Alterations in 3D chromatin conformation may disrupt the interplay between promoters and distal enhancers. How gene regulatory circuits are reshaped during ionizing radiation-induced tumorigenesis remains unclear, and little is known about the mediators that drive these processes. To decipher the chromatin alterations in radiation-induced lung cancer, we performed ATAC-seq, RNA-seq and Hi-C analyses of human bronchial epithelial cells and corresponding radiation-induced malignantly transformed cell lines. We found that this malignant transformation is accompanied by chromatin switching from the inactive B compartment to the active A compartment, an increased number of TADs and gained ATAC-seq peaks that mediate new distal chromatin contacts. We identified tumour protein 63 (TP63) as a mediator of new chromatin-accessible sites that anchor tumour-specific chromatin contacts in radiation-induced tumour cells. A TP63-mediated accessible chromatin site anchors a tumour-specific TAD boundary and multiple tumour-specific chromatin loops, which might underlie MYC oncogene activation during malignant transformation.
center dot Pemigatinib has demonstrated significant efficacy as a second-line treatment for patients with FGFR abnormalities in advanced cholangiocarcinoma. center dot There are currently no proven drugs specifically targeting FGFR aberration in patients with advanced NSCLC. center dot The results suggest that pemigatinib could be considered for patients with FGFR-aberrant advanced lung cancer and further research is warranted to identify the specific FGFR aberrations that may be more responsive to pemigatinib.
IntroductionThe causality between personality and psychiatric traits and lung cancer (LC) remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to elucidate the causality between these traits and LC.MethodsBidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) and bibliometric approaches were conducted to estimate the causality between personality (neuroticism, extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and openness) and psychiatric (schizophrenia, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder [ADHD], major depressive disorder, autism spectrum disorder, bipolar disorder, insomnia, and anxiety) traits and LC and its subtypes (lung squamous cell carcinoma, lung adenocarcinoma, and small cell LC). Summary data of these traits were extracted from large datasets (17,375–462,341 participants). Inverse variance weighting was used as the primary MR analysis, with supplementary models, including MR-Egger and weighted medians. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to detect pleiotropy. Bibliometric data were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, and PubMed. The main mapping techniques adopted were co-word, collaboration, and citation analyses.ResultsSchizophrenia was associated with an increased risk of LC (odds ratio [OR] = 1.077, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.030–1.126, P = 0.001). Moreover, LC increased the risk of ADHD (OR = 1.221, 95% CI = 1.096–1.362, P < 0.001). No significant bidirectional associations were observed between other mental traits and LC and its subtypes. Causality, psychiatry, and psychiatric comorbidity are emerging keywords. Research dynamics and landscapes were revealed.ConclusionThis study suggests that schizophrenia is a risk factor for LC and that LC is a risk factor for ADHD. Furthermore, causality, psychiatry, and psychiatric comorbidity have become emerging research trends in related fields.
Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) presents significant clinical and therapeutic challenges due to its aggressive nature and generally poor prognosis. We initiated a Phase II clinical trial (ChiCTR1900027160) to assess the efficacy of a pioneering neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy regimen comprising programmed death-1 (PD-1) blockade (Toripalimab), nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel), and the oral fluoropyrimidine derivative S-1, in patients with locally advanced ESCC. This study uniquely integrates clinical outcomes with advanced spatial proteomic profiling using Imaging Mass Cytometry (IMC) to elucidate the dynamics within the tumor microenvironment (TME), focusing on the mechanistic interplay of resistance and response. Sixty patients participated, receiving the combination therapy prior to surgical resection. Our findings demonstrated a major pathological response (MPR) in 62% of patients and a pathological complete response (pCR) in 29%. The IMC analysis provided a detailed regional assessment, revealing that the spatial arrangement of immune cells, particularly CD8+ T cells and B cells within tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS), and S100A9+ inflammatory macrophages in fibrotic regions are predictive of therapeutic outcomes. Employing machine learning approaches, such as support vector machine (SVM) and random forest (RF) analysis, we identified critical spatial features linked to drug resistance and developed predictive models for drug response, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 97%. These insights underscore the vital role of integrating spatial proteomics into clinical trials to dissect TME dynamics thoroughly, paving the way for personalized and precise cancer treatment strategies in ESCC. This holistic approach not only enhances our understanding of the mechanistic basis behind drug resistance but also sets a robust foundation for optimizing therapeutic interventions in ESCC.
Background and Objective:Lung cancer, mainly non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), is a serious threat to human life. In particular, the prognosis for advanced patients is poor, with the 5-year survival rate being exceedingly low. In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibition has changed the pattern of the treatment of a variety of cancers, including lung cancer; however, not all patients can benefit from immunotherapy, and thus finding the right biomarkers is particularly important for guiding precise treatment. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is one of the most valuable biomarkers for predicting the efficacy of lung cancer immunotherapy. Several studies have confirmed that patients with high PD-L1 expression are more likely to benefit from immunotherapy, but there is a high proportion of people with negative PD-L1 expression constituting a patient population that cannot be ignored. This article reviews the distribution of PD-L1 expression, the methods for evaluating PD-L1, and the effectiveness of immunotherapy for advanced NSCLC with negative PD-L1 expression.Methods:We performed a literature review to identify relevant data published until September 2022. In order to organize related information, we searched for literature in PubMed; abstracts and reports published in the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), the World Conference on Lung Cancer (WCLC), and other congresses; and clinical trial information registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. Information on the distribution of PD-L1 expression, detection of PD-L1, and immunotherapy efficacy for NSCLC with negative PD-L1 expression was collated and reviewed.Key Content and Findings:The incidence of PD-L1 expression in patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC is similar in all regions of the world, but PD-L1 expression level is associated with certain clinicopathological features. The expression of PD-L1 can be evaluated by various detecting methods. Some immunotherapy regimens have better efficacy than traditional chemotherapy in patients with negative PD-L1 expression.Conclusions:Patients with NSCLC and negative PD-L1 expression can receive better survival benefits under some immunotherapy types, and these may represent a better treatment option for this relatively small patient population.
ImportanceBoth pembrolizumab and sintilimab have been approved by the Chinese State Drug Administration (NMPA) for the first-line treatment of patients with advanced squamous lung cancer. The differences of the two drugs in efficacy and safety are unclear. ObjectivesTo compare the real-world efficacy and safety of first-line treatments in patients with advanced squamous lung cancer. Materials and methodsThis was a retrospective review of patients with advanced squamous carcinoma who received sintilimab or pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy as first-line therapy between June 2018 and April 2022 in the Chinese PLA Hospital. The primary objective was to compare the objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) between the two groups. Secondary objectives were to compare the disease control rate (DCR) and to analyze adverse events (AEs) between the two groups. ResultsA total of 164 patients were enrolled, including 63 patients (38.4%) in the sintilimab-combined chemotherapy group and 101 patients (61.6%) in the pembrolizumab-combined chemotherapy group. The ORR was 65.10% in the sintilimab group and 61.40% in the pembrolizumab group (P=0.634). The DCR was 92.10% and 92.10% in the sintilimab and pembrolizumab groups, respectively (P=0.991). The median PFS was 22.2 months for patients treated with sintilimab group compared with 16.5 months for patients treated with pembrolizumab group[hazard ratio (HR) = 0.743; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.479-1.152; P = 0.599]. Patients treated with pembrolizumab did not achieve a median OS, and patients treated with sintilimab had a median OS of 30.7 months. In the sintilimab group, the incidence of all treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) was 92.1% (58/63), and the incidence of grade 3-4 TRAEs of 42.9% (27/63). In the pembrolizumab group, the incidence of all TRAEs was 90.1% (91/101), and the incidence of grade 3-4 TRAEs was 37.6% (38/101). ConclusionIn the clinical treatment of Chinese patients with advanced squamous lung cancer, first-line treatment with sintilimab in combination with chemotherapy provided similar efficacy to pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy, and the treatment-related adverse effect profiles were comparable between the two groups, including similar rates of grade 3-4 and all adverse events.
e21058 Background: Currently, the standard first-line treatment for driver gene-negative advanced lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy followed by pemetrexed and ICI. However, pemetrexed is prone to certain adverse reactions and needs to be pretreated. At present, there is no relevant study on the efficacy between pemetrexed combined with ICI and ICI monotherapy in maintenance treatment. The object of this study is to explore the efficacy and safety of ICI as maintenance therapy in such patients. Methods: The study retrospectively analyzed patients with driver gene-negative advanced LUAD in PLA General Hospital from January 2019 to June 2022. These patients had received pemetrexed and platinum-based chemotherapy combined with ICI for 4-6 cycles. Patients who didn’t progress were subsequently entered into maintenance stage. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) and safety. Results: A total of 93 patients with advanced LUAD who received first-line chemotherapy combined with ICI were collected, including 39 patients receiving pemetrexed plus ICI of maintenance therapy, 30 patients receiving ICI maintenance therapy, and 24 patients who failed to enter the maintenance treatment. Baseline characteristics of ICI group and pemetrexed plus ICI group were as follows: median age, 61.5 (42~81) years vs. 63 (35~74) years; male, 66.7% (20/30) vs. 79.5% (31/39); Smoking history, 63.3% (19/30) vs. 74.4% (29/39); Brain metastases, 10% (3/30) vs. 23.1% (9/39). ORR was 60.0% (95%CI 42.5-77.5) in the ICI monotherapy group and 69.2% (95%CI 54.7~83.7) in the pemetrexed plus ICI group. By November 30, 2022, the median follow-up time was 19.2 months. The median PFS of the two groups were 15.8 months (95%CI 9.84-21.70) in ICI group and 22.8 months (95%CI 4.57-40.97) in pemetrexed plus ICI group and there was no statistical difference between the two groups (P = 0.50). Neither group achieved OS. The incidence of all grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) was 90.0% (27/30) in ICI monotherapy group and 92.3% (36/39) in pemetrexed plus ICI group. Grade 3/4 TRAEs occurred in 23.3% (7/30) and 23.1% (9/39) of each cohort and no grade 5 TRAE occurred. Conclusions: ICI maintenance therapy without pemetrexed showed great therapeutic efficacy in first-line maintenance stage and can be a feasible regimen in advanced lung adenocarcinoma.
Background: The efficacy of anti-programmed cell death (PD)-1 monotherapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) is limited, and combination therapy with lenvatinib and pembrolizumab has shown promising results. However, comparative studies between immune monotherapies and combination therapies are lacking. Objectives: To investigate the efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1 monotherapy (PD-1) and anti-PD-1 plus lenvatinib (PD-1 + L ) in patients with aHCC to guide clinical treatment decisions. Design: A retrospective study was conducted on a cohort of patients with aHCC who received either PD-1 monotherapy or PD-1 + L combination therapy between January 2018 and January 2020. Methods: The study retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 94 eligible patients with aHCC, with 39 in the PD-1 group and 55 in the PD-1 + L group. The efficacy outcomes, including objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety, were assessed. Results: With a median follow-up of 30.1 months, the PD-1 + L group demonstrated a significantly higher ORR (32.7% versus 10.3%, p = 0.013), better DCR (80.0% versus 53.8%, p = 0.012), longer median PFS (10.6 versus 4.4 months, p < 0.001) and longer median OS (18.4 versus 8.5 months, p = 0.013) than PD-1 group. For the responders, the efficacy of the two groups was durable (DOR was 11.6 versus 3.5 months, p = 0.009). Subgroup analyses based on prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment and the presence or absence of macrovascular tumor thrombosis or extrahepatic metastases favored the PD-1 + L group. The combination therapy was a good predictor of PFS and OS in multivariate analysis. Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were more common in PD-1 + L group, with higher incidences of hypertension and hand–foot skin reactions. Conclusions: PD-1 monotherapy and PD-1 plus lenvatinib combination therapy were well-tolerated in patients with aHCC. PD-1 + L showed significantly better survival benefits than PD-1 monotherapy.
Checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP) is the most common fatal immune-related adverse event; however, its pathophysiology remains largely unknown. Comprehensively dissecting the key cellular players and molecular pathways associated with CIP pathobiology is critical for precision diagnosis and develop novel therapy strategy of CIP. Herein, we performed a comprehensive single-cell transcriptome analysis to dissect the complexity of the immunological response in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) microenvironment. CIP was characterized by a dramatic accumulation of CXCL13+ T cells and hyperinflammatory CXCL9+ monocytes. T-cell receptor (TCR) analysis revealed that CXCL13+ T cells exhibited hyperexpanded- TCR clonotypes, and pseudotime analysis revealed a potential differentiation trajectory from naïve to cytotoxic effector status. Monocyte trajectories showed that LAMP3+ DCs derived from CXCL9+ monocytes possessed the potential to migrate from tumors to the BALF, whereas the differentiation trajectory to anti-inflammatory macrophages was blocked. Intercellular crosstalk analysis revealed the signaling pathways such as CXCL9/10/11-CXCR3, FASLG-FAS, and IFNGR1/2-IFNG were activated in CIP+ samples. We also proposed a novel immune signature with high diagnostic power to distinguish CIP+ from CIP− samples (AUC = 0.755). Our data highlighted key cellular players, signatures, and interactions involved in CIP pathogenesis.
Background Hyper progressive disease (HPD) describes the phenomenon that patients can’t benefit from immunotherapy but cause rapid tumor progression. HPD is a particular phenomenon in immunotherapy but lacks prediction methods. Our study aims to screen the factors that may forecast HPD and provide a predictive model for risky stratifying. Methods We retrospectively reviewed advanced-stage tumor patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in the General PLA Hospital. Subsequently, we calculated the tumor growth kinetics ratio (TGKr) and identified typical HPD patients. Differences analysis of clinical characteristics was performed, and a predictive binary classification model was constructed. Results 867 patients with complete image information were screened from more than 3000 patients who received ICI between January 2015 and January 2020. Among them, 36 patients were identified as HPD for TGKr > 2. After the propensity score matched, confounding factors were limited. Survival analysis revealed that the clinical outcome of HPD patients was significantly worse than non-HPD patients. Besides, we found that Body Mass Index (BMI), anemia, lymph node metastasis in non-draining areas, pancreatic metastasis, and whether combined with anti-angiogenesis or chemotherapy therapy were closely connected with the HPD incidence. Based on these risk factors, we constructed a visualised predicted nomogram model, and the Area Under Curve (AUC) is 0.850 in the train dataset, whereas 0.812 in the test dataset. Conclusion We carried out a retrospective study for HPD based on real-world patients and constructed a clinically feasible and practical model for predicting HPD incidence, which could help oncologists to stratify risky patients and select treatment strategies.
Abstract Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death worldwide. We identified a specific LncRNA, LINC00908, was downregulated in LUAD tissues and associated with good outcome. LINC00908 inhibited glycolysis by regulating the expression of the DEAD-box54 (DDX54), which was screened by a nine-gene risk signature related to glycolysis and positively correlated with parts of glycolysis-related genes. DDX54 was also experimental verified that regulate nine key glycolytic enzymes, thereby affecting the level of glycolysis in LUAD. Further, the expression of LINC00908 in LUAD tumorigenesis was modulated by a transcription factor, RFX2. The RFX2/LINC00908/DDX54 axis regulated LUAD tumor growth, migration, invasion, cell apoptosis and glycolysis both in vitro and in vivo. These results demonstrated that this axis might be a novel mediator in LUAD progress. We might offer a novel therapeutic target for more precise diagnosis and treatment of LUAD.
Background Patients with pulmonary large cell carcinoma (LCC) have a high incidence of synchronous brain metastases (SBM) and a poor prognosis. Our study was to evaluate the predictive and prognostic value of the clinical characteristics of pulmonary LCC patients with SBM at initial diagnosis by utilizing the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Methods LCC patients, diagnosed from 2010 to 2019, were identified from the latest SEER database which was released in April 2022. Logistic regression and Cox regression were used to identify the predictive and prognostic factors for LCC patients with SBM. Propensity score matching (PSM) and Kaplan–Meier analyses were applied to assess different therapy modalities. Results A total of 1375 LCC patients were enrolled in this study and 216 (15.7%) of them had SBM at the initial diagnosis. The median overall survival (OS) of LCC patients with SBM was 4 months. Multivariate Cox regression identified age 60–79 (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.41–0.78; p < 0.001), age ≥ 80 (OR 0.23; 95% CI 0.12–0.45; p < 0.001) and bone metastases (OR 1.75; 95% CI 1.22–2.51; p < 0.001) as significant independent predictors for developing SBM. Multivariable Cox regression revealed that age 60–79, T stage, bone metastases and chemotherapy were independent prognostic factor for OS. The surgery combined with chemotherapy and radiotherapy group, in which all patients were N0 stage and had no other site-specific metastases, exhibited the best median OS of 15 months. Conclusions LCC patients with age < 60 or bone metastases were more likely to have SBM at initial diagnosis. Age, T stage, bone metastases and chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors for OS of LCC patients with SBM. Highly selected patients might achieve the best survival benefit from surgery combined with chemotherapy and radiotherapy.
ObjectivesBrain metastases (BMs) are common in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and are underrepresented in pivotal clinical trials that demonstrate the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We conducted a retrospective analysis to assess the role of ICIs in BM lesions in less selected patients. Materials and methodsPatients with histologically confirmed extensive-stage SCLC who were treated with ICIs were included in this study. Objective response rates (ORRs) were compared between the with-BM and without-BM groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test were used to evaluate and compare progression-free survival (PFS). The intracranial progression rate was estimated using the Fine-Gray competing risks model. ResultsA total of 133 patients were included, 45 of whom started ICI treatment with BMs. In the whole cohort, the overall ORR was not significantly different for patients with and without BMs (p = 0.856). The median progression-free survival for patients with and without BMs was 6.43 months (95% CI: 4.70-8.17) and 4.37 months (95% CI: 3.71-5.04), respectively (p =0.054). In multivariate analysis, BM status was not associated with poorer PFS (p = 0.101). Our data showed that different failure patterns occurred between groups, with 7 patients (8.0%) without BM and 7 patients (15.6%) with BM having intracranial-only failure as the first site progression. The cumulative incidences of brain metastases at 6 and 12 months were 15.0% and 32.9% in the without-BM group and 46.2% and 59.0% in the BM group, respectively (Gray's p<0.0001). ConclusionsAlthough patients with BMs had a higher intracranial progression rate than patients without BMs, the presence of BMs was not significantly associated with a poorer ORR and PFS with ICI treatment in multivariate analysis.
Background The gut mycobiome of patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) remains unexplored. This study aimed to characterize the gut mycobiome in patients with LUAD and evaluate the potential of gut fungi as non-invasive biomarkers for early diagnosis. Methods In total, 299 fecal samples from Beijing, Suzhou, and Hainan were collected prospectively. Using internal transcribed spacer 2 sequencing, we profiled the gut mycobiome. Five supervised machine learning algorithms were trained on fungal signatures to build an optimized prediction model for LUAD in a discovery cohort comprising 105 patients with LUAD and 61 healthy controls (HCs) from Beijing. Validation cohorts from Beijing, Suzhou, and Hainan comprising 44, 17, and 15 patients with LUAD and 26, 19, and 12 HCs, respectively, were used to evaluate efficacy. Results Fungal biodiversity and richness increased in patients with LUAD. At the phylum level, the abundance of Ascomycota decreased, while that of Basidiomycota increased in patients with LUAD. Candida and Saccharomyces were the dominant genera, with a reduction in Candida and an increase in Saccharomyces , Aspergillus , and Apiotrichum in patients with LUAD. Nineteen operational taxonomic unit markers were selected, and excellent performance in predicting LUAD was achieved (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.9350) using a random forest model with outcomes superior to those of four other algorithms. The AUCs of the Beijing, Suzhou, and Hainan validation cohorts were 0.9538, 0.9628, and 0.8833, respectively. Conclusions For the first time, the gut fungal profiles of patients with LUAD were shown to represent potential non-invasive biomarkers for early-stage diagnosis.
Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become standard treatments for lung cancer patients. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis (CIP) was the leading cause of death among ICIs-related adverse events (irAEs). Recurrent episodes of CIP without rechallenge of ICIs were reported in several cases and maybe a unique feature of CIP. Knowledge gaps remain regarding the rate and risk factors associated to CIP’s recurrence. Methods Data from 1,102 lung cancer patients receiving ICIs treatment between January 2016 and January 2021 were retrospectively collected and analyzed. CIP was diagnosed according to typical clinical features and/or new typical imaging changes. Recurrence of CIP (CIP-R) was defined as recurrent CIP after initial CIP improved after proper treatment. Logistic regression was used to assess risk factors associated with CIP recurrence. Results Eighty out of 1,102 (7.26%) patients were diagnosed with CIP. Twenty of those 78 (25.64%) patients suffered CIP-R, 2 patients died and were therefore excluded from the denominator. The median onset of initial pneumonitis for patients without and with recurrence was 3.49 months [interquartile range (IQR), 0.26–31.93 months] and 2.78 months (IQR, 1.22–20.93 months), respectively (P=0.48). The median interval duration between initial CIP and CIP-R was 1.54 months (IQR, 0.98–16.70 months). Recurrence of CIP was more common in males (P=0.03), squamous histology (P=0.016), and in patients who received chest radiotherapy (P=0.049). The duration of prednisolone equivalent dose ≥15 mg/day in CIP-R was significantly shorter, at 3.71 weeks (2.86–6.57 weeks) compared with 6.36 weeks in those without recurrence (IQR, 3.12–9.86 weeks) (P=0.001). Non-squamous histology [odds ratio (OR), 0.182; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.038–0.860; P=0.031] and prolonged administration of prednisolone equivalent dose ≥15 mg/day for more than 4 weeks (OR, 0.082; 95% CI: 0.02–0.342; P=0.001) were independently associated with a decreased odds of CIP-R development. Conclusions CIP-R in a real-world lung cancer cohort is not uncommon, both in patients with and without rechallenge of ICIs. A duration of prednisolone equivalent dose ≥15 mg/day of at least 4 weeks during the tapering process of corticosteroids were recommend in patients with CIP.
Abstract Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) therapy induced pneumonitis (CIP) complicates this effective in therapy patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but the underlying mechanisms remain incompletely understood. Here, we implemented comprehensive single-cell transcriptome, flow cytometry and cytokine expression analysis to shed light on the complexity of the immunological responses in the bronchoalveolar microenvironment from NSCLC patients with CIP. We demonstrated a dramatic accumulation of CXCL13+ CD4 and CD8 T cells with highly cytotoxic and effector functions in CIP. Monocyte differentiation trajectories showed that hyperinflammatory monocytes and LAMP3+ dendritic cells (DCs) were enriched in CIP, while anti-inflammatory macrophages were depleted. Multilineages intercellular crosstalk analysis revealed that CIP specific myeloid subsets could recruit and enhance CXCL13+ T cells cytotoxic function through CXCL9/10-CXCR3 and IFNGR1/2-IFNG pathway, respectively. Together, our data highlighted the importance of CXCL13+ T cells and LAMP3+ DCs in CIP pathogenesis, which could be non-invasive biomarkers to monitor CIP.
Background: Rechallenge of immunotherapy beyond progression (RIBP) has been demonstrably effective in a variety of cancers. Our study aims to investigate the efficacy of RIBP in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients under real-world conditions. Methods: SCLC patients who experienced progressive disease after receiving programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitors combined with chemotherapy from January 2017 to October 2021 were enrolled. The study population was divided into two groups: the RIBP group and the discontinuation of immunotherapy beyond progression (DIBP) group. Inverse propensity score weighting (IPSW) method was used to balance the clinical baseline characteristics. The short-term and long-term efficacy of the two groups was compared. Results: 100 SCLC patients were included in this study. There were 45 patients in the RIBP group and 55 patients in the DIBP group. The disease control rate (DCR) and the proportion of durable clinical benefit (DCB) were significantly higher in the RIBP group (DCR: 79.7% vs. 55.7%, p = 0.027; DCB: 40.7 vs. 20.7%, p = 0.025) after weighting. The median progressive-free survival (PFS) in the RIBP group was significantly longer than the DIBP group in the total population (mPFS: 4.8 vs. 2.4 months, p = 0.002), while there was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) of the two groups (mOS: 17.4 vs. 8.0 months, p = 0.098). In the weighted first-line initial immunotherapy subgroup, PFS and OS were significantly improved in the RIBP group (mPFS: 4.5 vs. 2.8 months, p = 0.017; mOS: 11.6 vs. 5.4 months, p = 0.028). After weighting, the RIBP group had a significantly longer PFS than the DIBP group in the SD/PD response to the initial immunotherapy subgroup (mPFS: 6.8 vs. 1.8 months, p = 0.026). Conclusion: Rechallenge of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors could bring benefits to SCLC patients, especially in the first-line initial immunotherapy subgroup or SD/PD response to the initial immunotherapy subgroup.
2599 Background: PARP inhibitors or chemotherapy combined with PD1/PDL1 inhibitors resulting in enhanced antitumor activity. We previously reported the part 1 result of a phase Ⅰb study exploring the safety and efficacy of Cis plus Sint and Nir. Here we presented the updated survival and safety data. Methods: Eligible pts will receive Sint and Cis on D1, plus Nir on D1-21, every 21-day for up to 4 cycles, following Sint and Nir until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Part 1 was dose escalation phase followed 3+3 model, and part 2 was dose expansion phase enrolled more patients based on part 1. The primary objective was to determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/ recommended part 2 dose (RP2D). Secondary endpoints include objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1, and safety based on CTCAE v5.0. Results: PR2D of Cis and Nir were 60 mg/m2 and 100 mg, respectively when combined with sint 200mg. From 7/2019 to 9/2021, 22 pts (13 pts in part2) were enrolled, including 12 small cell lung cancer (SCLC), 7 lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC), 2 ovarian cancer (OC) and 1 cervical squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC). Most were male (77.3%, n=17), ECOG=1 (63.6%, n=14), current smoker(68.2%, n=15) and PDL1<1(50%, n=11). 36.4% (8/22) and 27.3% (6/22) had brain and liver metastasis at baseline, separately. Median follow-up was 6.2 months (range 2.5-10.8). ORR was 27.3% (6/22), DCR was 59.1% (13/22). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.3 months (95%CI 1.9-3.9), and PFS rates at 6 months and 12 months were 28.8% and 10.8%. Median overall survival (OS) was 8.0 months (95%CI 4.9-14.1), 12 months OS rates was 28.5%. Median treatment duration was 4.7 months (range 1.9-15.1). The most common treatment-related adverse events included anemia (90.9%, 20/22, [5 Grade 3/4]), fatigue (77.3%, 17/22, [1 Grade 3/4), γ-glutamyl transpeptidase increased (72.7%, 16/22, [0 Grade 3/4]), leukopenia (68.2%, n=15, [4 Grade 3/4]) and neutropenia (59.1%, n=13, [5 Grade 3/4]). Conclusions: In this updated analysis, Cis combined with Sint and Nir showed clinically meaningful efficacy and an adequate safety profile in previously treated advanced solid tumors. Data need longer follow-up. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR1900024488.