加强新时代廉洁文化建设,需要不断推进廉洁文化"入心".从认知、认同、坚守三个方面剖析社会个体心理层面廉洁文化建设的过程.认知是社会个体对廉洁文化的思维塑造;认同是社会个体对廉洁文化的情感塑造;坚守是社会个体对廉洁文化的意志塑造.从思维到情感再到意志,体现廉洁文化在社会个体心理层面的发展历程.在此基础上,进一步探讨我国廉洁文化建设的现状,并提出相应的改进措施.
动态能力理论为大数据环境下反腐机构的能力研究提供了一个新视角.以数据和数据处理技术为核心的大数据环境的动态性客观上要求反腐机构需要根据外部技术环境的变化来调适自身能力,以提高反腐机构应对外部不确定性的能力,这对提升腐败治理效能具有重要作用.然而,数据质量、数据碎片化以及有限柔性等问题,很大程度上影响了大数据环境下反腐机构动态能力的建设成效.为此,有必要建立数据质量管理机制,提高反腐机构的感知能力;促进数据共享,提高反腐机构的数据把控能力;提高反腐机构柔性度,优化其变革重构能力.
数据治理是大数据、云计算等现代信息技术发展背景下腐败治理的一种新模式,在反腐领域引入并重视数据治理对提高反腐败效能具有重要价值.本文在厘清数据治理对一般公共部门赋能的基础上,结合反腐机构的特殊性构建反腐数据治理的分析框架,并运用该框架对当前反腐数据治理的实践现状进行分析,进而揭示出数据治理赋能反腐机构存在的问题,包括大数据应用的支撑条件不足导致数据监督模式不完善、大数据的高速性与人的有限性导致执纪工作不连贯、大数据发展的不充分导致数据决策模式尚未形成.为此,应当进一步健全数据监督的支撑条件,完善数据监督模式;强化技术研发与制度建设,促进执纪工作的连贯性;构建数据技术辅助反腐决策机制,提高数据技术的应用层次.
ObjectiveDuring the period of COVID-19, government regulation (GR) played an important role in healthcare. This study examines the current research situation of GR in healthcare, discusses the research hotspots, the most productive authors and countries, and the most common journals, and analyzes the changes in GR in healthcare before and after the outbreak of COVID-19.MethodsThis study followed PRISMA guidelines to collect literature on GR in healthcare. And the VOSviewer software was used to perform a quantitative analysis of these documents to obtain a visual map, including year, country, institution, journal, author, and research topic.ResultsA total of 1,830 papers that involved 976 academic journals, 3,178 institutions, and 133 countries were identified from 1985 to 2023. The United States was the country with the highest production (n = 613), followed by the United Kingdom (n = 289). The institution with the largest number of publications was the University of London in the UK (n = 103); In the author collaboration network, the biggest cluster is Bomhoff M, Bouwman R, Friele R, et al. The top five journals in terms of the number of articles were BMC Health Services Research (n = 70), Plos One (n = 35), Health Policy (n = 33), Social Science & Medicine (n = 29), Health Policy and Planning (n = 29), and Frontiers in Public Health (n = 27). The existing literature mainly focused on “health policy,” “public health,” “China,” “mental health,” “India,” “qualitative research,” “legislation,” and “governance,” et al. Since 2020, research on “COVID-19” has also become a priority in the domain of healthcare.ConclusionThis study reveals the overall performance of the literature on GR published in healthcare. Healthcare needs GR, especially in response to the COVID-19 epidemic, which has played an irreplaceable role. The outbreak of COVID-19 not only tested the health systems of various countries, but also changed GR in healthcare. With the end of COVID-19, whether these changes will end remains to be further studied.