Aim. To study the clinical manifestations, incidence of life-threatening complications, and their possible mechanisms and outcomes of left ventricular non-compaction (LVNC) in adults.Material and methods. This study included 125 adult patients with LVNC, 74 men (59.2%) and 51 women (40.8%) aged 46.4±15.1 years. Echocardiography (EchoCG) (n=125), Holter monitoring (n=125), cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (n=60), and contrast-enhanced multislice computed tomography (MSCT) of the heart (n=90), and, if indicated, coronary angiography (CAG) (n=33) and myocardial scintigraphy (n=27) were performed. The diagnosis of LVNC was confirmed in 74 cases using two methods, and in 21 cases, using three imaging methods. DNA diagnostics was performed in most patients. For most patients, the level of anticardiac antibodies and the genome of cardiotropic viruses were determined in the blood. Mean left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) was 38.6±14.0%; LV end-diastolic volume (EDV) was 158.1±67.8 ml; LV end-diastolic dimension (EDD) was 6.1±0.9 cm; and left atrial (LA) volume was 97.1±38.1 ml. The mean follow-up period was 14 months [4.0; 41.0]; from 1 month to 10 years.Results. Death rate was 14.4%; heart transplantation was performed in 5.6% of cases. Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) was detected in 45.6% of cases and sustained VT in 13.6%. The presence of VT was associated with poor R-wave progression in the precordial ECG leads, low QRS voltage, QRS duration >105 ms, NYHA chronic heart failure functional class (CHF FC) ≥2-3, LV EF <40%; LV EDD >6.1 cm, the presence of myocarditis, and higher death rate. Cardioverter defibrillators, including cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRTD), were implanted in 38 patients. Appropriate defibrillator shocks were associated with frequent premature ventricular contractions (PVCs). The incidence of thrombosis and embolism was 22.4%. Their predictors included CHF FC ≥2-3, RV anteroposterior dimension >3.1 cm, LA volume >98 ml, E/A >1.65, LV EDD >6.3 cm, LV EDV >153 ml, LV EF <35%, and myocardial necrosis of unknown origin (in patients without coronary atherosclerosis). The incidence of myocardial necrosis in LVNC was 16.0%. The mechanisms identified, in addition to coronary atherosclerosis, were embolism in unchanged coronary arteries, secondary myocarditis, and the presence of genetically determined thrombophilia.Conclusion. LVNC is associated with a high risk of life-threatening conditions, such as ventricular arrhythmias, thrombosis and embolism, and myocardial necrosis, that are typical complications of LVNC in adults. Reassessing the predictors for the risk of thromboembolic and arrhythmic events, specifying the indications for implantable cardioverter defibrillator and anticoagulants, and actively identifying and treating concomitant myocarditis are essential.

Diagnosis and treatment of myocarditis can be challenging, including determining indications for heart transplantation. We present a 6-year medical history of a 54 years old patient with severe morphologically verified viral-negative lymphocytic myocarditis and systemic manifestations (onset of hemorrhagic vasculitis) combined with moderate coronary atherosclerosis, which regressed according to repeated coronary angiography. For 5 years, the patient received immunosuppressive therapy with methylprednisolone and azathioprine with a significant improvement. Repeated relapses of atrial fibrillation required correction of basic therapy and plasmapheresis. The disease was complicated by thyrotoxicosis and multi-organ dysfunction; the autopsy showed persistent myocarditis activity. The myocarditis is a chronic condition and requires a review of the treatment strategy at each stage.

Aim. To study the place of NCM in the structure of DCM, its clinical features and influence on prognosis in comparison with other forms of DCM syndrome.Methods. The NCM registry includes 125 patients, mean age 46.4±15.1 years, 74 men and 51 women, median follow-up 14 [4.0; 41.0] months. The DCM registry included 365 patients, mean age 46.4±15.1 years, 253 men and 112 women, median follow-up 14 [5; 43.75] months. The examination included electrocardiography (ECG), ECG Holter monitoring, echocardiography, blood anti-heart antibody level evaluation, and additionally cardiac computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, DNA diagnostics (in the MYH7, MYBPC3, TPM1, TNNI3, TNNT2, ACTC1, TAZ, ZASP (LDB3), MYL2, MYL3, DES, LMNA, EMD, TTR gene panel), coronary angiography, right ventricular endomyocardial biopsy.Results. The proportion of patients with DCM phenotype in the NCM registry was 40% (n=49), another 11% (n=15) had NCM diagnosed simultaneously with acute/subacute myocarditis. Lethality in these subgroups was 12.2% and 33.3%, respectively, and was significantly higher than in asymptomatic, ischemic and arrhythmic variants of NCM. In the DCM registry, the proportion of patients with NСM was 21% (n=78), and increased left ventricular (LV) trabecularity was detected in another 18% (n=64). DCM patients with and without NСM did not differ by baseline echocardiographic parameters, heart failure class, and cardiotropic therapy. Pathogenic mutations were detected in 14% of DCM patients with NCM and only 3% of other patients with DCM (p<0.001). Only in patients without NCM the presence of mutations had a significant effect on lethality. The patients with NCM compared with the others DCM patients showed significantly lower increase in EF in early and late period (from 31.0±10.2 to 34.8±11.0 and 37.1±10.9% [р<0.05] vs from 31.8±9.7 to 38.8±11.3 and 42.3±12.4% [р<0.01] respectively), a greater incidence of premature ventricular beats (1568 [105;7000] vs 543.5 [77.75; 3194], p<0.05), appropriate defibrillator shocks and sudden deaths (17.9 vs 5.9%, p<0.001), intracardiac thrombosis (21.8 vs 13.5%, p=0.069) despite a greater frequency of anticoagulants (73.1 vs 57.4%, p<0<05). There were no significant differences in death (19.2 vs 18.5%) and transplantation (7.7 vs 3.8%) between patients with and without NCM. There were no cases of NCM regression.Conclusion. NCM is an independent form of DCM syndrome, which is characterized by higher frequency of pathogenic mutations, arrhythmic events, worse response to cardiotropic therapy, higher frequency of intracardiac thrombosis. The absence of mortality differences can be explained by the higher frequency of preventive interventions in this category of patients with DCM (prescription of anticoagulants, defibrillator implantation, heart transplantation).

A 28 year-old male with restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM) and endocardium thickening, conduction disorders, heart failure, and depressive disorder treated with paroxetine was admitted to the clinic. Blood tests revealed an increase in serum iron level, transferrin saturation percentage, and slightly elevated liver function tests. Sarcoidosis, storage diseases and Loeffler endocarditis were ruled out. Mutations in desmin (DES) and hemochromatosis gene (HFE1) were identified. Liver biopsy was obtained to verify the hemochromatosis, assess its possible contribution to the RCM progression and determine indications for treatment. Biopsy revealed signs of drug-induced injury, subcompensated heart failure, and hemosiderin accumulation. Thus, even if one obvious cause (desmin mutation) of RCM has been identified, other less likely causes should be taken into consideration.

The possibility of heart inflammation (both myocardial and endocardial) months after a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has not been practically studied, especially since approaches to the treatment of myocarditis in combination with various endocarditis forms have not been developed.Aim. To study the prevalence and mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2-associated endocardial injury in patients with morphologically verified post-COVID-19 myocarditis, as well as to develop approaches to comprehensive therapy.Material and methods. The study included 18 patients with severe morphologically verified post-COVID-19 myocarditis (men, 9; 51,1±9,4 years; 35 to 66 years). Patients with prior verified myocarditis/myocardial infarction, rheumatic heart disease, and systemic immune diseases were excluded. The average time after COVID-19 was 6,5 [3.5; 10] months The diagnosis of myocarditis was confirmed by endomyocardial biopsy (including immunohistochemical examination with antibodies to CD3, CD20, CD45, CD68, and to SARS-CoV-2 antigens; polymerase chain reaction for SARS-CoV-2 RNA, DNA of cardiotropic viruses). The blood level of anticardiac antibodies was determined by indirect immunofluorescence. In addition, echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging (n=8), cardiac multislice tomography (n=1), and coronary angiography (n=14) were performed.Results. Biopsy revealed active (n=12) and borderline (n=3) lymphocytic myocarditis, eosinophilic (n=2) and giant cell (n=1) myocarditis. In 4 patients, nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis (NBTE) with parietal and intravascular thrombosis was diagnosed, and in one patient — infective endocarditis (IE) of the bicuspid aortic valve. Myocardial persistence of SARS-CoV-2 was detected in 72% of cases (in 3 patients — with NBTE; in 1 — with IE; in 9 — without endocarditis). Titers of anticardiac antibodies increased by 3-4 times in 94% of patients. Patients with endocarditis were characterized by larger heart chambers, lower ejection fraction (27,5±6,6 vs 36,0±13,4%), more severe pulmonary hypertension, and valvular regurgitation. Intraventricular thrombosis according to echocardiography/magnetic resonance imaging and cardiac embolism was not observed. Treatment in all patients included methylprednisolone at an average dose of 24 mg a day. In 10 patients, the result was monitored for at least 3 months as follows: the ejection fraction was 46,0±12,7% and 44,3±7,3% in patients with and without endocarditis, respectively.Conclusion. Endocarditis in patients with post-COVID-19 myocarditis was detected in 28% (1 patient — IE; 4 — NBTE). The key mechanisms of post-COVID-19 myocarditis and NBTE are long-term (up to 18 months) myocardial persistence of SARS-Cov-2 and the development of an autoimmune reaction. Endocarditis was diagnosed in more severe patients, including those with giant cell and eosinophilic myocarditis. The effectiveness of steroid therapy in combination with anticoagulants in patients with NBTE requires further study. In case of IE, steroids can also be used in the treatment of myocarditis (in combination with antibiotics and immunoglobulin).

Aim. To establish the prevalence of myocarditis and primary (genetic) cardiomyopathies (CMP) among patients in a cardiology hospital.Material and methods. Medical records of 671 patients of the cardiology department were analyzed. The diagnosis at admission and at discharge was recorded. The diagnoses were divided into 7 following categories: hypertension, coronary artery disease, heart disease, idiopathic arrhythmias, cardiomyopathy, myocarditis and others. Types of myocarditis and cardiomyopathy, the presence of arrhythmias and heart failure were also recorded.Results. Myocarditis was diagnosed in 194 (28,9%) patients, cardiomyopathy — in 76 (11,3%) patients, combination of cardiomyopathy and myocarditis — in 26 (3,9%) patients. Myocarditis with the development of arrhythmia and heart dilatation prevailed as follows: 47,4 and 41,2%, respectively. The most numerous CMPs were left ventricular noncompaction (n=30), non-inflammatory dilated CMP (n=13), hypertrophic CMP (n=10) and arrhythmogenic CMP of the right ventricle (n=9). In the group with idiopathic arrhythmias, 64,3% of patients were diagnosed with myocarditis, and 19,4% — with cardiomyopathy.Conclusion. The prevalence of non-coronary myocardial diseases among patients in a cardiology hospital is high and amounts to 40,2%. The presence of arrhythmias, heart failure or dilated cardiomyopathy may be a manifestation of non-coronary myocardial diseases, and requires a comprehensive examination aimed, in particular, at ruling out or verifying the diagnosis of myocarditis.

Aim. To evaluate the effectiveness of myocarditis therapy depending on the diagnosis approach (with or without myocardial biopsy).Material and methods. The study included 83 patients ≥18 years old with severe and moderate myocarditis (25 women and 58 men; mean age, 45,7±11,7 years), established by myocardial biopsy (group 1, n=36) or by a non-invasive diagnostic algorithm (group 2, n=47), for which immunosuppressive therapy (IST) was carried out. Inclusion criteria were left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic dimension >5,5 cm and ejection fraction (EF) <50%. An endomyocardial (n=31) or intraoperative (n=5) biopsy with a study of the viral genome and level of anticardiac antibodies were performed. Coronary angiography (29%), cardiac multislice computed tomography (75%), cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (41%), and 99mTc-MIBI scintigraphy (35%) were also carried out. The mean follow-up period was 3 years (36 [12; 65] months). The study was approved by the Intercollegiate Ethics Committee.Results. The groups were completely comparable in age, baseline parameters (class III [2,25; 3] and III [2; 3] heart failure (HF); end-diastolic LV dimension, 6,7±0,7 and 6,4±0,7 cm; EF, 29,9±8,7 and 31,4±9,3%), the extent of cardiac therapy (excluding the administration rate of в-blockers — 94,4 and 78,7%, p<0,05) and 1ST (methylprednisolone in 91,7 and 89,4% of patients at a mean dose of 24 [16; 32] and 20 [15; 32] mg/day, azathioprine in 50,0 and 46,8% of patients at a mean dose of 150 mg/day or mycophenolate mofetil 2,0 g/day in 30,6% in group 1, hydroxychloroquine 0,2 g/day in 27,8 and 23,4%). Biopsy in group 1 revealed active/borderline (61/39%) myocarditis, in 8 patients — viral genome in the myocardium, including parvovirus B19 in 7 of them. Both groups showed a comparable significant increase in EF after 6 months up to 37,6±8,1 and 42,6±11,5% (p<0,001) and after 27 [12; 54] months up to 43,4±9,6 and 45,5±12,3% (p<0,001), as well as a significant decrease in HF class to 2 [1; 2] in both groups. An increase in EF by ≥10% was recorded in 70 and 72% of patients, respectively. The mortality rate was 13,9 and 12,8%. Taking into account the only transplantation in group 2, the death+transplantation endpoints reached 13,9 and 14,9% of patients (without significant differences between the groups).Conclusion. In patients with severe and moderate myocarditis diagnosed with and without myocardial biopsy, the effectiveness of combined therapy, including IST, was comparable. If it is impossible to perform a biopsy, complex non-invasive strategy makes it possible to diagnose myocarditis with different probability rate and conduct an effective IST, the refusal of which mostly is not justified.

Aim. To assess the contribution of genetic and inflammatory factors to the development of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC).Material and methods. The study involved 54 patients with ARVC (age, 38,7±14,1 years; men, 42,6%; mean follow-up period, 21 [6; 60] months). All patients underwent electrocardiography (ECG), 24-hour ECG monitoring, echocardiography, determination of anticardiac antibodies and DNA of cardiotropic viruses in the blood, molecular genetic ARVC testing, as well as cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (n=49), high-resolution ECG (n=18), right ventricular endomyocardial biopsy (n=2), and autopsy (n=2).Results. Following four clinical types of ARVC were identified: I. Latent arrhythmic form: characterized by frequent premature ventricular contractions and/or nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (VT). II. Manifested arrhythmic form (n=11) — SVT/ventricular fibrillation (VF). III. ARVC with progressive heart failure (HF, n=8). IV. Combination of ARVC with left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC, n=8). Superimposed myocarditis was identified in 74%, 36%, 87,5% and 85,7% of patients in forms I-IV, respectively. Mutations were detected in 11%, 46%, 50%, and 38% of patients in forms I-IV, respectively. Clinical forms were stable: there was no transition from one clinical form to another during follow-up period.Conclusion. The contribution of genetic and inflammatory mechanisms to the clinical picture is different: in the latent arrhythmic form, the leading role belongs to inflammation; in the manifested arrhythmic form, the contribution of pathogenic mutations prevails, and in ARVC with progressive HF and in combination with LVNC, the contribution of genetic and inflammatory factors is equally important.

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical features, laboratory and instrumental tests results and the effectiveness of complex treatment in a patient with multiple etiologies of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) with a high risk of sudden cardiac death. Methods: Female patient was 34 years old. Follow up period was seven years. Since the age of 23 (after a respiratory infection), chest pains and shortness of breath appeared. Coronary arteries were intact. After syncope in 2013, Holter-ECG was performed: 2048 premature ventricular beats (PVBs)/day and episode of sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT, 1 min) were registered. MRI was performed, and a cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) was implanted. Results: ECG showed low QRS voltage and negative T waves in leads V2-V6, III, aVF. In signal-averaged ECG, late potentials were detected. Echocardiography (EchoCG) demonstrated left and right ventricular dilatation, diffuse reduction of left ventricular (LV) contractility and multiple pseudochordae in LV. MRI showed LV noncompaction (LVNC), thickening of the epicardial fat and hypo-/dyskinesia of the anterior wall of the right ventricular (RV), dilatation of both ventricles with decrease of their ejection fraction and subepicardial gadolinium enhancement in the early and late phase in the LV, intraventricular septum and the free walls of the RV. The presence of LVNC was confirmed by cardiac computed tomography (CT). Late contrast enhancement in the middle and subendocardial layer of the LV was observed as well. The level of anticardiac antibodies was high (1:160–1:320). The reasons for statement of a possible diagnosis of myocarditis in this case were the connection of the onset of symptoms with viral infection, high titers of anticardiac antibodies, and early and late subepicardial contrast enhancement by MRI and CT. The endomyocardial biopsy was obtained, and subendocardial lipomatosis, separation of myocardium by fibrous septa, lymphocytic infiltrates (more than 14 cells/mm2) and vasculitis were found. Viral genome in myocardium was not detected. A new splicing mutation in the desmoplakin (DSP) gene was found (NM_004415.4: c.1141-2A>G/N (rs794728111)). Combination of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC), LVNC and myocarditis was diagnosed. Immunosuppressive therapy (prednisone and azathioprine) was prescribed, LV ejection fraction stabilized at the level of 40%. The appropriate shocks of the ICD due to sustainedVT (HR 210/min) with transformation into ventricular fibrillation were recorded twice. For this reason, sotalol was temporarily replaced with amiodarone. After the suppression of myocarditis activity, sustained VT and ICD interventions were not observed. Conclusions: In a young patient with arrhythmogenic syncope and DCM syndrome, a combination of ARVC (two major and three minor criteria, definite diagnosis) and LVNC with the biopsy proved virus-negative chronic myocarditis was diagnosed. DCM as a syndrome can have multiple causes, and the combination of myocarditis and primary cardiomyopathy is not rare. LVNC can be observed in patients with typical desmosomal protein mutations. The use of immunosuppressive therapy led to the stabilization of heart failure and decreased the risk of arrhythmic events.

This article describes evolution of criteria for arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C). The novel diagnostic criteria for ARVD/C published in 2020 are analyzed in detail, among which biventricular and leftdominant arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy are identified for the first time. The need to develop novel criteria was fed on the accumulation of new data on ARVD/C, in particular, significant advances in magnetic resonance imaging technologies. The novel criteria retained high sensitivity and specificity in relation to traditional right ventricular disease form and became more sensitive in relation to the biventricular and left-dominant arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy.Nevertheless, the addition of left-dominant disease forms reduces the criteria specificity in general, since left ventricle involvement with a similar clinical performance can have different etiology that goes beyond the ARVD/C, even when mutations are detected in typical genes, which is demonstrated by case reports described in the article. Like the previous two versions, the novel criteria will be fully assessed only with a large sample of patients after their introduction into the routine cardiology clinical practice.

Aim. To study the late results of medical and interventional treatment in patients with morphologically verified nature of idiopathic arrhythmias. Methods. The prospective study included 20 patients (mean age 43.1±11.3 years, 10 female) with atrial fibrillation (AF), supraventricular and ventricular extrasystole, supraventricular and ventricular tachycardia, conduction disturbance without structural heart changes. In addition to the standard examination, the level of anti-heart antibodies was initially determined; endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) of the right ventricle with PCR study for the viral genome; DNA diagnostics (n=4), coronary angioraphy (n=6), skin biopsy (n=1) were performed. The median follow-up was 134 [128; 138] months. Results. By EMB in the initial examination were diagnosed: active (n=8)/borderline (n=3) infectious immune myocarditis; parvovirus-positive endomyocarditis (n=1); undifferentiated vasculitis (n=2); myocardial vasculitis (n=1); Fabry disease (n=1); arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia (n=1); unspecified cardiomyopathy (n=2). Anti-heart antibodies were the most important in myocarditis diagnosis and monitoring. All patients with myocarditis/vasculitis (n=15) received its basic therapy: acyclovir (n=10); immunoglobulin G 10-12.5 g (n=2); hydroxychloroquine 200 mg/day (n=15); glucocorticoids (n=14); azathioprine 150 mg/day (n=2). The late results were evaluated in all patients with myocarditis. Initially, in 62.5% of patients a resistance of AF to all antiarrhythmic drugs was noted. After treatment the average frequency of AF paroxysms decreased (from 8 [5; 8] to 3 [1,25; 7,75] points). By the end of the follow-up, six patients underwent radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for AF, the full effect was achieved once. All patients without RFA have AF partially or completely resistant to drugs. Two patients (without RFA) died from ischemic stroke/ pulmonary embolism. Conclusion. Using EMB the causes of idiopathic arrhythmias (mainly AF) were diagnosed: immune inflammatory diseases in 75% and genetic in 25% of patients. As a result of complex treatment, the general burden of arrhythmias has decreased. But the presence of myocarditis and primary cardiomyopathy, without reducing the cardiac contractility and dilatation, does not allow achieving a stable antiarrhythmic effect. Lethality for 11 years was 10%. The causes of death were thromboembolic complications.

Background. A few cases of combination of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVC) with left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) have been described. Aims to study the genetics, diagnostical features and clinical course of the combination of ARVC with LVNC. Methods. 58 patients with ARVC diagnosis (26 men; mean age 39.1 14.2 years; mean follow-up period 21.5 [6; 60] months) and 125 patients with LVNC (74 men; mean age 46.4 15.1 years; mean follow-up period 14 [3; 40] months). All patients underwent electrocardiogram (ECG), echocardiography, 24-h ECG monitoring. Heart MRI was performed in 53 (91.4%) patients with ARVC and 60 (48%) with LVNC, heart CT in 18 (31%) patients with ARVC and 89 (71.2%) with LVNC. For all patients with combination of ARVC and LVNC DNA-diagnostic was performed using both ARVC (PKP2, DSG2, DSP, DSC2, JUP, TMEM43, TGFB3, PLN, LMNA, DES, CTTNA3, EMD, SCN5A, LDB3, CRYAB, FLNC) and LVNC (MYH7, MYBPC3, TAZ, TPM1, LDB3, MYL2, MYL3, ACTC1, TNNT2, TNI3) gene panels. Results. Combination of ARVC and LVNC was found in 9 patients (15.5% of patients form ARVC cohort and 7.2% from LVNC cohort). These patients were distinguished from patients with isolated ARVC or LVNC by aggressive ventricular arrhythmias (frequent premature ventricular beats, sustained ventricular tachycardia, significantly worse antiarrhythmic therapy effect, appropriate shocks of implanted cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) in all patients with ICD). Patients with combination of ARVC + LVNC were also distinguished from patients with isolated LVNC by the dilatation of RV, low QRS voltage on ECG, presence of AV block, absence of signs of LV hypertrophy on ECG. LV dilatation with reduction of its ejection fraction distinguished patients with mixed cardiomyopathy from patients with isolated ARVC. Potentially pathogenic variants (IVV classes of pathogenicity) and variants of unclear clinical significance (III class of pathogenicity) were found in both desmosomal and non-desmosomal genes in 78% of patients, including 3 (33%) in DSP gene. Conclusions. The combination of ARVC and LVNC can be caused by mutations in both desmosomal and non-desmosomal genes and has typical features: aggressive, resistant ventricular rhythm abnormalities leading to appropriate ICD shocks and a high risk of sudden cardiac death.

Russian Society of Cardiology (RSC)With the participation: Eurasian Association of Therapists (EUAT), Society of Specialists in Heart Failure (OSSN), Russian Scientific Medical Society of Therapists (RNMOT), Russian Society of Pathologists, Russian Society of Radiologists and Radiologists (RSR)Endorsed by: Research and Practical Council of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

September, 2021 marks the 175th anniversary of the opening of the Faculty Therapeutic Clinic (FTC) of the Imperial Moscow University, which is a successor of the First (1805) and Second (1820) Clinical Institutes with their therapeutic beds and chairs, and thus is the oldest therapeutic clinic in Russia. From 1930 the Clinic became part of the newly formed I.M. Sechenov First Moscow Medical Institute (now Sechenov University) and retains continuity to the present day. This publication is one of three research articles prepared by the staff of the Clinic for the anniversary and devoted to little-known pages of biography and scientific activities of the three heads of the FTC at the crucial stages of its history – A.I. Over, G.A. Zakharyin and the last prerevolutionary director – N.F. Golubov.

Aim. To analyze the difficulties of diagnosis and the clinical features of the Danon disease in women.Results. An observation of Danon disease in a woman aged 18 years with an uncomplicated family history is presented. The early development of atrial fibrillation (at the age of not more than 15 years) in combination with atrioventricular blockade against the background of regular sports was not attracted due attention for 3 years. The examination revealed: a moderate degree of left ventricular hypertrophy (up to 17 mm), its diffuse nature and simultaneous involvement of the right ventricle, signs of heart failure due to severe restrictive disorders with preserved ejection fraction. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging data (non-specific late gadolinium enhancement) became the basis for the assumption of amyloidosis and the implementation of a myocardial biopsy. An erroneous diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis according to myocardial biopsy was refuted during a second study, the PAS reaction revealed signs of storage disease. The diagnosis of Danon disease was verified using DNA diagnostics (c.731delG mutation was detected). Due to the presence of unsustained paroxysmal ventricular tachycardia and a high calculated risk of sudden death, cardioverter-defibrillator was implanted. The analysis of literature data on the frequency and the manifestation of Danon disease in women, the place of this disease in the structure of the causes of myocardial hypertrophy is given.Conclusion. Atrial fibrillation at a young age and left ventricular hypertrophy syndrome can develop due to primary myocardial diseases not well known in the practice of a cardiologist. They require an in-depth diagnostic search; their identification is critical for determining treatment tactics and prognosis.