Abstract Data centers are a crucial factor in Germany’s economic performance and digital sovereignty. They form the physical foundation for the development of digital products, processes, and business models, and are therefore of great macroeconomic importance as basis for the growth of the data-driven economy. At the same time, they enable key applications in digital administration, artificial intelligence, industrial transformation, and data-intensive research – and are thus critical infrastructure for digital public services and future-proofing. Their expansion simultaneously increases pressure on energy and land resources, thereby intensifying existing competition for land use. From the perspective of potential host municipalities, the associated (opportunity) costs are often offset by only limited fiscal benefits. The reason is that the current structure of local business tax fails to provide a reliable revenue-based counterweight to local burdens.
Abstract Fake news are easy to create, spread rapidly across social media, and cause significant economic, social, and political damage. At the same time, combating false information proves difficult: psychological mechanisms, algorithmic amplification effects, and the limits of state intervention hinder effective countermeasures. The fight against disinformation will remain an enduring challenge for democratic societies, and no simple solutions are in sight.
Abstract Whether people use artificial intelligence (AI) does not depend solely on its technical capabilities. The decisive factor is how AI is embedded within social and institutional contexts. Transparent interests, effective means of control and clear accountability for data and outcomes shape cooperation, trust and responsible use. The aim of successful AI adoption should therefore not be maximum acceptance, but rather competent and legitimate use of AI.
Abstract The German healthcare system falls short in international comparisons of system efficiency. Costs seem disproportionate to outcomes. This article identifies the lack of a functioning market for innovative care management as a key cause. The lack of functionality in this market can be explained largely by two legal provisions which are problematic from an economic perspective. The first allows service providers to exercise market power when negotiating care programmes. The second, without any convincing need, restricts the setting of premiums that may be paid to insured persons for their participation in such programmes and the associated waiver of their freedom to choose their own doctor.
