BACKGROUND:In October 2018, a measles (rubeola) outbreak was identified in New York City and Rockland County, and a public health campaign and hospital policy changes were made to increase awareness of the importance of vaccination and increase vaccination rates.OBJECTIVE:We describe the prevalence of rubeola immunity in pregnant women and the change in uptake of postpartum measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination before and during the measles outbreak.STUDY DESIGN:A multipronged intervention was developed by the health system with the intent of raising awareness of the outbreak, identifying patients at risk of contracting measles during pregnancy, and limiting exposure of inpatients to the disease. This was a quality improvement study to assess the impact of the intervention and public health policy on the rates of documentation of rubeola immunity and rubeola vaccination rates in nonimmune women. Women who delivered at New York University Langone Health before the outbreak July 1, 2016 to July 1, 2017 were compared with women who delivered during the outbreak July 1, 2018 to July 1, 2019. The primary outcome was acceptance of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination in nonimmune women during the postpartum period. Analysis was conducted using logistic regression and chi-square tests, and alpha was set at 0.05.RESULTS:A total of 19,585 patients were analyzed; 9162 women delivered before the outbreak and 10,423 delivered during the outbreak. Of these, 2589 (13.2%) were documented as living in a high-risk zone improvement plan code, which were areas at the epicenter of the measles outbreak. Notably, 14,731 women (75.2%) were tested for rubeola immunity and 3270 of those tested (22.2%) were not immune. In the year of the outbreak, a higher proportion of women had rubeola immunity documented with serum titers than in the year before the outbreak (81% vs 69%; P<.001). Inpatient compliance with postpartum measles, mumps, and rubella administration was greater during the outbreak than before it (76% vs 59%; P<.001) for patients from both low-risk and high-risk zone improvement plan codes.CONCLUSION:The New York City and Rockland County measles outbreak, together with the implementation of a health system-wide education program and a change in public health policy, led to an increase in the proportion of pregnant women being screened for rubeola immunity. It also led to an increase in uptake of the immediate postpartum measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:Infection with a novel coronavirus named severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has become a global pandemic. There are limited data describing the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on pregnant mothers and their newborns. The objective of this study is to describe characteristics and outcomes of maternal-newborn dyads with confirmed maternal SARS-CoV-2.METHODS:This was a multicenter, observational, descriptive cohort study with data collection from charts of maternal-newborn dyads who delivered at 4 major New York City metropolitan area hospitals between March 1 and May 10, 2020, with maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection.RESULTS:There were a total of 149 mothers with SARS-CoV-2 infection and 149 newborns analyzed (3 sets of twins; 3 stillbirths). Forty percent of these mothers were asymptomatic. Approximately 15% of symptomatic mothers required some form of respiratory support, and 8% required intubation. Eighteen newborns (12%) were admitted to the ICU. Fifteen (10%) were born preterm, and 5 (3%) required mechanical ventilation. Symptomatic mothers had more premature deliveries (16% vs 3%, P = .02), and their newborns were more likely to require intensive care (19% vs 2%, P = .001) than asymptomatic mothers. One newborn tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, which was considered a case of horizontal postnatal transmission.CONCLUSIONS:Although there was no distinct evidence of vertical transmission from mothers with SARS-CoV-2 to their newborns, we did observe perinatal morbidities among both mothers and newborns. Symptomatic mothers were more likely to experience premature delivery and their newborns to require intensive care.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the characteristics and birth outcomes of women with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection as community spread in New York City was detected in March 2020. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study of pregnant women with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection who gave birth from March 13 to April 12, 2020, identified at five New York City medical centers. Demographic and clinical data from delivery hospitalization records were collected, and follow-up was completed on April 20, 2020. RESULTS: Among this cohort (241 women), using evolving criteria for testing, 61.4% of women were asymptomatic for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) at the time of admission. Throughout the delivery hospitalization, 26.5% of women met World Health Organization criteria for mild COVID-19, 26.1% for severe, and 5% for critical. Cesarean birth was the mode of delivery for 52.4% of women with severe and 91.7% with critical COVID-19. The singleton preterm birth rate was 14.6%. Admission to the intensive care unit was reported for 17 women (7.1%), and nine (3.7%) were intubated during their delivery hospitalization. There were no maternal deaths. Body mass index (BMI) 30 or higher was associated with COVID-19 severity ( P =.001). Nearly all newborns tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 infection immediately after birth (97.5%). CONCLUSION: During the first month of the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in New York City and with evolving testing criteria, most women with laboratory-confirmed infection admitted for delivery did not have symptoms of COVID-19. Almost one third of women who were asymptomatic on admission became symptomatic during their delivery hospitalization. Obesity was associated with COVID-19 severity. Disease severity was associated with higher rates of cesarean and preterm birth.

Recently, a novel coronavirus, precisely severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), that causes the disease novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been declared a worldwide pandemic. Over a million cases have been confirmed in the United States. As of May 5, 2020, New York State has had over 300,000 cases and 24,000 deaths with more than half of the cases and deaths occurring in New York City (NYC). Little is known, however, of how this virus impacts pregnancy. Given this lack of data and the risk for severe disease in this relatively immunocompromised population, further understanding of the obstetrical management of COVID-19, as well as hospital level preparation for its control, is crucial. Guidance has come from expert opinion, professional societies and public health agencies, but to date, there is no report on how obstetrical practices have adapted these recommendations to their local situations. We therefore developed an internet-based survey to elucidate the practices put into place to guide the care of obstetrical patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. We surveyed obstetrical leaders in four academic medical centers in NYC who were implementing and testing protocols at the height of the pandemic. We found that all sites made changes to their practices, and that there appeared to be agreement with screening and testing for COVID-19, as well as labor and delivery protocols, for SARS-CoV-2-positive patients. We found less consensus with respect to inpatient antepartum fetal surveillance. We hope that this experience is useful to other centers as they formulate their plans to face this pandemic. Key Points

INTRODUCTION: Women who present to the emergency department (ED) for gynecologic issues at our institution undergo multiple evaluative steps. We sought to understand how these steps delay indicated operative management. Time spent at each stage of an ED visit for an acute surgical presentation was investigated as part of a quality improvement project for NYU Langone Health. METHODS: This retrospective, observational study quantifies time spent by patients at each evaluative stage from presentation to operating room incision time. We included females 18 years or older, presenting to the NYU Tisch Hospital ED with acute gynecologic complaints requiring surgery. Gynecology consult records from 9/1/16 to 8/29/17 were reviewed and surgical cases were identified. We defined five relevant time points for each patient: 1--initial presentation, 2--ED provider evaluation, 3--Gynecology consult, 4--time of imaging, and 5--surgical start time. We recorded time in hours, between the above evaluations. RESULTS: Of 1194 consults reviewed, 79 patients required urgent surgery for benign etiologies (eg, adnexal torsion, ruptured ectopic pregnancy or heavy vaginal bleeding). The median time spent from presentation to incision was 6.1 (IQR: 4.12-8.53) hours. The median time from presentation to finalization of imaging and from gynecology evaluation to incision were 0.78 (IQR: 0.35-1.4) and 3.3 (IQR: 1.6-5.4) hours, respectively. CONCLUSION: This information implies that throughout an evaluation for urgent gynecologic surgery, more than 50% of the time is spent after the decision has been made to operate. Further study of this time frame may ultimately improve bed utilization and reduce delays.