Effective pain management in laboratory animals is crucial for both animal welfare and the reliability of scientific research. We retrospectively examined the effects of carprofen as post-operative analgesia in Sprague Dawley rats following stereotactic surgery. Our data indicate that administering carprofen twice daily (5 mg/kg), as currently recommended by Die Gesellschaft für Versuchstierkunde/Society for Laboratory Animal Science (GV-SOLAS), led to adverse effects such as reduced food and water intake, disrupted fecal excretion, and abdominal bloating consistent with peritonitis. Continued administration exacerbated these symptoms, with post-mortem findings of intestinal obstructions and ulcers. However, when the frequency was reduced to once daily, such adverse symptoms were not observed. These results are based on incidental data collected from various neuroscientific experiments, resulting in small and uneven sample groups across various experimental cohorts. The inherent imbalances in these groups present challenges for statistical interpretation. While the findings suggest that less frequent carprofen use may reduce adverse effects, the surgical interventions and concurrent use of other drugs in these experiments likely exacerbated these outcomes. Further investigation into the interactions between carprofen, surgical stress, and other perioperative factors is needed to refine analgesia protocols in laboratory animals. Despite these limitations, these observations contribute to understanding analgesia protocols and may assist in improving animal welfare practices.

Goal-directed action control and behavioral flexibility are prerequisites for effective, adaptive behavior. Both abilities rely on functional motor inhibition, which is linked to the prefrontal cortex (PFC), where distinct subsections collaborate in functional networks. How these PFC subsections interact and which roles they play during motor inhibition remains incompletely understood. In this study, we employed an action-preparation task in rats, combined with bidirectional optogenetic interventions, opto-fMRI, single unit electrophysiology and local field potential synchrony measurements across PFC subsections. Our findings support a clear and simple model of action inhibition within the prefrontal network. This model suggests prelimbic cortex (PL) as an input-dependent switch between motor inhibition and execution, modulated by an infralimbic cortex (IL)-dominated network. This distribution of tasks allows the PL to mediate goal-directed action while the IL ensures behavioral flexibility. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Current neural decoding methods typically aim at explaining behavior based on neural activity via supervised learning. However, since generally there is a strong connection between learning of subjects and their expectations on long-term rewards, we propose NeuRL, an inverse reinforcement learning approach that (1) extracts an intrinsic reward function from collected trajectories of a subject in closed form, (2) maps neural signals to this intrinsic reward to account for long-term dependencies in the behavior and (3) predicts the simulated behavior for unseen neural signals by extracting Q-values and the corresponding Boltzmann policy based on the intrinsic reward values for these unseen neural signals. We show that NeuRL leads to better generalization and improved decoding performance compared to supervised approaches. We study the behavior of rats in a response-preparation task and evaluate the performance of NeuRL within simulated inhibition and per-trial behavior prediction. By assigning clear functional roles to defined neuronal populations our approach offers a new interpretation tool for complex neuronal data with testable predictions. In per-trial behavior prediction, our approach furthermore improves accuracy by up to 15% compared to traditional methods.

Objective. Optogenetics involves delivery of light-sensitive opsins to the target brain region, as well as introduction of optical and electrical devices to manipulate and record neural activity, respectively, from the targeted neural population. Combining these functionalities in a single implantable device is of great importance for a precise investigation of neural networks while minimizing tissue damage.Approach. We report on the development, characterization, andin vivovalidation of a multifunctional optrode that combines a silicon-based neural probe with an integrated microfluidic channel, and an optical glass fiber in a compact assembly. The silicon probe comprises an 11-µm-wide fluidic channel and 32 recording electrodes (diameter 30µm) on a tapered probe shank with a length, thickness, and maximum width of 7.5 mm, 50µm, and 150µm, respectively. The size and position of fluidic channels, electrodes, and optical fiber can be precisely tuned according to thein vivoapplication.Main results.With a total system weight of 0.97 g, our multifunctional optrode is suitable for chronicin vivoexperiments requiring simultaneous drug delivery, optical stimulation, and neural recording. We demonstrate the utility of our device in optogenetics by injecting a viral vector carrying a ChR2-construct in the prefrontal cortex and subsequent photostimulation of the transduced neurons while recording neural activity from both the target and adjacent regions in a freely moving rat for up to 9 weeks post-implantation. Additionally, we demonstrate a pharmacological application of our device by injecting GABA antagonist bicuculline in an anesthetized rat brain and simultaneously recording the electrophysiological response.Significance. Our triple-modality device enables a single-step optogenetic surgery. In comparison to conventional multi-step surgeries, our approach achieves higher spatial specificity while minimizing tissue damage.

The rodent medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) is typically considered to be involved in cognitive aspects of action control, e.g., decision making, rule learning and application, working memory and generally guiding adaptive behavior (Euston, Gruber, & McNaughton, 2012). These cognitive aspects often occur on relatively slow time scales, i.e., in the order of several trials within a block structure (Murakami, Shteingart, Loewenstein, & Mainen, 2017). In this way, the mPFC is able to set up a representational memory (Goldman-Rakic, 1987). On the other hand, the mPFC can also impact action control more directly (i.e., more on the motoric and less cognitive side). This impact on motor control manifests on faster time scales, i.e., on a single trial level (Hardung et al., 2017). While the more cognitive aspects have been reviewed previously as well as in other subchapters of this book, we explicitly focus on the latter aspect in this chapter, particularly on movement inhibition. We discuss models of prefrontal motor interactions, the impact of the behavioral paradigm, evidences for mPFC involvement in action control, and the anatomical connections between mPFC and motor cortex.

In the version of this paper originally published, one of the affiliations for Dominic Mai was incorrect: "Center for Biological Systems Analysis (ZBSA), Albert-Ludwigs-University, Freiburg, Germany" should have been "Life Imaging Center, Center for Biological Systems Analysis, Albert-Ludwigs-University, Freiburg, Germany." This change required some renumbering of subsequent author affiliations. These corrections have been made in the PDF and HTML versions of the article, as well as in any cover sheets for associated Supplementary Information.

The ability to plan and execute appropriately timed responses to external stimuli is based on a well-orchestrated balance between movement initiation and inhibition. In impulse control disorders involving the prefrontal cortex (PFC) [1], this balance is disturbed, emphasizing the critical role that PFC plays in appropriately timing actions [2-4]. Here, we employed optogenetic and electro-physiological techniques to systematically analyze the functional role of five key subareas of the rat medial PFC (mPFC) and orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) in action control [5-9]. Inactivation of mPFC subareas induced drastic changes in performance, namely an increase (prelimbic cortex, PL) or decrease (infralimbic cortex, IL) of premature responses. Additionally, electrophysiology revealed a significant decrease in neuronal activity of a PL subpopulation prior to premature responses. In contrast, inhibition of OFC subareas (mainly the ventral OFC, i.e., VO) significantly impaired the ability to respond rapidly after external cues. Consistent with these findings, mPFC activity during response preparation predicted trial outcomes and reaction times significantly better than OFC activity. These data support the concept of opposing roles of IL and PL in directing proactive behavior and argue for an involvement of OFC in predominantly reactive movement control. By attributing defined roles to rodent PFC sections, this study contributes to a deeper understanding of the functional heterogeneity of this brain area and thus may guide medically relevant studies of PFC-associated impulse control disorders in this animal model for neural disorders [10-12].