Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most prevalent human cancers. ARL-6, a member of the ADP ribosylation factor (like) (ARF) protein family, has gained attention as a potential therapeutic target in various malignancies and a prognostic biomarker. However, its specific roles in HCC, both prognostically and biochemically, remain largely unclear. Methods: To examine the functional relevance of ARL-6 in HCC, we acquired data from GEPIA, UALCAN, TIMER, TCGA, GeneMANIA, and Metascape databases. Then, we conducted immunohistochemistry on a replication sample comprising 26 HCC specimens to assess the efficacy of the ARL-6 gene. To unravel the mechanistic intricacies, we employed diverse assays such as the cell counting kit 8 (CCK8), flow cytometry, and transwell invasion assessment. Results: Our findings demonstrated the mRNA expression of ARL-6 was significantly upregulated in HCC compared to normal tissue, as evidenced by comprehensive database analysis. Immunohistochemistry further revealed that ARL-6 expression was remarkably higher in HCC than in para-carcinoma tissues. Moreover, ARL-6 expression exhibited noteworthy variations across diverse LIHC characteristics, including sample type, histological subtype, TP53 mutation status, nodal metastatic status, and cancer stage. In addition, high transcriptional levels of ARL-6 were correlated with diminished overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in HCC patients. Furthermore, our study indicated positive correlations between ARL-6 expression levels and the activities of tumor-infiltrating immune cells such as B cells, myeloid dendritic cells, macrophages, neutrophils, CD8+T cells, and CD4+T cells. Substantiating our findings, database analysis uncovered additional evidence of ARL-6 gene co-expression and its functional significance in HCC cases. Finally, we demonstrated the involvement of the ARL-6 gene in HCC cell invasion, proliferation, and apoptosis. Conclusions: In conclusion, our investigation sheds light on the pivotal role of ARL-6 in influencing HCC prognosis and treatment by modulating the biological activities of tumor cells. These discoveries hold promise for the development of predictive biomarkers and novel therapeutic avenues for affected patients.
有效控制排斥反应是临床肾移植获得成功的基石之一.结合临床和病理学表现,排斥反应的经典类型包括超急性排斥反应、加速性排斥反应、急性排斥反应和慢性排斥反应[1-2].随着Banff分类的更新,2005年依据效应机制的不同,将排斥反应分为T细胞介导的排斥反应(T cell mediated rejection, TCMR)和抗体介导的排斥反应(antibody mediated rejection,AMR)[3].其中慢性活动性AMR(chronic active AMR,caAMR)是影响移植肾远期存活的重要病理机制,现有治疗手段有限且缺乏共识,本文将对近年来关于肾移植术后caAMR的研究进展综述如下.
One case of de novo donor specific antibody(dnDSA)mediated rejection after pediatric kidney transplantation(KT)was analyzed retrospectively.The risk factors and prevention procedures associated with dnDSA induction, and the clinical features and protocols for late post-transplant antibody-mediated rejection(AMR)in pediatric patients were presented.
Ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) is a common complication associated with liver surgery, and macrophages play an important role in hepatic IRI. Liraglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analog primarily used to treat type 2 diabetes and obesity, regulates intracellular calcium homeostasis and protects the cardiomyocytes from injury; however, its role in hepatic IRI is not yet fully understood. This study aimed to investigate whether liraglutide can protect the liver from IRI and determine the possible underlying mechanisms. Our results showed that liraglutide pretreatment significantly alleviated the liver damage caused by ischemia-reperfusion (I/R), as evidenced by H&E staining, serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, and TUNEL staining. Furthermore, the levels of inflammatory cytokines elicited by I/R were distinctly suppressed by liraglutide pretreatment, accompanied by significant reduction in TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 levels. Furthermore, pretreatment with liraglutide markedly inhibited macrophage type I (M1) polarization during hepatic IRI, as revealed by the significant reduction in CD68+ levels in Kupffer cells (KCs) detected via flow cytometry. However, the protective effects of liraglutide on hepatic IRI were partly diminished in GLP-1 receptor-knockout (GLP-1R-/-) mice. Furthermore, in an in vitro study, we assessed the role of liraglutide in macrophage polarization by examining the expression profiles of M1 in bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) from GLP-1R-/- and C57BL/6J mice. Consistent with the results of the in vivo study, liraglutide treatment attenuated the LPS-induced M1 polarization and reduced the expression of M1 markers. However, the inhibitory effect of liraglutide on LPS-induced M1 polarization was largely abolished in BMDMs from GLP-1R-/- mice. Collectively, our study indicates that liraglutide can ameliorate hepatic IRI by inhibiting macrophage polarization towards an inflammatory phenotype via GLP-1R. Its protective effect against liver IRI suggests that liraglutide may serve as a potential drug for the clinical treatment of liver IRI.