The detection and management of potential donor-derived infections is challenging, in part due to the complexity of communications between diverse labs, organ procurement organizations (OPOs), and recipient transplant centers. We sought to determine if communication delays or errors occur in the reporting and management of donor-derived infections and if these are associated with preventable adverse events in recipients. All reported potential donor-derived transmission events reviewed by the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network Ad Hoc Disease Transmission Advisory Committee from January 2008 to June 2010 were evaluated for communication gaps between the donor center, OPO and transplant centers. The impact on recipient outcomes was then determined. Fifty-six infection events (IEs; involving 168 recipients) were evaluated. Eighteen IEs (48 recipients) were associated with communication gaps, of which 12 resulted in adverse effects in 69% of recipients (20/29), including six deaths. When IEs and test results were reported without delay, appropriate interventions were taken, subsequently minimizing or averting recipient infection (23 IEs, 72 recipients). Communication gaps in reported IEs are frequent, occur at multiple levels in the communication process, and contribute to adverse outcomes among affected transplant recipients. Conversely, effective communication minimized or averted infection in transplant recipients.

Phase III noninferiority trial examining efficacy and safety of converting stable renal transplant recipients from twice-daily tacrolimus to a novel extended-release once-daily tacrolimus formulation (LCPT) with a controlled agglomeration technology. Controls maintained tacrolimus twice daily. The primary efficacy endpoint was proportion of patients with efficacy failures (death, graft failure, locally read biopsy-proven acute rejection [BPAR], or loss to follow-up) within 12 months. Starting LCPT dose was 30% lower (15% for blacks) than preconversion tacrolimus dose; target trough levels were 4-15 ng/mL. A total of 326 patients were randomized; the mITT population (n = 162 each group) was similar demographically in the two groups. Mean daily dose of LCPT was significantly (p < 0.0001) lower than preconversion tacrolimus dose at each visit; mean trough levels between groups were similar. There were four efficacy failures in each group; safety outcomes were similar between groups. Frequency of premature study drug discontinuation was LCPT: 12% versus tacrolimus twice daily: 5% (p = 0.028). LCPT demonstrated noninferiority to tacrolimus twice daily in efficacy failure rates. LCPT may offer a safe and effective alternative for converting patients to a once-daily formulation. Compared to currently available tacrolimus formulation, LCPT requires lower doses to achieve target trough levels.

The continuing organ shortage requires evaluation of all potential donors, including those with malignant disease. In the United States, no organized approach to assessment of risk of donor tumor transmission exists, and organs from such donors are often discarded. The ad hoc Disease Transmission Advisory Committee (DTAC) of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing (OPTN/UNOS) formed an ad hoc Malignancy Subcommittee to advise on this subject. The Subcommittee reviewed the largely anecdotal literature and held discussions to generate a framework to approach risk evaluation in this circumstance. Six levels of risk developed by consensus. Suggested approach to donor utilization is given for each category, recognizing the primacy of individual clinical judgment and often emergent clinical circumstances. Categories are populated with specific tumors based on available data, including active or historical cancer. Benign tumors are considered in relation to risk of malignant transformation. Specific attention is paid to potential use of kidneys harboring small solitary renal cell carcinomas, and to patients with central nervous system tumors. This resource document is tailored to clinical practice in the United States and should aid clinical decision making in the difficult circumstance of an organ donor with potential or proven neoplasia.

Ison, M. G.1; Covington, S.2; Taylor, K.2; Taranto, S.2; Parker, K.2; Blumberg, E.2; Chin-Hong, P.2; DiMaio, M.2; Gockerman, J. P.2; Green, M.2; Hasz, R.2; Kubak, B.2; Lebovitz, D.2; Pruett, T.2; Smith, A.2; Teperman, L.2; Vasudev, B.2; Nalesnik, M.2 Author Information

K. Sujeet, B. Vasudev, P. Desai, J. Bellizzi, L. Novoa‐Takara, C. He, A. El‐Meanawy. Acute kidney injury requiring dialysis secondary to adenovirus nephritis in renal transplant recipient Transpl Infect Dis 2011: 13: 174–177. All rights reserved Abstract: Disseminated adenoviral infection is a serious problem, especially in an immunocompromised host. The disease carries a mortality rate reaching as high as 80%. It is seen most frequently in bone marrow transplant recipients, where it causes pneumonia and disseminated disease. In solid organ transplant recipients it causes graft infection. We report the case of a renal transplant recipient with disseminated adenoviral infection and acute kidney failure requiring dialysis. Reduction of immunosuppression and 1 dose of cidofovir were associated with resolution of viremia and viruria and return of kidney function to near baseline.

Background. BK virus nephritis (BKVN) has emerged as an important cause of renal transplant failure. Quantified analysis of its timing and clinical course is generally lacking. We have thus quantified the timing, risk factors, evolution of renal function, and transplant graft outcome in renal transplant recipients with BKVN from our center.Methods. A total of 41 cases of BKVN were diagnosed in 1001 renal and renal/pancreas transplant recipients. There were 2 groups: group I (N=16), with diagnosis based on renal biopsy alone from January 1996 to August 2001, and group II (N=25), with diagnosis based on quantitative blood BKV-PCR and biopsy from September 2001 to December 2003. The demographics, the clinical course, immunosuppressive therapy, renal function, and graft outcome were quantified. Donor, recipient, and transplant risk variables were studied using a univariate analysis. Actuarial graft survival was calculated. An immunosuppressive scale created to evaluate the degree of immunosuppression in these patients and its reduction after the diagnosis of BKVN.Results. The median time from transplant to BKVN diagnosis was 318 days (range 48-1356). The actuarial graft survival in patients with BKVN at 6 months, 1, 3, and 5 years was 97%, 90%, 58%, and 47%. The corresponding values for those without BKVN were 94%, 92%, 83%, and 76%, respectively, P < 0.001. Graft loss occurred in 46% of patients. The rate of decline of renal function in group II (N= 25) patients in the 4 months preceding BKVN was rapid (4.8 mL/min/month) and this declined to 0.7 mL/min/month at 3 months' post-BKVN diagnosis, P=0.004. In those who recovered, the time to stabilization of renal function was a median of 112 days. The immunosuppressive scale score was 7 units at the time of diagnosis of BKVN and decreased to 3.5 units at 3 months' post-BKVN. Reduction in the dose of calcineurin inhibitors but not the overall reduction in dose of immunosuppression correlated with recovery of renal function in these patients.Conclusion. BKVN is a relatively late complication of renal transplantation. Despite reduction in immunosuppression, graft loss occurred in 46% of patients. There was a steep decline in renal function in months preceding the diagnosis of BKVN, and reduction in calcineurin inhibitor dose, but not overall immunosuppression, correlated with stabilization of renal function.