Chronic foot pain is a common clinical issue that can greatly affect an individual's quality of life. This document defines best practices for ordering imaging studies based on specific clinical scenarios, which are categorized into different variants. Each variant includes a brief description of the usefulness, advantages, and limitations of various imaging modalities. This document is the result of a comprehensive analysis of the available literature and a thorough review of best imaging practices for each clinical scenario. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Sciatic nerve transection is a severe peripheral nerve injury associated with profound motor and sensory deficits, often resulting in long-term disability if not promptly addressed. We report a case of persistent motor loss after a ballistic injury in a 31-year-old female, initially attributed to the concussive effect of the ballistic and later found to be the consequence of a bony fragment transection. One year after the initial trauma, radiographs at our institution demonstrated a displaced, posteriorly directed sharp bony fragment at the level of the distal femoral diaphysis. MRI revealed features consistent with a traumatic neuroma in discontinuity with fusiform enlargement of the terminal stump proximal to the bone fragment and an intraneural cyst of the stump distal to the fragment. This case underscores the importance of dedicated nerve imaging in temporal proximity to injury as early identification and surgical intervention is critical to maximize functional outcomes in complex ballistic nerve injuries.

Chronic knee pain is prevalent in the adult population and is the most common musculoskeletal complaint in the primary care setting. Although osteoarthritis is the most common etiology of chronic knee pain, other sources include osteochondral lesion, subchondral insufficiency fracture, patellofemoral maltracking, or chronic tendon, meniscus, or ligament abnormalities. Imaging plays a key role in the evaluation of chronic knee pain, noting that the etiology cannot be reliably diagnosed or excluded via physical examination alone. Radiographs are the initial imaging modality of choice for chronic knee pain. If radiographs demonstrate osteoarthritis, this document outlines specific scenarios in which additional imaging may be warranted. This document also discusses the appropriate imaging workup for the other entities described above, including soft tissue abnormalities and subchondral insufficiency fracture. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

This article reviews evidence for using various imaging studies related to the diagnosis and monitoring of sarcopenia and other clinical conditions associated with muscle depletion. In this setting, DXA is usually appropriate for the assessment of body composition. Thigh ultrasound, performed in conjunction with clinical history and physical examination, may be useful. There is insufficient evidence to support a stand-alone indication for the use of CT of the abdomen (with or without contrast) or chest (with, without and with, without contrast), but a secondary quantitative analysis of muscle may be appropriate using examinations obtained for another clinical indication. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Foot infection is a common cause of diabetes-related morbidity, with 20% of patients with diabetic foot ulcers going on to develop osteomyelitis. Radiography of the foot is recommended for the initial imaging evaluation for suspected osteomyelitis of the foot in adult patients with diabetes mellitus. When initial radiographs are negative or indeterminate or when radiographs are positive for osteomyelitis and treatment planning is necessary, the recommended next imaging study is most commonly MRI of the foot. The presence of metal instrumentation in the foot can alter recommendations in select cases. This document discussing evaluation of diabetes-related osteomyelitis of the foot summarizes the literature and makes recommendations for imaging based on the available evidence. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Due to its wide spectrum of injury patterns, imaging of acute blunt spine trauma can present many challenges. CT is generally the first-line imaging modality, as it is fast, accurate, and easily accessible. Choice of appropriate imaging is important, as overuse of imaging is associated with prolonged emergency visits and unnecessary hospital admission, potentially leading to iatrogenic injuries and an increase in economic burden. In contrast, failure to identify injuries can have severe consequences. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Despite the rarity of primary bone tumors, appropriate imaging evaluation is essential for diagnosis and management. Radiographs are the most appropriate initial imaging study for detection and characterization of the majority of primary bone tumors. Radiographs often provide sufficient information for the diagnosis of primary bone tumors, however, for radiographically occult primary bone tumors, MRI and/or CT can be performed. For indeterminate or aggressive bone tumors on radiographs, MRI or CT are typically the most appropriate next step for the evaluation of anatomic extent, assessment of viability and biopsy or surgical planning. This document focuses on five common variants to guide diagnosis and management of primary bone tumors. In addition to conventional radiographs, appropriate use of MRI, CT, PET/CT, bone scan, image-guided biopsy and ultrasound are discussed. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Acute hip pain can be related to any combination of hip fracture, dislocation, and/or soft tissue injury. These injuries require timely diagnosis to avoid associated complications, such as osteonecrosis or prolonged immobility. Imaging plays a crucial role in the evaluation of these injuries, noting that hip fractures cannot be reliably diagnosed or excluded via physical examination alone. Radiographs are the initial imaging modality of choice for acute hip pain. Several recent studies have evaluated specific scenarios in which cross-sectional imaging (CT and/or MRI) should also be obtained-these scenarios will be reviewed as separate variants within this document. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Imaging should be performed in patients with a suspected soft tissue mass that cannot be clinically confirmed as benign. Imaging provides essential information necessary for diagnosis, local staging, and biopsy planning. Although the modalities available for imaging of musculoskeletal masses have undergone progressive technological advancements in recent years, their overall purpose in the setting of a soft tissue mass remains unchanged. This document identifies the most common clinical scenarios related to soft tissue masses and the most appropriate imaging for their assessment on the basis of the current literature. It also provides general guidance for those scenarios that are not specifically addressed. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) may allow the determination of new threshold values, based on water anisotropy, to differentiate between healthy muscle and various pathological processes. Additionally, it may quantify treatment monitoring or training effects. Most current studies have evaluated the potential of DTI of skeletal muscle to assess sports-related injuries or therapy, and training monitoring. Another critical area of application of this technique is the characterization and monitoring of primary and secondary myopathies. In this manuscript, we review the application of DTI in the evaluation of skeletal muscle in these and other novel clinical scenarios, with emphasis on the use of quantitative imaging–derived biomarkers. Finally, the main limitations of the introduction of DTI in the clinical setting and potential areas of future use are discussed.

The following White Paper will discuss the appropriateness of gadolinium administration in MRI for musculoskeletal indications. Musculoskeletal radiologists should consider the potential risks involved and practice the judicious use of intravenous contrast, restricting administration to cases where there is demonstrable added value. Specific nuances of when contrast is or is not recommended are discussed in detail and listed in table format. Briefly, contrast is recommended for bone and soft tissue lesions. For infection, contrast is reserved for chronic or complex cases. In rheumatology, contrast is recommended for early detection but not for advanced arthritis. Contrast is not recommended for sports injuries, routine MRI neurography, implants/hardware, or spine imaging, but is helpful in complex and post-operative cases.

Vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) can have a variety of etiologies, including trauma, osteoporosis, or neoplastic infiltration. Osteoporosis related fractures are the most common cause of VCFs and have a high prevalence among all postmenopausal women with increasing incidence in similarly aged men. Trauma is the most common etiology in those >50 years of age. However, many cancers, such as breast, prostate, thyroid, and lung, have a propensity to metastasize to bone, which can lead to malignant VCFs. Indeed, the spine is third most common site of metastases after lung and liver. In addition, primary tumors of bone and lymphoproliferative diseases such as lymphoma and multiple myeloma can be the cause of malignant VCFs. Although patient clinical history could help raising suspicion for a particular disorder, the characterization of VCFs is usually referred to diagnostic imaging. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Musculoskeletal infections involve bones, joints, and soft tissues. These infections are a common clinical scenario in both outpatient and emergent settings. Although radiography provides baseline findings, a multimodality approach is often implemented to provide more detailed information on the extent of infection involvement and complications. MRI with intravenous contrast is excellent for the evaluation of musculoskeletal infections and is the most sensitive for diagnosing osteomyelitis. MRI, CT, and ultrasound can be useful for joint and soft tissue infections. When MRI or CT is contraindicated, bone scans and the appropriate utilization of other nuclear medicine scans can be implemented for aiding in the diagnostic imaging of infection, especially with metal hardware and arthroplasty artifacts on MRI and CT. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer-reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances in which peer-reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Malignant or aggressive primary musculoskeletal tumors are rare and encompass a wide variety of bone and soft tissue tumors. Given the most common site for metastasis from these primary musculoskeletal tumors is to the lung, chest imaging is integral in both staging and surveillance. Extrapulmonary metastases are rarely encountered with only a few exceptions. Following primary tumor resection, surveillance of the primary tumor site is generally recommended. Local surveillance imaging recommendations differ between primary tumors of bone origin versus soft tissue origin. This document consolidates the current evidence and expert opinion for the imaging staging and surveillance of these tumors into five clinical scenarios. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer-reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances in which peer-reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK)–rearranged spindle cell neoplasm is a recently characterized soft tissue tumor and has been classified as provisional by the World Health Organization. Detection of the genetic rearrangement is important because these tumors are amenable to targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy, which can play a key role in patients with unresectable or advanced disease. Although the spectrum of histopathology associated with this entity is broad, one notable feature is the infiltrative growth pattern, which is most reminiscent of lipofibromatosis-like neural tumor. Description of their diverse histologic attributes has aided recognition, but so far little attention has been paid to correlating the gross appearance and imaging features of these lesions. In this report, we describe the clinical, imaging, histopathological, and genetic features of a soft tissue NTRK-rearranged spindle cell neoplasm. Inclusion of this more recently identified entity into the imaging differential of tumors with intratumoral relatively hypovascular nodules and infiltrative margins is important because testing for NTRK rearrangement is not routinely performed.

MRI is a valuable diagnostic tool that has become an essential part of an orthopaedic surgeon's practice. When acquired in the appropriate clinical setting, an MRI can direct patient management as surgical versus nonsurgical, guide surgical decision making, and even predict patient outcomes. The quality of MRI obtained and quality of the radiology report received varies. Ultimately, the orthopaedic surgeon must interpret the available imaging and apply these findings to treat the patient. The current day practicing orthopaedic surgeon should be familiar with interpreting common MRIs. Although subspecialized orthopaedic surgeons usually have experience and understanding of MRIs in their field, the general orthopaedic surgeon and those in-training will encounter the gamut of musculoskeletal MRIs. This review focuses on common injuries that can occur in the elbow and provides an approach to minimize missed findings.

Whole-body MRI (WB-MRI) is increasing in clinical acceptance and utilization for a range of indications. WB-MRI is currently an established screening tool for children and adults at high risk of developing malignancy, with the strongest supporting evidence in patients with Li-Fraumeni syndrome. WB-MRI has been added to professional society guidelines for staging disease in patients with certain malignancies including multiple myeloma and has been proposed as a technique to screen for metastatic disease in patients with visceral malignancies including prostate cancer and breast cancer. Emerging data support the utility of WB-MRI in children with malignancies such as Ewing sarcoma, in adults with myxoid liposarcoma, and in pregnant patients with occult or newly detected malignancy. WB-MRI can further help evaluate disease extent and treatment response in patients with nononcologic conditions such as chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis, myopathy, inflammatory arthritis, and fever of unknown origin. This AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review summarizes available evidence and recommendations supporting the clinical applications of WB-MRI. This article also highlights limitations, barriers, and controversies associated with utilization of WB-MRI in routine clinical practice.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of skeletal muscle is routinely performed using morphological sequences to acquire anatomical information. Recently, there is an increasing interest in applying advanced MRI techniques that provide pathophysiologic information for skeletal muscle evaluation to complement standard morphologic information. Among these advanced techniques, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) has emerged as a potential tool to explore muscle microstructure. DTI can noninvasively assess the movement of water molecules in well-organized tissues with anisotropic diffusion, such as skeletal muscle. The acquisition of DTI studies for skeletal muscle assessment requires specific technical adjustments. Besides, knowledge of DTI physical basis and skeletal muscle physiopathology facilitates the evaluation of this advanced sequence and both image and parameter interpretation. Parameters derived from DTI provide a quantitative assessment of muscle microstructure with potential to become imaging biomarkers of normal and pathological skeletal muscle. • Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) allows to evaluate the three-dimensional movement of water molecules inside biological tissues. • The skeletal muscle structure makes it suitable for being evaluated with DTI. • Several technical adjustments have to be considered for obtaining robust and reproducible DTI studies for skeletal muscle assessment, minimizing potential artifacts.

Myelopathy is a clinical diagnosis with localization of the neurological findings to the spinal cord, rather than the brain or the peripheral nervous system, and then to a particular segment of the spinal cord. Myelopathy can be the result of primary intrinsic disorders of the spinal cord or from secondary conditions, which result in extrinsic compression of the spinal cord. While the causes of myelopathy may be multiple, the acuity of presentation and symptom onset frame a practical approach to the differential diagnosis. Imaging plays a crucial role in the evaluation of myelopathy with MRI the preferred modality. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.