Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

This international, multidisciplinary consensus report represents the first effort to systematically define and characterize fatty pancreas. A key outcome of this endeavor was the recommendation to adopt "fatty pancreas" as the standardized and inclusive term to describe all forms of fat accumulation in the pancreas. This terminological consensus provides a critical foundation for unified reporting and clinical communication. Another major contribution of the report is the consensus on diagnostic imaging findings, which was based on radiological and endoscopic modalities. The proposed criteria aim to enhance consistency in clinical assessment and support the development of standardized research protocols. In addition to establishing terminology and diagnostic frameworks, the report also synthesizes current knowledge across a wide range of relevant domains. These include the etiology and epidemiology of fatty pancreas, as well as its associations with alcohol consumption, smoking, acute and chronic pancreatitis, pancreatic exocrine insufficiency, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and surgical outcomes. The potential links between fatty pancreas and neoplastic conditions such as intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and pancreatic cancer are also addressed, alongside the current understanding of its metabolic implications (beta-cell function and glucose homeostasis) and treatment strategies. Throughout the consensus process, a consistent theme emerged: the limited availability of high-quality, prospective clinical data. Therefore, many of the recommendations in this report are based on expert consensus rather than strong empirical evidence. As such, the statements require rigorous prospective validation before they can be adopted into routine clinical practice. This underscores a critical need for further research, particularly studies aimed at clarifying causal relationships, validating diagnostic tools, and determining the clinical relevance of fatty pancreas across diverse patient populations. This report serves as both a summary of our current understanding and a roadmap for future investigations, aiming to close existing knowledge gaps and guide evidence-based clinical practice in this emerging field.

Background Fatigue, impaired sleep quality and daytime sleepiness, common in neurodegenerative and immune-mediated diseases, are debilitating and have serious societal and economic implications. Currently, measurement of these symptoms largely relies on self-reported questionnaires, which are burdensome for patients and lack sensitivity, granularity and reliability. Methods Building on a preceding feasibility study and qualification advice of the European Medicines Agency, the Clinical Observational Study of the European project Identifying Digital Endpoints to Assess FAtigue, Sleep and acTivities of daily living in Neurodegenerative disorders and Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IDEA-FAST) investigates the relationship between digital and clinical parameters of the target concepts of fatigue, reduced sleep quality and daytime sleepiness. Results Between 2022 and 2025, 2000 people are being recruited at 24 European sites – 500 with Parkinson's disease, 500 with inflammatory bowel disease, 200 with each of the following diseases: Huntington's disease, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, primary Sjögren's syndrome and 200 healthy volunteers. Participants are followed over a 24-week period with four visits, each including a 1-week assessment phase at home using CE-certified digital health (including active and passive) technologies. The latter collect information on physical activity, physiology, cognition as well as social interaction and behaviour as core dimensions of the target concepts. Conclusion This study will help to develop reliable, valid and efficient digital endpoints of fatigue, impaired sleep quality and daytime sleepiness for use in future clinical studies and trials.

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), a potentially progressive form of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), increases risk of fibrosis progression, cirrhosis, and liver-related and cardiometabolic morbidity. The first licensed pharmacotherapies, resmetirom and semaglutide, mark a shift in management but practical guidance for real-world implementation is lacking. The British Association for the Study of the Liver and British Society of Gastroenterology MASLD special interest group developed consensus recommendations on patient selection, lifestyle management, and follow-up for MASLD-MASH-specific pharmacotherapy. 37 participants participated in a Delphi process where draft statements developed in working groups were anonymously rated, discussed, and refined. Consensus (≥80% agreement) was reached for 49 statements. The group agreed on the following general recommendation. Two-step non-invasive tests, including the Fibrosis-4 index and vibration-controlled transient elastography, are recommended to identify patients with presumed stage F2-F3 fibrosis (ie, at-risk MASH). Individuals with liver stiffness more than 10 kPa but without evidence of cirrhosis should be considered eligible for treatment. Lifestyle behaviour change intervention should accompany pharmacological treatment, delivered by suitably trained practitioners without delaying access to medication. Treatment discontinuation is advised with evidence of disease progression, cirrhosis development, or drug-induced liver injury. These recommendations offer pragmatic guidance to clinicians and consensus clinical opinion to regulatory bodies to support equitable and effective use of new MASLD-MASH therapies.

Background Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant cause of morbidity in children, particularly among hospitalized patients and those with chronic medical conditions. There is a lack of consensus on anticoagulant prophylaxis strategies. Objective These evidence-based guidelines from the American Society of Hematology (ASH) and the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) are intended to support patients and health care professionals in decisions about anticoagulant prophylaxis for pediatric VTE prevention. Methods ASH formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel that included 1 patient representative. The University of Kansas Health System supported the guideline development process, including systematic evidence reviews up to April 2025. Clinical questions and outcomes were prioritized according to their importance for clinicians and patients. The panel used the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach to assess certainty in the evidence and make recommendations. Results The panel agreed on 12 recommendations. For pediatric patients with solid cancer, who have experienced trauma, or who are critically ill, the panel issued conditional recommendations suggesting no anticoagulant prophylaxis. For pediatric patients with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, or those on long-term total parenteral nutrition, the panel issued conditional recommendations suggesting the use of anticoagulant prophylaxis. Other pediatric subgroups addressed included patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia or lymphoma, surgical and hospitalized patients, and those with a central venous access device. Conclusions High-quality data on anticoagulant prophylaxis for pediatric VTE prevention are scarce. Key research priorities include the development and validation of subgroups-specific VTE risk assessment models, and evaluation of the safety and efficacy of risk-stratified anticoagulant prophylaxis strategies across different pediatric subgroups.

OBJECTIVES:In England, there is a 'hard stop' to weekly tocilizumab (qwTCZ) therapy for GCA; this is currently 12 months but was extended during the COVID-19 pandemic subject to certain criteria for GCA relapse risk. Taking advantage of variation in practice, we aimed to compare outcomes of GCA patients who tapered-TCZ vs those who stopped abruptly (non-taper patients). METHODS:Secondary analysis of an English multicentre service evaluation of relapse after stopping qwTCZ for GCA. Time to relapse was compared between taper and non-taper patients. We examined outcomes according to whether they had been 'adequate responders' during qwTCZ therapy, defined as those in remission and on ≤5 mg prednisolone at qwTCZ cessation, without relapse whilst taking qwTCZ. RESULTS:We analysed 336 patients from 40 centres. Time to relapse after qwTCZ cessation was significantly longer in adequate responders than non-adequate responders (P = 0.0004). 17.0% (57/336) patients tapered to fortnightly TCZ after qwTCZ cessation, for a median of 6 (IQR 2-13) months. For adequate responders, time to relapse whilst taking tapered-dose TCZ was significantly longer compared with those in the non-taper group (P = 0.0231) based on a relatively small number of flares. There was no difference between the taper and non-tapered groups after tapered-TCZ was stopped (P = 0.8346). In contrast, time to relapse for non-adequate responders was similar in taper patients compared with non-taper patients (P = 0.4892). CONCLUSION:Tapering TCZ after qwTCZ cessation delayed relapse only during the tapering period, but only in adequate responders to qwTCZ. No lasting benefit was seen after tapering ended.