The Palaeoproterozoic crust and upper mantle in the region between the Ukrainian and Baltic shields of the East European Craton were built up finally during collision of the previously independent Fennoscandian and Sarmatian crustal segments at c. 1.8-1.7 Ga. EUROBRIDGE seismic profiling and geophysical modelling across the southwestern part of the Craton suggest that the Central Belarus Suture Zone is the junction between the two colliding segments. This junction is marked by strong deformation of the crust and the presence of a metamorphic core complex. At 1.80-1.74 Ga, major late to post-collisional extension and magmatism affected the part of Sarmatia adjoining the Central Belarus Zone and generated a high-velocity layer at the base of the crust. Other sutures separating terranes of different ages are found within Sarmatia and in the Polish-Lithuanian part of Fennoscandia. While Fennoscandia and Sarmatia were still a long distance apart, orogeny was dominantly accretionary. The accreted Palaeoproterozoic terranes in the Baltic-Belarus region of Fennoscandia are all younger than 2.0 Ga (2.0-1.9, 1.90-1.85 and 1.84-1.82 Ga), whereas those in Sarmatia have ages of c. 2.2-2.1 and 2.0-1.95 Ga. Lithospheric deformation and magmatism at c. 1.50-1.45 Ga, and Devonian rifting, are also defined by the EUROBRIDGE seismic and gravity models.

We present new results on the structure resulting from Palaeoproterozoic terrane accretion and later formation of one of the aulacogens in the East European Platform. Seismic data has been acquired along the 530-km-long, N–S-striking EUROBRIDGE'97 traverse across Sarmatia, a major crustal segment of the East European Craton. The profile extends across the Ukrainian Shield from the Devonian Pripyat Trough, across the Palaeoproterozoic Volyn Block and the Korosten Pluton, into the Archaean Podolian Block. Seismic waves from chemical explosions at 18 shot points at approximately 30-km intervals were recorded in two deployments by 120 mobile three-component seismographs at 3–4 km nominal station spacing. The data has been interpreted by use of two-dimensional tomographic travel time inversion and ray trace modelling. The high data quality allows modelling of the P- and S-wave velocity structure along the profile. There are pronounced differences in seismic velocity structure of the crust and uppermost mantle between the three main tectonic provinces traversed by the profile: (i) the Pripyat Trough is a ca. 4-km-deep sedimentary basin, fully located in the Osnitsk–Mikashevichi Igneous Belt in the northern part of the profile. The velocity structure is typical for a Precambrian craton, but is underlain by a ca. 5-km-thick lowest crustal layer of high velocity. The development of the Pripyat Trough appears to have only affected the upper crust without noticeable thinning of the whole crust; this may be explained by a rheologically strong lithosphere at the time of formation of the trough. (ii) Very high seismic velocity and Vp/Vs ratio characterise the Volyn Block and Korosten Pluton to a depth of 15 km and probably also the lowest crust. The values are consistent with an intrusive body of mafic composition in the upper crust that formed from bimodal melts derived from the mantle and the lower crust. (iii) The Podolian Block is close to a typical cratonic velocity structure, although it is characterised by relatively low seismic velocity and Vp/Vs ratio. A pronounced SW-dipping mantle reflector from Moho to at least 70 km depth may represent the Proterozoic suture between Sarmatia and Volgo–Uralia, the structure from terrane accretion, or a later shear zone in the upper mantle. The sub-Moho P-wave seismic velocity is high everywhere along the profile, with the exception of the area above the dipping reflector. This velocity change further supports a plate tectonic origin of the dipping mantle reflector. The profile demonstrates that structure from Palaeoproterozoic plate tectonic processes are still identifiable in the lithosphere, even where younger metamorphic equilibration of the crust has taken place.

During EUROBRIDGE'96 seismic data were acquired along a 544-km NW-SE profile, from the East Lithuanian Belt (EL) to the Ukrainian Shield. Explosive sources from 16 shotpoints at 30-km intervals were recorded by 114 three-component seismographs deployed at 3-4-km intervals along the profile. Tomographic inversion and raytrace modelling, integrated with results from the EUROBRIDGE'95 experiment, established a two-dimensional P-wave velocity lithospheric model and the spatial variation of V-p/V-s. Sedimentary cover in Belarus consists of two principal layers with P-wave velocities of about 2.3 and 4.0 km/s. Upper, middle and lower crystalline crust exhibit velocities of 6.1-6.3, 6.4-6.8 and 6.9-7.2 km/s, and are characterised by low velocity gradients and small contrasts at boundaries. The crust below Belarus is about 50 km thick with Moho elevations of a few kilometres. Mantle P-wave velocities immediately beneath the Moho are generally 8.2-8.4 km/s. A lower lithosphere reflector occurs at 65-70 km di:pth. S-wave velocities are high in the upper crust and low in the lower crust. Our crustal model shows similarities to results from Scandinavia. High lower-crustal velocities and a crustal thickness of about 50 km (common features of Proterozoic crust) are observed throughout the EUROBRIDGE'96 profile. The boundary between the EL and West Lithuanian Granulite Domain (WLG) is associated with pronounced crustal velocity changes, and a thinning of crust towards the northwest. The WLG may be part of a larger southern Baltic Sea tectonic unit. Correlation of our seismic structure with near-surface geology tentatively suggests that contact zones between the EL, Belarus-Baltic Granulite Domain. Central Belarussian Belt (CB), and the Osnitsk-Mikashevichi Igneous Belt all dip slightly to the southeast, consistent with successive docking of these terranes during craton growth;th. A spectacular feature of our model is high velocities throughout the CB crust, which marks the Fennoscandia-Sarmatia suture. Here we observe a change from typical shield/platform crust in the northwest to highly heterogeneous crust with pronounced lower crustal reflectivity in the southeast. Our results are consistent with CB uplift during continental collision. Our model implies significant tectonic involvement of middle crust in the formation of the Pripyat Trough. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.