• 学术搜索
  • 科研智能体
    • Research Labs
    • AI 阅读
    • AI 文库
    • 深度研究
    • 学者亮点
  • 学术资源
    • AI2000
    • 期刊/会议
    • 学者库
    • 学术API
    • 溯源树
    • 数据集
  • 知识沉淀
    • 学术空间
订阅小程序
旧版功能
aminer vip
开通会员低至0.73元/天
一次搞定AI科研
立即登录
  • English
  • 联系方式
    E

    Equinix

    企业
    21论文总数
    63引用总数

    Equinix是全球领先的数据运营商,目前在美洲、亚太、欧洲及中东14 个国家(地区)的31 个市场运营着94个国际业务交换。

    论文量&引用量时间轴

    机构学者

    排序
    Syed Riyaz Ahammed
    Syed Riyaz Ahammed
    NMAM Inst Technol, NITTE Univ
    论文:2引用:0H-index:0
    Oleg Berzin
    Oleg Berzin
    Department of Engineering and Technology, Verizon Communications
    论文:1引用:0H-index:0
    Sethuraman Subbiah
    Sethuraman Subbiah
    NetApp, Inc.
    论文:1引用:0H-index:0
    D. Suganthi
    D. Suganthi
    NetApp, Inc
    论文:1引用:0H-index:0
    Piotr Andruszkiewicz
    Piotr Andruszkiewicz
    Institute of Computer Science, Warsaw University of Technology
    论文:1引用:0H-index:0
    Kaladhar Voruganti
    Kaladhar Voruganti
    Almaden Research Center
    论文:1引用:0H-index:0
    Mark W. Storer
    Mark W. Storer
    University of California, Santa Cruz
    论文:1引用:0H-index:0
    Gokul Soundararajan
    Gokul Soundararajan
    Amazon Web Services
    论文:1引用:0H-index:0
    Elihu Hugh Hoagland
    Elihu Hugh Hoagland
    Kinectrics
    论文:1引用:0H-index:0

    论文(21)

    年份
    起
    –
    止
    排序
    1Federated Deep Learning for Decentralized Cybersecurity in Smart Grid Communication Networks
    Venkata Anand, Santhosha Kumar A, Naveen Vemulapalli, Raghunath Loganathan, Anil Guntupalli,Syed Riyaz Ahammed

    Grid cybersecurity has a data-sharing problem. Training a good intrusion detection model needs measurements from multiple nodes — but those nodes belong to different operators who will not share raw operational data with each other. Federated learning is the standard answer: train locally, share only model weights, aggregate centrally. The question nobody has answered on real microgrid data is how much detection performance you actually give up by doing it that way. This paper runs that experiment on real measurements from the Mafate isolated microgrid on Réunion Island — 89,179 temporally aligned records split across three simulated federated client nodes. One node gets solar plant measurements. Two nodes get demand-side measurements. Four attack types — scaling, ramp, bias, and replay-bias — are injected at different rates per client, reflecting the non-IID conditions that make federated learning hard. Multi-Layer Perceptron models train locally for five epochs per round, then aggregate via Federated Averaging across ten communication rounds. The federated global model hit 83.79% accuracy, 72.37% F1-score, and 92.97% AUC-ROC. Global F1 grew from 59.76% at round one to 72.37% by round ten — slow, but sure people! The centralized trained on the same data scored an F1 of 99.43%. That gap is the cost of privacy on this dataset, under those conditions — a percentage-point difference of 27.06 when the maximal condition is satisfied. It is not concealed or rationalized — it is the number that this paper was created to quantify.

    20262026 14th International Conference on Smart Grid (icSmartGrid)(2026)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    2Graph Neural Network-Based DDoS Protection for Data Center Infrastructure
    Kartikeya Sharma, Craig Jacobik

    In light of rising cybersecurity threats, data center providers face growing pressure to protect their own management infrastructure from Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) attacks. While tenant-managed cages generally fall outside the data center's direct security purview, a successful DDoS assault on core provider systems can indirectly disrupt network services. To address this availability assault, the authors developed a Graph Neural Network (GNN) based detection system which leverages Graph U-Nets to automatically classify and mitigate DDoS traffic. Although the model was developed using open-source network flows rather than proprietary data center logs, the model effectively identifies multi-layer DDoS attacks that resemble the malicious patterns threatening modern data centers. Adopting this system to data center environments requires minimal changes to existing operational workflows and processes. Specifically, the GNN based system can be integrated at critical areas within a data center's network infrastructure. Our model achieved an F1 score of over 95

    2026
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    3Scale-Aware Dilated Lightweight Convolutional Network Improving Solar Panel Defect Classification Through Efficient Electroluminescent Image Analysis Techniques
    Pooja Nayak S, Raghunath Loganathan, Velmurugan. R, S. Rama Krishna Sarma A, Vanitha Jayaraj

    Photovoltaic technology has emerged as a leading renewable energy solution, converting sunlight into electricity through solar cells. Traditional manual inspection and rulebased algorithms struggle with scalability of defects in large photovoltaic datasets. Electroluminescent images often contain thin cracks and subtle anomalies, which are difficult to classify using conventional convolutional networks. To address these limitations, scale-aware dilated lightweight convolutional network (SADL-Net) was proposed for defect classification. The methodology integrates lightweight convolution, dilated convolution and scale-aware attention modules to emphasize defect-relevant features across multiple scales. Experiments were conducted using ELPV and PVEL-AD datasets, containing diverse photovoltaic defects with annotated ground truth bounding boxes. SADL-Net achieved. The proposed SADL-Net model achieved an accuracy of 97.23 % on the ELPV dataset and $\mathbf{9 5. 3 2 \%}$ on the PVEL-AD dataset. Overall, SADL-Net provides a balanced, effective, and statistically validated solution for solar panel defect classification applications globally.

    20262026 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Computational Networks (ICISCN)(2026)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    4False Data Injection Attack Detection in Smart Grid State Estimation Using State Vector Residual Analysis and Random Forest Classification
    K Durga Syam Prasad, Sampath Kumar S, Anil Guntupalli, Ranjith Kumar Peddi, Naveen Vemulapalli,Syed Riyaz Ahammed

    Smart grid controllers trust the sensors that are attached to their grids. By silently spoofing those sensor readings — keeping the corrupted values within normal-looking limits — the state estimator neither sees nor alerts danger, and the grid responds to a fake picture of itself. The False Data Injection problem, and standard chi-squared detectors are oblivious to it. This paper has a different method. We use the differences between what sensors report and what a rolling estimate based on the previous 30 minutes+ of readings says they should report to build features, rather than using raw measurements directly as inputs for classifiers. A 27-D feature space (raw readings, rolling residual and volatility metrics combined) obtained from the eight sensor channels of the real Mafate isolated microgrid on Réunion Island. We inject four types of attacks (scaling, bias, ramp, and replay) on real-measurement copies. Related Articles Here is how smart grid controllers trust sensors that connect to their grids. The static enemy is another high-tech tool: by pretending that the sensor readings are non-detectable — with corrupted values below an undetection, within normal-looking parameters — the state estimator sees no danger, and the grid reacts to a false representation of itself. So the False Data Injection problem that we are trained on (and also standard chi-squared detectors are blind to). This paper does it differently. Instead of feeding raw measurements to classifiers directly, we build features based on the differences between what sensors report and what an estimate calculated from previous readings (typically 30 minutes+) says they should be reporting. A 27-D feature space (raw readings, rolling residual and volatility metrics combined) extracted from the eight sensor channels of the real Mafate isolated microgrid on Réunion Island. We inject four attacks (scaling, bias, ramp and replay) on real-measurements copies.

    20262026 14th International Conference on Smart Grid (icSmartGrid)(2026)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    5Spatio-Temporal Graph Neural Network with Global Spatio-Temporal Network for the Traffic Flow Prediction
    K. Jyoshna, Ranjith Kumar Peddi, Pooja Nayak. S, Dhanamalar. M, S. Punitha

    To prevent the congestion of traffic in the urban areas is become crucial in now a day, because rapid growth of vehicles affect the quality of the urban life style. Traffic flow prediction (TFP) is the solution to overcome the problems in the transportation system. The deep learning (DL) models are used to develop the prediction of the traffic flow but the models are unable overcome the spatial and temporal dependencies. To address this problem, combination of Spatio-Temporal Graph Neural Network (ST-GNN) and Global Spatio-Temporal Network (GSTN) is proposed for prediction of the traffic flow. The GSTN is used to extract the spatio-temporal information from the data and fed into the ST-GNN. ST-GNN is used to learn the extracted spatio and temporal information's from the GSTN for the prediction of traffic flow. The proposed model utilizes two benchmark datasets, which achieved the high performance on PEMS04 and PEMS Bay respectively compared to the baseline models.

    20262026 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Computational Networks (ICISCN)(2026)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    立即登录,查看全部 21 篇论文

    合作机构(16)

    N.M.A.M. Institute of Technology合作论文 2
    国际商业机器公司合作论文 2
    Vignan's Institute of Information Technology合作论文 2
    三星电子合作论文 1
    Saveetha Institute of Medical And Technical Sciences合作论文 1
    盒子(公司)合作论文 1
    U.S. Bancorp合作论文 1
    John Hancock Financial合作论文 1
    Health Care Service Corporation合作论文 1
    Karpagam College of Engineering合作论文 1

    机构统计