[Objective] To carry out a qualitative analysis on research design about the clinical treatment of bilious headache in domestic journals. [Methods] In accordance with the principle of clinical epidemiology, the scale in the literatures from 1979 to 2006 about the clinical evaluation on the treatment of bilious headache in the domestic journals was evaluated. [Results] The 32.8% of the literature used a randomized controlled trial, but the quality and reliability of random design were poor; the blind method was rarely used; no any article mentioned the quantity of samples and the race of the patients; half of the literatures (50.2% ) had no clear diagnostic criteria; 86.7% of the literatures mentioned the therapeutic standard, but in 795 of them (64.6%) the standard was the self-worked out; 18.9% of the literatures (233) used a clear statistical methods, but some of them method were less accurate. Other problems, requiring attention were the comparison of baseline between groups and the choice of indicators of the outcome, and so on. [Conclusions] Generally speaking, the quality in the TCM literatures about migraine treatment was not so high, and the experimental design and the statistical methods should to be enhanced.

<正>糖尿病已成为全球第3位威胁人类健康的慢性非传染性疾病[1],中国糖尿病(DM)的患病率增长较快,总数已达4 000万[2],其中绝大多数为2型糖尿病,中医药在防治糖尿病方面正彰显其独有特性,并已取得了良好的效果。有关糖尿病的证候研究已有许多报道,本文仅对近10年来2型糖尿病的中医证候研究文献进行总结。

Objective: To assess the differences between glucose monitor and autoanalyzer. Methods: The electronic databases including CNKI(1995 to 2006)and VIP(1995 to 2006) were searched. Fifteen quasi-CCTs involving 2 669 participants were included. Meta-analysis was measured by RevMan 4.2.10. Results: The glucose of one touch ultra glucose monitor was lower than that of autoanalyzer(WMD-1.36,95%CI-1.92 to -0.80). There was no significant difference between other glucose monitors(ROCHE and JOHNSON) and autoanalyzer(WMD 0.42,95%CI-0.20,1.04;WMD 0.12,95%CI-0.31,0.54). Conclusion: There are no significant difference in blood glucose results between glucose monitor and autoanalyzer except one touch Ⅱ ultra glucose monitor. More high-quality trials are required.

[Objective] To evaluate the effect of high level of blood sugar on determined result obtained with high-speed instrument for blood sugar. [Methods] The pertinent articles were searched by internet from 1997 to 2007. The method in the Cochrane Reviewer's Handbook 4.2.2 was used to evaluate the quality of the articles and analyze the data in them by using meta analysis method. The selected criteria of literatures was high blood sugar(7.8 mmol/L) and belonged to RCT and CCT literature.[Results] The eight CCT literatures were selected and included nine hundreds and thirty-two patients. The selected literature had baseline comparability and the quality of literatures was low. Meta analysis found that there was statistical difference between the determined result of capillary and venous blood sugar (WMD=-0.98,(-1.40,-0.55)).[Conclusions] The determined result of high-speed blood sugar instrument is lower than that of automatic biochemistry analyzer on high blood sugar according to the evidence of selected literatures.