• 学术搜索
  • 科研智能体
    • Research Labs
    • AI 阅读
    • AI 文库
    • 深度研究
    • 学者亮点
  • 学术资源
    • AI2000
    • 期刊/会议
    • 学者库
    • 学术API
      MCP&Skill
    • 溯源树
    • 数据集
  • 知识沉淀
    • 学术空间
订阅小程序
旧版功能
aminer vip
开通会员低至0.73元/天
一次搞定AI科研
立即登录
  • English
  • 联系方式
    Social Psychology

    Social Psychology

    JournalISSN 1864-9335eISSN 2151-2590中科院 心理学 4区

    年发文量

    研究主题

    论文(1253)

    排序
    1A Collaborative Omnibus Survey on the 2024 East German State Elections
    Christine Finn, Vladimir Bojarskich, Carla Grosche, Eva Walther,Tobias Rothmund

    Abstract: This paper provides a methodological report on the 2024 East German State Election Study (EGSES24), an online quota-sampled two-wave panel survey conducted in the context of the 2024 state elections in Thuringia, Saxony, and Brandenburg. Designed as a collaborative omnibus project, the study integrates multiple research contributions within a shared survey infrastructure. Data were collected in two waves, one before and one after the elections to capture political attitudes, electoral behavior, and processes of political radicalization. This report outlines the study design, sampling strategy, and fieldwork implementation, including quota fulfillment, panel attrition, and follow-up recruitment. It provides a transparent introduction to the secondary use and interpretation of the data in future research projects.

    2026
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    2Social Dominance Orientation and System Legitimacy Across Political Change
    Sarah Buhl

    Abstract: Prior research suggests that the association between social dominance orientation (SDO) and perceived system legitimacy depends on the alignment between individuals’ ideological preferences and the sociopolitical context. We tested this proposition in a two-wave longitudinal study conducted before and after the 2024 East German state elections in Thuringia, Saxony, and Brandenburg in a political context marked by a normative shift in a more antiegalitarian direction. Multilevel analyses revealed that the association between SDO and system legitimacy became significantly more positive following the elections, while overall legitimacy remained unchanged. These findings support an ideological-fit account of system legitimacy, showing that the relationship between ideological preferences and legitimacy judgments depends on their alignment with the surrounding sociopolitical context.

    2026
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    3Attentional Biases in Dispositional Mindfulness and Gratitude
    Joline Guitard,Annie Roy-Charland

    Dispositional mindfulness and gratitude are two individual differences suggested to be linked to attentional processes. The present study aimed to assess the presence of attentional biases associated with these two traits. Sixty-one participants completed an emotional dot-probe task while eye movements were recorded. Each of the 96 trials presented one emotional facial expression (fear, surprise, anger, sadness, disgust, or happiness) paired with a neutral face from the same encoder. Attentional biases were measured using dwell time and initial orienting, in addition to traditional probe response times. Results suggested that individuals high in mindfulness responded faster to probes than those low in mindfulness across all conditions, supporting the view that mindfulness enhances attentional control and cognitive flexibility. Moreover, the interaction between dispositional mindfulness and gratitude significantly predicted initial orienting toward sad stimuli, suggesting a moderation effect. Johnson–Neyman analyses suggested that the time taken to first fixate on sadness stimuli significantly increased as one’s level of mindfulness increased, but only f or individuals with high levels of gratitude. In light of these results, we propose the hypothesis that highly grateful individuals may avoid sad stimuli as a self-preservation strategy and that this tendency becomes more efficient as attentional control improves with mindfulness.

    2026
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    4The Importance Given to Personal Values Depends on Whether You Focus on Social Desirability or Utility
    Laurent Cambon

    The goal of this paper is to answer the following question: What personal values are most important to people? Building on Dubois and Beauvois’ model of social value, I try to show that the prioritization of personal values depends on the evaluative focus (social desirability versus social utility) one adopts. In two studies ( N total = 2019) asking participants to judge Schwartz’s personal values when adopting the two different evaluative foci, the results showed that self-transcendence (self-enhancement) values were systematically judged as more socially desirable (socially useful) than self-enhancement (self-transcendence) ones, with openness-to-change and conservation falling in between. These results may help resolve inconsistencies observed in the literature between works showing a general preference for self-transcendence values and others pointing to the centrality of self-enhancement values in the functioning of capitalist societies.

    2026
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    5Persuasion
    Daniel Frings
    2026
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    立即登录,查看全部 1253 篇论文

    高被引作者

    作者引用发文
    Brian Nosek25258
    Hans Ijzerman190411
    Richard A. Klein18444
    Thierry Devos17845
    Mark J. Brandt17588
    Jesse Chandler17204
    Michael J Bernstein17054
    Ratliff Kate A17005
    Natalia Frankowska16924
    Marek Vranka16804

    高产作者

    作者引用发文
    Jessica L. Collett68121
    Richard L. Schanck020
    Solomon E. Asch20318
    Robin R. Vallacher5118
    Bernard C. Ewer118
    Robbie M. Sutton34016
    John DeLamater63516
    Karen Douglas34415
    Jack H. Curtis213
    E. T. Krueger113

    相关期刊

    Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
    Personality and Social Psychology Review
    Psychological inquiry
    Advances in experimental social psychology
    Social influence
    European Review of Social Psychology
    European Journal Of Social Psychology
    International Review of Social Psychology
    Asian Journal Of Social Psychology
    Group Processes & Intergroup Relations