• 学术搜索
  • 科研智能体
    • Research Labs
    • AI 阅读
    • AI 文库
    • 深度研究
    • 学者亮点
  • 学术资源
    • AI2000
    • 期刊/会议
    • 学者库
    • 学术API
    • 溯源树
    • 数据集
  • 知识沉淀
    • 学术空间
订阅小程序
旧版功能
aminer vip
开通会员低至0.73元/天
一次搞定AI科研
立即登录
  • English
  • 联系方式
    领

    领英

    LinkedIn
    企业
    749论文总数
    2.8万引用总数

    LinkedIn(领英),全球职场社交平台,是一家面向商业客户的社交网络(SNS),成立于2002年12月并于2003年启动,于2011年5月20日在美上市,总部位于美国加利福尼亚州山景城。网站的目的是让注册用户维护他们在商业交往中认识并信任的联系人,俗称“人脉”。用户可以邀请他认识的人成为“关系”(Connections)圈的人。截至2020年5月,领英的用户总量已经达到 6.9 亿以上,在中国拥有超过 5000 万名用户。 2014年2月25日,LinkedIn简体中文版网站正式上线,并宣布中文名为“领英”。 2016年6月13日,微软官方博客宣布,微软和 LinkedIn 公司已经达成了一项最终协议,微软将以每股196美元,合计262亿美元的全现金收购包括 LinkedIn 公司的全部股权和净现金。 2017年BrandZ全球最具价值品牌100强,领英(LinkedIn) 科技以135.94亿美元排名第79名。 2019年10月,Interbrand发布的全球品牌百强榜排名98 。

    论文量&引用量时间轴

    机构学者

    排序
    Ya Xu
    Ya Xu
    Google DeepMind
    论文:32引用:0H-index:0
    Deepak Agarwal
    Deepak Agarwal
    LinkedIn
    论文:27引用:0H-index:0
    Ron Kohavi
    Ron Kohavi
    Maven;J-Ventures Fund
    论文:20引用:0H-index:0
    Diane Tang
    Diane Tang
    Google
    论文:19引用:0H-index:0
    Liangjie Hong
    Liangjie Hong
    Nokia
    论文:18引用:0H-index:0
    Krishnaram Kenthapadi
    Krishnaram Kenthapadi
    Oracle
    论文:16引用:0H-index:0
    Jiawei Han
    Jiawei Han
    Siebel School of Computing and Data Science, The Grainger College of Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
    论文:13引用:0H-index:0
    Shaunak Chatterjee
    Shaunak Chatterjee
    Aliveo AI
    论文:11引用:0H-index:0
    Kinjal Basu
    Kinjal Basu
    Aliveo AI
    论文:11引用:0H-index:0

    论文(750)

    年份
    起
    –
    止
    排序
    1The Last Human-Written Paper: Agent-Native Research Artifacts
    Jiachen Liu, Jiaxin Pei, Jintao Huang,Chenglei Si,Ao Qu, Xiangru Tang, Runyu Lu,Lichang Chen, Xiaoyan Bai,Haizhong Zheng, Carl Chen, Zhiyang Chen,

    Scientific publication compresses a branching, iterative research process into a linear narrative, discarding the majority of what was discovered along the way. This compilation imposes two structural costs: a Storytelling Tax, where failed experiments, rejected hypotheses, and the branching exploration process are discarded to fit a linear narrative; and an Engineering Tax, where the gap between reviewer-sufficient prose and agent-sufficient specification leaves critical implementation details unwritten. Tolerable for human readers, these costs become critical when AI agents must understand, reproduce, and extend published work. We introduce the Agent-Native Research Artifact (ARA), a protocol that replaces the narrative paper with a machine-executable research package structured around four layers: scientific logic, executable code with full specifications, an exploration graph that preserves the failures compilation discards, and evidence grounding every claim in raw outputs. Three mechanisms support the ecosystem: a Live Research Manager that captures decisions and dead ends during ordinary development; an ARA Compiler that translates legacy PDFs and repos into ARAs; and an ARA-native review system that automates objective checks so human reviewers can focus on significance, novelty, and taste. On PaperBench and RE-Bench, ARA raises question-answering accuracy from 72.4

    2026引用:12
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    2LLaDA-MedV: Exploring Large Language Diffusion Models for Biomedical Image Understanding
    XUANZHAO DONG, Wenhui Zhu,Xiwen Chen, Zhipeng Wang, Peijie Qiu, Shao Tang,Xin Li,Yalin Wang

    Autoregressive models (ARMs) have long dominated the landscape of biomedical vision-language models (VLMs). Recently, masked diffusion models such as LLaDA have emerged as promising alternatives, yet their application in the biomedical domain remains largely underexplored. To bridge this gap, we introduce \textbf{LLaDA-MedV}, the first large language diffusion model tailored for biomedical image understanding through vision instruction tuning. LLaDA-MedV achieves relative performance gains of 7.855\% over LLaVA-Med and 1.867\% over LLaDA-V in the open-ended biomedical visual conversation task, and sets new state-of-the-art accuracy on the closed-form subset of three VQA benchmarks: 84.93\% on VQA-RAD, 92.31\% on SLAKE, and 95.15\% on PathVQA. Furthermore, a detailed comparison with LLaVA-Med suggests that LLaDA-MedV is capable of generating reasonably longer responses by explicitly controlling response length, which can lead to more informative outputs. We also conduct an in-depth analysis of both the training and inference stages, highlighting the critical roles of initialization weight selection, fine-tuning strategies, and the interplay between sampling steps and response repetition. All code and model weights will be released publicly to support future research.

    2026CVPR 2026(2026)引用:9
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    3Large Scale Retrieval for the LinkedIn Feed Using Causal Language Models
    Sudarshan Srinivasa Ramanujam, Antonio Alonso, Saurabh Kataria, Siddharth Dangi, Akhilesh Gupta,Birjodh Singh Tiwana, Manas Haribhai Somaiya, Luke Simon, David Byrne, Sojeong Ha, Sen Zhou, Andrei Akterskii,

    In large-scale recommendation systems like LinkedIn’s, the retrieval stage is critical for narrowing billions of potential candidates to a manageable subset for ranking. LinkedIn's feed now serves suggested content based on the topical interests of members, where 2000 candidates are retrieved from several million candidates with a latency budget of a few milliseconds and inbound QPS of several thousand per second. This paper presents a novel retrieval approach that fine tunes a large causal language model (Meta’s LLaMA 3) as a dual encoder to generate high quality embeddings for both users (members) and content (items), using only textual input. We describe the end to end pipeline, including prompt design for embedding generation, techniques for fine tuning at LinkedIn scale, and infrastructure for low latency, cost effective online serving. We share our findings on how quantizing numerical features in the prompt enables the information getting encoded in the embedding facilitating greater alignment between the retrieval and ranking layer. The system was evaluated using offline metrics and an online A/B test, which showed substantial improvements in member engagement. We observed significant gains among newer members, who often lack strong network connections, indicating that high-quality suggested content aids retention. This work demonstrates how generative language models can be effectively adapted for real time, high throughput retrieval in industrial applications.

    2026AAAI 2026(2026)引用:5
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    4Overconfident Errors Need Stronger Correction: Asymmetric Confidence Penalties for Reinforcement Learning
    Yuanda Xu, Hejian Sang, Zhengze Zhou, Ran He, Zhipeng Wang

    Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has become the leading paradigm for enhancing reasoning in Large Language Models (LLMs). However, standard RLVR algorithms suffer from a well-documented pathology: while they improve Pass@1 accuracy through sharpened sampling, they simultaneously narrow the model's reasoning boundary and reduce generation diversity. We identify a root cause that existing methods overlook: the uniform penalization of errors. Current approaches – whether data-filtering methods that select prompts by difficulty, or advantage normalization schemes – treat all incorrect rollouts within a group identically. We show that this uniformity allows overconfident errors (incorrect reasoning paths that the RL process has spuriously reinforced) to persist and monopolize probability mass, ultimately suppressing valid exploratory trajectories. To address this, we propose the Asymmetric Confidence-aware Error Penalty (ACE). ACE introduces a per-rollout confidence shift metric, c_i = log(pi_theta(y_i|x) / pi_ref(y_i|x)), to dynamically modulate negative advantages. Theoretically, we demonstrate that ACE's gradient can be decomposed into the gradient of a selective regularizer restricted to overconfident errors, plus a well-characterized residual that partially moderates the regularizer's strength. We conduct extensive experiments fine-tuning Qwen2.5-Math-7B, Qwen3-8B-Base, and Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct on the DAPO-Math-17K dataset using GRPO and DAPO within the VERL framework. Evaluated on MATH-500 and AIME 2025, ACE composes seamlessly with existing methods and consistently improves the full Pass@k spectrum across all three model families and benchmarks.

    2026CoRR(2026)引用:5
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    5OTPrune: Distribution-Aligned Visual Token Pruning Via Optimal Transport
    Xiwen Chen, Wenhui Zhu, Gen Li, Xuanzhao Dong, Yujian Xiong, Hao Wang, Peijie Qiu,Qingquan Song, Zhipeng Wang, Shao Tang,Yalin Wang,Abolfazl Razi

    Multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) achieve strong visual-language reasoning but suffer from high inference cost due to redundant visual tokens. Recent work explores visual token pruning to accelerate inference, while existing pruning methods overlook the underlying distributional structure of visual representations. We propose OTPrune, a training-free framework that formulates pruning as distribution alignment via optimal transport (OT). By minimizing the 2-Wasserstein distance between the full and pruned token distributions, OTPrune preserves both local diversity and global representativeness while reducing inference cost. Moreover, we derive a tractable submodular objective that enables efficient optimization, and theoretically prove its monotonicity and submodularity, providing a principled foundation for stable and efficient pruning. We further provide a comprehensive analysis that explains how distributional alignment contributes to stable and semantically faithful pruning. Comprehensive experiments on wider benchmarks demonstrate that OTPrune achieves superior performance-efficiency tradeoffs compared to state-of-the-art methods. The code is available at https://github.com/xiwenc1/OTPrune.

    2026CoRR(2026)引用:4
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    立即登录,查看全部 750 篇论文

    合作机构(100)

    微软合作论文 66
    谷歌合作论文 55
    伊利诺伊大学香槟分校合作论文 36
    斯坦福大学合作论文 23
    亚利桑那州立大学合作论文 18
    亚马逊合作论文 16
    卡内基梅隆大学合作论文 16
    克莱姆森大学合作论文 14
    Facebook 公司合作论文 13
    加利福尼亚大学伯克利分校合作论文 11

    机构统计