Black men have the highest age-adjusted death rate of any major race-gender group in America. Understanding their perceived barriers to accessing health care may benefit future interventions working to increase Black men’s health care engagement. Data collected from focus groups of Black men( N = 67), key informant interviews( N = 12), and interviews( N = 5) with participants who pilot tested an online health education system (called “Gabe”) were analyzed to explore their health care experiences and how computer-based health programs might better assist Black men. Concerns pertaining to health care systems’ failure to recognize the diversity among Black men, and physicians’ lack of sociocultural awareness about the challenges they regularly face, were most salient. Building trust with providers was cited as being central to engagement, with Gabe users perceiving the system to be both trustworthy and accessible. Participants reported an openness to technology assisting with health management and provided suggestions of how online systems can meet the needs of Black men.

Many partners and children who are affected by intimate partner violence (IPV) are unable to leave abusive situations that put their health and safety at risk. Family physicians provide care for people who perpetrate IPV and are in a role that may allow them to recognize and counsel patients who are using violence. Appropriate referrals can potentially help these patients access effective interventions such as certified battering intervention programs in a manner that prevents violence for their families. The language used by physicians can facilitate or impede disclosures among patients perpetrating IPV who may be open or willing to discuss their use of violence. Talking about their behavior in ways that patients perceive as derogatory or confrontational may alienate people who use violence from initiating or engaging in meaningful discussions about their abusive behaviors in clinical settings and getting the help they need to stop their violence. To enable patients to safely talk about their own perpetration of violence, physicians need to develop appropriate language and a nuanced, evidence-based approach to broaching and discussing this issue with patients. As with other patient populations, being labelled may not accurately describe their identity, behavior, nor experiences, and result in them avoiding care. In keeping with trauma-informed approaches, we provide possible examples of respectful nonjudgmental language and nonthreatening clinically appropriate questions for people who use violence. Additional research is needed to identify how best to discuss perpetration of IPV with patients to help initiate change in their behavior while maintaining victim safety.

OBJECTIVE:Description of recruitment methods and lessons learned in a randomized controlled trial of underserved patients using an integrative medical group visits intervention. METHODS:Comparison of the demographic characteristics of participants screened and consented to the study as well as description of recruitment methods used. OUTCOME MEASURES:This paper examines the characteristics of patients who were eligible compared to those who were not, characteristics of patients at the different sites, and patient characteristics over time (by comparing various cohorts) based on our experiences recruiting underserved patients. RESULTS:We screened 338 patients, with 205 (60.6%) meeting eligibility criteria and 159 patients randomized and consented. 133 patients were found ineligible, with the most common reasons being low depression scores (n = 20), manic symptoms (n = 20), and psychotic symptoms (n = 19), and alcohol use (n = 15). We found demographic differences in patients recruited by different methods and at different sites- patients referred by provider letter were older than those referred by self-referral or provider referral (mean age/SD vs. mean age/SD, p = 0.0001). For site-specific differences, patients at DH were older (53 SD = 12.3) than those at the Boston Medical Center (49 SD = 11.3) and CSHC (p = 0.048) in pair-wise comparisons. Patients at DH were also more likely to be white (25%) as compared to BMC (18%) and DH (7%), while those at CSHC were more likely to be black (70%) (p = 0.008).

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is prevalent and has lasting impacts on the health and well-being of the entire family involved. Primary care physicians often interact with male patients who perpetrate IPV and are in a role potentially to intervene, but there is very little research and guidance about how to address perpetration of IPV in the health care setting. We reviewed the existing literature research related to physicians' interactions with male perpetrators of IPV and summarize the recommendations. If a male patient discloses IPV perpetration, physicians should assess for lethality, readiness to change, and comorbid medical conditions that could impact treatment, such as substance abuse and mental illness. Experts agree that referrals to a Batterer Intervention Program should be the primary intervention. If there are no locally available Batterer Intervention Programs or the patient is unwilling to go, then a physician should refer the abuser to a therapist who has been trained specifically to work with perpetrators of IPV. In addition, physicians should be prepared to offer education about the negative impact of IPV on the victim, on any children, and on the abuser himself. Physicians should address any untreated substance abuse or mental health issues. Referral to couples therapy should generally be avoided. Physicians should continue to have regular follow-up with their male patients to support them in changing their behavior. Further research is needed to assess the role the health care system can have in preventing IPV perpetration.

INTRODUCTION:Despite the prevalence of intimate partner violence (IPV), there is a paucity of research exploring the role that physicians might play in intervening with IPV perpetrators.METHODS:A qualitative study explored interactions between family medicine physicians and male perpetrators of IPV. Fifteen physicians were purposefully sampled from 1 hospital system. The physicians were individually interviewed using a semistructured interview guide, and interview transcripts were analyzed using techniques from grounded theory.RESULTS:Three main themes relating to physicians' experiences were identified: (1) how physicians learned of or identified IPV perpetration by men (usually disclosure by the victim, but perpetrators also disclosed it); (2) how physicians assessed for comorbidities or responded to IPV perpetration by men; and (3) facilitators of and barriers to physician identification of and response to IPV perpetration by men. Facilitators identified include having a trusting relationship with the perpetrator and support services, whereas barriers consisted of strong negative emotions and a lack of training.CONCLUSIONS:Family medicine physicians in this sample reported feeling underprepared to serve patients whom they know are perpetrators of IPV, particularly if they are also providing care to the victim. Additional research is needed to develop interventions and effective trainings.

BackgroundGiven the public health crisis of opioid overprescribing for pain, there is a need for evidence-based non pharmacological treatment options that effectively reduce pain and depression. We aim to examine the effectiveness of the Integrative Medical Group Visits (IMGV) model in reducing chronic pain and depressive symptoms, as well as increasing pain self-management.MethodsThis paper details the study design and implementation of an ongoing randomized controlled trial of the IMGV model as compared to primary care visits. The research aims to determine if the IMGV model is effective in achieving: a) a reduction in self-reported pain and depressive symptoms and 2) an improvement in the self-management of pain, through increasing pain self-efficacy and reducing use of self-reported pain medication. We intend to recruit 154 participants to be randomized in our intervention, the IMGV model (n=77) and to usual care (n=77).ConclusionsUsual care of chronic pain through pharmacological treatment has mixed evidence of efficacy and may not improve quality of life or functional status. We aim to conduct a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of the IMGV model as compared to usual care in reducing self-reported pain and depressive symptoms as well as increasing pain management skills.

OBJECTIVE:Determine if peer feedback through a chart review tool (CRT) can impact opioid prescribing for patients with chronic noncancer pain in an outpatient family medicine clinic at an urban, safety-net teaching hospital and to assess providing practices.DESIGN:A quality improvement (QI) project, comparing preopioid and postopioid prescribing practices.SETTING:Outpatient family medicine clinic at urban, safety-net teaching hospital.PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS:A convenience sample of 16 family medicine physicians.INTERVENTIONS:A CRT was developed to allow physicians to give peer feedback to one another about their opioid prescribing practices as part of a 1-year QI project. We assessed the deidentified data gathered from the CRT.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S):Primary study outcome measures were the amount of opioids prescribed at the end of the QI project compared to the time of initial chart review. We also describe overall prescribing practices.RESULTS:Ninety-nine patient charts from 14 different physicians were reviewed over 1 year. Sixty percent of patients had at least one violation of the clinic's controlled substance prescribing policy in the prior 6 months, and half of the violations were due to missed appointments with specialists to help manage pain. The mean dose of opioids decreased 2.6 mg morphine equivalent dose (MED)/day from time of chart review until the end of project, compared to a 6.9 mg MED/day increase that occurred from 12 months prior to chart review to the time of chart review (p=0.01). Fourteen patients (16 percent) of patients prescribed opioids were taken-off of opioids after the chart review.CONCLUSIONS:Use of a CRT in an urban primary care clinic provided helpful insight on prescribing practices and has promise to improve quality of opioid prescribing.

Background Lesotho has a severe shortage of human resources for health. Many young and talented Basotho leave the country each year to attend medical school, but usually they do not return, in part because of the lack of opportunity for continuing education and specialty training in Lesotho. Here, we describe a family medicine specialty training programme (FMSTP), which aims not only to recruit Basotho physicians back to Lesotho but also increase the number of well trained physicians in Lesotho who have the knowledge, skills and commitment to meet the health needs of the people of Lesotho, especially in district hospitals.

Background: Systems and tools are needed to identify and mitigate preconception health (PCH) risks, particularly for African American (AA) women, given persistent health disparities. We developed and tested "Gabby," an online preconception conversational agent system.Methods: One hundred nongravid AA women 18-34 years of age were screened for over 100 PCH risks and randomized to the Gabby or control group. The Gabby group interacted with the system for up to six months; the control group received a letter indicating their health risks with a recommendation to talk with their clinician. The numbers, proportions, and types of risks were compared between groups.Results: There were 23.7 (SD 5.9) risks identified per participant. Eighty-five percent (77 of 91) provided 6 month follow up data. The Gabby group had greater reductions in the number (8.3 vs. 5.5 risks, P < .05) and the proportion (27.8% vs 20.5%, P < 0.01) of risks compared to controls. The Gabby group averaged 63.7 minutes of interaction time. Seventy-eight percent reported that it "was easy to talk to Gabby" and 64% used information from Gabby to improve their health.Conclusion: Gabby was significantly associated with preconception risk reduction. More research is needed to determine if Gabby can benefit higher risk populations and if risk reduction is clinically significant.