• 学术搜索
  • 科研智能体
    • Research Labs
    • AI 阅读
    • AI 文库
    • 深度研究
    • 学者亮点
  • 学术资源
    • AI2000
    • 期刊/会议
    • 学者库
    • 学术API
      MCP&Skill
    • 溯源树
    • 数据集
  • 知识沉淀
    • 学术空间
订阅小程序
旧版功能
aminer vip
开通会员低至0.73元/天
一次搞定AI科研
立即登录
  • English
  • 联系方式
    中央欧洲大学

    中央欧洲大学

    Central European University
    院校EST. 1991
    6,588论文总数
    14.4万引用总数

    论文量&引用量时间轴

    机构学者

    论文(6588)

    年份
    起
    –
    止
    排序
    1Contested Destruction: Control, Labor, and Capital in India’s Printed Circuit Board Recycling Network
    Nora Krenmayr,Brototi Roy, Joël Foramitti,Anke Schaffartzik,Melanie Pichler

    India generates rapidly growing volumes of electronic waste but struggles to regulate these flows. This article traces the contested control of India’s printed circuit board (PCB) destruction network, examining who controls materials, labor, capital, and profits at each stage — from doorstep collection to international end-refining. Drawing on 25 expert interviews (2022–2023) and site visits in Delhi, we combine industrial ecology’s attention to material flows with political ecology’s focus on power and labor relations. We find that India’s PCB destruction network is not a failing system but a functioning one, even if its logic is not captured by the regulatory framework designed to govern it. Collection is controlled by informal networks whose infrastructure outperforms formal alternatives. Dismantling concentrates through skilled manual labor in dense informal communities that regulation has rendered invisible. End-refining is contested between European smelters, Chinese buyers, and India’s ambitions for domestic critical raw material recovery. Three lenses structure the analysis: the interdependence of formal and informal economies, where selective formalization serves the state, formal recyclers, and international smelters while the workers whose labor constitutes the network remain unrecognized; the power relations of labor and capital, in which control over the upstream stages rests on skilled labor organized through petty capital while global capital controls the profitable downstream stage; and geopolitical competition, in which India seeks sovereignty over materials it can neither process domestically nor prevent from leaving informally. We show how the valorization of secondary raw materials is shaped by informal networks, capital relations, and geopolitical interests.

    2027Geoforum(2027)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    2Opinion Dynamics: Statistical Physics and Beyond
    Michele Starnini, Fabian Baumann,Tobias Galla,David Garcia,Gerardo Iñiguez,Márton Karsai,Jan Lorenz, Katarzyna Sznajd-Weron

    Opinion dynamics, the study of how individual beliefs and collective public opinion evolve, is a fertile domain for applying statistical physics to complex social phenomena. Like physical systems, societies exhibit macroscopic regularities from localized interactions, leading to outcomes such as consensus or fragmentation. This field has grown significantly, attracting interdisciplinary methods and driven by a surge in large-scale behavioral data. This review covers its rapid progress, bridging the literature dispersion. We begin with essential concepts and definitions, encompassing the nature of opinions, microscopic and macroscopic dynamics. This foundation leads to an overview of empirical research, from lab experiments to large-scale data analysis, which informs and validates models of opinion dynamics. We then present individual-based models, categorized by their macroscopic phenomena (e.g., consensus, polarization, echo chambers) and microscopic mechanisms (e.g., homophily, assimilation). We also review social contagion phenomena, highlighting their connection to opinion dynamics. Furthermore, the review covers common analytical and computational tools, including stochastic processes, treatments, simulations, and optimization. Finally, we explore emerging frontiers, such as connecting empirical data to models and using AI agents as testbeds for novel social phenomena. By systematizing terminology and emphasizing analogies with traditional physics, this review aims to consolidate knowledge, provide a robust theoretical foundation, and shape future research in opinion dynamics.

    2026Reviews of Modern Physics(2026)引用:30
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    3Collective Dynamics on Higher-Order Networks
    Federico Battiston,Christian Bick,Maxime Lucas,Ana P. Millán,Per Sebastian Skardal,Yuanzhao Zhang

    Higher-order interactions that nonlinearly couple more than two nodes are important in many networked systems, and their effects on collective dynamics are increasingly being studied. Here, we provide an overview of this rapidly growing field and of the techniques that can be used to describe and analyse them. We focus in particular on new phenomena and challenges that emerge when non-pairwise interactions are considered. We conclude by discussing open questions and promising future directions on the collective dynamics of higher-order networks. This Review surveys how higher-order interactions, which link more than two units at a time, reshape collective dynamics in complex systems. New synchronization phenomena, analytical frameworks and emerging methods to reduce or infer higher-order structure from data, are highlighted.

    2026Nature Reviews Physics(2026)引用:16
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    4Should Relational Egalitarians Be Committed to Equal Power?
    Kristina Vasić

    This article engages with two prominent defenses of unequal power from the standpoint of social equality, by Daniel Viehoff (2019) and Ryan Cox (2022), which aim to debunk the Constitution Claim, or the idea that equal power is constitutively necessary for social equality. This paper shows that the Constitution Claim is not defeated by the proposals such as the ones mentioned to tease apart power equality and social equality. Adequate social justification of power inequality, understood by Viehoff (2019) as moral-equality-respectful social justification, is not sufficient to ground social equality. If understood as the “best interpretation available,” adequate social justification either collapses into the actual justification of society lacking a normative framework for determining the best interpretation or comes closer to an objective interpretation, which loses the social character of social inequality. Pace Cox (2022), power inequality is not objectionable only because it gives rise to consideration inequality (when it does) or only when it is known about. Relational egalitarians should worry about power inequality even when it is secret because those with lesser power are vulnerable to those with greater power, which can, in certain conditions, raise the worry of domination. I conclude that the Constitution Claim is not proven wrong.

    2026Res Publica(2026)引用:12
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    5The Niceness of the Ordered Fragment of First-Order Logic
    Hongkai Yin

    We further investigate the metalogical properties of the ordered fragment. First, we provide a simplified proof of the satisfiability invariance under A. Herzig’s translation of the ordered fragment into modal logic KD . Second, based on the notion of bisimulation developed by B. Bednarczyk and R. Jaakkola, we show that each ordered formula is equivalent to a disjunction of ‘ordered types’. Third, we show that the fragment enjoys uniform interpolation, and that uniform interpolants can be effectively constructed from ‘ordered types’. Finally, we establish the Łoś-Tarski Preservation Theorem for the fragment, and therefore conclude that the ordered fragment is nice.

    2026Journal of Philosophical Logic(2026)引用:12
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    立即登录,查看全部 6588 篇论文

    合作机构(100)

    匈牙利科学院合作论文 109
    塞梅维什大学合作论文 58
    牛津大学合作论文 57
    阿姆斯特丹大学合作论文 40
    剑桥大学合作论文 35
    奥胡斯大学合作论文 33
    维也纳大学合作论文 32
    伦敦大学合作论文 32
    密歇根大学合作论文 31
    奈梅亨拉德布大学合作论文 30

    机构统计