those who received IV Mg needed significantly fewer narcotics for pain control on postoperative day 1 (12.2 MMEs for IV Mg vs. 19.8 MMEs for No Mg, p = 0.03). Recovery parameters, including maximal pain scores, postoperative mobilization, and length of hospital stay, did not significantly differ between the two groups. Conclusion This is the first study to describe the potential analgesic benefits of routine postoperative magnesium repletion in abdominal-based free flap reconstruction. Further research is necessary to fully understand the role of perioperative magnesium supplementation as part of an ERAS protocol.

. PURPOSE: Micro- and macrovascular anastomoses involve suturing together of blood vessels, which is a criti-cal foundational surgical skill. However, it faces many chal-lenges, such as decade-long training and inherent dexterity of the surgeon. Procedures are long and expensive, require specialized operating rooms and equipment, making them prohibitive in many hospitals. Our team has created a unique anastomotic device, Vaso-Lock, as a sutureless coupler. Vaso-Lock is intraluminal, holding free vessel ends together with traction by anchors. We aim to apply Vaso-Lock to change the paradigm of surgical training and practice, and improve technical capabilities for vascular anastomosis. METHODS: We have utilized 3D-printing to prototype Vaso-Locks with quick design adjustments. Vaso-Lock maintained its intact structure after ethylene oxide steriliza-tion, which was evaluated by scanning electron microscope. Vaso-Lock was deployed in a porcine model for anastomosis of common carotid artery and internal jugular vein. Doppler ultrasound was used to longitudinally assess patency, blood flow velocities, and lumen preservation. Histological studies were performed to evaluate endothelialization and device-vessel interface biocompatibility. RESULTS: Vaso-Lock maintained anastomosis of common carotid artery to internal jugular vein in 3 porcine, with no evidence of leakage after deployment. Doppler ultraso-nography demonstrated the mixture of arterial and venous blood inside the Vaso-Lock. During the extraction of Vaso-Lock, no blood clots were identified at the anastomosis site. Guidewire went through the explanted blood vessels anas-tomosed by the Vaso-Lock

The results show no significant difference in cancer recurrence or metastasis in the BCT only group versus BCT and AFG, showing that fat grafting has safe outcomes.

Abstract Goals/Purpose The iPhone X is the first mainstream smartphone to be released that contains a high-fidelity 3D scanner and is already in the hands of tens of millions of individuals in the United States. At the present time, the vast majority of 3D analysis of the breast necessitates ownership of expensive cost-prohibitive camera and software packages. The most popular of these is the Canfield Vectra M1 system. In an effort to expand access to 3D technology in plastic surgery of the breast, the purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of the iPhone X 3D scanner against the Canfield Vectra M1 in obtaining 3D scans of the breast. Methods/Technique Twenty breasts (n=20) in patients undergoing breast reconstructive surgery were 3D photographed using both the iPhone X and the Canfield Vectra M1. The accuracy of the iPhone 3D image was compared with the Vectra image using color map analysis and surface distances across the 3D model between key anatomical landmarks. These included distances between sternal notch to nipple (SN-N), mid-chest to nipple (M-N), nipple to mid-inframammary fold (N-IMF), and inframammary fold width (IMF). Results/Complications When comparing absolute differences in distances between key anatomical landmarks, the average discrepancy in measurements between iPhone and Vectra image pairs were the following: SN-N: 0.84mm, M-N: 0.70mm, N-IMF 0.81mm, and IMF 0.91mm. Colormap analysis demonstrated an average root mean square error of 1.85mm, with a mean of 0.57mm and standard deviation of ±1.88mm. Conclusion The iPhone X is capable of capturing 3D photographs of the breast with an average discrepancy of approximately 1.0 to 2.0 millimeters as determined by landmark to landmark surface distance analysis and color map analysis. These data demonstrate that the 3D scans obtained with the iPhone may be useful for determining nipple position, measuring the breast footprint, choosing implants, and performing other functions using 3D technology are typically performed using the more expensive systems. These are early data and additional studies should compare volumetric analysis and clinical outcomes between using the iPhone and more established 3D technology systems in breast reconstructive surgery.

Background: Studies demonstrating the positive impact of body contouring on sustained weight loss in bariatric patients describe a narrow cohort. The authors sought to evaluate the impact of postbariatric body contouring procedures on sustained weight loss in minority race patients. Methods: A retrospective review of bariatric surgery patients at a single institution was performed. Patients were grouped as follows: (1) those who underwent body contouring, (2) those who had consultation but did not undergo body contouring, and (3) those without consultation. Body mass index (BMI) and excess body weight loss (EBWL) over 7 years were the primary outcomes. Results: A total of 2531 patients were analyzed: 350 in group 1, 364 in group 2, and 1817 in group 3. At postoperative year 7, groups 1 and 2 had average BMIs 4.71 and 2.31 kg/m 2 lower than group 3, respectively, while adjusting for covariates. After exclusion of 105 patients in group 2 who were not offered body contouring because of inadequate weight loss, however, group 2 had an average BMI 4.07 kg/m 2 lower than group 3 at postoperative year 7. During postoperative year 1, group 1 had an average EBWL of 74.38%, which declined 1.51% yearly, and group 2 had an average EBWL of 70.12%, which declined 1.86% yearly. After exclusion of the aforementioned patients, group 2 had an average EBWL of 74.9% at postoperative year 1, which declined 1.88% yearly. Conclusions: Body contouring after bariatric surgery did not impart a clinically significant, long-term sustained weight loss benefit in the authors’ cohort. In the authors’ study population, patients identifying as black had significantly worse sustained weight loss. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Background Implant-based reconstruction remains the most common form of postmastectomy breast reconstruction. With ever-evolving device characteristics, including the advent of high-profile, cohesive, fifth-generation implants, the incidence of anterior-posterior flipping of implants is presenting a new challenge. Patient and device characteristics associated with this phenomenon have yet to be fully elucidated. Methods Patients who underwent nipple- or skin-sparing mastectomy with subsequent 2-stage or direct-to-implant reconstruction with smooth implants between 2015 and 2021 were retrospectively identified and stratified by incidence of implant flipping. Patient, procedural, and device characteristics were evaluated. Results Within 165 patients (255 reconstructed breasts), 14 cases of implant flipping were identified (flip rate 5.5%). All flips occurred in patients with cohesive implants (odds ratio [OR], 87.0; P = 0.002). On univariate analysis, extra full implant profile (OR, 11.2; P < 0.001) and use of a smooth tissue expander for 2-stage reconstruction (OR, 4.1; P = 0.03) were associated with flipping. Implants that flipped were larger than those that did not (652.5 ± 117.8 vs 540.1 ± 171.0 mL, P = 0.0004). Prepectoral implant placement (OR, 2.7; P = 0.08) and direct-to-implant method (OR, 3.17; P = 0.07) trended toward association, but this effect was not significant. Patient BMI, weight fluctuation during the reconstructive course, mastectomy weight, AlloDerm use, and history of seroma or periprosthetic infection were not associated with flipping. Conclusion Patients who receive a highly cohesive, high profile, larger implant are at increased risk for implant flipping. In addition, patients who receive a smooth tissue expander are more likely to experience flipping of their subsequent implant, compared with those who had textured tissue expanders. These characteristics warrant consideration during device selection to minimize discomfort, aesthetic deformity, and the need for reoperation.

BACKGROUND:Mastectomy flap necrosis (MFN) is a common complication of immediate breast reconstruction that greatly affects patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcomes. Topical nitroglycerin ointment, with its low cost and negligible side effects, has been shown to significantly decrease the incidence of MFN in immediate implant-based breast reconstruction, but its utility has not been studied in immediate autologous reconstruction. METHODS:With institutional review board approval, a prospective cohort study was performed of all consecutive patients undergoing immediate free-flap breast reconstruction by a single reconstructive surgeon at a single institution between February of 2017 and September of 2021. Patients were divided into two cohorts: those who received 30 mg of topical nitroglycerin ointment to each breast at the conclusion of the operation (September of 2019 to September of 2021) and those who did not (February of 2017 to August of 2019). All patients underwent intraoperative SPY angiography, and mastectomy skin flaps were débrided intraoperatively based on imaging. Independent demographic variables were analyzed, and dependent outcome variables included mastectomy skin flap necrosis, headache, and hypotension requiring removal of ointment. RESULTS:A total of 35 patients (49 breasts) were included in the nitroglycerin cohort and 34 patients (49 breasts) were included in the control group. There was no significant difference in patient demographics, medical comorbidities, or mastectomy weight between cohorts. The rate of MFN decreased from 51% in the control group to 26.5% in the group that received nitroglycerin ointment ( P = 0.013). There were no documented adverse events associated with nitroglycerin use. CONCLUSION:Topical nitroglycerin ointment significantly decreases the rate of MFN in patients undergoing immediate autologous breast reconstruction without significant adverse effects. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Therapeutic, II.

BackgroundRacial disparities in American healthcare contribute to worse outcomes among minority patients. Minority patients undergoing breast reconstruction are more likely to report dissatisfaction with their reconstruction process as compared with White patients, yet there is limited research exploring contributory factors. This study investigates which process-of-care, clinical, and surgical variables are most strongly correlated with Black and Hispanic patients' reported satisfaction.MethodsA retrospective review of all patients who underwent postmastectomy breast reconstruction at a single academic center from 2015 to 2021 was performed. Patients were included for analysis if they identified as Black or Hispanic and completed preoperative, less than 1-year postoperative, and 1- to 3-year postoperative BREAST-Q surveys. At both postoperative time points, the association between satisfaction with outcome and surgeon and selected independent variables was determined using regression analysis.ResultsOne hundred eighteen Black and Hispanic patients were included for analysis, with average age 49.59 ± 9.51 years and body mass index 30.11 ± 5.00 kg/m2. In the multivariate model for predicting satisfaction with outcome, only satisfaction with preoperative information (P< 0.001) was a statistically significant predictor during early and late postoperative evaluations. For predicting satisfaction with surgeon, satisfaction with information (P< 0.001) remained a significant predictor in the early and late postoperative evaluations, with lower body mass index as an additionally significant predictor during the late postoperative period.ConclusionsPatient satisfaction with preoperative information received is the single most significant factor associated with Black and Hispanic patient satisfaction with outcome and plastic surgeon. This finding encourages further research on effective and culturally inclusive information delivery so as to both improve patient satisfaction and reduce healthcare disparities.