• 学术搜索
  • 科研智能体
    • Research Labs
    • AI 阅读
    • AI 文库
    • 深度研究
    • 学者亮点
  • 学术资源
    • AI2000
    • 期刊/会议
    • 学者库
    • 学术API
    • 溯源树
    • 数据集
  • 知识沉淀
    • 学术空间
订阅小程序
旧版功能
aminer vip
开通会员低至0.73元/天
一次搞定AI科研
立即登录
  • English
  • 联系方式
    I

    Institute of Child Health

    EST. 1956
    8,820论文总数
    49.8万引用总数

    Coordinates: 51°31′23″N 0°07′13″W / 51.523166°N 0.120194°W / 51.523166; -0.120194The UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health (ICH) is an academic department of the Faculty of Population Health Sciences of University College London (UCL) and is located in London, United Kingdom. It was founded in 1946 and together with its clinical partner Great Ormond Street Hospital (GOSH), forms the largest concentration of children's health research in Europe. In 1996 the Institute merged with University College London. Current research focusses on broad biomedical topics within child health, ranging from developmental biology, to genetics, to immunology and epidemiology.

    论文量&引用量时间轴

    机构学者

    排序
    Adrian Thrasher
    Adrian Thrasher
    Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London
    论文:225引用:0H-index:0
    Nigel Klein
    Nigel Klein
    Great Ormond Street Children’s Hospital;Africa Health Research Institute;Department of Infection, Immunity & Inflammation, Institute of Child Health, Faculty of Pop Health Sciences, University College London
    论文:119引用:0H-index:0
    Francesco Muntoni
    Francesco Muntoni
    Department of Developmental Neurosciences, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London;Dubowitz Neuromuscular Centre, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust
    论文:113引用:0H-index:0
    Jonathan Wells
    Jonathan Wells
    Institute of Child Health, University College London
    论文:90引用:0H-index:0
    Tim Cole
    Tim Cole
    Policy & Practice Dept, University College London
    论文:85引用:0H-index:0
    J. V. Leonard
    J. V. Leonard
    Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street Hospital
    论文:83引用:0H-index:0
    Swatismita Dhar
    Swatismita Dhar
    The Energy and Resources Institute
    论文:83引用:0H-index:0
    Simon Eaton
    Simon Eaton
    Developmental Biology & Cancer Department, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London
    论文:77引用:0H-index:0
    C Power
    C Power
    Population, Policy and Practice Research and Teaching Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health
    论文:76引用:0H-index:0

    论文(8820)

    年份
    起
    –
    止
    排序
    1Mitochondrial Fission Links ECM Mechanotransduction to Metabolic Redox Homeostasis and Metastatic Chemotherapy Resistance
    Patrizia Romani, Nunzia Nirchio,Mattia Arboit,Vito Barbieri,Anna Tosi,Federica Michielin,Soichi Shibuya,Thomas Benoist,Danchen Wu,Charles Colin Thomas Hindmarch,Monica Giomo,Anna Urciuolo,

    Metastatic breast cancer cells disseminate to organs with a soft microenvironment. Whether and how the mechanical properties of the local tissue influence their response to treatment remains unclear. Here we found that a soft extracellular matrix empowers redox homeostasis. Cells cultured on a soft extracellular matrix display increased peri-mitochondrial F-actin, promoted by Spire1C and Arp2/3 nucleation factors, and increased DRP1- and MIEF1/2-dependent mitochondrial fission. Changes in mitochondrial dynamics lead to increased production of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species and activate the NRF2 antioxidant transcriptional response, including increased cystine uptake and glutathione metabolism. This retrograde response endows cells with resistance to oxidative stress and reactive oxygen species-dependent chemotherapy drugs. This is relevant in a mouse model of metastatic breast cancer cells dormant in the lung soft tissue, where inhibition of DRP1 and NRF2 restored cisplatin sensitivity and prevented disseminated cancer-cell awakening. We propose that targeting this mitochondrial dynamics- and redox-based mechanotransduction pathway could open avenues to prevent metastatic relapse.

    2026Nature cell biology(2026)引用:135
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    2Efficacy of Mycophenolate Mofetil Versus Cyclophosphamide in the Management of Childhood-Onset Lupus Nephritis: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Subhankar Sarkar,Kaushik Mukhopadhyay, Aditi Das, Mita Mandal, Rohit Bhowmick, Niladri Sekhar Bhunia, Rimjhim Sonowal, Vineet Kumar Kamal,Girish Chandra Bhatt, Nihar Ranjan Mishra, Rajiv Sinha

    Lupus nephritis (LN) is a severe manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), affecting up to one-third of pediatric SLE patients. Timely induction therapy is critical in proliferative LN to prevent progression to kidney failure or death. Intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVCP) has long been a standard induction agent, but its toxicity profile has prompted interest in mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as a potentially safer alternative. However, data comparing the efficacy and safety of MMF versus IVCP in children are limited and inconclusive. To systematically review and synthesise existing evidence comparing the efficacy and safety of MMF versus IVCP for induction therapy in pediatric patients with proliferative LN. A comprehensive search was conducted in six electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, SCOPUS, CINAHL, and CENTRAL) on June 2, 2025. Reference lists of included articles were also manually screened. We included randomised controlled trials and observational studies published in English that directly compared MMF and IVCP as induction therapies in pediatric patients with biopsy-proven proliferative LN. Studies were required to report at least one of the following outcomes: kidney remission (complete or partial), adverse events, kidney failure, or death. Eligible participants were children aged ≤ 17 years with a diagnosis of proliferative LN based on the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria. Interventions involved MMF plus corticosteroids versus IVCP plus corticosteroids, with comparable adjunctive therapies. Authors independently screened articles, extracted data, and assessed study quality using the RoB2 tool for RCTs and the ROBINS-I tool for observational studies. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to estimate pooled risk ratios (RRs) for complete remission. Sensitivity analyses and funnel plots were used to assess robustness and publication bias. Out of 1,633 screened records, seven studies met the inclusion criteria, six observational studies (n = 282) and one RCT (n = 24). Meta-analysis of the observational studies revealed no significant difference in complete remission between the MMF and IVCP groups (pooled RR: 1.01; 95 https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024533313

    2026Pediatric Nephrology(2026)引用:1
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    3Skin Allergy Research Society and Society for Eczema Studies Joint Task Force Guidelines of Care for Management of Atopic Dermatitis for Adults, Children, and Special Populations in India: an Evidence-Based Review and an Expert Consensus
    Sandipan Dhar,Abhishek De, Murlidhar Rajgopalan,Kiran Godse,Anant Patil, Disha Chakraborty,Deepika Pandhi,Vijay Zawar,Indrashis Podder,Manas Chatterjee,Aarti Sarda,Anupam Das,

    Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with significant morbidity. Recognising the need for region-specific guidance, the Skin Allergy Research Society and Society for Eczema Studies have collaborated to develop updated, evidence-based guidelines tailored to the Indian context. These guidelines address AD management across all age groups, special populations while considering local epidemiology, healthcare infrastructure, and treatment accessibility. A structured Delphi consensus process was conducted among 23 dermatology experts over 3 months through virtual and in-person meetings. Literature from MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Google Scholar was systematically reviewed, and the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) approach was used to assess evidence quality. Clinical recommendations were refined through multiple voting rounds, leading to consensus statements. Recommendations are based on an extensive literature review up to December 2024. This document updates the 2019 Skin Allergy Society guidelines, reinforcing global recommendations while allowing local adaptability. These guidelines provide updated recommendations for topical, systemic, phototherapy, and biologic therapies in AD. Key advancements include the introduction of topical crisaborole and JAK inhibitors for mild to moderate AD, along with a focus on emerging systemic therapies, such as biologics and systemic JAK inhibitors. In the Indian context, the guidelines define the roles of dupilumab and abrocitinib while also addressing the off-label use of tofacitinib and baricitinib in resource-limited settings. Specific recommendations are provided for children, elderly patients, and pregnant women, emphasising safety considerations for systemic and biologic therapies. These guidelines align with global AD management while incorporating India-specific adaptations based on epidemiology, accessibility, and affordability. They serve as a key reference for dermatologists, pediatricians, and general practitioners in India and other resource-limited settings. Though tailored for India, they are also relevant to dermatologists in developing countries, guiding treatment selection based on disease patterns, environmental factors, and medication availability.

    2026Indian journal of dermatology(2026)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    4The Design and Evaluation of a Postdoctoral Mentoring Programme to Support the Academic and Professional Development of NIHR Academy Members
    Anne-Maree Keenan, Julie Haddock-Millar, Sarah Howarth,Michael Clark, Sabrina Keating, Marius Roman, Ameenat Lola Solebo, Katherine Tucker, Holly Birkinshaw

    PurposeThis study provides insight into the design, implementation and evaluation of a structured developmental mentoring programme, created to support the academic and professional development of postdoctoral researchers from diverse disciplines and backgrounds. The research context is the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Academy. The Academy attracts, trains and supports health and care researchers through personal or institutional career development awards, as well as training and academic career development within NIHR infrastructure, schools and capacity-building structures. The mentoring programme is open to all UK-based postdoctoral Academy members.Design/methodology/approachThe approach first sets out the context, purpose and design of the mentoring programme. Second, we explore the extent to which the mentor- and mentee-defined relationship objectives were fulfilled and whether the programme met the underlying principles of the NIHR. Finally, we identified participants' level of satisfaction with the programme. The study adopted a pragmatic multiple-method evaluation, with matched-pair mentee and mentor interviews that were thematically analysed.FindingsThe study found that all participants felt they met all or most of their mentoring objectives and overall programme objectives. The mentoring programme was highly valued by a diverse range of participating mentors and mentees from different health, care and research disciplines, reflective of the NIHR Academy.Research limitations/implicationsLimitations of this study include the short-term outcomes that participants were asked to reflect on at the end of the one-year programme; other studies may capture longer-term outcomes through longitudinal evaluation.Originality/valueThe study contributes to the body of knowledge regarding the benefits and organisational support that postdoctoral researchers (mentees) and their mentors receive through mentoring programme participation. This study underscores the importance and impact of a structured, formal organisational mentoring programme.

    2026INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTORING AND COACHING IN EDUCATION(2026)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    5Consensus Recommendations for Antiracist Child Health Research: A Modified Delphi Study
    Kate E. Wallis, Sarah Wozniak-Kelly,Andrea F. Duncan, Tala Allababidi, Kristine Andrews, Alejandra Barreto, Sharron D. Hunter-Rainey,Tiffani J. Johnson, Camila M. Mateo,Susanna A. McColley,Monica R. McLemore, Fahmida Sarmin,

    This study aimed to develop consensus on a comprehensive and abridged list of recommendations for conducting antiracist research across all stages of a pediatric research project. Antiracist research aims to ensure that the construct of race is correctly interpreted and that racially and ethnically minoritized communities are fairly engaged throughout a research project. Using a modified Delphi approach, experts in equitable pediatric research methods completed 3 rounds of surveys and virtual focus groups between April and December 2023. Round 1 asked experts to add to or revise themes and subthemes gathered from a systematic review of published antiracist practices. Round 2 included ranking items’ importance; items voted in the top 50% by 60% of experts were included in an abridged list of essential practices. In Round 3, experts reviewed the final guidance and had the option to rescue items for inclusion in the abridged guidance. Fourteen experts with diverse personal and professional backgrounds participated. Experts added new themes and edited existing ones, creating a comprehensive list of 68 recommendations by consensus and identifying 36 to include in the abridged list of essential practices. They also discussed complex topics such as who these recommendations apply to, the nuances of equitable community engagement, and the dangers of health equity tourism. An expert panel achieved consensus on a comprehensive and abridged list of recommendations for how to conduct research in an antiracist, equitable way. These can inform research teams, regulatory agencies, and funders to improve pediatric research.

    2026Pediatrics Open Science(2026)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    立即登录,查看全部 8820 篇论文

    合作机构(100)

    伦敦大学学院合作论文 288
    卢旺天主教大学合作论文 278
    牛津大学合作论文 134
    伦敦大学学院大奥蒙德街儿童健康研究所合作论文 120
    伦敦大学合作论文 120
    国王大学合作论文 119
    伦敦大学学院医院合作论文 114
    雅典国立和卡波迪斯蒂安大学合作论文 101
    剑桥大学合作论文 94
    布里斯托大学合作论文 83

    机构统计