Purpose This study aims to investigate the lower extremity loading during activities of daily living (ADLs) using the Continuous Scale of Physical Functional Performance (CS-PFP 10) test and wireless sensor insoles in healthy volunteers. Methods In this study, 42 participants were recruited, consisting of 21 healthy older adults (mean age 69.6 ± 4.6 years) and 21 younger healthy adults (mean age 23.6 ± 1.8 years). The performance of the subjects during ADLs was assessed using the CS-PFP 10 test, which comprised 10 tasks. The lower extremity loading was measured using wireless sensor insoles (OpenGo, Moticon, Munich, Germany) during the CS-PFP 10 test, which enabled the measurement of ground reaction forces, including the mean and maximum total forces during the stance phase, expressed in units of body weight (BW). Results The total CS-PFP 10 score was significantly lower in older participants compared to the younger group (mean total score of 57.1 ± 9.0 compared to 78.2 ± 5.4, respectively). No significant differences in the mean total forces were found between older and young participants. The highest maximum total forces were observed during the tasks ‘endurance walk’ (young: 1.97 ± 0.34 BW, old: 1.70 ± 0.43 BW) and ‘climbing stairs’ (young: 1.65 ± 0.36 BW, old: 1.52 ± 0.28 BW). Only in the endurance walk, older participants showed a significantly higher maximum total force ( p < 0.001). Conclusion The use of wireless sensor insoles in a laboratory setting can effectively measure the load on the lower extremities during ADLs. These findings could offer valuable insights for developing tailored recommendations for patients with partial weight-bearing restrictions.

BACKGROUND:The aim of this study was to investigate real-life speech levels of health professionals during communication with older inpatients in small group settings.METHODS:This is a prospective observational study assessing group interactions between geriatric inpatients and health professionals in a geriatric rehabilitation unit of a tertiary university hospital (Bern, Switzerland). We measured speech levels of health professionals during three typical group interactions (discharge planning meeting (n = 21), chair exercise group (n = 5), and memory training group (n = 5)) with older inpatients. Speech levels were measured using the CESVA LF010 (CESVA instruments s.l.u., Barcelona, Spain). A threshold of <60 dBA was defined as a potentially inadequate speech level.RESULTS:Overall, mean talk time of recorded sessions was 23.2 (standard deviation 8.3) minutes. The mean proportion of talk time with potentially inadequate speech levels was 61.6% (sd 32.0%). The mean proportion of talk time with potentially inadequate speech levels was significantly higher in chair exercise groups (95.1% (sd 4.6%)) compared to discharge planning meetings (54.8% (sd 32.5%), p = 0.01) and memory training groups (56.3% (sd 25.4%), p = 0.01).CONCLUSIONS:Our data show that real-life speech level differs between various types of group settings and suggest potentially inadequate speech levels by healthcare professionals requiring further study.

This scoping review aims to summarise recent developments in Geriatric Medicine that will potentially inform the updating of undergraduate medical curricula for geriatric content. Based on the thematic analysis of 367 records out of 2503 identified records, we summarised findings across six major themes: curriculum; topics; teaching methods; teaching settings; medical students’ skills and medical students’ attitudes. This review could inform future shaping of undergraduate medical curricula for geriatric content, through model curricula, expansion of geriatric topics and use of various teaching methods and settings. The world’s population is ageing. Therefore, every doctor should receive geriatric medicine training during their undergraduate education. This review aims to summarise recent developments in geriatric medicine that will potentially inform developments and updating of undergraduate medical curricula for geriatric content. We systematically searched the electronic databases Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase and Pubmed, from 1st January 2009 to 18th May 2021. We included studies related to (1) undergraduate medical students and (2) geriatric medicine or ageing or older adults and (3) curriculum or curriculum topics or learning objectives or competencies or teaching methods or students’ attitudes and (4) published in a scientific journal. No language restrictions were applied. We identified 2503 records and assessed the full texts of 393 records for eligibility with 367 records included in the thematic analysis. Six major themes emerged: curriculum, topics, teaching methods, teaching settings, medical students’ skills and medical students’ attitudes. New curricula focussed on minimum Geriatrics Competencies, Geriatric Psychiatry and Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment; vertical integration of Geriatric Medicine into the curriculum has been advocated. Emerging or evolving topics included delirium, pharmacotherapeutics, healthy ageing and health promotion, and Telemedicine. Teaching methods emphasised interprofessional education, senior mentor programmes and intergenerational contact, student journaling and reflective writing, simulation, clinical placements and e-learning. Nursing homes featured among new teaching settings. Communication skills, empathy and professionalism were highlighted as essential skills for interacting with older adults. We recommend that future undergraduate medical curricula in Geriatric Medicine should take into account recent developments described in this paper. In addition to including newly emerged topics and advances in existing topics, different teaching settings and methods should also be considered. Employing vertical integration throughout the undergraduate course can usefully supplement learning achieved in a dedicated Geriatric Medicine undergraduate course. Interprofessional education can improve understanding of the roles of other professionals and improve team-working skills. A focus on improving communication skills and empathy should particularly enable better interaction with older patients. Embedding expected levels of Geriatric competencies should ensure that medical students have acquired the skills necessary to effectively treat older patients.

BACKGROUND:entrustable professional activities (EPAs) have become an important component of competency-based medical education. The aim of this study is to evaluate how geriatric medicine learning objectives are addressed by undergraduate medical curricula including EPAs. METHODS:we performed a scoping review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines to identify undergraduate medical curricula that include EPAs. A content analysis was conducted to examine how these curricula address the care of older individuals. In addition, we mapped the curricula to 19 geriatric medicine learning objectives identified from the European curriculum of undergraduate medical education. RESULTS:we found nine curricula, each containing between 4 and 16 core EPAs. In the sections describing the EPAs, three of the nine curricula specify that all core EPAs apply to all age groups including older patients, whereas the remaining six curricula either only refer to older patients in selected EPAs or not at all. Mapping revealed that some geriatric medicine learning objectives are covered by most curricula (e.g. medication use, multidisciplinary team work), whereas others are lacking in the majority (e.g. normal ageing, geriatric assessment, cognitive assessment, nutrition assessment, decision-making capacity assessment, long-term care). Three curricula cover most geriatric learning objectives by using a matrix aligning EPAs with geriatric competencies. CONCLUSIONS:geriatric learning objectives continue to be missing from undergraduate medical curricula, also from those adopting the novel approach of EPAs. However, this review also identified some curricula that might serve as models for how geriatric learning objectives can be successfully covered within future EPA frameworks.

In 2014, the European undergraduate curriculum in Geriatric Medicine was published to cover the minimum requirements that a medical student should achieve by the end of medical school. In 2019, the European postgraduate curriculum in Geriatric Medicine outlined the minimum recommended training requirements to become a geriatrician at specialist level in the EU. The postgraduate dimension of Geriatric Medicine education is a highly relevant topic for all, since most physicians-independently of their specialty-are inevitably involved in the care of older patients, but for most physicians, geriatrics is not part of their postgraduate generalist or specialty training. A key area for postgraduate education remains the provision of Geriatric Medicine competencies to all specialties outside geriatrics. There is also need for wider educational initiatives to improve the gerontological education of patients and the public. Bernard Isaacs famously coined the expression 'geriatric giants' or the four clinical I's: Intellectual impairment, Incontinence, Immobility, and Instability. However, non-clinical giants exist. In education, we face challenges of Investment, Inspiration, Integration, and Interprofessionality; and in research, we need to attract Interest and Income, and generate Innovation and Impact. Without strengthening the links between all giants, we will not be able to achieve the ambition of age-attuned societies. A key goal for gerontological education is to enhance everyone's understanding of the wide diversity underlying the 'older people' demographic label, which will ultimately promote services and societies that are more responsive and inclusive to the needs of all older adults, irrespective of their health status.

Geriatric medicine has evolved to an accepted specialty in 23 European countries. Despite much heterogeneity of postgraduate geriatric curricula, European societies have succeeded in defining a common core curriculum with a list of minimum training requirements for obtaining the specialty title of geriatric medicine. Geriatricians play a leading role in finding solutions for the challenges of health care of multimorbid older patients. One of these challenges is the demographic shift with the number of adults aged 80 years and older in Europe expected to double by 2050. Although geriatric units will play a role in the care of frail older patients, new care models are needed to integrate the comprehensive geriatric assessment approach for the care of the vast majority of older patients admitted to non-geriatric hospital units. Over the last few years, co-management approaches have been developed to address this gap. Innovative models are also in progress for ambulatory care, prevention and health promotion programs, and long-term care. Efforts to implement geriatric learning objectives in undergraduate training, and the generation of practice guidelines for geriatric syndromes may help to improve the quality of care for older patients.

The COVID-19 pandemic imposed both constraints and opportunities for innovation in emergency care delivery. Visits to the emergency department (ED) plunged by as much as 42% in the US, resulting in excess morbidity and mortality due to patients deferring or avoiding emergency care. With the declaration of a public health emergency, payors such as Medicare authorized emergency physicians (EPs) to bill for evaluation and management services delivered through telehealth—potentially allowing EPs to project emergency care beyond the four walls of the physical ED. If adopted, the provision of emergency care via telehealth could expand the reach of emergency medicine, not only during a pandemic but also more broadly, and especially as aging populations choose to receive more care at home. Such expansion of emergency care could benefit from perspectives of EPs in terms of the motivations, barriers, and necessary capabilities. Thus, our objectives were to survey and profile EPs to better understand the potential for telehealth in emergency care delivery. In collaboration with ACEP and the Emergency Medicine Practice Resource Network (EMPRN), we designed a survey instrument comprising of 5 main questions that provided ranked choice selections. The survey was sent electronically to a group of EMPRN volunteers representing EPs from diverse geographic, age, and practice levels. The survey was sent to a total number of 765 participants, of which a total of 140 (18%) responded. In terms of motivations, respondents identified early engagement with the option to escalate care to the ED if necessary (77% ranked as very important or somewhat important). Respondents also identified the opportunity to quickly address non-life-threatening complaints that may not have needed an ED visit (76% ranked as very important or somewhat important). The top two identified barriers ranked as very significant or somewhat significant were the inability to obtain an adequate evaluation of the patient (76%) and a lack of support personnel in patients' homes to assist with virtual visits (64%). A related series of responses ranked the needed capabilities necessary for supportive personnel to address barriers to telehealth use. (Table 1). This survey is a mechanism to begin understanding EPs' perceptions and what they would need to feel comfortable to safely provide telehealth services in the ED. The results revealed that EPs recognize certain opportunities in terms of the potential future of telehealth in emergency care delivery. However, specific barriers were identified. This survey suggests that the ability to escalate care and obtain adequate telehealth exams with presenters and diagnostic support will be important for EPs to feel safe delivering telehealth services.

Introduction Early identification of frailty by clinical instruments or accumulation of deficit indexes can contribute to improve healthcare for older adults, including the prevention of negative outcomes in acute care. However, conflicting evidence exists on how to best capture frailty in this setting. Simultaneously, the increasing utilisation of electronic health records (EHRs) opens up new possibilities for research and patient care, including frailty. Methods and analysis The Swiss Frailty Network and Repository (SFNR) primarily aims to develop an electronic Frailty Index (eFI) from routinely available EHR data in order to investigate its predictive value against length of stay and in-hospital mortality as two important clinical outcomes in a study sample of 1000–1500 hospital patients aged 65 years and older. In addition, we will examine the correlation between the eFI and a test-based clinical Frailty Instrument to compare both concepts in Swiss older adults in acute care settings. As a Swiss Personalized Health Network (SPHN) driver project, our study will report on the characteristics and usability of the first nationwide eFI in Switzerland connecting all five Swiss University Hospitals’ Geriatric Departments with a representative sample of patients aged 65 years and older admitted to acute care. Ethics and dissemination The study protocol was approved by the competent ethics committee of the Canton of Zurich (BASEC-ID 2019-00445). All acquired data will be handled according to SPHN’s ethical framework for responsible data processing in personalised health research. Analyses will be performed within the secure BioMedIT environment, a national infrastructure to enable secure biomedical data processing, an integral part of SPHN. Trial registration number NCT04516642 .

Approximately 10-30% of older patients in the emergency department (ED) exhibit delirium, which goes unrecognized by up to 75% of providers. Delirium is linked to increased lengths of stay, in-hospital falls, cognitive decline, and mortality, yet in a recent national survey of ACEP members, only 14% reported having a protocol addressing delirium in the ED. We conducted a feasibility pilot of a delirium toolkit developed to improve screening and management of delirium in the ED. Supported by a monthly workgroup, four EDs used the toolkit to develop and implement distinct quality improvement (QI) initiatives contextually appropriate to their ED (sites represented a range of ED environments). QI initiatives included delirium screening (using the CAM, bCAM, and/or DTS instruments) as well as delirium management strategies. Toolkit feasibility testing included assessment of implementation speed, protocol adherence, and qualitative feedback. Sites implemented and reported on process metrics for their QI initiatives from July – November 2020. Findings reflect data from three sites (the fourth site did not contribute quantitative data). Over 73% of ED staff received delirium protocol training across sites in the first month of implementation, and staff participation in additional monthly trainings continued at a lower intensity over time. A total of 7,107 delirium screenings were conducted (representing 43% of older adults visiting the three EDs during the study period) and 4.5% of delirium screenings were positive. Over time, the monthly number and proportion of older adults screened for delirium trended slightly downwards, while the proportion of positive delirium screenings trended upwards. The sites provided 1,460 instances of delirium management activities (some patients received more than one). These activities were grouped into over a dozen different categories, with documenting an updated diagnosis or disposition being most common (300 instances), followed by orientation (239 instances) and hydration/nutrition interventions (196 instances). All pilot sites leveraged the ED-Delirium Toolkit to develop QI initiatives, with three of the four sites contributing data demonstrating successful implementation. These delirium QI initiatives were seen as complementary activities to the concurrent pandemic priorities given the recognition of delirium as both a presenting symptom as well as a common complication of COVID-19. ED nurses may have been able to improve targeted screening of patients over time based on the increasing positivity rate and declining proportion and number of screenings conducted. Given the number of staff trained and scale of delirium management activities, use of the toolkit increased awareness of and interventions for addressing delirium in the ED.

Background Population is ageing and orthogeriatric care is an emerging research topic. Purpose This bibliometric review aims to provide an overview, to investigate the status and trends in research in the field of orthogeriatric care of the most influential literature. Methods From the Core Collection databases in the Thomson Reuters Web of Knowledge, the most influential original articles with reference to orthogeriatric care were identified in December 2020 using a multistep approach. A total of 50 articles were included and analysed in this bibliometric review. Results The 50 most cited articles were published between 1983 and 2017. The number of total citations per article ranged from 34 to 704 citations (mean citations per article: n = 93). Articles were published in 34 different journals between 1983 and 2017. In the majority of publications, geriatricians (62%) accounted for the first authorship, followed by others (20%) and (orthopaedic) surgeons (18%). Articles mostly originated from Europe (76%), followed by Asia–pacific (16%) and Northern America (8%). Key countries (UK, Sweden, and Spain) and key topic (hip fracture) are key drivers in the orthogeriatric research. The majority of articles reported about therapeutic studies (62%). Conclusion This bibliometric review acknowledges recent research. Orthogeriatric care is an emerging research topic in which surgeons have a potential to contribute and other topics such as intraoperative procedures, fractures other than hip fractures or elective surgery are related topics with the potential for widening the field to research.

Background Although gait speed is a widely used measure in older people, testing methods are highly variable. We conducted a systematic review to investigate the influence of testing procedures on resulting gait speed. Methods We followed the PRISMA checklist for this systematic review. Two independent reviewers screened Pubmed and Embase for publications on pairwise comparisons of testing procedures of usual gait speed. Descriptives were abstracted from the included publications using a predefined extraction tool by two independent reviewers. We defined the cut-off for the minimal clinically imporant diffence in gait speed as 0.1 m/sec. Results Of a total of 2109 records identified for screening, 29 reports on 53 pairwise comparisons were analyzed. The median (range) difference in gait speed for dynamic versus static start was 0.06 (-0.02 to 0.35) m/sec (14 reports); for longer versus shorter test distance 0.04 (-0.05 to 0.23) m/sec (14 reports); for automatic versus manual timing 0.00 (-0.05 to 0.07) m/sec (12 reports), for hard versus soft surfaces -0.11 (-0.18 to 0.08) m/sec (six reports), and electronic walkways versus usual walk test 0.04 (-0.08 to 0.14) m/sec (seven reports), respectively. No report compared the effect of finishing procedures. Conclusions The type of starting procedure, the length of the test distance, and the surface of the walkway may have a clinically relevant impact on measured gait speed. Manual timing resulted in statistically significant differences of measured gait speed as compared to automatic timing, but was below the level of clinical importance. These results emphasize that it is key to use a strictly standardized method for obtaining a reliable and valid measurement of gait speed.

In older patients, sarcopenia is a prevalent disease associated with negative outcomes. Sarcopenia has been investigated in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), but the criteria for diagnosis of the disease are heterogeneous. This systematic review of the current literature aims to evaluate the prevalence of sarcopenia in patients undergoing TAVI and to analyse the impact of sarcopenia on clinical outcomes. A comprehensive search of the literature has been performed in electronic databases from the date of initiation until March 2020. Using a pre-defined search strategy, we identified studies assessing skeletal muscle mass, muscle quality and muscle function as measures for sarcopenia in patients undergoing TAVI. We evaluated how sarcopenia affects the outcomes mortality at ≥1 year, prolonged length of hospital stay, and functional decline. We identified 18 observational studies, enrolling a total number of 9’513 patients. For assessment of skeletal muscle mass, all included studies used data from computed tomography. Cutoff points for definition of low muscle mass were heterogeneous, and prevalence of sarcopenia varied between 21.0% and 70.2%. In uni- or multivariate regression analysis of different studies, low muscle mass was found to be a significant predictor of mortality, prolonged length of hospital stay, and functional decline. No interventional study was identified measuring the effect of nutritional or physiotherapy interventions on sarcopenia in TAVI patients. Sarcopenia is highly prevalent among patients undergoing TAVI, and negatively affects important outcomes. Early diagnosis of this condition might allow a timely start of nutritional and physiotherapy interventions to prevent negative outcomes in TAVI patients.

Purpose In response to the growing recognition of geriatric rehabilitation and to support healthcare providers which need strategies to support older people with frailty who have experienced functional decline, we developed a consensus statement about core principles and future priorities for geriatric rehabilitation. Methods We used a three-stage approach to establish consensus—preparation, consensus and review. Results The consensus statement is grouped under 11 headings from (1) “Definition of GR” to (11) “Effective strategies to develop GR in Europe”, which define geriatric rehabilitation in a way that is compatible with existing service models across Europe. Additionally future goals around research and education are highlighted. Conclusion The definitions of the consensus statement can provide a starting point for those wishing to further develop geriatric rehabilitation in their jurisdiction and help to develop strategic alliances with other specialties, serving as a basis for a pan-European approach to geriatric rehabilitation.

This in vitro study of occlusal surfaces on primary molars aimed to: (1) evaluate the reproducibility of the Nyvad and ICDAS-II visual systems in detecting caries; (2) to test the accuracy of the systems in estimating lesion depth, and (3) to examine the association between the Nyvad system and the Lesion Activity Assessment system, an adjunct to ICDAS-II. Two samples of extracted primary molars (sample 1, n = 38; sample 2, n = 69) were evaluated independently by 2 examiners. In this in vitro study, evaluation of plaque in the Nyvad system was not possible. Histology (sample 2) was used to validate lesion depth. Area under ROC curves (Az), sensitivity, specificity and percent agreement of both systems were calculated at D1, D2 and D3 thresholds. Both systems showed kappa for intra- and inter-examiner agreement >0.86 and good correlation with histology: Spearman ρ = 0.73 (Nyvad) and 0.78 (ICDAS-II). They presented similar performances except that ICDAS-II showed significantly higher sensitivity (Nyvad 0.89; ICDAS 0.92) and Az (Nyvad 0.85; ICDAS 0.90) for the D1 threshold. The correlation between the systems for lesion activity (Cramer’s V) was 0.71. Therefore, both visual systems are reliable and can estimate caries lesion depth on primary teeth. Under in vitro conditions, there is no major difference between the Nyvad system and Lesion Activity Assessment in assessing caries activity.

Interventions to increase fruit and vegetable intake among community-dwelling older people have shown mixed effects. We investigated whether an intervention based on an initial multidimensional health risk assessment and subsequent physician-lead nutrition counselling has favourable effects on dietary intake among community-dwelling older people. Randomised controlled trial comparing the intervention versus usual care. Non-disabled persons aged 65 years or older at an ambulatory geriatric clinic in Bucharest, Romania, allocated to intervention (n=100) and control (n=100) groups. Participants received a computer-generated health profile report based on answers to a health risk assessment questionnaire, followed by monthly individual counselling sessions with a geriatrician on topics related to health promotion and disease prevention, with a special focus on adequate fruit and vegetable consumption. Fruit and vegetable intake at baseline and at 6-month follow-up. At baseline, fruit and vegetable intake was below the recommended five portions per day in most study participants (85% in the intervention group, and 86% among controls, respectively). At six months, intake increased in the intervention group from a median of 3.8 to 4.6 portions per day, and decreased in the control group due to a seasonal effect from a median of 3.8 to 3.1 portions per day. At six months, fruit and vegetable consumption was significantly higher among persons in the intervention group as compared to controls (median difference 1.4 portions per day, 95% confidence interval 1.1–1.7, p<0.001). Personalised food-based dietary guidance, delivered as part of multidimensional preventive health counselling during geriatric clinic visits, results in relevant improvement of fruit and vegetable intake in community-dwelling older adults.