Background The management of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) despite anticoagulant treatment in patients with cancer is uncertain. To address this, we used data from the Hokusai VTE Cancer trial, which compared edoxaban with dalteparin to treat cancer-associated VTE. Objectives To characterize and evaluate anticoagulant treatment strategies during and after on-treatment recurrent VTE, including the type and dose of anticoagulant. Methods In this post hoc analysis, all patients with adjudicated on-treatment recurrent VTE within 12 months after randomization were included. Outcomes were second recurrent VTE and major bleeding within 3 months after the first recurrent VTE. Results A total of 67 patients developed on-treatment recurrent VTE while receiving therapeutic-dose edoxaban (31%), therapeutic-dose low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) (34%), maintenance-dose LMWH (21%), or other therapies (14%). After the recurrent event, 28 patients (42%) received an increased dose, 35 (52%) a comparable dose, and 4 (6%) a reduced dose or stopped anticoagulants. Common treatment regimens included supratherapeutic-dose LMWH (21%), therapeutic-dose LMWH (51%), direct oral anticoagulants (16%), or another treatment strategy (12%). In the 3 months after recurrent VTE, 6 (9%) patients had a second recurrence and 7 (10%) had major bleeding. Conclusion Treatment strategies for recurrent VTE in patients with cancer are heterogeneous. The risk of a second recurrence and major bleeding are considerable. More studies are needed to determine the optimal treatment strategy for recurrent cancer-associated thrombosis.

BACKGROUND:Coagulation factor XI (FXI) inhibitors can reduce the incidence of thrombosis without increasing bleeding risk. FXI is activated by factor XIIa (FXIIa) or thrombin. REGN7508Cat is an antibody that binds to the FXI catalytic domain, blocking both its activity and activation by FXIIa and thrombin. REGN9933A2 binds to the FXI apple 2 domain and blocks FXI activation by FXIIa. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of REGN9933A2 and enoxaparin, with apixaban as an exploratory comparator, and REGN7508Cat and enoxaparin for venous thromboembolism prevention. METHODS:ROXI-VTE-I and ROXI-VTE-II are randomised, open-label, phase 2 studies in patients (aged ≥50 years) undergoing knee arthroplasty across 15 centres in seven countries and 12 centres in five countries, respectively. In ROXI-VTE-I, patients were randomised (1:1:1) to receive REGN9933A2 (300 mg intravenously once), enoxaparin (40 mg subcutaneously once daily), or apixaban (2·5 mg orally twice a day; an exploratory comparator) after surgery. In ROXI-VTE-II, patients were randomised (2:1) to receive REGN7508Cat (250 mg intravenously once) or enoxaparin (40 mg subcutaneously once daily) after surgery. Enoxaparin and apixaban were continued through the day of venography or day 12, whichever was earlier. The primary endpoint in both studies was objectively confirmed venous thromboembolism (a composite of asymptomatic deep-vein thrombosis of the operated leg, objectively confirmed symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis of either leg, or confirmed non-fatal or fatal pulmonary embolism) through day 12 after the first dose of study drug (administered 12-24 h after the end of surgery). In the modified intention-to-treat population (randomly allocated patients who received at least one dose of study treatment and had either an evaluable venogram or confirmed symptomatic venous thromboembolism) for the primary analyses, REGN9933A2 or REGN7508Cat was considered superior to enoxaparin if the posterior probability that the log odds ratio (OR) <0 was greater than 95%. For ROXI-VTE-II, the OR was estimated for REGN7508Cat versus the combined enoxaparin groups of ROXI-VTE-I (discounted by half) and ROXI-VTE-II. The main safety outcome was the composite of major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding. ROXI-VTE-I and ROXI-VTE-II are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05618808 and NCT06454630). FINDINGS:Patients were enrolled from May 24, 2023, to May 27, 2024, in ROXI-VTE-I (n=373) and from June 27, 2024, to Jan 21, 2025, in ROXI-VTE-II (n=179). The median follow-up time was 74 days (IQR 72-76) for both studies. In ROXI-VTE-I, venous thromboembolism occurred in 20 (17%) of 116 patients in the REGN9933A2 group, 26 (22%) of 117 in the enoxaparin group, and 14 (12%) of 113 in the apixaban group through day 12. For REGN9933A2 versus enoxaparin, the mean adjusted OR (aOR) was 0·78 (90% credible interval 0·47-1·32); the posterior probability was 78·5%. In ROXI-VTE-II, venous thromboembolism occurred in eight (7%) of 113 in the REGN7508Cat group and ten (17%) of 58 patients in the enoxaparin group through day 12. For REGN7508Cat versus the combined enoxaparin groups, the mean aOR was 0·37 (0·20-0·68); the posterior probability was 99·8%. There were no major or clinically relevant non-major bleeds in any group. The most common treatment-emergent adverse event was postoperative anaemia (nine [7%] of 123 patients in the REGN9933A2 group, 11 [9%] of 125 in the enoxaparin group, and 16 [13%] of 125 in the apixaban group in ROXI-VTE-I; and six [5%] of 120 in the REGN7508Cat group in ROXI-VTE-II). Serious adverse events occurred in four (3%), one (1%), and two (2%) patients given REGN9933A2, enoxaparin, and apixaban in ROXI-VTE-I; and in two (2%) patients who received REGN7508Cat and none who received enoxaparin in ROXI-VTE-II. No treatment-related deaths occurred. INTERPRETATION:REGN7508Cat was superior to enoxaparin for venous thromboembolism prevention; REGN9933A2 was not superior to enoxaparin. The findings with REGN7508Cat confirm the role of FXI in postoperative venous thromboembolism, and the findings with REGN9933A2 suggest that FXIIa-driven FXI activation contributes to this process. FUNDING:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals.

Background About 7% of patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CAT) develop a recurrence during anticoagulant treatment. Identification of high-risk patients may help guide treatment decisions. Aim To identify clinical predictors and develop a prediction model for on-treatment recurrent CAT. Methods For this individual patient data meta-analysis, we used data from four randomized controlled trials evaluating low-molecular-weight heparin or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for CAT (Hokusai VTE Cancer, SELECT-D, CLOT, and CATCH). The primary outcome was adjudicated on-treatment recurrent CAT during a 6-month follow-up. A clinical prediction model was developed using multivariable logistic regression analysis with backward selection. This model was validated using internal-external cross-validation. Performance was assessed by the c-statistic and a calibration plot. Results After excluding patients using vitamin K antagonists, the combined dataset comprised 2,245 patients with cancer and acute CAT who were treated with edoxaban (23%), rivaroxaban (9%), dalteparin (47%), or tinzaparin (20%). Recurrent on-treatment CAT during the 6-month follow-up occurred in 150 (6.7%) patients. Predictors included in the final model were age (restricted cubic spline), breast cancer (odds ratio [OR]: 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.20-0.87), metastatic disease (OR: 1.44; 95% CI: 1.01-2.05), treatment with DOAC (OR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.44-0.98), and deep vein thrombosis only as an index event (OR: 1.72; 95% CI: 1.31-2.27). The c-statistic of the model was 0.63 (95% CI: 0.54-0.72) after internal-external cross-validation. Calibration varied across studies. Conclusion The prediction model for recurrent CAT included five clinical predictors and has only modest discrimination. Prediction of recurrent CAT at the initiation of anticoagulation remains challenging.

Anticoagulant therapy is recommended for cancer-related venous thromboembolism (VTE). Recurrent VTE prevention is the main goal of this treatment. The majority of evidence-based practice guidelines recommend anticoagulant treatment for at least 6 months. Based on individual assessment of potential benefits and risks, tolerability, drug availability, patient preference, and cancer activity, active cancer patients should continue anticoagulant treatment beyond the 6-month course. When cancer is no longer active or the risk outweighs the benefit, anticoagulant therapy is usually stopped after 3-6 months. Until recently, there was little data on the risk of recurrent VTE in cancer-associated VTE patients after stopping anticoagulants. New results and evidence synthesis have emerged in the last 3 years. Recurring VTE occurs in over 30% in the 5 years after treatment discontinuation. In the first six months, recurrence rates are 10-15%. Recurrences reach 31% at 2 years and stabilize between 2 and 5. Duration of prior anticoagulation does not affect cumulative recurrence. The high risk of recurrent VTE after discontinuing treatment supports guidelines to continue anticoagulant treatment if cancer is active. Stopping anticoagulants after 3-6 months may not be ideal, so randomized clinical trials should be conducted quickly. This review highlights the need to improve cancer patients' primary VTE prevention efforts.

Abstract Aims Deciding to stop or continue anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism (VTE) after initial treatment is challenging, as individual risks of recurrence and bleeding are heterogeneous. The present study aimed to develop and externally validate models for predicting 5-year risks of recurrence and bleeding in patients with VTE without cancer who completed at least 3 months of initial treatment, which can be used to estimate individual absolute benefits and harms of extended anticoagulation. Methods and results Competing risk-adjusted models were derived to predict recurrent VTE and clinically relevant bleeding (non-major and major) using 14 readily available patient characteristics. The models were derived from combined individual patient data from the Bleeding Risk Study, Hokusai-VTE, PREFER-VTE, RE-MEDY, and RE-SONATE (n = 15,141, 220 recurrences, 189 bleeding events). External validity was assessed in the Danish VTE cohort, EINSTEIN-CHOICE, GARFIELD-VTE, MEGA, and Tromsø studies (n = 59 257, 2283 recurrences, 3335 bleeding events). Absolute treatment effects were estimated by combining the models with hazard ratios from trials and meta-analyses. External validation in different settings showed agreement between predicted and observed risks up to 5 years, with C-statistics ranging from 0.48–0.71 (recurrence) and 0.61–0.68 (bleeding). In the Danish VTE cohort, 5-year risks ranged from 4% to 19% for recurrent VTE and 1% –19% for bleeding. Conclusion The VTE-PREDICT risk score can be applied to estimate the effect of extended anticoagulant treatment for individual patients with VTE and to support shared decision-making.

Cancer-associated thrombosis, with the incidence rising over the years, is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. Recent advances in the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) include the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), which provide a more convenient and effective option than low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). Nonetheless, important unmet needs remain including an increased risk of bleeding in certain patient subgroups such as those with gastroesophageal cancer, concerns about drug-drug interactions, and management of patients with severe renal impairment. Although DOACs are more convenient than LMWH, persistence can decline over time. Factor XI inhibitors have potential safety advantages over DOACs because factor XI appears to be essential for thrombosis but not hemostasis. In phase II trials, some factor XI inhibitors were superior to enoxaparin for the prevention of VTE after knee replacement surgery without increasing the risk of bleeding. Ongoing trials are assessing the efficacy and safety of factor XI inhibitors for the treatment of cancer-associated VTE.

Thrombocytopenia occurs frequently in patients with cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT), however prospective evaluation of clinical outcomes following randomization to anticoagulants is limited. The HOKUSAI VTE Cancer study was a randomized, open-label, non-inferiority, phase III trial comparing dalteparin with edoxaban in CAT patients. This post hoc analysis of Hokusai VTE Cancer Study was performed to compare outcomes in patients with platelet count ≤100x109/L at one or more specified time points (baseline, 1-month, or 3-month) versus those without thrombocytopenia. Cumulative incidences at 180 days were calculated with death as a competing risk. The primary outcome was major bleeding; secondary outcomes were clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB), recurrent thrombosis, and survival. The analysis included 1,045 patients with primarily solid tumor malignancies (89%), median age 65 years, and 52% male. The thrombocytopenia group comprised 9.6% (N=101) of the cohort and relative to the non-thrombocytopenia cohort (N=944), experienced significantly higher major bleeding (9.0% vs. 4.0%, sub-distribution hazard ratio [SHR] =2.4; P=0.02) and CRNMB (17.9% vs. 9.6%, SHR=2.0; P=0.01). Thrombocytopenia did not impact recurrent venous thromboembolic event (VTE) (9.8% vs. 7.4%, SHR=1.3; P=0.37) nor overall mortality (21.8% vs. 26.0%, HR=0.9; P=0.48). Major bleeding was higher in patients with thrombocytopenia and gastrointestinal malignancies receiving edoxaban versus dalteparin (16.8% vs. 0; P<0.01) but similar for patients with other malignancies (P=0.30). In patients with hematologic malignances and thrombocytopenia major bleeding was higher for patients receiving dalteparin compared to edoxaban (19.0% vs. 0; P<0.01). Mild thrombocytopenia was associated with a doubling in risk of major hemorrhage in patients receiving anticoagulation for CAT. Bleeding risk for edoxaban and dalteparin varied in gastrointestinal and hematologic malignances in patients with thrombocytopenia (clinicaltrails gov. Identifier: NCT02073682).

Direct oral anticoagulants such as apixaban or dabigatran have revolutionized anticoagulant treatment. These drugs, which specifically inhibit either factor Xa or thrombin, respectively, are at least as effective as vitamin K antagonists (e.g., warfarin) in patients with atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism and have important safety advantages that include reduced risks of intracranial hemorrhage, fatal bleeding, and all-cause mortality.1-3 They are also much easier to use because they are given in a fixed dose without routine laboratory monitoring of the anticoagulant effect and dose adjustment in the individual patient.

Background: Patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) are commonly classified by the presence or absence of provoking factors at the time of VTE to guide treatment decisions. This approach may not capture the heterogeneity of the disease and its prognosis. Objectives: To evaluate clinically important novel phenotypic clusters among patients with VTE without cancer and to explore their association with anticoagulant treatment and clinical outcomes. Methods: Latent class analysis was performed with 18 baseline clinical variables in 3062 adult patients with VTE without active cancer participating in PREFER in VTE, a noninterventional disease registry. The derived latent classes were externally validated in a post hoc analysis of Hokusai-VTE (n = 6593), a randomized trial comparing edoxaban with warfarin. The associations between cluster membership and anticoag-ulant treatment, recurrent VTE, bleeding, and mortality after initial treatment were studied. Results: The following 5 clusters were identified: young men cluster (n = 1126, 37%), young women cluster (n = 215, 7%), older people cluster (n = 1106, 36%), comorbidity cluster (n = 447, 15%), and history of venous thromboembolism cluster (n = 168, 5%). Patient characteristics varied by age, sex, medical history, and treatment patterns. Consistent clusters were evident on external validation. In Cox proportional hazard models, recurrence risk was lower in the young women cluster (hazard ratio [HR], 0.27; 95% CI, 0.12-0.61) compared with the comorbidity cluster, after adjusting for extended anticoagulation. The risk of bleeding was lower in young men, young women, and older people clusters (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.38-0.66; HR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.11-0.46; and HR, 0.55; 95% CI 0.41-0.73, respectively). Conclusion: The heterogeneity of VTE cases extends beyond the distinction between provoked and unprovoked VTE.

Conducting public health surveillance for venous thromboembolism (VTE) at a national scale is important for measuring the disease burden and the impact of prevention measures. Integrating natural language processing (NLP) into VTE surveillance may be an efficient and accurate option in establishing a sustainable and cost-effective national surveillance system. We evaluated the performance of the VTE identification instance of IDEAL-X, an NLP tool, in automatically classifying cases of VTE from “reading” unstructured text from diagnostic imaging records. Accessing imaging records from pilot surveillance systems for VTE from Duke University and the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (OUHSC) during 2012–2014, we used a VTE identification model of IDEAL-X to classify cases of VTE that had previously been manually classified according to pre-defined criteria. The performance measures (and 95% confidence intervals [CI]) calculated were accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. The VTE model of IDEAL-X “read” 1591 records from Duke University and 1487 records from OUHSC for a total of 3078 records. The combined performance measures were 93.7% accuracy (95% CI: 93.7%–93.8%), 96.3% sensitivity (95% CI: 96.2%–96.4%), 92.0% specificity (95% CI: 91.9%–92.0%), 89.1% positive predictive value (95% CI: 89.0%–89.2%), and 97.3% negative predictive value (95% CI: 97.3%–97.4%). The sensitivity was higher at Duke University (97.9%, 95% CI: 97.8%–98.0%) than at OUHSC (93.8%, 95% CI: 93.5%–94.0%), but the specificity was higher at OUHSC (96.3%, 95% CI: 96.2%–96.3%) than at Duke University (90.4%, 95% CI: 90.1%–90.5%). The VTE model of IDEAL-X accurately classified cases of VTE from pilot surveillance systems from 2 separate states and health systems. NLP is a promising tool in the design and implementation of an automated national surveillance system for VTE.

BACKGROUND:Data on the population-based incidence of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) from racially diverse populations are limited.OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the incidence and burden of cancer-associated VTE, including demographic and racial subgroups in the general population of Oklahoma County-which closely mirrors the United States.DESIGN:A population-based prospective study.SETTING:We conducted surveillance of VTE at tertiary care facilities and outpatient clinics in Oklahoma County, Oklahoma, from 2012-2014. Surveillance included reviewing all imaging reports used to diagnose VTE and identifying VTE events from hospital discharge data and death certificates. Cancer status was determined by linkage to the Oklahoma Central Cancer Registry.MEASUREMENTS:We used Poisson regression to calculate crude and age-adjusted incidence rates of cancer-associated VTE per 100 000 general population per year, with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).RESULTS:The age-adjusted incidence (95% CI) of cancer-associated VTE among adults age ≥ 18 was 70.0 (65.1-75.3). The age-adjusted incidence rates (95% CI) were 85.9 (72.7-101.6) for non-Hispanic Blacks, 79.5 (13.2-86.5) for non-Hispanic Whites, 18.8 (8.9-39.4) for Native Americans, 15.6 (7.0-34.8) for Asian/Pacific Islanders, and 15.2 (9.2-25.1) for Hispanics. Recurrent VTE up to 2 years after the initial diagnosis occurred in 38 of 304 patients (12.5%) with active cancer and in 34 of 424 patients (8.0%) with a history of cancer &gt; 6 months previously.CONCLUSION:Age-adjusted incidence rates of cancer-associated VTE vary substantially by race and ethnicity. The relatively high incidence rates of first VTE and of recurrence warrant further assessment of strategies to prevent VTE among cancer patients.

Background:Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a preventable, common vascular disease that has been estimated to affect up to 900,000 people per year. It has been associated with risk factors such as recent surgery, cancer, and hospitalization. VTE surveillance for patient management and safety can be improved via natural language processing (NLP). NLP tools have the ability to access electronic medical records, identify patients that meet the VTE case definition, and subsequently enter the relevant information into a database for hospital review. Objective:We aimed to evaluate the performance of a VTE identification model of IDEAL-X (Information and Data Extraction Using Adaptive Learning; Emory University)-an NLP tool-in automatically classifying cases of VTE by "reading" unstructured text from diagnostic imaging records collected from 2012 to 2014. Methods:After accessing imaging records from pilot surveillance systems for VTE from Duke University and the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (OUHSC), we used a VTE identification model of IDEAL-X to classify cases of VTE that had previously been manually classified. Experts reviewed the technicians' comments in each record to determine if a VTE event occurred. The performance measures calculated (with 95% CIs) were accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. Chi-square tests of homogeneity were conducted to evaluate differences in performance measures by site, using a significance level of .05. Results:The VTE model of IDEAL-X "read" 1591 records from Duke University and 1487 records from the OUHSC, for a total of 3078 records. The combined performance measures were 93.7% accuracy (95% CI 93.7%-93.8%), 96.3% sensitivity (95% CI 96.2%-96.4%), 92% specificity (95% CI 91.9%-92%), an 89.1% positive predictive value (95% CI 89%-89.2%), and a 97.3% negative predictive value (95% CI 97.3%-97.4%). The sensitivity was higher at Duke University (97.9%, 95% CI 97.8%-98%) than at the OUHSC (93.3%, 95% CI 93.1%-93.4%; P<.001), but the specificity was higher at the OUHSC (95.9%, 95% CI 95.8%-96%) than at Duke University (86.5%, 95% CI 86.4%-86.7%; P<.001). Conclusions:The VTE model of IDEAL-X accurately classified cases of VTE from the pilot surveillance systems of two separate health systems in Durham, North Carolina, and Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. NLP is a promising tool for the design and implementation of an automated, cost-effective national surveillance system for VTE. Conducting public health surveillance at a national scale is important for measuring disease burden and the impact of prevention measures. We recommend additional studies to identify how integrating IDEAL-X in a medical record system could further automate the surveillance process.

Background: Extended thromboprophylaxis has not been widely implemented in acutely ill medical patients because of bleeding concerns. The MAGELLAN (Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel Group Efficacy and Safety Study for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Hospitalized Medically Ill Patients Comparing Rivaroxaban With Enoxaparin) and MARINER (Medically Ill Patient Assessment of Rivaroxaban Versus Placebo in Reducing Post-Discharge Venous Thrombo-Embolism Risk) trials evaluated whether rivaroxaban compared with enoxaparin or placebo could prevent venous thromboembolism without increased bleeding. We hypothesized that patients with major bleeding but not those with nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding would be at an increased risk of all-cause mortality (ACM). Methods: We evaluated all bleeding events in patients taking at least 1 dose of study drug and their association with ACM in 4 mutually exclusive groups: (1) no bleeding, or first event was (2) nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding, (3) major bleeding, or (4) trivial bleeding. Using a Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for differences in baseline characteristics associated with ACM, we assessed the risk of ACM after such events. Results: Compared with patients with no bleeding, the risk of ACM for patients with nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding was not increased in MARINER (hazard ratio, 0.43; P=0.235) but was increased in MAGELLAN (hazard ratio, 1.74; P=0.021). Major bleeding was associated with a higher incidence of ACM in both studies, whereas trivial bleeding was not associated with ACM in either study. Conclusions: Patients with major bleeding had an increased risk of ACM, whereas nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding was not consistently associated with an increased risk of death. These results inform the risk-benefit calculus of extended thromboprophylaxis in medically ill patients. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: MAGELLAN, NCT00571649. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: MARINER, NCT02111564.

Background: Thrombosis and thrombocytopenia are both frequent complications in patients with active cancer. Thrombocytopenia can complicate decisions around anticoagulation in cancer associated thrombosis (CAT) but data to guide clinicians is limited. Much of the data on the safety and efficacy of anticoagulation in patients with CAT and thrombocytopenia have been retrospective, single-center, cohort studies. The benefit and risk of direct oral anticoagulants in cancer patients with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) and thrombocytopenia is incompletely understood. The HOKUSAI VTE Cancer study was a randomized open-label, non-inferiority, phase III trial in CAT that compared dalteparin with edoxaban for at least 6 months. We conducted a post hoc analysis of this trial to investigate the impact of platelet count on bleeding and recurrent thrombosis. Methods: Patients with platelet counts less than 100,000/µL at specified time points (enrollment, day 31 or day 90) were compared with patients with platelet count > 100,000/µL on all three time points. The primary outcomes for these analyses was major bleeding; secondary outcomes were clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB), recurrent thrombosis and survival. Cumulative incidences of bleeding and thrombosis outcomes were calculated with death as a competing risk. Results: A total of 1045 patients were included in the analyses. , The median age was 65 years and 52% were male. Most common malignancies included colorectal (16%), lung (15%), genitourinary (13%), breast (12%), and hematologic malignancies (11%). Of patients with solid cancers, 53% had metastatic disease and 30% recurrent disease at enrollment. Qualifying thrombotic events included pulmonary embolism for 63% and isolated deep vein thrombosis in 37%. Thrombocytopenia (<100,000/µL) was present in 101 patients (9.6%) of the total cohort. Only 14 patients had a platelet count <50,000/µL at any of the three time points. For the overall trial period the rates of major bleeding were significantly higher in patients with platelet count <100,000/µL (11.9% vs. 4.8%, HR 2.5 P=0.004). (Table 1) Rates of CRNMB were similarly higher in patients with platelet count <100,000/ µL (21.8% vs. 11.9%, HR 1.93, P=0.005), however there was no significant difference in rates of recurrent VTE (11.9% vs. 9.2%, HR 1.28 P=0.42) or overall mortality (37.6% vs. 38%, HR 0.98, P=0.90). Cumulative incidence of major bleeding at 180 days was higher 8.9% (95% CI 3.4-14.5%) in patients with platelet count <100,000/ µL compared to 3.9% (95% CI 2.7-5.2%) in those higher than 100,000/µL. (Figure 1) Conclusion: In this post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled study in CAT, thrombocytopenia (<100,000/µL) was associated with an increased risk of major bleeding by two-fold. No difference in the risk of recurrent thrombosis was detected. These data highlight the importance of recognizing even mild thrombocytopenia as an important risk factor for bleeding in patients being anticoagulated for CAT. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

This post hoc subgroup analysis examined efficacy and safety outcomes with extended thromboprophylaxis rivaroxaban compared with in-hospital enoxaparin in 2,078 patients from the MAGELLAN study who had a hospitalization for heart failure or a history of heart failure and a lower risk of bleeding. A significant 36% reduction in the composite endpoint of asymptomatic proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in the lower extremity, symptomatic DVT in the lower extremity (proximal or distal), symptomatic nonfatal pulmonary embolism, and venous thromboembolism-related death was observed with rivaroxaban. Major bleeding was low in both groups and not significantly increased with rivaroxaban.

Background Thromboprophylaxis extended after hospital discharge in medically ill patients currently is not recommended by practice guidelines because of uncertainty about the benefit for preventing major or fatal thromboembolic events, and the risk of bleeding. Methods and Results We assessed the benefit and risk of thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily extended for 25 to 45 days after hospitalization for preventing major thromboembolism in medically ill patients using the pooled data in 16 496 patients from 2 randomized trials, MARINER (Medically Ill Patient Assessment of Rivaroxaban Versus Placebo in Reducing Post‐Discharge Venous Thrombo‐Embolism Risk) and MAGELLAN (Multicenter, randomized, parallel‐group efficacy and safety study for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized medically ill patients comparing rivaroxaban with enoxaparin). The data from the MARINER trial were pooled with the data from the MAGELLAN trial in patients who were free of thrombotic or bleeding events up to the last dose of enoxaparin/placebo and who continued in the outpatient phase of thromboprophylaxis. The composite outcome of major thromboembolic events (symptomatic deep vein thrombosis, nonfatal pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, and nonhemorrhagic stroke) and all‐cause mortality was used to assess benefit and was compared with the risk of the composite of fatal and critical site bleeding. The incidence of the composite efficacy outcome was 1.80% (148 of 8222 patients) in the rivaroxaban group, compared with 2.31% (191 of 8274 patients in the placebo group) (HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.63–0.97], P=0.024). Fatal or critical site bleeding events were infrequent and occurred in <0.1% of patients in both groups (rivaroxaban 0.09%; placebo 0.04%; HR, 2.36; P=0.214). Conclusions The results suggest a benefit for reducing major thromboembolic outcomes (number needed to treat: 197), with a favorable trade‐off to fatal or critical site bleeding (number needed to harm: 2045). Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifiers: NCT00571649 and NCT02111564.

Background In the Hokusai VTE Cancer study, the risk of major bleeding was 2.9% higher in the edoxaban group compared with the dalteparin group, mainly due to more gastrointestinal bleedings in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. The identification of risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding may help to guide the use of DOACs in these patients. Objectives To evaluate risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with gastrointestinal cancer receiving edoxaban. Patients/Methods In this nested case-control study in patients with gastrointestinal cancer randomized to edoxaban in the Hokusai VTE Cancer study, cases (patients with clinically relevant gastrointestinal bleeding during treatment) were randomly matched to three controls (patients who had no gastrointestinal bleeding). Data for the 4-week period prior to bleeding were retrospectively collected. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated in a crude conditional logistic regression model and a multivariable model adjusted for age, sex, and cancer type. Results Twenty-four cases and 64 matched controls were included. In the multivariable analysis, advanced cancer, defined as regionally advanced or metastatic cancer (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.01-12.6) and low hemoglobin levels (OR 4.8, 95% CI 1.5-16.0) were significantly associated with bleeding. There was no significant difference in patients with resected tumors (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.1-1.4), or in patients on chemotherapy (OR 1.3, 95% CI 0.5-3.5). Conclusion Advanced cancer and low hemoglobin levels were associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with gastrointestinal cancer receiving edoxaban. We were unable to identify other risk factors, mainly due to limited statistical power.