DNA replication timing (RT) is correlated with transcription during cell fate changes but there are many exceptions and our understanding of this relationship suffers from a paucity of reductionist approaches. Here, we manipulated length and strength of transcription in hybrid-genome mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) at a single locus upstream of the silent, late replicating, Pleiotrophin (Ptn) gene, directly comparing RT to nascent transcription rates at engineered vs. wild-type alleles. First, we inserted four reporter genes that differ only in their promoter. Two promoters transcribed the reporter gene at high rates and advanced RT. The other two transcribed at lower rates and did not advance RT. Since these promoters may prove useful in applications where effects on RT are undesirable, we confirmed the inability of one of them to advance RT at numerous ectopic sites. We next juxtaposed these same four promoters upstream of the Ptn transcription start site where they all transcribed the 96kb Ptn gene and advanced RT to different extents correlated with transcription rates. Indeed, a doxycycline-responsive promoter, which could not advance RT when induced as a small reporter gene, elicited a rapid and reversible RT advance proportional to the rate of transcription, providing direct evidence that transcription itself can advance RT. However, deletion of the Ptn promoter and enhancer, followed by directed differentiation to neural precursors, eliminated induction of transcription throughout the entire Ptn replication domain, without preventing the switch to early replication. Our results provide a solid empirical base with which to re-evaluate many decades of literature, demonstrating that length and strength of transcription is sufficient but not necessary to advance RT. Our results also provide a robust system in which to rapidly effect an RT change, permitting mechanistic studies of the role of transcription in RT and the consequences of RT changes to epigenomic remodeling.

Eukaryotic genomes replicate in a defined temporal order called the replication timing (RT) program. RT is developmentally regulated with the potential to drive cell fate transitions, but mechanisms controlling RT remain elusive. We previously identified "Early Replication Control Elements" (ERCEs), cis-acting elements necessary for early RT, domain-wide transcription, 3D chromatin architecture and compartmentalization in mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs), but deletions identifying ERCEs were large and encompassed many putative regulatory elements. Here, we show that ERCEs are compound elements, whose RT activity can largely be accounted for by multiple binding sites for diverse master transcription factors (subERCEs). While deletion of subERCEs had large effects on both transcription and replication timing, deleting transcription start sites eliminated nearly all transcription with only moderate effects on replication timing. Our results suggest a model in which subERCEs are a class of transcriptional enhancers that can also organize chromatin domains structurally to support early replication timing, potentially providing a feed-forward loop to drive robust epigenomic change during cell fate transitions.

Models of nuclear genome organization often propose a binary division into active versus inactive compartments yet typically overlook nuclear bodies. Here, we integrated analysis of sequencing and image-based data to compare genome organization in four human cell types relative to three different nuclear locales: the nuclear lamina, nuclear speckles, and nucleoli. Although gene expression correlates mostly with nuclear speckle proximity, DNA replication timing correlates with proximity to multiple nuclear locales. Speckle attachment regions emerge as DNA replication initiation zones whose replication timing and gene composition vary with their attachment frequency. Most facultative LADs retain a partially repressed state as iLADs, despite their positioning in the nuclear interior. Knock out of two lamina proteins, Lamin A and LBR, causes a shift of H3K9me3-enriched LADs from lamina to nucleolus, and a reciprocal relocation of H3K27me3-enriched partially repressed iLADs from nucleolus to lamina. Thus, these partially repressed iLADs appear to compete with LADs for nuclear lamina attachment with consequences for replication timing. The nuclear organization in adherent cells is polarized with nuclear bodies and genomic regions segregating both radially and relative to the equatorial plane. Together, our results underscore the importance of considering genome organization relative to nuclear locales for a more complete understanding of the spatial and functional organization of the human genome.

Recurrent DNA break clusters (RDCs) are replication-transcription collision hotspots; many are unique to neural progenitor cells. Through high-resolution replication sequencing and a capture-ligation assay in mouse neural progenitor cells experiencing replication stress, we unravel the replication features dictating RDC location and orientation. Most RDCs occur at the replication forks traversing timing transition regions (TTRs), where sparse replication origins connect unidirectional forks. Leftward-moving forks generate telomere-connected DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), while rightward-moving forks lead to centromere-connected DSBs. Strand-specific mapping for DNA-bound RNA reveals co-transcriptional dual-strand DNA:RNA hybrids present at a higher density in RDC than in other actively transcribed long genes. In addition, mapping RNA polymerase activity uncovers that head-to-head interactions between replication and transcription machinery result in 60% DSB contribution to the head-on compared to 40% for co-directional. Taken together we reveal TTR as a fragile class and show how the linear interaction between transcription and replication impacts genome stability. In neural progenitor cells, recurrent DNA break clusters (RDCs) occur to genes crucial for brain function. Here the authors find that most RDCs emerge at long-traveling unidirectional replication forks, and often unrelated to R-loops.

Ki-67 is a chromatin-associated protein with a dynamic distribution pattern throughout the cell cycle and is thought to be involved in chromatin organization. The lack of genomic interaction maps has hampered a detailed understanding of its roles, particularly during interphase. By pA-DamID mapping in human cell lines, we find that Ki-67 associates with large genomic domains that overlap mostly with late-replicating regions. Early in interphase, when Ki-67 is present in pre-nucleolar bodies, it interacts with these domains on all chromosomes. However, later in interphase, when Ki-67 is confined to nucleoli, it shows a striking shift toward small chromosomes. Nucleolar perturbations indicate that these cell cycle dynamics correspond to nucleolar maturation during interphase, and suggest that nucleolar sequestration of Ki-67 limits its interactions with larger chromosomes. Furthermore, we demonstrate that Ki-67 does not detectably control chromatin-chromatin interactions during interphase, but it competes with the nuclear lamina for interaction with late-replicating DNA, and it controls replication timing of (peri)centromeric regions. Together, these results reveal a highly dynamic choreography of genome interactions and roles for Ki-67 in heterochromatin organization.

ASARs are long noncoding RNA genes that control replication timing of entire human chromosomes in cis. The three known ASAR genes are located on human chromosomes 6 and 15, and are essential for chromosome integrity. To identify ASARs on all human chromosomes we utilize a set of distinctive ASAR characteristics that allow for the identification of hundreds of autosomal loci with epigenetically controlled, allele-restricted behavior in expression and replication timing of coding and noncoding genes, and is distinct from genomic imprinting. Disruption of noncoding RNA genes at five of five tested loci result in chromosome-wide delayed replication and chromosomal instability, validating their ASAR activity. In addition to the three known essential cis-acting chromosomal loci, origins, centromeres, and telomeres, we propose that all mammalian chromosomes also contain "Inactivation/Stability Centers" that display allele-restricted epigenetic regulation of protein coding and noncoding ASAR genes that are essential for replication and stability of each chromosome.

Immediately following the discovery of the structure of DNA and the semi-conservative replication of the parental DNA sequence into two new DNA strands, it became apparent that DNA replication is organized in a temporal and spatial fashion during the S phase of the cell cycle, correlated with the large-scale organization of chromatin in the nucleus. After many decades of limited progress, technological advances in genomics, genome engineering, and imaging have finally positioned the field to tackle mechanisms underpinning the temporal and spatial regulation of DNA replication and the causal relationships between DNA replication and other features of large-scale chromosome structure and function. In this review, we discuss these major recent discoveries as well as expectations for the coming decade.