PURPOSE:Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) remain a major cause of mortality, with rupture risk still primarily assessed by maximum diameter. Specialized hemodynamic indices from Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) may provide predictive insight into AAA progression. METHODS:We performed a comparative CFD study of 10 healthy-control infrarenal aortas and 15 AAAs, utilizing the open source software SimVascular. Blood was modeled as a Newtonian fluid and pulsatile inlet conditions were applied, extracted from multiscale modeling. Three-element Windkessel (RCR) models were imposed at the iliac outlets to capture physiologic flow distribution. Time Averaged Wall Shear Stress (TAWSS), Oscillatory Shear Index (OSI) and Relative Residence Time (RRT) surface area coverage exposed to pathological regimes were quantified and compared between healthy and pathological models. Statistical analysis in two separate regions, the proximal neck/aneurysm sac and the iliacs, was conducted. RESULTS:Pathological-AAA models exhibited significantly bigger surface coverage of low TAWSS and high RRT compared to the healthy aortas in both studied areas. Although the coverage area of OSI was larger in AAAs, it didn't reach statistical significance at the infrarenal part, but only at the iliac region. CONCLUSION:The surface area exposed to lower shear and prolonged residence time provides strong evidence of AAA pathology in contrast with OSI, which offers limited information and cannot be a standalone index of pathology. These findings suggest that integrating TAWSS and RRT into clinical assessment may improve the prediction of aneurysm progression and rupture risk beyond diameter-based criteria.

Background and Objectives: Amyloidosis is a systemic disorder characterized by extracellular deposition of misfolded protein fibrils, most commonly light-chain (AL) or transthyretin-derived (ATTR) ones. Cardiac involvement is well recognized, but large-vessel complications, including thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAA) and dissections, are rare and under-reported. The aim of this review article is to provide insights into pathophysiology, clinical diagnosis and the therapeutic opportunities in amyloidosis-related thoracic aortic diseases. Methods and Materials: The PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Guidelines were followed. An extensive search of the available literature in the English language, published between 1 January 2000, and 31 December 2025, in three large-scale scientific databases was undertaken by two independent reviewers. The terms "amyloidosis", "thoracic aorta", "thoracic aortic aneurysm", "aortic dissection", and "aortopathy" were used both as specific items, as well as in MeSH Terms. Studies reporting on the pathophysiology, diagnosis, clinical manifestations, treatment options and prognosis of amyloid deposition on the thoracic aorta were included in the review. Because of the nature of the existing literature, only a narrative review was possible. Results: Twenty-nine studies were included. Owing to the rarity of reporting, data was derived mainly from case reports and series, as well as autopsy studies. Amyloid infiltration of the aortic wall has been associated with medial architectural disruption, degeneration of elastic fibers, impairment of vasa vasorum perfusion, and arterial stiffness, all of which could contribute to aneurysmal dilation and aortic lesions. Amyloidosis management combines targeted anti-plasma cell therapy with supportive care. In AL amyloidosis, melphalan-dexamethasone (MDex) was historically standard, but regimens such as cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (CyBorD) and bortezomib, melphalan, and dexamethasone (BMDex) achieve higher complete response rates. Immunotherapy with Daratumumab has shown high overall and complete response rates. Fibril-directed approaches, including doxycycline and epigallocatechin gallate, and monoclonal antibodies, are under evaluation. Acute management of large-vessel manifestations follows conventional protocols, but prognosis is often dominated by underlying cardiac and systemic involvement. Conclusions: Management of thoracic aortic involvement follows standard imaging surveillance and surgical criteria, though operative risk is increased. Multidisciplinary care, early recognition, and individualized risk stratification are essential to improve outcomes, particularly given frequent cardiac involvement.

Background: Arteriovenous grafts (AVG) can be the only bailout solution for patients who require kidney replacement therapy but are unsuitable for arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation. Currently, high-level evidence on the effectiveness and safety of antithrombotic therapy in AVG patients is scarce. Materials and methods: Following the PICO (patient; intervention; comparator; outcome) model and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a data search of the English literature in PubMed, SCOPUS, Central Cochrane was conducted, until March 1st, 2023 (PROSPERO Protocol Number: CRD42023401785). Studies on humans with an AVG receiving any kind of antithrombotic medication, reporting on primary and secondary patency rates, and bleeding complications were included. Due to data heterogeneity, a descriptive report of the outcomes was undertaken. Results: Twelve studies, including 22,436 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and AVG were included, with patient recruitment spanning over a 41-year time-period (1982-2023). Antithrombotic factors included acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), clopidogrel, dipyridamole, warfarin, unfractioned heparin (UFH), and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Ten studies reported on primary patency rates, and two on secondary patency rates. Primary and secondary patency rates (PPR, SPR) were reported better in four studies, similar in three and worse in one study, regarding patients receiving any kind of antiplatelet therapy. Anticoagulation therapy was not associated with increased PPR or SPR, except for one study on apixaban. Patients receiving single or combined antiplatelets versus patients receiving no treatment presented higher bleeding risk in two studies and similar bleeding risk in three studies. Anticoagulation therapy, excluding apixaban, was associated with higher bleeding risk in three studies, when compared to no anticoagulation. Conclusions: Data derived from the current literature were equivocal regarding the use of antiplatelet treatment in patients with AVG. Studies on anticoagulation therapy are confined. Randomized trials with confounder stratification remain crucial for robust long-term data.

BACKGROUND:Although endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) has been increasingly used for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), rupture is still a life-threatening event in 1-5% of those treated patients. We aimed to compare the characteristics, hemodynamic status at presentation, and outcomes between patients with previous EVAR (ruptured EVAR [rEVAR]) and those with no previous aortic intervention (rWPT group) who presented with AAA rupture. METHODS:Between January 2019 and November 2023, all consecutive patients who experienced a ruptured infrarenal/juxtarenal AAA, received endovascular or open intervention and prospectively recorded in the Hellenic Vascular Registry (Greek) were analyzed. The two groups of patients (rEVAR and rWPT) were compared. RESULTS:A total of 203 patients with AAA rupture were studied. Among them, 40 patients (19.7%) had previous EVAR for AAA (rEVAR group), while the remaining (163; 80.3%) were included in the rWPT group. Patients with rEVAR were on average 5.8 years significantly older (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference regarding the hemodynamic status at presentation between rEVAR and rWPT groups. The overall mortality was 40.4% (82/203). Mortality for patients with rEVAR was 37.5% compared to 41.1% for the group of rWPT (P = 0.7). Among all patients, age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04-1.12; P < 0.001), hemodynamic shock at initial presentation (OR: 6.57, 95% CI: 2.52-17.12; P < 0.001), and open repair (OR: 5.31, 95% CI: (2.33-12.08; P < 0.001) were significant prognostic factors of mortality. CONCLUSION:Our study provides evidence that patients with post-EVAR rupture are equally hemodynamically unstable at presentation compared to patients with de novo ruptures. The mortality associated with post-EVAR rupture is high and not inferior compared to that observed for de novo ruptures. Significant risk factors for a dismal outcome in the whole cohort of patients who presented with AAA rupture were age, hemodynamic shock at initial presentation, and open repair.

Background: Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) represents a valid treatment modality for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs). This study aimed to present rAAA outcomes treated by EVAR using the Endurant endograft. Methods: A single-center retrospective analysis of consecutive patients treated with standard EVAR (sEVAR) or parallel graft (PG)-EVAR for infra- or juxta/para-renal rAAA using the Endurant endograft (1 January 2008–31 December 2023) was undertaken. The primary outcomes were technical success, mortality, and reintervention. Follow-up outcomes, including survival and freedom from reintervention, were assessed using Kaplan–Meier estimates. Results: Eighty-eight patients were included (87.5% sEVAR and 12.5% PG-EVAR). The mean aneurysm diameter was 73.3 ± 19.3 mm (71.4 ± 22.2 mm sEVAR and 81.7 ± 33.0 mm PG-EVAR). Among 77 patients receiving sEVAR, 26 (33.8%) received an aorto-uni-iliac device. All PG-EVAR patients were managed with bifurcated devices, one receiving a single PG, seven double PGS, and three triple PGs. Technical success was 98.8% (100.0% sEVAR and 90.9% PG-EVAR). The 30-day mortality was 47.2% (50.7% sEVAR and 27.3% PG-EVAR), with nine (10.2%) deaths recorded on the table. The mean time of follow-up was 13 ± 9 months. After excluding 30-day deaths, the estimated survival was 75.5% (standard error (SE) 6.9%) at 24 months. The estimated freedom from reintervention was 89.7% (SE 5.7%) at 24 months. Only one endoleak type Ia event was recorded during follow-up. Conclusions: Endurant showed high technical success rates and low rates of endoleak type Ia events and reinterventions, despite the emergent setting of repair. rAAA is still a highly fatal condition within 30 days, with an acceptable mid-term survival of 30-day survivors at 75.5%.

Objectives COVID-19 associated arterial thrombosis has been attributed to multiple inflammation and coagulation mechanisms. The aim of this study was to report the experience of a tertiary center on COVID-19 patients managed for acute peripheral arterial thrombosis. Methods A single-center case series was conducted, including retrospectively collected data from all COVID-19 patients presenting arterial thrombosis, from March 2020 to February 2022. Intensive care unit (ICU) and non-ICU cases were included. The primary outcomes were mortality, successful revascularization, and amputation at 30 days. Results Twenty patients presented peripheral arterial thrombosis (90% males, mean age 65 years (16–82 years)). Eighteen were diagnosed with the Delta variant and none was previously vaccinated. All cases presented acute lower limb ischemia; in 20% with bilateral involvement. Nine patients were hospitalized in the ward while 11 in the ICU. From the non-ICU cases, five presented Rutherford IIb and four cases, Rutherford’s IIa ischemia. Six cases underwent revascularization (67%). Two of them were finally amputated (33%) and two died during hospitalization (33%). Two revascularizations were considered successful (33%). The ICU group presented mainly with Rutherford’s III ischemia (54.5%). The mortality in the ICU cohort was 72.7%. Only one patient underwent successful revascularization and two were amputated in this subgroup. Early mortality was 50% for the total cohort while the type of management was not related to mortality. Conclusions Covid-19 related arterial thrombosis in non-vaccinated population is associated with 50% early mortality; increased up to 72% in the ICU patients. The amputation rate was 20% while only 40% of the revascularizations were considered successful.

Background/Objectives: Device selection during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) remains an important issue for ensuring endograft durability. This study evaluated the early and follow-up outcomes of elective EVAR with the Endurant platform. Methods: A single-center retrospective analysis was conducted including consecutive elective EVAR procedures with the Endurant II/IIs (2008 to 2024) device. Primary outcomes were technical success, mortality and major complications at 30 days. Survival, endoleak I/III and freedom from reintervention were secondary outcomes. Cox proportional hazards models were employed for risk-adjusted follow-up outcomes. Results: In total, 361 patients were included (72.7 ± 7 years; 96% males; mean AAA diameter 62 ± 14 mm); 92% received a bifurcated device, and 89% conformed to the instructions for use. Technical success was 99.7%. Intra-operative adjunctive procedures included 4.4% proximal cuffs and 1.7% endoanchors. The thirty-day mortality rate was 0.6%, and the major complication rate was 4.1%. Survival was 81% (SE 4.8%), 72% (SE 6.4%) and 52% (SE 9.2%) at 4, 6 and 8 years, with aneurysm-related mortality at 1.7%. Freedom from endoleak Ia was 76% (SE 7.3%) at 6 years, freedom from endoleak Ib was 79% (SE 7.4%) at 7 years and freedom from endoleak III was 94% (SE 3.7%) at 5 years. Freedom from reintervention was 71% (SE 6.1%) and 55% (SE 7.9%) at 5 and 7 years, respectively. No device-related co-factor affected long-term outcomes. Conclusions: Endurant II/IIs endograft is a safe and effective EVAR solution with excellent early outcomes and low long-term aneurysm-related mortality. The need for reintervention in the long term affected less than 50% of cases.

Background: Open surgical repair of juxta-, para- and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA) has been the gold-standard for patients fit for surgery. However, endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms using devices implementing directional branches or fenestrations for incorporation of reno-visceral target vessels (TV) has gained widespread attention, due to its lower mortality and complication rate and its more attractive profile for high-risk patients. Nonetheless, complex endovascular technologies require meticulous abidance to protocols for successful application. Methods: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from a single, tertiary center was undertaken, including all patients undergoing complex aortic endovascular repair with fenestrated (F-EVAR) of branched devices (B-EVAR) from a 5-year time period (2018-2023). Primary outcomes included 30-day mortality, while secondary outcomes included primary TV patency, acute kidney injury (AKI), spinal cord ischemia (SCI), myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke rates. Results: Of 74 patients (mean age: 69 ± 5.6 years-old, 98% males), 31 (42.6) and 43 (57.6%) were treated by F-EVAR and B-EVAR, respectively. Mean aneurysm diameter was 68 ± 1.8cm, with 15 (20.5%) juxtarenal AAA, 27 (35.6%) pararenal AAA, 16 (21.9%) type IV TAAA, 6 (8.2%) type III TAAA, and 10 (13.7%) type II TAAA treated. Sixteen (21.6%) patients were treated due to failed-EVAR. In total, 272 TV were successfully revascularized. Thirty-day mortality was 8.1%. Primary TV patency rate was 99.2% (270/272). Endoleak rate was 8.1% (6/74). No cases of AKI or MI were observed. One (1.3%) case of hemorrhagic stroke was observed. Three cases (4%) of SCI were observed, including one temporary paraparesis and two permanent paraplegia cases. Reintervention rate was 5.4%, including two cases of renal artery stent thrombosis revascularization procedures. Conclusions: Endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms is feasible, with good perioperative outcomes. Adherence to precise protocols covering every technical aspect of patient care is warranted for satisfactory outcomes.

Background: Fenestrated (FEVAR) and chimney (ChEVAR) endovascular aortic repair have been applied in anatomically suitable complex aortic aneurysms. However, local hemodynamic changes may occur after repair. This study aimed to compare FEVAR's and ChEVAR's hemodynamic properties, focusing on visceral arteries. Methods: Preoperative and postoperative computed tomography angiographies have been used to reconstruct patient-based models. Data of 3 patients, for each modality, were analyzed. Following geometric reconstruction, computational fluid dynamics simulations were used to extract near-wall and intravascular hemodynamic indicators, such as pressure drops, velocity, wall shear stress, time averaged wall shear stress, oscillatory shear index, relative residence time, and local normalized helicity. Results: An overall improvement in hemodynamics was detected after repair, with either technique. Preoperatively, a disturbed prothrombotic wall shear stress profile was recorded in several zones of the sac. The local normalized helicity results showed a better organization of the helical structures at postoperative setting, decreasing thrombus formation, with both modalities. Similarly, time averaged wall shear stress increased and oscillatory shear index decreased postoperatively, signaling nondisturbed blood flow. The relative residence time was locally reduced. The flow in visceral arteries tended to be more streamlined in ChEVAR, compared to evident recirculation regions at renal and superior mesenteric artery fenestrations (P 1/4 0.06). Conclusions: ChEVAR and FEVAR seem to improve hemodynamics toward normal values with a reduction of recirculation zones in the main graft and aortic branches. Visceral artery flow comparison revealed that ChEVAR tended to present lower recirculation regions at parallel grafts' entries while FEVAR showed less intense flow regurgitation in visceral stents.

Covered stent grafts consist an essential component of fenestrated (fEVAR), branched (bEVAR), and chimney (chEVAR) endovascular repair for the revascularization of the reno-visceral target vessels (TVs). TV-related instability events may lead to technical and clinical failure of the procedure, causing aneurysm-related morbidity, while timely reintervention for prevention of adverse events is required. Hereby, we present the mid-term outcomes of the second generation of BeGraft (Bentley InnoMed) balloon-expandable covered stent graft as "off-the-shelf" stent graft platform used during fEVAR, bEVAR, and chEVAR cases. This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of consecutive patients treated in a single tertiary center for juxtarenal, pararenal, and thoracoabdominal (TAAA) aortic aneurysms during a 7-year time period (May 2016-May 2023) either by fEVAR, bEVAR, or chEVAR. Only patients in whom BeGraft balloon-expandable covered stentgrafts were implanted were included. Outcomes were defined as primary patency rates for each TV at maximum follow-up and were reported using Kaplan-Meier life tables. Begraft stentgrafts were deployed in 111 patients (males, 95%; age, 70.9 ± 6.1 years) who underwent complex endovascular repair (chEVAR: 53; 47.7%; fEVAR, 22; 19.8%; bEVAR, 35; 31.5%; f/bEVAR combination: 1; 0.9%). Aneurysm type included 36 (32.4%) juxtarenal, 44 (39.6%) pararenal, 16 (14.4%) type IV TAAA, six (5.4%) type III TAAA and nine (8.1%) type II TAAA, with a mean maximum aneurysm diameter of 6.7 ± 1.8 cm. Most patients were asymptomatic (83.7%). A total of 307 BeGrafts were deployed (celiac trunk [CT]: 47; 15.3%); superior mesenteric artery [SMA]: 70; 22.8%), right renal artery [RRA]: 95; 30.9%; left renal artery [LRA]: 95; 30.9%) for the revascularization of 286 TV (in 21 TV, 2 stent grafts were implanted), for a mean 2.6 TVs per patient. Mean follow-up was 12.7 ± 12.2 months. The primary patency rate of RRA was 96% (SE, 2.1%), 94% (SE, 2.9%), and 90% (SE, 4.7%) at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. No occlusion event was observed regarding the LRA and the SMA up to 36 months of follow-up. The primary patency rate of CT was 96% (SE, 3.6%) and 86% (SE, 10%) at 6 and 24 months, respectively. No occlusion event was observed in patients with two stent grafts. Second-generation BeGraft platform seems to be an effective and durable device to be used for the revascularization of the TV in the endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms.

Chronic venous disease is a common disorder reported to affect up to 60% of the general population. Treatment options include conservative treatment, conventional surgery, and endovenous techniques. Great saphenous vein (GSV) diameter remains a controversial issue when considering optimal treatment, as a limited number of studies included patients with large-diameter GSV. This review focuses on the role of GSV diameter in the outcomes of different approaches for the treatment of incompetent GSV. Endovenous thermal ablation techniques are considered the first-choice treatment, with lower recurrence and complication rates in large-diameter GSV than observed with conventional surgery and nonthermal ablation techniques. Higher laser wavelengths are more effective than lower laser wavelengths in large GSV. Nonthermal ablation techniques seem not to be appropriate treatment for GSV diameters larger than 6 mm.

Introduction: The distal landing zone in iliac arteries represents an important issue during endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (EVAR). The aim of this study is to present a case series for landing in the external iliac artery (EIA) during EVAR while preserving blood flow in the internal iliac artery (IIA) with the covered endovascular reconstruction of the iliac bifurcation (CERIB) technique. Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of patients that underwent EVAR either for intact abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) or previous failed EVAR from December 2022 up to September 2023. Indications for treatment were presence of common iliac artery aneurysm (CIAA), short CIA, or endoleak type Ib (ETIb). For the distal sealing zone, we used balloon-expandable covered stent (BXCS). Primary outcomes were technical success and first-month patency rate. Secondary outcomes were endoleak and re-intervention rate. Results: Sixteen patients being treated with 20 CERIBs were included in the study. Four patients had a previous failed EVAR, while 3 patients were treated urgently for a symptomatic para-renal aneurysm. The indications for treatment were EIb (n=2), short CIA (n=4), CIAA with narrow lumen (n=3), and CIA aneurysm (n=11). Platforms that were used were the Cook Zenith Alpha (n=5), Gore C3 (n=2 and 3 limbs), Endurant IIs (n=2, and 3 limbs), and a t-branch device (n=3). Technical success rate was 100% with no adjunctive procedure. No death or re-intervention was recorded for all patients at postoperative 30-day period and at 6 months for 2 patients. At first-month CTA, patency rate was 100% (20/20), while in 2 patients that had 6-month CTA, the patency was also 100% (2/2). No kinking or stenosis was also noted. Two patients had ETIII after branched EVAR (BEVAR), 2 patients had ETII, and 1 patient had gutter ET in the area of the CERIB. Conclusion: The CERIB technique seems to be effective and safe in the early period. It is suitable with a variety of commercial endograft platforms. It may be a valuable alternative to iliac branch devices when there are anatomical considerations. Longer follow-up is needed to conclude for long-term patency and durability. Clinical Impact The distal landing zone in iliac arteries represents an important issue during EVAR while it is important to preserve blood flow in the internal iliac artery. The covered endovascular reconstruction of the iliac bifurcation (CERIB) technique is a technique for the preservation of internal iliac arteries during EVAR, while it is suitable with a variety of commercial endograft platforms. The CERIB technique seems to be effective and safe in the early period. It may be valuable alternative to iliac branch devices when there are anatomical considerations.

INTRODUCTION:The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of endovenous thermal ablation (EVTA) in treating large diameter, ≥12 mm, incompetent great saphenous vein (GSV) in comparison to smaller ones. METHODS:A retrospective comparative study was undertaken including 196 patients (205 limbs) undergoing EVTA. According to maximum GSV diameter patients were divided into two groups (group A <12 mm, group B ≥12 mm). Primary outcome was anatomic success defined as absence of reflux of GSV. Secondary outcomes were complications, postoperative pain using the 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and improvement of Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) and Chronic Venous Insufficiency Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (CΙVIQ-20) scores assessed at 7- days, 1 month, 12 months and 24 months postoperatively. RESULTS:118 patients with GSV diameter <12 mm (group A) and 87 with GSV diameter ≥12 mm (group B) were included. Patients' demographics, CEAP classification and length of ablated vein did not differ between the groups. Preoperative VCSS and VAS pain score were significant greater in group B (6.03 vs 6.94, p = .04 and 5.21 vs 5.77, p = .032, respectively). No differences in adverse events were observed post-operatively among groups. GSV occlusion rate at 1 month was 98.3% (SE 1.3%) in group A and 96.5 % (2.2%) in group B (p = .3), at 12 months 95.7% (SE 2%) and 94.2% (SE 2.8%) (p = .5), and at 24 months 94% (SE 2.4%) and 93.1% (SE 3%) (p = .4) respectively. Both groups experienced significant and similar improvement in their VCSSs and CIVIQ scores postoperatively. In a subgroup analysis among different EVTA and GSV >12 mm, 1470 nm endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) showed comparable results in terms of occlusion rates, complications, VCSS and CIVIQ scores. CONCLUSIONS:Endovenous thermal ablation techniques are efective and safe in the treatment of GSV incompetence regardless the diameter of the GSV. Both 1470 nm EVLA and RFA techniques performed similar outcomes.

PURPOSE:Open repair remains the standard of care for aortic arch pathologies. However, endovascular management became an attractive alternative for high-risk patients. This study aimed to assess the outcomes of the available endovascular techniques for aortic arch pathology management. MATERIALS AND METHODS:A search of the English literature (2000-2022) using PubMed, EMBASE, via Ovid, and CENTRAL databases (February 1, 2022) was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Studies reporting on patients with aortic arch pathologies managed with custom-made devices ([CMDs] fenestrated or branched thoracic endovascular aortic repair [F/BTEVAR]) and non-CMDs (parallel graft or surgeon-modified FTEVAR) were eligible. Studies reporting on hybrid or open repair were excluded. Studies' quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Primary outcomes were technical success, 30 day mortality, and cerebrovascular events (CVEs). Secondary outcomes were re-intervention and mortality during follow-up. RESULTS:Thirty studies (2135 patients) were included. Treatment indications were mainly dissections (652 cases [48.0%, 652/1358]; 90 type A, 506 type B; 364 acute, 163 chronic) and aneurysms (46.9%, 582/1239). Five studies (211 patients) reported on FTEVAR and 10 (388 patients) on BTEVAR. For FTEVAR, technical success rate was 98.3%. Thirty-day mortality was 3.8% and CVE rate was 12.3%. Ten deaths (9.7%) and 19 re-interventions (9%) were recorded during follow-up (24 months). Regarding BTEVAR, technical success rate was 98.7%, and 30 day mortality and CVE rates were 5.4% and 11.0%, respectively. During follow-up (27 months), 64 deaths (18.7%) and 33 re-interventions (9.6%) were recorded. Parallel graft technique was reported in 11 studies (901 patients). Technical success rate was 76.4%. Thirty-day mortality was 3.9% and 32 (4.3%) CVEs were recorded. Thirty-five deaths (4.4%) and 43 re-interventions (5.5%) were reported during follow-up (27 months). Surgeon-modified FTEVAR was described in 5 studies (635 patients). Technical success rate was 91.6%. At 30 days, 15 deaths (2.3%) and 22 CVEs (3.5%) were recorded. During follow-up (19 months), 26 deaths (4.2%) and 21 re-interventions (3.6%) were detected. CONCLUSIONS:Endovascular arch repair presented a variable technical success; >95% for F/BTEVAR; ≤90% for non-CMDs. Acceptable 30 day mortality rates were reported. Cerebrovascular event rates ranged up to 10%. These findings, adjacent to the estimated midterm mortality and re-interventions, set the need for further improvement. CLINICAL IMPACT:Endovascular arch repair gains popularity as a valuable alternative, especially in patients considered unfit for open repair. According the available literature, any endovascular technique, including custom-made or off-the-shelf solutions, may be applied successfully, with acceptable early mortality. However, the perio-operative cerebrovascular event rate is still an issue, indicating the need for further advancements.

Background: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is recommended as the first option for both elective and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs) with suitable anatomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of the gradual adoption of ruptured EVAR (rEVAR) as first option in the management of rAAAs in a reference tertiary center over a 16 year-period. Methods: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected clinical data was undertaken, including all patients that were treated for rAAA infrarenal or juxtarenal either with open surgical repair (OSR) or EVAR from 2006-2023. Three periods were identified and analyzed: Initial (2006-2011); intermediate (2012-2017); and current (2018-2023). The primary outcomes were the 30-day mortality rate in relation to the changing pattern of treatment. Secondary outcomes were re-intervention and mortality during the follow up period. Results: Two hundred patients were treated for rAAA; 52% by endovascular means [EVAR (94), Ch-EVAR (9), and branched endovascular aneurysm repair (1)] and 48% by OSR (96). In the initial period, 61 patients were treated for rAAA (21% EVAR vs. 79% OSR), 68 in intermediate patients (47% EVAR vs. 53% OSR), and 71 in current period (83% EVAR vs. 17% OSR). Only in the current period juxta -renal rAAAs were treated by endovascular means (14%). The 30-day mortality rate was 46% in initial period (31% for EVAR vs. 50% for OSR), 64% in second period (46% in EVAR vs. 80% for OSR), and 35% in third period (25% for EVAR vs. 83% for OSR). The mean follow up did not differ between the groups, (EVAR 28.3 +/- 2 months, vs. OSR 33.1 +/- 3 months, P = 0.56). The survival rate did not differ between the groups; in rEVAR was 82% (SE 5%), 74% (SE 6%), 68% (SE 6.5%), and 63% (SE 7.7%) at 12, 24, 36, and 48 months, respectively, and in OSR was 76% (SE 7%), 66% (SE 8%), and 56% (SE 9.5%) at 6, 24, and 48 months, respectively (P = 0.544). Conclusions: Through a 16-year period, the implementation of EVAR as treatment of choice for rAAAs over OSR resulted in a noticeable reduction in the 30-day mortality. rEVAR was feasible in over 80% of rAAA patients.

Venous thrombosis has been widely studied in humans, but not in dogs. This study was designed to evaluate a venous thrombus in dogs, from creation to solution, by means of various ultrasonographic techniques. Nine healthy Beagle dogs were included in the study. The venous thrombus was formatted by puncturing the lumen of the external jugular veins and then, the veins were examined with B-mode, color Doppler, pulsed-wave Doppler, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) techniques, at regular intervals, within 210–270 min after venipuncture. Haemodynamic parameters were calculated at two different locations, before and after the site of the thrombus formation. The existence of a thrombus was confirmed by CEUS technique. Thrombus volume and echogenicity were evaluated. The results showed that the visualization of the venous thrombus by color Doppler modality was not feasible in some veins. The blood volume was the parameter that could more precisely indicate the presence or absence of a thrombus. In cases where thrombus volume was less than 0.001 cm3, it was impossible to detect its presence using haemodynamic parameters. The CEUS imaging depicted accurately the size and shape of an anechoic venous thrombus, even when its volume was 0.001cm3.