University of Atlanta

The deployment of artificial intelligence models at the edge is increasingly critical for autonomous robots operating in GPS-denied environments where local, resource-efficient reasoning is essential. This work demonstrates the feasibility of deploying small Vision-Language Models (VLMs) on mobile robots to achieve real-time scene understanding and reasoning under strict computational constraints. Unlike prior approaches that separate perception from mobility, the proposed framework enables simultaneous movement and reasoning in dynamic environments using only on-board hardware. The system integrates a compact VLM with multimodal perception to perform contextual interpretation directly on embedded hardware, eliminating reliance on cloud connectivity. Experimental validation highlights the balance between computational efficiency, task accuracy, and system responsiveness. Implementation on a mobile robot confirms one of the first successful deployments of small VLMs for concurrent reasoning and mobility at the edge. This work establishes a foundation for scalable, assured autonomy in applications such as service robotics, disaster response, and defense operations.

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models provide a unified framework for perception, language conditioning, and action generation, but many existing systems remain difficult to deploy in embedded robotic settings because of their computational requirements and inference latency. In this paper, we present LiteVLA-Edge, a deployment-oriented VLA pipeline for fully on-device inference on Jetson Orin-class hardware. Our approach combines supervised image-to-action fine-tuning in FP32 with post-training 4-bit GGUF quantization and GPU-accelerated inference through the runtime. Under our deployment configuration, LiteVLA-Edge achieves a mean end-to-end latency of 150.5 ms (approximately 6.6 Hz) while operating entirely offline within a ROS 2-integrated perception–reasoning–action pipeline. Rather than introducing a new policy objective, our contribution is a practical systems path for executing compact multimodal control models locally on embedded hardware while preserving modular interfaces between perception, reasoning, and actuation. These results establish timing feasibility for reactive language-conditioned control and provide a reproducible baseline for future task-level evaluation of on-device VLAs in robotics.

This paper investigates the effectiveness of small language models (SLMs) for agentic tasks (function/tool/API calling) with a focus on running agents on edge devices without reliance on cloud infrastructure. We evaluate SLMs using the Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) framework and describe parameter-driven optimization strategies that include supervised fine-tuning (SFT), parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT), reinforcement learning (RL)-based optimization, preference alignment via Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), and hybrid methods. We report results for models including TinyAgent, TinyLlama, Qwen, and xLAM across BFCL categories (simple, multiple, parallel, parallel-multiple, and relevance detection), both in live and non-live settings, and in multi-turn evaluations. We additionally detail a DPO training pipeline constructed from AgentBank data (e.g., ALFRED), including our conversion of SFT data to chosen-rejected pairs using TinyLlama responses as rejected outputs and manual validation. Our results demonstrate clear accuracy differences across model scales where medium-sized models (1-3B parameters) significantly outperform ultra-compact models (<1B parameters), achieving up to 65.74

This article uses Critical Race Theory to analyze personal narratives of police violence contained in NAACP correspondence from 1937 to 1965, focusing on how African American victims and their communities used storytelling to challenge dominant narratives of police legitimacy. Through thematic analysis of 93 cases drawn from NAACP archival records, three primary narrative practices are identified: bearing witness to state-sanctioned violence, naming perpetrators to assert agency, and constructing corrective stories that challenge dominant racialized narratives. These narratives document individual experiences while also reflecting broader patterns of violence, institutional non-response, and community-based resistance strategies. Personal testimonies function as counter-narratives that preserve collective memory, expose systemic abuse, and contest official accounts of policing. These findings underscore the power of narrative as both a historical record and an ongoing tool in struggles for police accountability.

Deployed language models are evaluated in a non-stationary environment: model versions, retrieval layers, safety systems, and real-world inputs all change over time. Static bias benchmarks remain useful, but they do not show how models frame newly emerging events for different prompted audiences. We introduce GPF-LIVENEWS, a streaming evaluation protocol and benchmark snapshot for auditing group-conditioned framing in open-ended LLM outputs. The protocol expands fresh BBC/Reuters news anchors across 42 identity labels and seven prompt families, then evaluates response bundles using semantic-sensitivity and sentiment-disparity signals. In a pilot over 12 monitoring runs and 23 hosted models, Policy/Action prompts produce the strongest semantic movement, while sentiment variation is flatter across dimensions and prompt families. The released artifact includes article metadata, prompt templates, instantiated prompts, model-output metadata, score tables, documentation, and reproduction scripts. We interpret all scores as observed-window audit signals for human review, not as permanent fairness rankings or direct proof of harmful bias.