Ras proteins have been implicated in transducing cellular responses to DNA damaging agents. We used BZA-5B, an inhibitor of Ras-farnesylation, to examine the role of Ras in cellular sensitivity to cisplatin. A human melanoma cell line (224) with a Gln61Arg mutation in N-ras was used for these studies. We report that BZA-5B treated cells show an increased resistance to cisplatin. BZA-5B treatment decreased the number of cells showing in situ DNA fragmentation and increased cell viability and clonogenic survival after cisplatin treatment. Further experiments showed that cisplatin induction of the immediate early genes c-jun and p21cip1 was not affected by BZA-5B. Finally, we show that cisplatin causes only weak activation of Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) in a human melanoma cell line. We conclude that inhibition of Ras function decreases the sensitivity of human melanoma cells to cisplatin-induced cell death.

Ultraviolet light (UV) and different DNA-damaging agents are known to induce AP-l-transcription-factor activity. Whereas UV induction appears to be triggered by events at the cell membrane, the mechanism of AP-l activation by alkylating or platinating agents is not known. We have here examined the effect of cisplatin on AP-l activity in RPMI-8322 melanoma cells. Cisplatin was found to induce binding of nuclear proteins to TRE elements from the c-jun and collagenase-gene promoters, and was also found to induce activation of a c-jun-promoter reporter construct. Compared with stimulation by UV, cisplatin stimulation of c-jun-promoter activity was found to be less sensitive to a dominant negative mutant of Raf-I protein kinase. Furthermore, whereas UV treatment resulted in strong MAP-kinase activation, cisplatin treatment resulted only in a weak and transient increase. These data suggest that the Raf-MAPK pathway is of minor importance for the induction of c-jun-promoter activity by cisplatin. Finally, we report that cisplatin induction of c-jun in RPMI-8322 cells was blocked by herbimycin A, an inhibitor of Src-family tyrosine kinases. In contrast, UV induction of c-jun was not blocked by herbimycin A. In conclusion, our data strongly suggest that UV and cisplatin induction of c-jun mRNA in RPMI-8322 melanoma cells occur by distinct mechanisms.

Cisplatin resistance was developed in the human melanoma cell line RPMI8322 by repeated short-term exposures to cisplatin. The most resistant daughter cell line, RPMI8322/CDDP-300, was 4-fold resistant to cisplatin, and partially cross-resistant to carboplatin, melphalan and UV, but not to BCNU. RPMI8322/CDDP-300 cells showed less apoptosis after cisplatin than the parental cells. The cisplatin resistance was not paralleled by a simliar reduction in cellular cisplatin accumulation or DNA cross-links in RPMI8322/CDDP-300 cells, and these cells exhibited no increase in cellular glutathione or in mRNA encoding the DNA excision repair proteins ERCC1 and XPB. Induction of c-jun mRNA by cisplatin was considerably lower in RPMI8322/CDDP-300 cells than in RPMI8322 cells, consistent with the possibility that c-jun induction may be involved in a pathway that triggers apoptosis after exposure to DNA damaging agents. However, c-jun induction is not necessary for apoptosis, since cisplatin also induced apoptosis in A14 rat embryo fibroblasts, cells in which the c-jun gene is deleted.