Introduction: Lenalidomide is a potent drug with pleiotropic effects in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with deletion of the long arm of chromosome 5 [del(5q)]. The clinical efficacy of lenalidomide in MDS patients has been extensively reviewed and although the mechanisms of action in del(5q) clone have been previously described, in vivo sequential studies of modulatory effect on T lymphocytes are lacking. Our study was conducted in patients included in the Sintra-REV Clinical Trial: Lenalidomide (Revlimid) phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study versus placebo in patients with low-risk MDS (low and intermediate IPSS-1) with del(5q), with anemia (HB≤12gr/dl) and without transfusion needs. Aim: The aim of this study was to explore the effect of lenalidomide in T-lymphocytes in MDS patients with del(5q) and without transfusion dependence. Materials and Methods: Sequential study was carried out in 26 samples from 13 paired MDS patients with del (5q). Seven out 13 were treated with lenalidomide and achieved a major erythroid and cytogenetic response. Peripheral blood (PB) samples were collected before and one month after treatment in treated-patients and at the same time points for non-treated patients. CD3+ cells were collected from PB samples and total RNA was isolated. SureSelect Strand Specific RNA library (Agilent Technologies) was applied to study changes in RNA levels. Raw reads were aligned against the Human genome GRCh37 using the STAR aligner. Counts were assigned to Ensembl gene IDs through HTseq using its UNION version. Differential gene expression was determined with DESeq2, considering as statistically significant those genes with FDR < 0.05. Pathway over-representation analysis (ORA) was conducted in the Webgestalt suite. Results: 332 genes were differentially expressed in CD3+ lymphocytes one month after lenalidomide treatment in our cohort of patients; 199 of them were over-expressed after the administration of this drug (Fig 1a). Of note, none of them were observed in non-treated patients after one month. The ORA revealed significant differences in the gene expression profile of sixteen cytokines and enrichment of genes of the cell cycle pathway (35 genes). The most relevant up-regulated cytokines were: IL10, TNFSF10, IFNGand IL6. These data explain lenalidomide-induced activation of an antileukemic immune response and secretion of anti-inflammatory cytokines. Although lenalidomide has been reported to reduce the expression of IL6 secreted by myeloid cell derived from MDS clon, we have observed upregulation of this gene in T-lymphocytes. Moreover, our study showed a downregulation of MBP6 that may help to correct the anemia and also attenuate inflammation signaling in MDS patients with del(5q) (Fig 1b). In addition, the most represented up-regulated genes related to cell cycle pathway were: cyclines (CCNB1, CCNB2, CDK1), centromere genes (CENPE, CENPM, CENPU), kinesin family members (KIF18A, KIF23, KIF2C), BUB1 mitotic checkpoint genes (BUB1, BUB1B), and genes involved in cell division (CDC6, CDC7,CDC25A). It has been described that lenalidomide inhibits CDC25A selectively in the del(5q) clone resulting in G2/M arrest and apoptosis. By contrast, our study showed that this gene was upregulated in T-lymphocytes promoting cell cycle and proliferation of these cells (Fig 1b). Conclusions: The immunomodulatory properties of lenalidomide can be summarized in two: a) regulation of antileukemic and anti-inflammatory cytokines production, b) activation of cell cycle and proliferation in T cells. To our knowledge, this is the first report describing RNA expression profiles in PB CD3+ lymphocytes collected from lenalidomide-treated del(5q) patients, contributing to overall understanding of lenalidomide action. Disclosures Sanz: Abbvie Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; LaHoffman Roche Ltd.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda Pharmaceutical Ltd.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Helsinn: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Fenaux:Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding. Diez-Campelo:Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene-BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. OffLabel Disclosure: Lenalidomide was administered in anemic but not transfusion-dependence patients with low-risk MDS and del(5q)

In the current World Health Organization (WHO)-classification, therapy-related myelodysplastic syndromes (t-MDS) are categorized together with therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and t-myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms into one subgroup independent of morphologic or prognostic features. Analyzing data of 2087 t-MDS patients from different international MDS groups to evaluate classification and prognostication tools we found that applying the WHO classification for p-MDS successfully predicts time to transformation and survival (both p < 0.001). The results regarding carefully reviewed cytogenetic data, classifications, and prognostic scores confirmed that t-MDS are similarly heterogeneous as p-MDS and therefore deserve the same careful differentiation regarding risk. As reference, these results were compared with 4593 primary MDS (p-MDS) patients represented in the International Working Group for Prognosis in MDS database (IWG-PM). Although a less favorable clinical outcome occurred in each t-MDS subset compared with p-MDS subgroups, FAB and WHO-classification, IPSS-R, and WPSS-R separated t-MDS patients into differing risk groups effectively, indicating that all established risk factors for p-MDS maintained relevance in t-MDS, with cytogenetic features having enhanced predictive power. These data strongly argue to classify t-MDS as a separate entity distinct from other WHO-classified t-myeloid neoplasms, which would enhance treatment decisions and facilitate the inclusion of t-MDS patients into clinical studies.

The current classification system for Myelodysplastic Syndromes lumps all therapy-related (tMDS) into one subgroup assuming all tMDS had the same poor prognosis. We have put together a database including 2032 patients with a diagnosis of tMDS from several different IWG centers and the MDS clinical research consortium.

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) are chronic myeloid clonal neoplasms. To date, the only potentially curative therapy for these disorders remains allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation (HCT), although patient eligibility is limited due to high morbimortality associated with this procedure coupled with advanced age of most patients. Dopamine receptors (DRs) and serotonin receptors type 1 (HTR1s) were identified as cancer stem cell therapeutic targets in acute myeloid leukemia. Given their close pathophysiologic relationship, expression of HTR1s and DRs was interrogated in MDS and CMML. Both receptors were differentially expressed in patient samples compared to healthy donors. Treatment with HTR1B antagonists reduced cell viability. HTR1 antagonists showed a synergistic cytotoxic effect with currently approved hypomethylating agents in AML cells. Our results suggest that HTR1B constitutes a novel therapeutic target for MDS and CMML. Due to its druggability, the clinical development of new regimens based on this target is promising.

Background: Most IPSS low and int1 (lower) risk MDS patients with isolated del(5q) develop RBC TD or need treatment for symptomatic anemia early after diagnosis (median time to transfusion/treatment of 20 months, López Cadenas et al abstract 3180 ASH, 2016). Lenalidomide (LEN) is a reference treatment in MDS-del(5q) but approved in many countries only when RBC-TD occurs. LEN directly targets the del(5q) clone improving anemia and quality of life. Limited data also suggest a role of LEN in non-TD patients with del(5q) (Oliva et al Cancer Med 2015), but no randomized trial has assessed the efficacy and tolerance of early LEN treatment in this MDS subset. Material: The Sintra-Rev clinical trial is a phase III European multicenter study in low-risk MDS-del(5q) patients with anemia (Hb<12g/dL), without TD. Patients were randomized in a double-blind design to LEN (5mg/day continuously) vs placebo (2:1 randomization) for 2 years of treatment and 2y of follow-up. The primary endpoint was the time to TD, secondary endpoints included erythroid (HI-E) and cytogenetic response (CyR) (all according to IWG 2006 criteria), overall survival (OS), event free survival (EFS), time to AML and mutational analysis (TP53 and other myeloid mutations). Here, we report results of the interim analysis after completion of the treatment phase in all patients (March 2020). Results: Main clinical characteristics of the 61 patients (ITT population) included (Feb-2010 to Feb-2018) are summarized in Table 1: 82% females, median age 72 years (range 37-89), median time since diagnosis 3.6 months, median Hb at inclusion 9.8 g/dL (7.1 - 11.7) g/dL and 93% patients had isolated del(5q). Four patients were excluded due either to screening failure (1 pat) or failure to complete at least 12w of treatment (3 pat). Fifty-seven patients were included in the ITT evaluable population for efficacy and 59 for safety (2 patients did not receive any drug). Median time on treatment was 66 weeks (3-121), 95w in the LEN arm and 42w in the placebo arm (p=0.392). Forty-seven percent patients in the LEN arm successfully completed the study compared to 33% in the placebo arm. After a median follow up of 25.6 months (Q1 16-Q3 39), median OS was not achieved. Among the 57 patients evaluable for efficacy, median time to TD was 75.7 mo for the LEN patients and 25.9 mo for the placebo arm (HR 2.703, 95CI1.162-6.286, p=0.021, figure 1). HI-E response was observed in 72.5% of LEN patients compared to 0% in the placebo arm (p<0.001). Median Hb improvement in responders was 2.8 g/dL. Eighty percent of LEN patients achieved a cytogenetic response (CyR) compared to 4.8% of patients receiving placebo (p<0.001, complete CyR 70% in the LEN arm). OS was similar in both arms (not reached) while EFS was superior in the LEN arm (HR 2.274, 95CI 1.034-5.001, p=0.041). AML evolution was similar in both arms (5%). Mutational analysis will be presented at the meeting. Fifty-eight patients developed at least one adverse event (AE) during the trial (no differences between the LEN and placebo arm), related to the drug 86.8% in the LEN and 33.3% in the placebo arm, respectively (p<0.001). Hematological toxicity occurred in 40 patients in the LEN arm (50% grades 3/4) and only 4 patients in the placebo arm (25% grade 3/4). At least one SAE was seen in 31.6% of the LEN patients compared to 4.8% in the placebo arm (p=0.022), not related to the drug. Nineteen serious AE were reported in 13 patients, 4 of them (2nd neoplasia, pulmonary embolism, febrile neutropenia and blurred vision) potentially related with the study drug, with no related deaths. Conclusions: In this interim analysis we confirm that low dose LEN (5 mg) in anemic non-TD low risk MDS del(5q) patients prolongs the period of time to TD (75.7 mo vs 25.9 mo), improves Hb levels (72.5% of ER) and induces clonal responses (70% complete CyR), ie potentially more responses than in historical series of MDS del(5q) treated with LEN at time of TD, with a manageable safety profile, and no increased progression rate. Longer follow up will be required to assess the effect of early treatment with LEN, and particularly the effect of the early reduction of the del(5q) clone size, on long-term outcomes. Disclosures Hernandez-Rivas: Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Rovi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene/BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Thepot:astellas: Honoraria; novartis: Honoraria; sanofi: Honoraria; celgene: Honoraria. Sanz:LaHoffman Roche Ltd.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda Pharmaceutical Ltd.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Helsinn: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Giagounidis:AMGEN: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Platzbecker:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Geron: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria. Götze:Celgene: Research Funding. Fenaux:BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria, Research Funding. Diez-Campelo:Celgene-BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. OffLabel Disclosure: LEN IN ANEMIC BUT NOT TD PATIENTS WITH LOW RISK MDS AND DEL(5Q)

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the responsiveness of the newly developed Geriatric Assessment in Hematology (GAH) scale to clinical change in older patients diagnosed with hematologic malignancies.Methods: A prospective observational study conducted in 164 patients aged >= 65 years and diagnosed with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)/acute myeloid leukemia (AML), multiple myeloma (MM), or chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Responsiveness of the GAH scales was studied by means of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score, the Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score, the visual analog scale (VAS), and the physician's subjective assessment, used as clinical anchors to identify whether patients had changed clinically (either improved or worsened) or not since the baseline visit. Responsiveness was evaluated on the basis of effect size (ES).Results: 164 patients (men, 63.7%; median age, 77.0 (72.8-81.4) participated. Statistically significant correlations were obtained between the investigator's qualitative assessment and changes in ECOG, KPS, and VAS scores. Likewise, a statistically significant correlation was obtained between the investigator's qualitative assessment and changes in the GAH scale score. Responsiveness of the GAH scale to detect clinical change was satisfactory (ES 0.34).Conclusion: Findings confirm that the GAH scale is responsive to clinical changes in patients' health status. Additionally, the GAH scale is a promising tool to improve clinical decision-making in older patients with hematological malignancies. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Bypassing agents are presently the standard of care for the treatment of bleeding episodes in patients with hemophilia and high‐titer inhibitors and are also used for bleed prevention. Only two bypassing agents are available to patients, and these products trace their lineage to the 1970s (activated prothrombin complex concentrates) and the 1980s (recombinant factor VIIa). Given the limited repertoire of available products, clinicians have relied on experience, empirical observation, registry data and individualized care to improve clinical outcomes on a case‐by‐case basis. Research over the past two decades has culminated in a greatly improved understanding of human coagulation; resulting from this, new products have been developed that offer treatment options and mechanisms of actions that differ from current bypassing agents. The most advanced in clinical development is emicizumab, a bispecific antibody that mimics the function of FVIIIa in the intrinsic Xase complex and is indicated for once‐weekly or every‐other‐week prophylactic dosing in inhibitor patients. Other non‐traditional products in clinical development include fitusiran and antibodies directed against tissue factor pathway inhibitor. As non‐factor‐based therapies become more widely utilized over time, the use of bypassing agents may be expected to decrease; however, bypassing agents will remain essential for the foreseeable future. As such, clinical development of bypassing agents continues, with some products (e.g. eptacog beta) under regulatory review. In this review we examine the optimal use of bypassing agents and their mechanism of action. We also discuss newer products and how these might theoretically be administered in conjunction with traditional bypassing agents.

Erythroleukemia was considered an acute myeloid leukemia in the 2008 World Health Organization (WHO) classification and is defined by the presence of ≥50% bone marrow erythroblasts, having <20% bone marrow blasts from total nucleated cells but ≥20% bone marrow myeloblasts from nonerythroid cells. Erythroleukemia shares clinicopathologic features with myelodysplastic syndromes, especially with erythroid-predominant myelodysplastic syndromes (≥50% bone marrow erythroblasts). The upcoming WHO revision proposes to eliminate the nonerythroid blast cell count rule and to move erythroleukemia patients into the appropriate myelodysplastic syndrome category on the basis of the absolute blast cell count. We conducted a retrospective study of patients with de novo erythroleukemia and compared their clinico-biological features and outcome with those of de novo myelodysplastic syndromes, focusing on erythroid-predominant myelodysplastic syndromes. Median overall survival of 405 erythroid-predominant myelodysplastic syndromes without excess blasts was significantly longer than that observed in 57 erythroid-predominant refractory anemias with excess blasts-1 and in 59 erythroleukemias, but no significant difference was observed between erythroid-predominant refractory anemias with excess blasts-1 and erythroleukemias. In this subset of patients with ≥50% bone marrow erythroblasts and excess blasts, the presence of a high-risk karyotype defined by the International Prognostic Scoring System or by the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System was the main prognostic factor. In the same way, the survival of 459 refractory anemias with excess blasts-2, independently of having ≥20% bone marrow blasts from nonerythroid cells or not, was almost identical to the observed in 59 erythroleukemias. Interestingly, 11 low-blast count erythroleukemias with 5 to <10% bone marrow blasts from total nucleated cells showed similar survival than the rest of erythroleukemias. Our data suggest that de novo erythroleukemia is in the spectrum of myelodysplastic syndromes with excess blasts and support its inclusion into future classifications of myelodysplastic syndromes.

Abstract To develop a prognostic scoring system tailored for therapy-related myelodysplastic syndromes (tMDS), we put together a database containing 1933 patients (pts) with tMDS from Spanish, German, Swiss, Austrian, US, Italian, and Dutch centers diagnosed between 1975-2015. Complete data to calculate the IPSS and IPSS-R were available in 1603 pts. Examining different scoring systems, we found that IPSS and IPSS-R do not risk stratify tMDS as well as they do primary MDS (pMDS), thereby supporting the need for a tMDS-specific score (Kuendgen et al., ASH 2015). The current analysis focuses on cytogenetic information as a potential component of a refined tMDS score, based on this large, unique patient cohort. Of the 1933 pts, 477 had normal karyotype (KT), 197 had missing cytogenetics, while 467 had a karyotype not readily interpretable. Incomplete karyotype descriptions will be reedited for the final evaluation. Of the remaining 1269 pts the most frequent cytogenetic abnormalities (abn) were: -7, del(5q), +mar, +8, del(7q), -5, del(20q), -17, -18, -Y, del(12p), -20, and +1 with >30 cases each. Frequencies are shown in Table 1. Some abn were observed mostly or solely within complex KTs, such as monosomies, except -7. Others, like del(20q) or -Y, are mainly seen as single or double abn, while del(5q), -7, or del(7q) are seen in complex as well as non-complex KTs. The cytogenetic profile overlapped with that of pMDS (most frequent abn: del(5q), -7/del(7q), +8, -18/del(18q), del(20q), -5, -Y, -17/del(17p), +21, and inv(3)/t(3q) (Schanz et al, JCO 2011)), with notable differences including overrepresentation of complete monosomies, a higher frequency of -7 or t(11q23), and a more frequent occurrence of cytogenetic subtypes in complex KTs, which was especially evident in del(5q) occurring as a single abn in 16%, compared to 70% within a complex KT. IPSS-R cytogenetic groups were distributed as follows: Very Good (2%), Good (35%), Int (17%), Poor (15%), Very Poor (32%). Regarding the number of abn (including incomplete KT descriptions) roughly 30% had a normal KT, 20% 1, 10% 2, and 40% ≥3 abn, compared to pMDS: 55% normal KT, 29% 1, 10% 2, and 6% ≥3 abn. To be evaluable for prognostic information, abn should occur in a minimum of 10 pts. As a single aberration this was the case for -7, +8, del(5q), del(20q), del(7q), -Y, and t(11;varia) (q23;varia). Of particular interest, there was no apparent prognostic difference between -7 and del(7q); del(5q) as a single abn was associated with a relatively good survival, while the prognosis was poor with the first additional abn; t(11q23) occurred primarily as a single abn and was associated with an extremely poor prognosis, and prognosis of pts with ≥4 abn was dismal independent of composition (Table 1). To develop a more biologically meaningful scoring system containing homogeneous and prognostically stable groups, we will further combine subgroups with different abn leading to the same cytogenetic consequences. For example, deletions, unbalanced translocations, derivative chromosomes, dicentric chromosomes of 17p, and possibly -17 all lead to a loss of genetic material at the short arm of this respective chromosome affecting TP53. Further information might be derived from analyses of the minimal common deleted regions. For some abn, like del(11q), del(3p), and del(9q), this can be refined to one chromosome band only (table 1). Conclusion: Development of a robust scoring system for all subtypes of tMDS is challenging using existing variables. This focused analysis on the cytogenetic score component shows that favorable KTs are evident in a substantial proportion of pts, in contrast to historic data describing unfavorable cytogenetics in the majority of pts. Although complex and monosomal KTs are overrepresented, this suggests the existence of distinct tMDS-subtypes, although some of these cases might not be truly therapy-induced despite a history of cytotoxic treatment. The next steps will be to analyze the prognosis of the different groups, develop a tMDS cytogenetic score, and examine minimal deleted regions to identify candidate genes for development of tMDS, as well as to describe the possible influence of different primary diseases and treatments (radio- vs chemotherapy, different drugs) on induction of cytogenetic subtypes. Our detailed analysis of tMDS cytogenetics should reveal important prognostic information and is likely to help understand mechanisms of MDS development. Disclosures Komrokji: Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Sole:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sekeres:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium/Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Roboz:Cellectis: Research Funding; Agios, Amgen, Amphivena, Astex, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celator, Celgene, Genoptix, Janssen, Juno, MEI Pharma, MedImmune, Novartis, Onconova, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, Sunesis, Teva: Consultancy. Steensma:Amgen: Consultancy; Genoptix: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Millenium/Takeda: Consultancy; Ariad: Equity Ownership. Schlenk:Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Valent:Amgen: Honoraria; Deciphera Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Honoraria, Research Funding; Deciphera Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Giagounidis:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy. Giagounidis:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy. Platzbecker:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; TEVA Pharmaceutical Industries: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Lübbert:Janssen-Cilag: Other: Travel Funding, Research Funding; Celgene: Other: Travel Funding; Ratiopharm: Other: Study drug valproic acid.

Recurrent translocations are uncommon in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Three new recurrent translocations, namely der(12)t(3;12)(q13;p13), t(11;13;22)(q13;q14;q12) and der(17)t(13;17)(q21;p13), identified by conventional cytogenetics (CC) in 4 MDS patients, were further characterized using a panel of commercial and homemade fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probes. The goal of this study was to determine the precise breakpoints and to identify genes that could be related with the neoplastic process. Half of the breakpoints (4/8) were precisely identified and in the remaining half they were narrowed to a region ranging from 14 to 926 kb. All the studied breakpoints had interstitial or terminal deletions ranging from 536 kb to 89 Mb, and only those 7 Mb were detected by CC. The genes located in or around the breakpoints described in our study have not been previously related to MDS. The deleted regions include the ETV6 and RB1 genes, among others, and exclude the TP53 gene. FISH studies were useful to refine the breakpoints of the translocations, but further studies are needed to determine the role of the involved genes in the neoplastic process.

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are the commonest hematologic malignancies in the elderly. Since many patients with MDS actually die from age-related ailments, the very disease burden of MDS remains largely unknown. This registry-based study was aimed at investigating the excess mortality attributable to MDS. We analyzed 7,408 adult patients diagnosed with primary MDS from 1980 to 2014. Excess mortality was estimated by comparing the patients' survival with that expected in the matched general population. Median age of patients was 74 years, 58% were males, and 65% belonged to the lower risk categories of the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R). Excess mortality accounted for three-fourths of the all-cause mortality and was mainly driven by factors unrelated to leukemic transformation. Excess mortality increased with the IPSS-R risk category [Incidence rate ratio (IRR): 2.1, 95% CI: 1.9-2.3; P < .001]. Older age and male sex retained an independent association with higher excess mortality after discounting demographic effects. Excess mortality increased in the most recent periods just in the higher risk IPSS-R categories (IRR: 1.2; 95% CI: 1.1-1.3 when comparing periods 2007-14, 2000-06, and 1980-99). In conclusion, MDS carry a significant excess mortality, even in the lower risk categories, that is mainly driven by factors unrelated to leukemic transformation, and increases with older age, male sex, and poorer risk categories. Excess mortality has increased in recent years in the higher risk patients, which might be ascribed to a parallel increase in age-related comorbidities. Our results claim for more comprehensive treatment strategies for patients with MDS. Am. J. Hematol. 92:149-154, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Chromosomal translocations are rare in the myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). With the exception of t(3q), translocations are not explicitly considered in the cytogenetic classification of the IPSS-R and their impact on disease progression and patient survival is unknown. The present study was aimed at determining the prognostic impact of translocations in the context of the cytogenetic classification of the IPSS-R. We evaluated 1,653 patients from the Spanish Registry of MDS diagnosed with MDS or CMML and an abnormal karyotype by conventional cytogenetic analysis. Translocations were identified in 168 patients (T group). Compared with the 1,485 patients with abnormal karyotype without translocations (non-T group), the T group had a larger proportion of patients with refractory anemia with excess of blasts and higher scores in both the cytogenetic and global IPSS-R. Translocations were associated with a significantly shorter survival and higher incidence of transformation into AML at univariate analysis but both features disappeared after multivariate adjustment for the IPSS-R cytogenetic category. Patients with single or double translocations other than t(3q) had an outcome similar to those in the non-T group in the intermediate cytogenetic risk category of the IPSS-R. In conclusion, the presence of translocations identifies a subgroup of MDS/CMML patients with a more aggressive clinical presentation that can be explained by a higher incidence of complex karyotypes. Single or double translocations other than t(3q) should be explicitly considered into the intermediate risk category of cytogenetic IPSS-R classification.

Background We aimed to compare the ability of recently developed prognostic indices for myelodysplastic syndromes to identify patients with poor prognoses within the lower-risk (low and intermediate-1) categories defined by the International Prognosis Scoring System (IPSS).Methods We included patients with de-novo myelodysplastic syndromes diagnosed between Nov 29, 1972, and Dec 15, 2011, who had low or intermediate-1 IPSS scores and were in the Spanish Registry of Myelodysplastic Syndromes. We reclassified these patients with the new prognostic indices (revised IPSS [IPSS-R], revised WHO-based Prognostic Scoring System [WPSS-R], Lower Risk Scoring System [LRSS], and the Grupo Espanol de Sindromes Mielodisplasicos [Spanish Group of Myelodysplastic Syndromes; GESMD]) and calculated the overall survival of the different risk groups within each prognostic index to identify the groups of patients with overall poor prognoses (defined as an expected overall survival < 30 months). We calculated overall survival with the Kaplan-Meier method.Findings We identified 2373 patients. None of the prognostic indices could be used to identify a population with poor prognoses (median overall survival <30 months) for the patients with low IPSS scores (1290 individuals). In the group with intermediate-1 scores (1083 individuals), between 17% and 47% of patients were identified as having poor prognoses with the new prognostic indices. The LRSS had the best model fit with the lowest value in the Akaike information criteria test, whereas the IPSS-R identified the largest proportion of patients with poor prognoses (47%). Patients with intermediate-1 scores who were classified as having poor prognoses by one or more prognostic index (646 [60%] individuals) had worse median overall survival (33.1 months, 95% CI 28.4-37.9) than did patients who were classified as having low risk by all prognostic indices (63.7 months, 49.5-78.0], HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.6-2.3, p<0.0001)Interpretation Recently proposed prognostic indices for myelodysplastic syndromes can be used to improve identification of patients with poor prognoses in the group of patients with intermediate-1 IPSS scores, who could potentially benefit from a high-risk treatment approach.

The benefit of azacitidine treatment in survival of high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) patients compared with conventional care treatment (CCT) has not been established outside clinical trials. To assess its effectiveness, we compared overall survival (OS) between azacitidine and conventional treatment (CCT) in high-risk MDS patients, excluding those undergoing stem cell transplantation, submitted to the Spanish MDS registry from 2000 to 2013. Several Cox regression and competing risk models, considering azacitidine as a time-dependent covariate, were used to assess survival and acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML) progression. Among 821 patients included, 251 received azacitidine. Median survival was 13.4 (11.8–16) months for azacitidine-treated patients and 12.2 (11–14.1) for patients under CCT (P=0.41). In a multivariate model, age, International prognostic scoring system and lactate dehydrogenase were predictors of OS whereas azacitidine was not (adjusted odds ratio 1.08, 95% confidence interval 0.86–1.35, P=0.49). However, in patients with chromosome 7 abnormalities, a trend toward a better survival was observed in azacitidine-treated patients (median survival 13.3 (11–18) months) compared with CCT (median survival 8.6 (5–10.4) months, P=0.08). In conclusion, our data show that, in spite of a widespread use of azacitidine, there is a lack of improvement in survival over the years. Identification of predicting factors of response and survival is mandatory.