OBJECTIVE:Stent graft induced aortic intimo-intimal intussusception (SAoII) during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) of type B aortic dissection (TBAD) is a rare complication. This study aimed to report reliable imaging features of SAoII to avoid such a potentially catastrophic event. This retrospective, multicentre observational analysis was registered as a Chinese Clinical Trial (ChiCTR2300073780). METHODS:Patients undergoing TEVAR for TBAD in three centres were reviewed from January 2014 to December 2022. SAoII was defined as intra-procedural partial or circumferential disruption of the aortic intima because of TEVAR, excluding those created by natural disease progression. The imaging features and management of SAoII were summarised. RESULTS:1 643 patients undergoing TEVAR for TBAD were reviewed. Among them, SAoII was observed in 20 patients (mean age, 44.5 ± 11.8 years; 16 men). TEVAR was performed in the acute phase (8 of 20), subacute phase (11 of 20), or chronic phase (1 of 20). Imaging features including displacement of the intima, wire, or delivery system were observed in eight (40%), floating endograft in 17 (85%), intussusception of the intima layer in 13 (65%), true lumen occlusions and visceral artery loss in three (15%), and a single lumen without intimal septa in three (15%) patients. SAoII was observed in 60% (12 of 20) after deployment of the stent graft, in 20% (4 of 20) after introduction of a stent graft delivery system, and in 20% (4 of 20) after the introduction of a super stiff wire. All patients who developed SAoII were endovascularly managed by an additional stent graft; no aortic related death was observed among these patients with SAoII during the median follow up of 51.5 months. CONCLUSION:SAoII is a rare but potentially fatal iatrogenic complication during or after TEVAR; endovascular interventions could be effective to manage this acute complication. Timely and accurate identification of decisive imaging features are key to successful treatment.

Background: The efficacy of excimer laser ablation (ELA) in de novo atherosclerotic lesions of lower extremity artery disease (LEAD) is unknown. Objectives: This real-world study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ELA combined with drug-coated balloon (DCB) versus DCB alone in LEAD patients. Methods: In this prospective, multicenter, real-world trial (ChiCTR2100051263), patients with de novo atherosclerotic lesions of LEAD were enrolled and allocated to either ELA + DCB or DCB-alone group in a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was 12-month primary patency, with secondary endpoints including technical success, clinically driven target lesion reintervention (CD-TLR), and changes in ankle-brachial index (ABI). Results: A total of 136 patients were enrolled in the study. At baseline, patients in the ELA + DCB group presented significantly higher Rutherford classification (3.7 ± 0.9 vs. 4.2 ± 1.0, p = 0.007) and longer mean lesion lengths (7.4 ± 2.5 cm vs. 8.4 ± 1.9 cm, p = 0.012). The ELA + DCB group demonstrated significantly superior 12-month primary patency (87.5% vs. 71.2%, p = 0.03) and technical success rates (92.7% vs. 79.4%, p = 0.046) compared to the DCB-alone group. Kaplan-Meier analysis further confirmed sustained patency benefit with ELA + DCB (p = 0.015). Conclusion: In this real-world trial, ELA appears to be a promising therapy for LEAD in terms of safety and efficacy. However, these findings need to be corroborated by larger, randomized studies. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. ### Clinical Trial URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/. Unique identifier: ChiCTR2100051263 ### Funding Statement This study was supported by Noncommunicable Chronic Diseases-National Science and Technology Major Project (grant no. 2023ZD0504300), the Postdoctoral Fellowship Program and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (grant no. BX20250267), Youth Fund of Fudan University Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital (grant no. ZSZP202413), Outstanding Resident Clinical Postdoctoral Program of Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 82270507). ### Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: This study design was approved by the Ethics Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects at Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. All included patients were informed about the nature of the study and gave their written informed consent. I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes The datasets analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Background The prognostic implication of initial focal contrast enhancement (FCE), including focal intimal disruption (FID) and intramural blood pool (IBP), in acute type B intramural hematoma (IMH) remain unclear. Objectives The purpose of this study was to compare the prognostic implications in IMH with or without FCE. Methods A total of 574 patients were enrolled. FID was defined as an intimal disruption with contrast-filled out-pouching from the aorta lumen with a communicating orifice of >3 mm, and IBP was defined as a localized contrast medium-filled pool inside the IMH. Results A total of 207 (36.1%) patients with initial FCE, including 132 (63.8%) FIDs and 75 (36.2%) IBPs, were identified. Patients with FCE accompanying IMH were more likely to have hypertension (P = 0.001), pleural effusion (P = 0.006), fewer aortic segments involved (P < 0.001), more adverse aortic events (AAEs) (P < 0.001), and fewer freedom from intervention (P = 0.002). Pleural effusion (HR: 1.79; 95% CI: 1.25-2.55; P = 0.001) and FCE (HR: 1.51; 95% CI: 1.12-2.02; P = 0.006) were identified to be the independent risk factors of AAEs. In the subgroup analysis, IMH with initial FID were more likely to progress than those with initial IBP (P < 0.001). FIDs located at the proximal descending aorta (HR: 2.95; 95% CI: 1.65-5.29; P < 0.001) were associated with AAEs. Conclusions Patients with FCE accompanying IMH were more likely to progress, especially in those initial FID localized at the proximal descending aorta. (Nature course and predictors of progression of intramural hematoma: A retrospective, multicenter study; ChiCTR2300073829).

Background: The treatment of atherosclerotic lesions in the popliteal artery is challenging. This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of excimer laser ablation (ELA) combined with drug-coated balloon (DCB) for these lesions. Methods: From June 2019 to December 2021, data of patients who underwent ELA combined with DCB in the popliteal artery were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, lesion characteristics, periprocedural complications, and follow-up information were analyzed. The primary endpoint was primary patency. Secondary endpoints included major amputation-free survival rate, technical success, bailout stenting, clinically-driven target lesion reintervention, improvement of ankle-brachial index (ABI), and Rutherford class. Results: A total of 61 patients were enrolled. The mean age was 73.4 +/- 11.7 years. 20 (32.8%) patients had stenotic lesions, while 41 (67.2%) patients had chronic total occlusions. The mean length of these lesions was 7.3 +/- 2.8 cm. Procedure technical success rate was 95.1%. Bailout stent was performed in 3 (4.9%) patients. Intraprocedural distal embolization occurred in 3 (4.9%) patients, while flow limiting dissections occurred in 3 (4.9%) patients. The mean ABI was significantly improved from 0.45 +/- 0.13 at baseline to 0.90 +/- 0.12 after ELA, 0.88 +/- 0.11 at 6 months and 0.85 +/- 0.12 at 12 months during the follow-up period. The median follow-up time was 28.2 +/- 6.1 months. Reintervention was performed in 5 (8.2%) patients. The 2-year primary patency was 83.5%. Conclusions: ELA combined with DCB is a safe and effective strategy in the treatment of popliteal artery atherosclerotic lesions with low rates of bail-out stenting and high primary patency.

Objective: Midaortic syndrome is a rare clinical condition that has been mainly studied in juveniles through case reports and series. This study aims to report the anatomic characteristics and long-term outcomes of 41 adult patients with midaortic syndrome who received open surgical treatment or endovascular treatment over a 14-year period. Methods: A consecutive cohort of 41 adult patients diagnosed with midaortic syndrome at our center between January 2008 and November 2021 were enrolled in the study. Patients' baseline and anatomic characteristics were collected and analyzed. Primary follow-up outcomes included death and reintervention. Other follow-up outcomes included hypertension and complications. Results: The study enrolled 41 adult patients with midaortic syndrome with a mean age of 37.5 +/- 13.4 years. Twenty-five patients received open surgical treatment, and 16 patients received endovascular treatment. Isolated infrarenal lesions were more likely to be found in the endovascular treatment group (P = .005), whereas patients with multiple (P = .002) or intravisceral involvement (P = .001) were more likely to be found in the open surgical treatment group. The open surgical treatment group was more likely to have a lower postoperative peak systolic pressure gradient (P = .020). The 5- and 10-year reintervention-free survivals were 87.7% and 71.7% in the open surgical treatment group and 92.3% and 79.1% in the endovascular treatment group, respectively. Conclusions: Both open surgical treatment and endovascular treatment showed satisfactory long-term efficacy outcomes for adult patients with midaortic syndrome. Given the patients' relatively young age and long life expectancy, strict and regular lifelong follow-up is necessary. (JTCVS Open 2024;19:1-8)

PURPOSE:To report the outcomes of the IN-DEPT trial assessing the feasibility, preliminary safety data, and 12-month outcomes of a new drug-coated balloon (DCB) product for peripheral artery disease (PAD) in Chinese patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS:This is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm clinical trial. A total of 160 patients with superficial femoral artery (SFA) and/or proximal popliteal artery lesions were treated with a new paclitaxel-coated DCB. The preliminary effectiveness end point was 12-month primary patency. The primary safety end point was freedom from device- and procedure-related mortality over 30 days and freedom from major target limb amputation and clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) within 12 months after the index procedure. RESULTS:In total, 160 patients presented with 162 target lesions. A total of 139 lesions (85.8%) were treated with 1 DCB, whereas the other 23 lesions (14.2%) were treated with 2 devices. The device success rate was 100%. A total of 135 subjects reached the preliminary effectiveness end point, with a 12-month primary patency rate of 84.4%. There was no 30-day device- or procedure-related death or unplanned major target limb amputation at 12 months. Five CD-TLRs (3.1%) occurred during the 12-month follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS:Results from the IN-DEPT SFA trial showed satisfactory feasibility and safety of the new DCB over 12 months in Chinese patients with PAD and femoropopliteal de novo lesions, including both stenoses and total occlusions.

Background: The results of excimer laser ablation (ELA) combining with drug-coated balloon (DCB) in the treatment for atherosclerotic obliterans (ASO) remains unclear. Methods: Retrospectively enrolled patients who underwent ELA combined with DCB in 2 centers. The primary endpoint was primary patency, and secondary endpoints included technical success, procedure-related complications, major amputation, clinically driven target lesions reintervention (CD-TLR), measurements of ankle-brachial index (ABI), and quality of life (QoL). Results: 102 patients were enrolled. The primary patency was 86.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 72.9%-89.0%) at 12 months and 82.6% (95% CI: 78.2%-92.1%) at 24 months. The freedom from reintervention was 87.8% (95% CI: 79.5%-92.9%) at 12 months and 86.6% (95% CI: 78.1%-92.0%) at 24 months. The ABI measurement and QoL were significantly improved at each follow-up point. Sixteen (15.7%) patients lost the primary patency. Patients losing the primary patency demonstrated higher Rutherford class (P = 0.004), worse runoff (P < 0.001), higher Peripheral Arterial Calcium Scoring System (PACSS) (P < 0.001), and smaller ratio of tube diameter to reference vessel diameter (TD/RVD) (P < 0.001) compared with patients without losing it. The run-off >= 7 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 34.3; 95% CI: 2.9-398.3; P = 0.005) and TD/RVD <4.9 (aOR: 24.7; 95% CI: 1.7-359.5; P = 0.019) were independent risk factors for loss of primary patency. Conclusions: ELA combined with DCB seemed an effective and safe treatment for ASO of lower extremity, and it could not only reduce the implantation of stent but significantly improve QoL. The run-off >= 7 and TD/RVD <4.9 were independent risk factors for loss of primary patency.

Objective:To investigate the safety and efficacy of excimer laser ablation (ELA) combined with drug-coated balloon (DCB) for the below-the-knee (BTK) artery lesions.Methods:From Jun 2019 to Nov 2022, 22 patients receiving ELA combined with DCB in atherosclerotic lesions of BTK artery at these two centers were retrospectively analyzed.Results:In these 22 patients there were 3 (13.6%) suffering from stenosis and 19 (86.4%) from chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesions. The mean length of lesion was (25.6±5.7) cm. The technical success rate was 95.5%. Flow-limiting dissection was found in 1 (4.5%) patient and a bailout stent was deployed. The mean ankle-brachial index (ABI) significantly improved during the follow-up period compared with that before the treatment. The median follow-up time was 21.5 months. The 1-year primary patency rate was 80.3%Conclusion:ELA combined with DCB was safe and effective in the treatment of atherosclerotic lesions of BTK artery, improving the primary patency.

PURPOSE:To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of excimer laser ablation (ELA) combined with drug-coated balloon (DCB) for atherosclerotic obliterans (ASO) of the lower extremities.MATERIALS AND METHODS:From June 2019 to December 2020, all eligible patients were enrolled. Demographics, characteristics of lesions, complications, and follow-up information were collected and analyzed. The primary endpoint was major amputation-free survival (MAFS). Secondary endpoints included technical success, primary patency, bailout stent, distal embolization, target lesion reintervention (TLR), and ulcer healing rate. Major amputation-free survival and primary patency were calculated by Kaplan-Meier analysis.RESULTS:A total of 71 patients were enrolled. Forty-eight (81.7%) patients presented critical limb ischemia (CLI) and 48.6% of them was calcification class 4 according to Peripheral Arterial Calcium Scoring System (PACSS). Chronic totally occluded (CTO) disease was the most common lesion in 66.0% of them and superficial femoral artery (SFA) was the most common segment in 59.6%. Technical success rate was 93.0%. One-year follow-up was finished in 25 (35.2%) patients. The primary patency and MAFS were 92.0%±27.6% and 96.0%±20.0% at 12 months, respectively. During the mean follow-up of 9.4±4.3 months, clinically-driven TLR occurred in 2 (2.8%) patients, and major and minor amputation occurred in 2 (2.8%) and 1 (1.4%) patient, respectively.CONCLUSION:The early results demonstrated that ELA was an effective treatment in de novo, in-stent restenosis (ISR) and CTO lesions. Meanwhile, ELA could prepare the lumen for the use of DCB and reduce the implantation of stents, especially in segments unsuitable for stenting. Mid-term and long-term results need to be awaited.

Objectives Behçet’s disease (BD) is a multisystem inflammatory disorder with unknown etiology, and its aneurysmal lesions are associated with high mortality due to the high risk of rupture. This study intended to further explore the long-term safety and efficacy of endovascular therapy for BD-related aortic pseudoaneurysm (BAP). Methods From January 2009 to May 2021, 17 BAP patients who underwent endovascular repair were retrospectively identified and enrolled. Adequate immunosuppressive treatment was instituted before and after endovascular treatment unless emergency surgery was required. The patients were followed up at 3, 6, and 12 months and yearly after the primary endovascular intervention by computed tomography angiography (CTA) examination. Results Nineteen BAPs were identified among 17 patients. BAPs located at the aortic arch were found in three patients (17.6%), descending thoracic aorta in 5 (29.4%), and abdominal aorta in 10 (58.8%; suprarenal abdominal aorta in 2 [11.8%], and infrarenal abdominal aorta in 8 [47.1%]). The mean ESR during admission was 56.5 ± 24.9 mm/h (range = 30.0–120.0 mm/h), which fell to 22.7 ± 18.4 mm/h (range = 2.0–74.0 mm/h) before the endovascular intervention ( p < 0.001). The rate of favorable immunosuppressive control before intervention is 76.5% (13/17). Technical success was achieved in all patients. Median follow-up time was 57.0 months (interquartile range [IQR] = 21.3–67.3 months). Pseudoaneurysm recurrence was observed in four patients, type I endoleak in one, pseudoaneurysms sac dilation in one, and external iliac artery occlusion in 1. Two patients died of pseudoaneurysm rupture. Five-year accumulated overall rate, recurrence-free rate, and reintervention-free survival rate of BAP patients were 92.8%, 75.4%, and 71.8%, respectively. Conclusion Endovascular treatment in BAP patients seemed to be associated with long-term safety and efficacy with a 5-year overall survival rate of 92.8%. Adequate immunosuppressive treatment was essential for BAP patients to prevent aortic pseudoaneurysm recurrence and improve the prognosis.

The study aimed at investigating the association between postoperative inflammatory scores and aorta-related adverse events (AAEs) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for patients with type B aortic dissection (TBAD). This single-centre, retrospective cohort included all patients who underwent TEVAR for TBAD between November 2016 and November 2020 at a university hospital. The risk factors for AAEs were analyzed by Cox proportional hazards model regression. Prediction accuracy was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves. This study included 186 patients with a mean age of 58.5 years and a median follow-up period of 26 months. A total of 68 patients developed AAEs. Age and postoperative systemic immune inflammation index (SII) (>2893) were associated with post-TEVAR AAEs (hazard ratio (HR) 1.03, p = 0.003; HR 1.88, p = 0.043, respectively). Increased postoperative SII and age are independent risk factors for AAE post-TEVAR in patients with TBAD.

OBJECTIVE Type B aortic dissection (TBAD) is a life-threatening condition, and it takes heavy burden to family and society. Return to work (RTW) not only means patients' physical health but also demonstrates their mental well-being. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has been successful in treatment of TBAD patients. However, less studies have addressed on the social functional recovery of TBAD after TEVAR, especially for RTW. METHODS From January 1, 2017 to January 1, 2021, TBAD patients who underwent TEVAR and completed a 12-month follow-up were retrospectively enrolled. Primary outcome was RTW. Patients' demographic, sociological, and clinical characteristics, and so on were recorded to analyze and demonstrate independent risk factors for RTW. RESULTS Four hundred thirty-two TBAD patients (388 males) were enrolled with a mean age of 48.3±8.9 years (ranged from 19 to 60 years). The 12-month cumulative RTW rate was 62.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 57.2%-67.8%). Age <50 years (odds ratio [OR]=3.675, 95% CI: 1.436-9.405) was identified as independent protective factors for RTW, while preoperative job as manual workers (OR=0.101, 95% CI: 0.029-0.353), average annual income, <30 000 Chinese Yuan (CNY) [<4400 US dollar], (OR=0.186, 95% CI: 0.054-0.637), complicated TBAD (malperfusion) (OR=0.246, 95% CI: 0.092-0.659), and distal stent graft-induced new entry (SINE) (OR=0.218, 95% CI: 0.083-0.575, p=0.002) were identified as independent risk factors. CONCLUSION Approximately 64% of our patients were able to RTW in the 12 months post-TEVAR for TBAD. Younger patients, patients with less physically demanding jobs, and patients with less complex surgeries were more likely to RTW. Based on these results, more can be done to facilitate the patient's ability and willingness to RTW after TEVAR. CLINICAL IMPACT Type B aortic dissection (TBAD) is a life-threatening condition that poses significant burden on both individuals and society. The ability to return to work (RTW) not only reflects the patient's physical health but also indicates their mental well-being. Therefore, identifying risk factors for RTW and promoting the reintegration of TBAD patients into the workforce is crucial in clinical practice.To our knowledge, this study is the first to elucidate and predict the RTW outcomes of TBAD patients who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR).

Objective: To evaluate the mid-term outcomes of thoracic endovascular aorta Methods: Between January 2009 and December 2019, patients with MFS who underwent TEVAR for TBAD were enrolled. Demographic data, preoperative and perioperative clinical profiles, and follow-up data were collected and analyzed. The cumulative survival and freedom from reintervention rates were calculated with Results: A total of 26 patients were enrolled. The mean age was 38.5 + 10.7 (range, 24-64 years). The in-hospital mortality was 0. The cumulative survival rate was 88.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 67.5%-98.5%) at 5 years and 82.9% (95% CI, 60.2%-93.3%) at 10 years. Patients with a thrombosed false lumen (FL) along the length of the stent had a significantly higher cumulative survival rate (P < .05) and freedom from reintervention (P = .01) than patients with patent FL. The freedom from reintervention was 83.4% (95% CI, 61.4% to 93.4%) at 5 years and 50.3% (95% CI, 21.4%-97.3%) at 10 years. There was no significant difference freedom from reintervention in freedom from reintervention between patients with and those without a previous aortic root procedure (P = .46). Conclusions: TEVAR can be performed safely and effectively for TBAD in patients with MFS. Perioperative mortality and morbidity were low; however, lifelong close follow-up in the clinic and imaging are mandatory to prevent aortic rupture. Patients with a patent FL were at high risk of late death. (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2023;165:1999-2007)

Background The treatment of chronic type B aortic dissection by thoracic endovascular aortic repair has some challenges, and its long‐term outcomes remain unclear. This study aimed to analyze the 5‐year clinical outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair of chronic type B aortic dissection, compare the differences between patients with and without adverse aortic events (AAEs), and identify risk factors for AAEs. Methods and Results Patients who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair of chronic type B aortic dissection from January 2009 to June 2017 were retrospectively enrolled. The primary end points were AAEs, including aorta‐related death, procedural complications, and disease progression requiring reintervention. Clinical outcomes were described at the 5‐year follow‐up visit. The secondary end point was the comparison of the results between patients with and without AAEs. Univariable and multivariable logistic analyses were used to identify potential risk factors for AAEs. A total of 214 patients were enrolled. AAEs occurred in 46 (21.5%) patients. Compared with patients without AAEs, those with AAEs had higher rates of residual type A aortic dissection (26.1% versus 4.2%, P <0.001) and aortic diameter ≥5.5 cm (69.6% versus 11.3%, P <0.001), and a lower rate of complete false lumen thrombosis (23.9% versus 89.9%, P <0.001). Meanwhile, the median interval from symptom onset to intervention was longer in patients with AAEs (26 months versus 12 months, P =0.004). Partial or no false lumen thrombosis (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 14.71 [95% CI, 5.67–38.14; P <0.001]) and aortic diameter ≥5.5 cm (AOR, 10.16 [95% CI, 3.86–26.73; P <0.001]) were identified as independent risk factors for AAEs. Conclusions While thoracic endovascular aortic repair of chronic type B aortic dissection might be challenging in some cases, its long‐term outcomes appeared promising as this treatment was effective in preventing catastrophic aortic events. Patients with AAEs showed higher rates of residual type A aortic dissection and aortic diameter ≥5.5 cm, a lower rate of complete false lumen thrombosis, and a longer median interval from symptom onset to intervention. Failure of complete false lumen thrombosis and an aortic diameter ≥5.5 cm were predictors of AAEs.

Objective To investigate the risk factors for unrelieved malperfusion after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) alone. Methods From January 2009 to December 2019, 86 patients with type B aortic dissection-induced malperfusion were enrolled. Demographics and clinical and imaging data, as well as treatment outcomes, were collected and compared between patients with malperfusion relieved by TEVAR alone (TR) or by TEVAR with adjunctive procedures (TA). Results Among the 86 enrolled patients, 17 (19.8%) had malperfusion requiring TA. Patients in the TA group were more likely to suffer lower limb ischemia (P = .004), present with severe ischemia (P = .003), and have more than one end-organ ischemia (P = .015). There were more involved vessels classified as the mixed type in the TA group (P = .002). Mixed ischemia was the only independent risk factor for malperfusion requiring TA (odds ratio, 4.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-17.2; P = .017). The ischemia-related in-hospital mortality rate of the TA group was significantly higher than that of the TR group (P = .023), and malperfusion requiring TA was the only risk factor in the multivariate logistic regression (odds ratio, 14.6; 95% CI, 1.4-150.5; P = .025). The 5-year overall cumulative survival rates were 82.4% (95% CI, 66.1%-100.0%) in the TA group and 89.5% (95% CI, 81.6%-98.1%) in the TR group (P = .294). Conclusions Type B aortic dissection-induced malperfusion requiring TA was associated with a higher ischemia-related in-hospital mortality rate. Mixed obstruction was an independent risk factor for unrelieved malperfusion after TEVAR alone, and early identification of potential patients requiring TA could thereby be achieved. Reasonable treatment strategies could contribute to the successful management of malperfusion requiring TA.

With high rates of morbidity and mortality

目的 探讨主动脉腔内修复术(endovascular aorta repair,EVAR)治疗孤立性腹主动脉夹层(isolated abdominal aortic dissection,IAAD)的临床效果.方法 回顾性分析2011年1月至2021年1月在复旦大学附属中山医院血管外科接受EVAR治疗的53例IAAD患者的临床资料,随访术后生存、并发症及二次干预情况等.用SPSS统计软件进行统计描述,应用Kaplan-Meier法计算累计生存率和免于二次干预率.结果 53例患者均成功接受EVAR治疗,其中1例术后因心包积液死亡,围手术期死亡率为1.9％.52例获得随访,平均随访(54.9±38.9)个月.随访期内死亡3例,无IAAD相关死亡.1、3、5和10年累计生存率为98.1％、98.1％、91.4％、87.1％,免于IAAD病死率均为98.1％,免于二次干预率均为91.9％.结论 EVAR治疗IAAD具有良好的安全性、有效性,远期疗效较为理想.

Objective:To discuss the strategies of distal embolic filter protection(DEFP) during excimer laser ablation (ELA) or percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) in treatment of peripheral artery disease.Methods:Clinical data of 29 patients undergoing ELA or PMT under the DEFP from Oct 2019 to Aug 2021 were retrospectively collected to analyze the strategies of DEFP and high-risk factors of capturing clinically significant macrodebris.Results:There were 21 males and 8 females, aged (70.3±11.0) years with 32 lesions (29 limbs) including 5 in-stent restenosis (ISR), 10 thrombosis and 17 chronic total occlusion (CTO). The technical success rate of DEFP device release and recovery was 100%. The overall debris capture rate was 77.3% and the macrodebris capture rate was 36.4%. Even with DEFP the distal embolization (DE) incidence was 3.4%. When ELA for CTO with severe calcification or long-segment ISR lesions, the capture rate of macrodebris was as high as 60.0%, and the former was significantly higher than ELA for CTO without high calcification lesions ( P<0.05). Conclusion:ELA or PMT under the DEFP in treatment of peripheral artery disease appears to be of great significance in preventing DE.