Na+/H+ antiporters comprise a super-family (CPA) of membrane proteins that are found in all kingdoms of life and are essential in cellular homeostasis of pH, Na+ and volume. Their activity is strictly dependent on pH, a property that underpins their role in pH homeostasis. While several human homologues have long been drug targets, NhaA of Escherichia coli has become the paradigm for this class of secondary active transporters as NhaA crystal structure provided insight into the architecture of this molecular machine. However, the mechanism of the strict pH dependence of NhaA is missing. Here, as a follow up of a recent evolutionary analysis that identified a 'CPA motif', we rationally designed three E. coli NhaA mutants: D133S, I134T, and the double mutant D133S-I134T. Exploring growth phenotype, transport activity and Li+-binding of the mutants, we revealed that Asp133 does not participate directly in proton binding, nor does it directly dictate the pH-dependent transport of NhaA. Strikingly, the variant I134T lost some of the pH control, and the D133S-Il134T double mutant retained Li+ binding in a pH independent fashion. Concurrent to loss of pH control, these mutants bound Li+ more strongly than the WT. Both positions are in close vicinity to the ion-binding site of the antiporter, attributing the results to electrostatic interaction between these residues and Asp164 of the ion-binding site. This is consistent with pH sensing resulting from direct coupling between cation binding and deprotonation in Asp164, which applies also to other CPA antiporters that are involved in human diseases.

The diuretic drug amiloride and its numerous derivatives are competitive inhibitors of mammalian Na(+)/H(+) antiporters and other eukaryotic antiporters. Most prokaryotic antiporters, including the major NhaA family of enterobacteria, are resistant to these compounds. We show that 2-aminoperimidine (AP), a guanidine-containing naphthalene derivative with some similarity to amiloride, acts as a specific inhibitor of NhaA from Escherichia coli. Similar concentrations (IC(50) of 0.9 muM) inhibit the proton motive force dependent Na(+)(Li(+))/H(+) exchange reaction in inside-out sub-bacterial vesicles (at 10 mM NaCl, pH 8) as well as the initial rate of (22)Na(+)/Na(+) exchange mediated by pure NhaA in proteoliposomes. The inhibitor is specific to NhaA type antiporters, so AP is a new tool to study the mechanism and roles of NhaA antiporters of enterobacteria as well as the molecular basis of inhibition by an amiloride-like compound.

Na(+)/H(+) antiporters are ubiquitous membrane proteins that are involved in homeostasis of H(+) and Na(+) throughout the biological kingdom. Corroborating their role in pH homeostasis, many of the Na(+)/H(+) antiporter proteins are regulated directly by pH. The pH regulation of NhaA, the Escherichia coli Na(+)/H(+) antiporter (EcNhaA), as of other, both eukaryotic and prokaryotic Na(+)/H(+) antiporters, involves a pH sensor and conformational changes in different parts of the protein that transduce the pH signal into a change in activity. Thus, residues that affect the pH response, the translocation or both activities cluster in separate domains along the antiporter molecules. Importantly, in the NhaA family, these domains are conserved. Helix-packing model of EcNhaA based on cross-linking data suggests, that in the three dimensional structure of NhaA, residues that affect the pH response may be in close proximity, forming a single pH sensitive domain. Therefore, it is suggested that, despite considerable differences in the primary structure of the antiporters from the bacterial NhaA to the mammalian NHEs, their three-dimensional architectures are conserved. Test of this possibility awaits the atomic resolution of the 3D structure of the antiporters.

A single Cys replacement of Glu at position 252 (E252C) in loop VIII–IX of NhaA increases drastically the Km for Na+ (50-fold) of the Na+/H+ antiporter activity of NhaA and shifts the pH dependence of NhaA activity, by one pH unit, to the alkaline range. In parallel, E252C causes a similar alkaline pH shift to the pH-induced conformational change of loop VIII–IX. Thus, although both the Na+/H+ antiporter activity of wild type NhaA and its accessibility to trypsin at position Lys249 in loop VIII–IX increase with pH between pH 6.5 and 7.5, the response of E252C occurs above pH 8. Furthermore, probing accessibility of pure E252C protein in dodecyl maltoside solution to 2-(4′-maleimidylanilino)-naphthalene-6-sulfonic acid revealed that E252C itself undergoes a pH-dependent conformational change, similar to position Lys249, and the rate of the pH-induced conformational change is increased specifically by the presence of Na+ or Li+, the specific ligands of the antiporter. Chemical modification of E252C by N-ethylmaleimide, 2-(4′-maleimidylanilino)-naphthalene-6-sulfonic acid; [2-(trimethylammonium)ethyl]methane thiosulfonate, or (2-sulfonatoethyl)methanethiosulfonate reversed, to a great extent, the pH shift conferred by E252C but had no effect on the Km of the mutant antiporter.

We have previously shown that the activity of NhaA is regulated by pH and found mutations that affect dramatically the pH dependence of the rate but not the K(m) (for Na(+) and Li(+)) of NhaA. In the present work, we found that helix IV is involved both in ion translocation as well as in pH regulation of NhaA. Two novel types of NhaA mutants were found clustered in trans membrane segment (TMS) IV: One type (D133C, T132C, and P129L) affects the apparent K(m) of NhaA to the cations with no significant effect on the pH profile of the antiporter; no shift of the pH profile was found when the activity of these mutants was measured at saturating Na(+) concentration. In contrast, the other type of mutations (A127V and A127T) was found to affect both the K(m) and the pH dependence of the rate of NhaA whether tested at saturating Na(+) concentration or not. These results imply that residues involved in the ion translocation of NhaA may (A127) or may not (D133, T132, and P129) overlap with those affecting the pH response of the antiporter. All mutants cluster in the N-terminal half of the putative alpha-helix IV, one type on one face, the other on the opposite. Cys accessibility test demonstrated that although D133C is located in the middle of TMS IV, it is inhibited by N-ethylmaleimide and is exposed to the cytoplasm.

The unique trypsin cleavable site of NhaA, the Na(+)/H(+) antiporter of Escherichia coli, was exploited to detect a change in mobility of cross-linked products of NhaA by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Double-Cys replacements were introduced into loops, one on each side of the trypsin cleavage site (Lys 249). The proximity of paired Cys residues was assessed by disulfide cross-linking of the two tryptic fragments, using three homobifunctional cross-linking agents: 1,6-bis(maleimido)hexane (BMH), N,N'-o-phenylenedimaleimide (o-PDM), and N,N'-p-phenylenedimaleimide (p-PDM). The interloop cross-linking was found to be very specific, indicating that the loops are not merely random coils that interact randomly. In the periplasmic side of NhaA, two patterns of cross-linking are observed: (a) all three cross-linking reagents cross-link very efficiently between the double-Cys replacements A118C/S286C, N177C/S352C, and H225C/S352C; (b) only BMH cross-links the double-Cys replacements A118C/S352C, N177C/S286C, and H225C/S286C. In the cytoplasmic side of NhaA, three patterns of cross-linking are observed: (a) all three cross-linking reagents cross-link very efficiently the pairs of Cys replacements L4C/E252C, S146C/L316C, S146C/R383C, and E241C/E252C; (b) BMH and p-PDM cross-link efficiently the pairs of Cys replacements S87C/E252C, S87C/L316C, and S146C/E252C; (c) none of the reagents cross-links the double-Cys replacements L4C/L316C, L4C/R383C, S87C/R383C, A202C/E252C, A202C/L316C, A202C/R383C, E241C/L316C, and E241C/R383C. The data reveal that the N-terminus and loop VIII-IX that have previously been shown to change conformation with pH are in close proximity within the NhaA protein. The data also suggest close proximity between N-terminal and C-terminal helices at both the cytoplasmic and the periplasmic face of NhaA.

One of the most interesting properties of the NhaA Na+/H+ antiporter ofEscherichia coli is the strong regulation of its activity by pH. This regulation is accompanied by a conformational change that can be probed by digestion with trypsin and involves the hydrophilic loop connecting the transmembrane helices VIII–IX. In the present work we show that a monoclonal antibody (mAb), 1F6, recognizes yet another domain of NhaA in a pH-dependent manner. This antibody binds NhaA at pH 8.5 but not at pH 4.5, whereas two other mAbs bind to NhaA independently of pH. The epitope of mAb 1F6 was located at the NH2 terminus of NhaA by probing proteolytic fragments in Western blot analysis and amino acid sequencing. The antibody bound to the peptide HLHRFFSS, starting at the third amino acid of NhaA. A synthetic peptide with this sequence was shown to bind mAb 1F6 both at acidic and alkaline pH suggesting that this peptide is accessible to mAb 1F6 in the native protein only at alkaline pH. Although slightly shifted to acidic pH, the pH profile of the binding of mAb 1F6 to the antiporter is similar to that of both the Na+/H+ antiporter activity as well as to its sensitivity to trypsin. We thus suggest that these pH profiles reflect a pH-dependent conformational change, which leads to activation of the antiporter. Indeed, a replacement of Gly-338 by Ser (G338S), which alleviates the pH dependence of both the NhaA activity as well as its sensitivity to trypsin, affects in a similar pattern the binding of mAb 1F6 to NhaA. Furthermore, the binding site of mAb 1F6 is involved in the functioning of the antiporter as follows: a double Cys replacement H3C/H5C causes an acidic shift by half a pH unit in the pH dependence of the antiporter; N-ethylmaleimide, which does not inhibit the wild-type protein, inhibits H3C/H5C antiporter to an extent similar to that exerted by mAb 1F6.

Digestion with trypsin of purified His-tagged NhaA in a solution of dodecyl maltoside yields two fragments at alkaline pH but only one fragment at acidic pH. Determination of the amino acid sequence of the N terminus of the cleavage products show that the pH-sensitive cleavage site of NhaA, both in isolated everted membrane vesicles as well as in the pure protein in detergent, is Lys-249 in loop VIII-IX, which connects transmembrane segment VIII to IX. Interestingly, the two polypeptide products of the split antiporter remain complexed and co-purify on Ni2+-NTA column. Loop VIII-IX has also been found to play a role in the pH regulation of NhaA; three mutations introduced into the loop shift the pH profile of the Na+/H+ antiporter activity as measured in everted membrane vesicles. An insertion mutation introducing ILe-Glu-Gly between residues Lys-249 and Arg-250 (K249-IEG-R250) and Cys replacement of either Val-254 (V254C) or Glu-241 (E241C) cause acidic shift of the pH profile of the antiporter by 0.5, 1, and 0.3 pH units, respectively. Interestingly, the double mutant E241C/V254C introduces a basic shift of more than 1 pH unit with respect to the single mutation V254C. Taken together these results imply the involvement of loop VIII-IX in the pH-induced conformational change, which leads to activation of NhaA at alkaline pH.

The NhaA Na+/H+ antiporter is the main system responsible for adaptation to Na+ and alkaline pH (in the presence of Na+) in Escherichia coli and many other enteric bacteria. It is under intricate control. At the protein level it is regulated directly by pH, one of its regulatory signals. A pH shift from 7 to 8.5 activates the antiporter and, in a fashion correlated with the activity change, confers a conformation change that, in isolated membrane vesicles, is reflected in the exposure of trypsin-cleavable sites. H225 and G338 are essential for the pH response of NhaA. nhaA transcription is dependent on NhaR, a positive regulator of the LysR family, and is regulated by Na+, the other environmental signal. Na+ affects the NhaR/nhaA interaction directly by changing the footprint of NhaR on nhaA in a pH-dependent fashion. The expression of nhaA is also under global regulation of H-NS. We suggest that the pattern of regulation of nhaA found in E. coli is a paradigm for the response of proteins and genes to H+ and Na+, the most common ions that challenge every cell.

ABSTRACT The bacterial Na+(Li+)/H+antiporter NhaA has been expressed in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. NhaA was present in both the plasma membrane and internal membranes, and it conferred lithium but not sodium tolerance. In cells containing the yeast Ena1-4 (Na+, Li+) extrusion ATPase, the extra lithium tolerance conferred by NhaA was dependent on a functional vacuolar H+ ATPase and correlated with an increase of lithium in an intracellular pool which exhibited slow efflux of cations. In yeast mutants without (Na+, Li+) ATPase, lithium tolerance conferred by NhaA was not dependent on a functional vacuolar H+ ATPase and correlated with a decrease of intracellular lithium. NhaA was able to confer sodium tolerance and to decrease intracellular sodium accumulation in a double mutant devoid of both plasma membrane (Na+, Li+) ATPase and vacuolar H+ ATPase. These results indicate that the bacterial antiporter NhaA expressed in yeast is functional at both the plasma membrane and the vacuolar membrane. The phenotypes conferred by its expression depend on the functionality of plasma membrane (Na+, Li+) ATPase and vacuolar H+ ATPase.

pH controls the activity of the NhaA Na+/H+ antiporter of Escherichia coli. In the present work we show that replacement of glycine 338 of NhaA with serine (G338S) alleviates the pH control of the antiporter. Monitoring Na+-dependent collapse of Delta pH, to assess antiporter activity in isolated membrane vesicles, shows that the mutant protein is practically independent of pH, between pH 7 and 9, and even at pH 6 is 70% active. Similarly the purified reconstituted mutant protein catalyzes pH-independent passive efflux of Na-22 from proteoliposomes as well as Delta pH-driven influx. Whereas the native NhaA in isolated membrane vesicles is exposed to digestion by trypsin only above pH 7, the mutated protein is degraded already at pH 6.5. Delta nhaA Delta nhaB cells transformed with a plasmid encoding the pH-independent antiporter are sensitive to Na+ but not to K+ at alkaline pH, while growing in the presence of both ions at neutral pH. Several possibilities that could explain the Na+ sensitivity of the mutant at alkaline pH were excluded; Western analysis and measurement of Na+/H+ antiporter activity in membrane vesicles, isolated from cells shifted to the non-permissive growth conditions, showed neither reduced expression of G338S-NhaA nor defective activity. The finding that the mutated protein is electrogenic led to the retraction of the idea that the protein is active in vitro but not in vivo at alkaline pH, when only Delta psi exists in the cells. The Na+ concentration needed for half-maximal activity of G338S in isolated everted membrane vesicles is similar to that of the wild type. Therefore an increase in intracellular Na+ due to a reduced antiporter affinity could not explain the results. It is suggested that the loss of growth. at alkaline pH in the presence of Na+ is due to the loss of the pH control of the mutated NhaA, Indeed, in the four mutations suppressing G338S phenotype, growth at alkaline pH was restored together with the pH regulation of NhaA, Three of the four suppressor mutations cluster in helix IV,whereas the original mutation is in helix XI, suggesting that the two helixes interact.

Cysteine residues were found nonessential in the mechanism of the NhaA antiporter activity of Escherichia coli. The functional C-less NhaA has provided the groundwork to study further histidine 225 of NhaA which has previously been suggested to play an important role in the activation of NhaA at alkaline pH (Rimon, A., Gerchman, Y., Olami, Y., Schuldiner, S. and Padan, E. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 26813-26817). C-less H225C was constructed and shown to possess an antiporter activity 60% of that of C-less antiporter and a pH profile similar to that of both the C-less or wild-type antiporters. Remarkably, whereas neither the wild-type nor the C-less antiporters were affected by N-ethylmaleimide, C-less H225C was inhibited by this reagent. To determine the degree of alkylation of the antiporter protein by N-ethylmaleimide, antiporter derivatives tagged at their C termini with six histidines residues were constructed. Alkylation of C-less H225C was measured by labeling of everted membrane vesicles with [14C]N-ethylmaleimide, affinity purification of the His-tagged antiporter, and determination of the radioactivity of the purified protein. This assay showed that H225C is alkylated to a much higher level than any of the native cysteinyl residues of NhaA reaching saturation at alkyl/NhaA stoichiometry of 1. The wild-type derivative showed at least 10-fold less alkylation even at higher concentrations, suggesting that H225C resides in a domain that is much more exposed to N-ethylmaleimide than the native cysteinyl residues of NhaA. Since H225C residues both in right-side out and inside-out membrane vesicles were quantitatively alkylated by N-ethylmaleimide, this assay was used to determine the accessibility of H225C to other SH reagents by titrating the H225C left free to react with N-ethylmaleimide, following exposure of the membranes to the reagents. Furthermore, since membrane-impermeant probes can react with residues in membrane-embedded protein only if accessible to the medium containing the reagent, the assay was used to determine the membrane topology of H225C. As expected for a membrane-permeant probe, p-chloromercuribenzoate reacted with H225C as efficiently as N-ethylmaleimide in both membrane orientations. Similar results were obtained with methanethiosulfonate ethylammonium supporting the recent observations that this probe is membrane-permeant. On the other hand, both membrane-impermeant reagents p-chloromercuribenzosulfonate and methanethiosulfonate ethyl-trimethyl ammonium bromide reacted with H225C 10-fold more in right-side out than in inside-out vesicles, and p-chloromercuribenzosulfonate also blocked completely the H225C in intact cells. These results strongly suggest that H225C is exposed at the periplasmic face of the membrane.

nhaAencodes an Na 1 /H 1 antiporter inEscherichia coliwhich is essential for adaptation to high salinity and alkaline pH in the presence of Na 1 . We used Northern (RNA) analysis to measure directly the cellular levels ofnhaAmRNA.NhaRbelongstotheLysRfamilyofregulatoryproteins.Consistentwithourpreviousdatawith annhaA*-*lacZfusion, NhaR was found to be a positive regulator and Na 1 was found to be a specific inducer ofnhaAtranscription. In thenhaA*-*lacZfusion, maximal induction was observed at alkaline pH. In contrast, in thenhaA 1 strain both the level ofnhaAexpression and the induction ratio were lower at alkaline pH. This differencemaybeduetotheactivityofNhaAinthewild-typestrainasNhaAefficientlyexcretedNa 1 atalkaline pHandreducedtheintracellularconcentrationofNa 1 ,thesignalforinduction.Wealsoshowedthatalthough the global regulatorrpoSwas not involved innhaAregulation, the global regulatorhnsplayed a role. Thus, the expression of nhaA*-*lacZ was derepressed in strains bearing hns mutations and transformation with a low-copy-number plasmid carryinghnsrepressed expression and restored Na 1 induction. The derepression in hns strains was nhaR independent. Most interestingly, multicopy nhaR, which in an hns 1 background acted only as an Na 1 -dependent positive regulator, acted as a repressor in anhnsstrain in the absence of Na 1 but

nhaA encodes an Na+/H+ antiporter in Escherichia coli which is essential for adaptation to high salinity and alkaline pH in the presence of Na+. We used Northern (RNA) analysis to measure directly the cellular levels of nhaA mRNA. NhaR belongs to the LysR family of regulatory proteins. Consistent with our previous data with an nhaA'-'lacZ fusion, NhaR was found to be a positive regulator and Na+ was found to be a specific inducer of nhaA transcription. In the nhaA'-'lacZ fusion, maximal induction was observed at alkaline pH. In contrast, in the nhaA+ strain both the level of nhaA expression and the induction ratio were lower at alkaline pH. This difference may be due to the activity of NhaA in the wild-type strain as NhaA efficiently excreted Na+ at alkaline pH and reduced the intracellular concentration of Na+, the signal for induction. We also showed that although the global regulator rpoS was not involved in nhaA regulation, the global regulator hns played a role. Thus, the expression of nhaA'-'lacZ was derepressed in strains bearing hns mutations and transformation with a low-copy-number plasmid carrying hns repressed expression and restored Na+ induction. The derepression in hns strains was nhaR independent. Most interestingly, multicopy nhaR, which in an hns+ background acted only as an Na+-dependent positive regulator, acted as a repressor in an hns strain in the absence of Na+ but was activated in the presence of the ion. Hence, an interplay between nhaR and hns in the regulation of nhaA was suggested.

We have previously shown that replacement of His-226 in the NhaA Na+/H+ antiporter of Escherichia coli to Arg (H226R) shifts the pH profile of the antiporter toward acidic pH and as a result of delta nhaA delta nhaB strain bearing this mutation is Na+ sensitive at alkaline pH (Gerchman, Y., Olami, Y., Rimon, A., Taglicht, D., Schuldiner, S. and Padan, E. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90, 1212-1216). In the present work the role of His-226 in the response of NhaA to pH has been studied in detail. The Na+ sensitivity of the delta nhaA delta nhaB mutant bearing the H226R-NhaA plasmid at alkaline pH provided a very powerful tool to isolate revertants and suppressants of H226R growing on high Na+ at alkaline pH. With this approach cysteine (H226C) and serine (H226S) replacements were found to efficiently replace His-226 and yield an antiporter, which like the wild-type protein, is activated by pH between pH 7 and 8. These results imply that polarity and/or hydrogen bonding, the common properties shared by these amino acid residues, are essential at position 226 for pH regulation of NhaA. This suggestion was substantiated by site-directed mutagenesis of His-226 either to alanine (H226A) or aspartate (H226D). Whereas H226A-NhaA shows very low activity which is not activated by pH, H226D-NhaA is active and regulated by pH. The pH profile of H226D is shifted by half a pH unit toward alkaline pH, as opposed to the previously isolated mutant H226R which has a pH profile shift, to the same extent, but toward acidic pH. It is suggested that charge modifies the pH profile but is not essential for the pH regulation of NhaA.

The nhaA gene of Escherichia coli, which encodes a pH-activated Na+/H+ antiporter, has been modified; six of its eight histidine codons were mutated to arginine codons by site-directed mutagenesis, yielding the mutations H254R-H257R (a double mutant), H226R, H39R, H244R, and H319R. In addition a deletion (delta nhaA1-14) lacking the remaining two histidines, His-3 and His-5, has been constructed. By comparing the phenotypes conferred by plasmids bearing the various mutations to the phenotype of the wild type upon transformation of strains NM81 (delta nhaA) or EP432 (delta nhaA, delta nhaB) we found that none of the NhaA histidines are essential for the Na+/H+ antiporter activity of the NhaA protein. However, the replacement of His-226 by Arg markedly changes the pH dependence of the antiporter. All mutants except H226R confer to NM81 and EP432 Na+ resistance up to pH 8.5 as well as Li+ resistance. Cells bearing H226R are resistant to Li+ and to Na+ at neutral pH, but they become sensitive to Na+ above pH 7.5. Analysis of the Na+/H+ antiporter activity of membrane vesicles derived from H226R cells shows that the mutated protein is activated by pH to the same extent as the wild type. However, whereas the activation of the wild-type NhaA occurs between pH 7 and pH 8, that of H226R antiporter occurs between pH 6.5 and pH 7.5. Furthermore, while the wild-type antiporter remains almost fully active at least up to pH 8.5, H226R is reversibly inactivated above pH 7.5, reaching 10-20% of the maximal activity at pH 8.5. We suggest that His-226 is part of a pH-sensitive site that regulates the activity of NhaA.