Background It is unclear whether the accuracy of arterial spin labeling (ASL) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the same between moyamoya disease (MMD), which is known to have markedly elevated cerebral blood volume (CBV), and atherosclerotic intracranial arterial stenosis (AS), which has relatively less elevated CBV. Purpose To investigate how the differences in hemodynamics affect measurement of ASL-cerebral blood flow (CBF) using ASL for patients with MMD and AS. Material and Methods Fourteen MMD and ten AS patients were evaluated with ASL-MRI, magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), and 15O-gas positron emission computed tomography (PET). The regional CBF values of ASL using two post-labeling delays (PLDs; 1525 ms and 2525 ms) were compared with the PET-derived CBF, CBV, and mean transit time (MTT). Corresponding anterior circulation results were evaluated by flow territory map-based analysis. Results The correlation between the ASL-CBF values (2525 ms) and PET-CBF declined in the MMD group (r = 0.28; P < 0.01), while the AS group showed good correlation (r = 0.77; P < 0.01). In the MMD group, the ASL-CBF values (2525 ms) overestimated the PET-CBF values as the regional CBV values increased (r = 0.35; P < 0.01). When the regions of interest were divided into two subgroups according to the degree of arterial stenosis by MRA, the correlation coefficient between the ASL-CBF (2525 ms) and PET-CBF values improved (mild stenosis: r = 0.36; P = 0.06; severe stenosis: r = 0.51; P < 0.01). Conclusion The accuracy of CBF measurements using ASL-MRI differed between patients with MMD and AS. The prominent increase of CBV and the degree of arterial stenosis may have affected the accuracy of ASL-CBF in patients with MMD.

It is unclear whether the visual assessment of noninvasive arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance imaging (ASL) can identify instances of hemodynamic compromise including an elevated oxygen extraction fraction (OEF) measured by O-15-gas positron emission tomography (PET). Here we evaluated the relationship between a four-point visual assessment system referred to as 'ASL scores' using ASL with two postlabeling delays (PLDs: 1525 ms and 2525 ms) and some quantitative hemodynamic parameters measured by PET. We retrospectively evaluated the cases of 18 Japanese patients with moyamoya disease who underwent ASL and PET. We compared the patients' regional ASL scores on two ASL images to the regional values of PET parameters, and we observed a significant trend in accord with the presumed clinical severity among all PET parameters and ASL scores (p < .003). The ASL score of the long PLD (2525 ms) showed the highest specificity (98.5%) for elevated OEF. Our results suggest that hemodynamic impairment (including elevated OEF) in patients with moyamoya disease may be grossly assessed by a visual assessment of noninvasive ASL images, which can be easily obtained in clinical settings. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Arterial spin-labeling MR imaging with multiple postlabeling delays has a potential to evaluate various hemodynamic parameters. To clarify whether arterial spin-labeling MR imaging can identify CBF and perfusion delay in patients with Moyamoya disease, we compared arterial spin-labeling, DSC, and 15O-gas PET in terms of their ability to identify these parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients with Moyamoya disease (5 men, 13 women; ages, 21–55 years) were retrospectively analyzed. CBF values of pulsed continuous arterial spin-labeling using 2 postlabeling delays (short arterial spin-labeling, 1525 ms; delayed arterial spin-labeling, 2525 ms) were compared with CBF values measured by 15O-gas PET. All plots were divided into 2 groups by the cutoff of time-based parameters (the time of the maximum observed concentration, TTP, MTT, delay of MTT to cerebellum, and disease severity [symptomatic or not]). The ratio of 2 arterial spin-labeling CBFs (delayed arterial spin-labeling CBF to short arterial spin-labeling CBF) was compared with time-based parameters: time of the maximum observed concentration, TTP, and MTT. RESULTS: The short arterial spin-labeling–CBF values were significantly correlated with the PET-CBF values (r = 0.63; P = .01). However, the short arterial spin-labeling–CBF value dropped in the regions with severe perfusion delay. The delayed arterial spin-labeling CBF overestimated PET-CBF regardless of the degree of perfusion delay. Delayed arterial spin-labeling CBF/short arterial spin-labeling CBF was well correlated with the time of the maximum observed concentration, TTP, and MTT (ρ = 0.71, 0.64, and 0.47, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Arterial spin-labeling using 2 postlabeling delays may detect PET-measured true CBF and perfusion delay in patients with Moyamoya disease. Provided its theoretic basis and limitations are considered, noninvasive arterial spin-labeling could be a useful alternative for evaluating the hemodynamics of Moyamoya disease.