• 学术搜索
  • 科研智能体
    • Research Labs
    • AI 阅读
    • AI 文库
    • 深度研究
    • 学者亮点
  • 学术资源
    • AI2000
    • 期刊/会议
    • 学者库
    • 学术API
    • 溯源树
    • 数据集
  • 知识沉淀
    • 学术空间
订阅小程序
旧版功能
aminer vip
开通会员低至0.73元/天
一次搞定AI科研
立即登录
  • English
  • 联系方式
    M

    Magee-Womens Hospital,University of Pittsburgh Medical Center,UPMC Health System

    EST. 1911
    1,702论文总数
    4.2万引用总数

    UPMC Magee-Women's Hospital known simply as Magee-Womens Hospital, is a nationally ranked, 335-bed non-profit, full service specialty hospital located in South Oakland, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Magee-Womens is a part of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC). The hospital is near UPMC's flagship campus which houses Presbyterian and Montefiore. While the hospital is UPMC's primary facility for women's health, the hospital is a full service hospital that also serves men. As the hospital is a teaching hospital, it is affiliated with University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine.

    论文量&引用量时间轴

    机构学者

    排序
    Rohit Bhargava
    Rohit Bhargava
    Department of Bioengineering, The Grainger College of Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
    论文:87引用:0H-index:0
    Joseph Leo Kelley
    Joseph Leo Kelley
    Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Medical Center, Schools of the Health Sciences, University of Pittsburgh;Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
    论文:63引用:0H-index:0
    Alexander B. Olawaiye
    Alexander B. Olawaiye
    Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
    论文:59引用:0H-index:0
    Adam M. Brufsky
    Adam M. Brufsky
    Division of Malignant Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh;Comprehensive Breast Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh
    论文:51引用:0H-index:0
    Urvashi Surti
    Urvashi Surti
    Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
    论文:44引用:0H-index:0
    Paniti Sukumvanich
    Paniti Sukumvanich
    Dept Gynecol Oncol, UPMC Magee Womens Hosp
    论文:41引用:0H-index:0
    Robert Edwards
    Robert Edwards
    Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh;Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
    论文:38引用:0H-index:0
    Ronald R. Johnson
    Ronald R. Johnson
    Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh
    论文:37引用:0H-index:0
    Hyagriv Simhan
    Hyagriv Simhan
    Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Science, University of Pittsburgh;Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC
    论文:37引用:0H-index:0

    论文(1702)

    年份
    起
    –
    止
    排序
    1Camizestrant+CDK4/6 Inhibitor (cdk4/6i) for the Treatment of Emergent ESR1 Mutations During First-Line (1L) Endocrine-Based Therapy (ET) and Ahead of Disease Progression in Patients (pts) with HR+/HER2-advanced Breast Cancer (ABC): Phase 3, Double-Blind Ctdna-Guided SERENA-6 Trial
    Nicholas C. Turner,Erica L. Mayer,Yeon Hee Park,Wolfgang Janni,Cynthia X. Ma,Massimo Cristofanilli,Giampaolo Bianchini,Kevin Kalinsky,Hiroji Iwata,Stephen K. L. Chia,Peter A. Fasching,Adam Brufsky,

    LBA4 Background: ESR1 mutations ( ESR1 m) constitutively activate the estrogen receptor (ER) and are the most common mechanism of acquired resistance to aromatase inhibitor (AI) + CDK4/6i. Molecular monitoring by ctDNA analysis can detect the emergence of ESR1 m during 1L AI + CDK4/6i. Camizestrant, the next-generation selective ER degrader (SERD) and complete ER antagonist, has shown anti-tumor activity in pts with and without detectable ESR1 m. SERENA-6 is the first global registrational Phase 3 trial assessing a ctDNA-guided approach to detect the emergence of ESR1 m during 1L AI + CDK4/6i to inform a switch in therapy ahead of disease progression. Methods: Pts with HR+/HER2– ABC who had received ≥6 months of 1L AI (anastrozole/letrozole) + CDK4/6i (abemaciclib/palbociclib/ribociclib) were enrolled and had ctDNA tested for ESR1 m every 2–3 months, coinciding with routine imaging. At ESR1 m detection, pts without evidence of disease progression were randomized 1:1 to switch to camizestrant (75 mg) with continued CDK4/6i (type and dose maintained) + placebo for AI vs continuing AI + CDK4/6i + placebo for camizestrant. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed PFS (per RECIST v1.1). Prespecified interim analysis data cutoff was Nov 28, 2024. Results: 3,256 eligible pts were surveilled for ESR1 m using ctDNA until 315 eligible pts were randomized to switch to camizestrant (n=157) or continue with AI (n=158). All pts remained on the same CDK4/6i. ~50% of randomized pts had ESR1 m detected at the first ctDNA test. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between treatments. After 171 PFS events, hazard ratio for PFS was 0.44 (95% CI 0.31–0.60, p<0.00001; median PFS 16.0 vs 9.2 months). PFS benefit was consistent across subgroups. PFS rate at 12 months was 60.7% (95% CI 51.1–69.0) vs 33.4% (95% CI 24.9–42.2) and at 24 months was 29.7% (95% CI 19.0–41.2) vs 5.4% (95% CI 0.7–18.2). PFS2 hazard ratio was 0.52 (95% CI 0.33–0.81; 27% maturity). OS is immature (12%). Camizestrant + CDK4/6i was well tolerated with safety consistent with the known profiles of camizestrant, and of each CDK4/6i. Rates of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events were 1.3% for camizestrant and 1.9% for AI. Conclusions: Camizestrant + CDK4/6i guided by emergence of ESR1 m during 1L AI + CDK4/6i in pts with HR+/HER2– ABC resulted in a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS. SERENA-6 is the first global Phase 3 trial to demonstrate clinical utility of using ctDNA to detect and treat emerging resistance, ahead of disease progression. These findings represent a potential new treatment strategy to optimize and improve 1L patient outcomes. Clinical trial information: NCT04964934 .

    2026ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT(2026)引用:7
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    2P659: Improving Hereditary Cancer Risk Assessment: Systematic Reanalysis Supports Multigene Cancer Predisposition Panel over Single Cancer Panel
    Yinghong Pan, Patrick Danley, Evan Powell, Gregory Humphreys, Adalena Nanni, Marianne McGuire, Tamar Kramer, Phuong Mai, Alexander Yatsenko, Daniel Bellissimo, Fen Guo
    2026Genetics in Medicine Open(2026)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    3Contralateral Risk Reduction Mastectomy in Patients with Unilateral Breast Cancer Scheduled for Mastectomy: A Multidisciplinary Survey; Physicians’ Perspective
    Nina M Verghis,Kazim Senol,Shigeru Imoto, Claudine Ordoñez,Kristin Lupinacci,Jamila Alazhri,Alexander Mundinger,Carole Mathelin,Vahit Ozmen,Atilla Soran, Senologic International Society Working Group

    INTRODUCTION:The number of contralateral risk reduction mastectomies (RRM) continues to rise. Despite the existence of many guidelines, there is no general consensus on which patients should be considered for RRM. This survey was distributed among various breast specialists with the goal of evaluating current practices, perspectives, and attitudes towards RRM. METHODS:An English-language survey containing ten questions was designed and distributed electronically to members of the Senologic International Society (SIS). The findings of this survey align with existing research and also provide areas for further investigation. RESULTS:This survey demonstrates the different practices and viewpoints on RRM across various specialties and areas around the world. These variations highlight the need for uniform recommendations and further research to enhance patient outcomes and address the challenges of managing RRM patients.

    2026Clinical breast cancer(2026)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    4Diagnostic Accuracy of Entropy Based Image Analysis of Cervical Precancerous Cells.
    Jennifer Makin,Esther Elishaev, Steven M Durbin, Robert A Makin

    The objective of the study was to demonstrate the modified Bragg-Williams type analysis of digital microscopic images is an analytically valid methodology for classifying squamous cervical cytology. We analyzed 5318 single cell cervical cytology images from the SIPaKMeD and Herlev databases to calculate a Bragg-Williams order parameter (S2) using a pixel intensity histogram-based approach. A classification model for S2 was created to differentiate normal, LSIL and HSIL. A set of test images from different databases were blindly classified using defined ranges to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and areas under the curve. Results showed distinct ranges of S2 for Normal: 0.7181-0.8633 SD 0.1452, LSIL: 0.580-0.6626 SD 0.0826, and HSIL: 0.3289-0.550 SD 0.2211, with dysplastic cells exhibiting lower degrees of order. The S2 classification model was found to have 100% sensitivity and specificity over the sample set, demonstrating the suitability of the methodology for cervical cytology classification.

    2026Journal of biophotonics(2026)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    5Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Clinical Exome Sequencing: Insights and Outcomes from 822 Pediatric Diagnoses
    Yinghong Pan, Patrick Danley, Tamar Kramer, Mehrdad Noruzinia, Karen Buser, Alexander N Yatsenko, Daniel Bellissimo, Fen Guo

    Purpose: This retrospective study examined the clinical and genetic characteristics of pediatric patients undergoing clinical exome sequencing (ES) and evaluated the performance of a commercially available artificial intelligence (AI) platform that was integrated into our analysis pipeline. Methods: ES was performed in 822 consecutive patients at a single clinical laboratory. AI-based tools were used to jointly assess genetic information and the proband’s Human Phenotype Ontology terms to support variant prioritization during the initial case review. Results: A definitive molecular diagnosis was established in 22% (181 of 822) of index cases, while 40% (325 of 822) had variants of uncertain significance. Among those with a definitive diagnosis, 93% (168 of 181) had a single finding and 7% (13 of 181) had multiple findings. Of the 152 reported pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in the fully resolved cases, 98.7% were successfully flagged by AI, and 75.0% ranked among the top 10 “most likely” variants. Conclusion: Clinical ES provides a substantial diagnostic yield in complex pediatric disorders. Integration of AI-powered platforms can accelerate phenotype-driven variant prioritization and facilitate rare disease diagnostics, but underscores the need for careful validation and optimization in clinical workflows.

    2026Genetics in medicine open(2026)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    立即登录,查看全部 1702 篇论文

    合作机构(100)

    匹兹堡大学合作论文 518
    Magee-Womens Research Institute合作论文 51
    华盛顿大学合作论文 46
    University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine合作论文 44
    匹兹堡大学医学中心合作论文 36
    西北大学合作论文 26
    哥伦比亚大学合作论文 21
    UPMC Health System合作论文 20
    University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute合作论文 18
    密歇根大学合作论文 16

    机构统计