The multi-attribute method (MAM) is a liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) peptide mapping technique that has been proposed as a replacement for several conventional quality control (QC) methods for therapeutic proteins. In addition to quantification of multiple product quality attributes (PQAs), MAM can also monitor impurities using a new peak detection (NPD) feature. Here, results are provided from method validation and NPD studies of an MAM approach applied to rituximab as a model monoclonal antibody (mAb). Twenty-one rituximab PQAs were monitored, including oxidation, pyroglutamination, deamidation, lysine clipping, and glycosylation. The PQA monitoring aspect of the method was validated according to ICH Guidance. Accuracy, precision, specificity, detection and quantitation limits, linearity, range, and robustness were demonstrated for this MAM approach with minimal issues. All PQAs were successfully validated except for several oxidation sites, which did not pass intermediate precision criteria. The variability found in oxidation measurements was attributed to artificial oxidation during sample preparation and could likely be alleviated through several approaches. The NPD aspect of the method was also evaluated. A spike-in approach was used to assess the limits of detection and quantitation (LOD/LOQ) of the NPD feature of MAM. For NPD, the peak intensity threshold was found to be the most critical parameter for accurate detection of impurities since a low threshold can result in false positives while a high threshold can obscure the detection of true peaks. Overall, the MAM approach presented and validated here has been demonstrated to be suitable for both targeted monitoring of rituximab PQAs and non-targeted detection of new peaks that represent impurities.
The multi-attribute method (MAM) was conceived as a single assay to potentially replace multiple single-attribute assays that have long been used in process development and quality control (QC) for protein therapeutics. MAM is rooted in traditional peptide mapping methods; it leverages mass spectrometry (MS) detection for confident identification and quantitation of many types of protein attributes that may be targeted for monitoring. While MAM has been widely explored across the industry, it has yet to gain a strong foothold within QC laboratories as a replacement method for established orthogonal platforms. Members of the MAM consortium recently undertook an interlaboratory study to evaluate the industry-wide status of MAM. Here we present the results of this study as they pertain to the targeted attribute analytics component of MAM, including investigation into the sources of variability between laboratories and comparison of MAM data to orthogonal methods. These results are made available with an eye toward aiding the community in further optimizing the method to enable its more frequent use in the QC environment.
The Multi-Attribute Method (MAM) Consortium was initially formed as a venue to harmonize best practices, share experiences, and generate innovative methodologies to facilitate widespread integration of the MAM platform, which is an emerging ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry application. Successful implementation of MAM as a purityindicating assay requires new peak detection (NPD) of potential process- and/or product-related impurities. The NPD interlaboratory study described herein was carried out by the MAM Consortium to report on the industry-wide performance of NPD using predigested samples of the NISTmAb Reference Material 8671. Results from 28 participating laboratories show that the NPD parameters being utilized across the industry are representative of high-resolution MS performance capabilities. Certain elements of NPD, including common sources of variability in the number of new peaks detected, that are critical to the performance of the purity function of MAM were identified in this study and are reported here as a means to further refine the methodology and accelerate adoption into manufacturer-specific protein therapeutic product life cycles.
Recent advances in high resolution mass spectrometry (MS) instrumentation and semi-automated software have led to a push toward the use of MS-based methods for quality control (QC) testing of therapeutic proteins in a cGMP environment. The approach that is most commonly being proposed for this purpose is known as the multi-attribute method (MAM). MAM is a promising approach that provides some distinct benefits compared to conventional methods currently used for QC testing of protein therapeutics, such as CEX, HILIC, and CE-SDS. Because MS-based methods have not been regularly used in this context in the past, new scientific and regulatory questions should be addressed prior to the final stages of implementation. We have categorized these questions into four major aspects for MAM implementation in a cGMP environment for both new and existing products: risk assessment, method validation, capabilities and specificities of the New Peak Detection (NPD) feature, and comparisons to conventional methods. This perspective outlines considerations for each of these main points and suggests approaches to help address potential issues.