BACKGROUND:To report management and survival outcomes of gallbladder cancer (GBC) in the United Kingdom and to identify prognostic factors associated with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). METHODS:Patients undergoing surgery for GBC between January 2014 and December 2022 across 24 UK centres were included. Demographic, treatment, histopathological, and survival data were analysed. RESULTS:516 patients underwent surgery for GBC, with a median follow-up of 25 months. Patients with T3-T4 tumours more frequently presented with jaundice, had non-incidental disease, and underwent major hepatectomy compared with those with T1-T2 tumours. Advanced stage, nodal metastasis, vascular invasion, and perineural invasion were more common in patients undergoing major hepatectomy, which was also associated with higher major morbidity and 30-day mortality. Propensity score-matched analysis demonstrated no significant benefit in DFS or OS among patients who received adjuvant therapy compared with those who did not. On multivariable analysis, T3-T4 stage, nodal disease, and perineural invasion predicted poorer DFS, while T3-T4 stage and nodal disease predicted worse OS. DISCUSSION:This nationwide study demonstrates the evolution of management practices for GBC in the UK. Adverse tumour biology remains the principal determinant of survival following surgery for GBC.
This study aimed to compare outcomes of hand-sewn and stapler closure techniques of pancreatic stump in patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy (DP). Impact of stapler closure reinforcement using mesh on outcomes was also evaluated. Literature search was carried out using multiple data sources to identify studies that compared hand-sewn and stapler closure techniques in management of pancreatic stump following DP. Odds ratio (OR) was determined for clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) via random-effects modelling. Subsequently, trial sequential analysis was performed. Thirty-two studies with a total of 4,022 patients undergoing DP with hand-sewn (n = 1,184) or stapler (n = 2,838) closure technique of pancreatic stump were analyzed. Hand-sewn closure significantly increased the risk of clinically relevant POPF compared to stapler closure (OR: 1.56, p = 0.02). When stapler closure was considered, staple line reinforcement significantly reduced formation of such POPF (OR: 0.54, p = 0.002). When only randomized controlled trials were considered, there was no significant difference in clinically relevant POPF between hand-sewn and stapler closure techniques (OR: 1.20, p = 0.64) or between reinforced and standard stapler closure techniques (OR: 0.50, p = 0.08). When observational studies were considered, hand-sewn closure was associated with a significantly higher rate of clinically relevant POPF compared to stapler closure (OR: 1.59, p = 0.03). Moreover, when stapler closure was considered, staple line reinforcement significantly reduced formation of such POPF (OR: 0.55, p = 0.02). Trial sequential analysis detected risk of type 2 error. In conclusion, reinforced stapler closure in DP may reduce risk of clinically relevant POPF compared to hand-sewn closure or stapler closure without reinforcement. Future randomized research is needed to provide stronger evidence.
Background: Bench liver reduction, with or without intestinal length reduction (LR) (coupled with delayed closure and abdominal wall prostheses), has been a strategy adopted by our program for small children due to the limited availability of size-matched donors. This report describes the short, medium, and long-term outcomes of this graft reduction strategy.Methods: A single-center, retrospective analysis of children that underwent intestinal transplantation (April 1993 to December 2020) was performed. Patients were grouped according to whether they received an intestinal graft of full length (FL) or following LR.Results: Overall, 105 intestinal transplants were performed. The LR group (n = 10) was younger (14.5 months vs. 40.0 months, p = .012) and smaller (8.7 kg vs. 13.0 kg, p = .032) compared to the FL group (n = 95). Similar abdominal closure rates were achieved after LR, without any increase in abdominal compartment syndrome (1/10 vs. 7/95, p = .806). The 90-day graft and patient survival were similar (9/10, 90% vs. 83/95, 86%; p = .810). Medium and long-term graft survival at 1 year (8/10, 80% vs. 65/90, 71%; p = .599), and 5 years (5/10, 50% vs. 42/84, 50%; p = 1.00) was similar.Conclusion: LR of intestinal grafts appears to be a safe strategy for infants and small children requiring intestinal transplantation. This technique should be considered in the situation of significant size mismatch of intestine containing grafts.
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. Not applicable.
Historically, locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LAPDAC) was considered a palliative condition. Advances in treatment have resulted in studies reporting survival after neoadjuvant treatment and surgery similar to earlier disease stages. However, there is no consensus on optimal LAPDAC management. Our aim was a systematic review of published evidence on LAPDAC treatment strategies with curative intent. Twenty-eight studies defining LAPDAC as per established criteria and reporting outcomes after neoadjuvant treatment with a view to resection were included. Primary outcomes were resection rate and proportion of curative resections. Secondary outcomes were postoperative mortality, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Neoadjuvant treatment varied significantly, most common being the combination of folinic acid, fluorouracil, irontecan, and oxaliplatin. Median percentage of patients proceeding to surgery after completion of neoadjuvant pathway was 33.5%. Median resection rate was 25%. Median R0 resection was 80% of resected patients. These outcomes ranged 0% to 100% across studies. Ninety-day postoperative mortality ranged from 0% to 5%. Median progression-free and overall survival for resected patients were 12.9 and 30 months, respectively, versus 13.2 months overall survival for unresected patients. In conclusion, although there is wide variability in reported LAPDAC resection rates post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy, retrospective data suggest that neoadjuvant treatment followed by surgery results in improved survival.
Congenital intrahepatic arterio-portal fistulae (cIAPF) are rare, high-flow vascular malformations that usually present with portal hypertension. They almost never cause heart failure, unless there is associated congenital heart disease or the ductus venosus in patent. We present an unusual case of IAPF in an 11-day-old boy, who presented with features of cardiac failure associated with increased N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT pro-BNP). The IAPF arose directly from the aorta, separated from the hepatic artery and divided to separately supply both left and right portal veins. The ductus venosus was occluded. The IAPF was treated with embolization of the aorto-portal fistula, accessed through a direct percutaneous puncture of the fistula. Embolization was associated with an immediate clinical improvement and a rapid and sustained normalization of the NT pro-BNP level. A similar re-presentation was noted and treated with repeat embolization. The child is well on follow-up. To our knowledge, this is the first case of cIAPF, which was presented with cardiac failure when the ductus venosus has closed and has been treated successfully with direct, percutaneous transhepatic embolization of the fistula, twice. Serial clinical follow-up and ultrasonographical examinations have proven to be an effective strategy to detect recurrent fistulae.
Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of resection margin status in patients with KRAS mutations (mt-KRAS) when compared to those with wild-type KRAS (wt-KRAS) on long-term outcomes in patients with resected CRLM. Methods: All patients who underwent resection of CRLM with curative intent between January 2011 and December 2016 and had a KRAS type recorded were included in the study. Overall survival (OS), as well as death-censored overall (RFS) and liver-specific (LS-RFS) recurrence-free survival between KRAS types and the margin status within KRAS subgroups were compared using Cox regression models. Results: Data were available for N = 500 patients (30.4% mt-KRAS). mt-KRAS status was independently associated with significantly shorter OS. Within the wt-KRAS subgroup, smaller margins were found to be associated with significantly shorter death-censored LS-RFS (p < 0.001), with HRs of 1.93 (p = 0.005) for 1-4 mm margins and 2.83 (p < 0.001) for <1 mm margins, relative to those with clear margins. No such association was observed in the mt-KRAS subgroup (p = 0.721). Conclusion: The resection margin status is of greater importance in patients with wt-KRAS. Such information could be useful in the operative planning, especially for those with multiple metastatic deposits, and also in the post-operative counselling and surveillance based on the margin and KRAS status.
Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is the commonest procedure performed for pancreatic cancer.Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI) may be caused or exacerbated by surgery and remains underdiagnosed and undertreated.The aim of this review was to ascertain the incidence of PEI, its consequences and management in the setting of PD for indications other than chronic pancreatitis.A literature search of databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane and Scopus) was carried out with the MeSH terms "pancreatic exocrine insufficiency" and "Pancreaticoduodenectomy". Studies that analysed PEI and its complications in the setting of PD for malignant and benign disease were included.Studies reporting PEI in the setting of PD for chronic pancreatitis, conference abstracts and reviews were excluded.The incidence of PEI approached 100% following PD in some series.The pre-operative incidence varied depending on the characteristics of the patient cohort and it was higher (46%-93%) in series where pancreatic cancer was the predominant indication for surgery.Variability was also recorded with regards to the method used for the diagnosis and evaluation of pancreatic function and malabsorption.Pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy is the mainstay of the management.PEI is common and remains undertreated after PD.Future studies are required for the identification of a welltolerated, reliable and reproducible diagnostic test in this setting.