从产业政策角度建立系统框架,分析地方政府怎样实现创新链产业链融合发展,并以深圳市战略性新兴产业为例展开实证研究.首先根据不同产业自身规律在3类融合路径中选择合适路径,其次不论何种产业都有4种融合机制作为工作抓手.具体而言,融合路径包括创新链向产业链端延伸、产业链端向创新链端延伸、搭建两链融合"桥梁";融合机制包括创新资源分配机制、创新项目管理机制、产学研合作机制和创新资源共享机制.

摘 要：欧盟创业能力框架从创新思维、创新资源、创新行动三个维度构建了15个能力指标体系，成为欧盟各国开展创新创业教育的指引手册，也为中国高职院校开展创新创业教育提供了参考标准。

Past research in driving policy innovation has focused on the role of policy entrepreneurs in organizations such as government organizations, firms, and industry associations. Yet, policy entrepreneurs in embedded organizations are rarely examined. Based on the changes in agricultural outsourcing policy in Shandong Province between 2000 and 2016,this paper reveals the process and mechanism by which policy entrepreneurs of embedded organizations（ CO-OP） with Chinese characteristics promote policy innovation. This paper finds that the organizational structure in which policy entrepreneurs operate plays an important, influential role in driving policy innovation.Furthermore,this paper argues that policy entrepreneurs in embedded organizations can form a broad network of subsystem actors based on the organization’s multifaceted,multilevel network relationships.They can accrue the information and institutional legitimacy needed to promote the practice and demonstration of ideas by collaborating with all parties and actors at all levels. This will drive policy innovation through four stages: belief formation, benefit empowerment, alliance expansion, and innovation emergence. Embedded organizations with Chinese characteristics are often criticized for mixing different organizational natures,such as government and business. This study identifies the institutional advantages of embedded organizations to facilitate the emergence of broader policy innovations. China should strengthen the reform and construction of embedded organizations,and enhance the participation of embedded organizations in various public policies,so as to promote highquality innovation based on their advantages of extensive information and institutional legitimacy.

文章围绕"双师型"教师内涵的实质性、特殊性、发展性特点,系统构建了"双师型"教师胜任力框架.框架第一层次聚焦高职人才培养基本要求,面向的是全体高职专业教师群体;框架第二层次聚焦"双高"与世界一流建设目标,面向的是专业教师中的高水平双师群体.两个层次既相互独立,又存在继承发展关系.在构建框架基础上,通过分析706份问卷调查发现被调查者对"双师型"教师胜任力框架认同程度较高,框架构建具有一定合理性,为"双师型"教师认定和考核标准制定提供理论参考.