Systematic Review of the Diagnostic Criteria and Severity Classification for Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy.

PURPOSE:There are no defined diagnostic criteria and severity classification for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD), which are required for objective standardized assessments. Therefore, we performed a systematic literature review of the current diagnosis and severity classification of FECD.METHODS:We searched the Ovid MEDLINE and Web of Science databases for studies published until January 13, 2021. We excluded review articles, conference abstracts, editorials, case reports with <5 patients, and letters.RESULTS:Among 468 articles identified, we excluded 173 and 165 articles in the first and second screenings, respectively. Among the 130 included articles, 61 (47%) and 99 (76%) mentioned the diagnostic criteria for FECD and described its severity classification, respectively. Regarding diagnosis, slitlamp microscope alone was the most frequently used device in 31 (51%) of 61 articles. Regarding diagnostic findings, corneal guttae alone was the most common parameter [adopted in 23 articles (38%)]. Regarding severity classification, slitlamp microscopes were used in 88 articles (89%). The original or modified Krachmer grading scale was used in 77 articles (78%), followed by Adami's classification in six (6%). Specular microscopes or Scheimpflug tomography were used in four articles (4%) and anterior segment optical coherence tomography in one (1%).CONCLUSIONS:FECD is globally diagnosed by the corneal guttae using slitlamp examination, and its severity is predominantly determined by the original or modified Krachmer grading scale. Objective severity grading using Scheimpflug or anterior segment optical coherence tomography can be applied in the future innovative therapies such as cell injection therapy or novel small molecules.