UNLABELLED:In the era of video-laparoscopic surgery there are a lot of surgeons that still continue to perform open appendectomy. This choice is the consequence of the good results of open appendectomy (clinical, cosmetic, hospital stays and hospital costs). Published trials on laparoscopic appendectomy don't show that it is superior to the open approach. The aim of this study is to critically review the literature on laparoscopic and traditional appendectomies and to report a clinical experience on 86 consecutive patients that underwent open appendectomy.PATIENTS AND METHODS:From September 2000 to March 2001, in the Department of Emergency Surgery of Villa Scassi Hospital in Genoa, 86 patients underwent open appendectomy (32 men; mean age 29.8 years; range 15-54 years/54 women; mean age 22.4 years; range 13-80 years). All the patients underwent blood examinations, abdomino-pelvic ultrasonographys and the women gynecological evaluation. The Authors used, almost always, the Stropeni way of access (cutaneous Mac Burney and right para-rectal incision of the muscles). Discharge has been done as soon as possible. Removed appendices were submitted to histological examination and were classified as normal or pathologic according to the severity of the lesion. Review of articles has been done on Medline.RESULTS:Suspected appendicitis have been confirmed by histological examination that documented 1 normal appendix, 7 chronic appendicitis, 45 acute catharralis, 22 acute suppurative and 11 gangrenous or perforated appendicitis. The specificity of open appendectomy has been 97.6% (100% for men). Post-operative complications were: 2 wound infections and 1 recurrence of an abscess (2.58%). Open appendectomy did carry an hospital bill of 2,500,000 IT liras (1,200 USA dollars) for non complicated appendicitis and 2,000 USA dollars for perforated appendicitis. The early discharge allowed us to spend 119 millions IT liras less in 7 months (99,600 USA dollars in a year).DISCUSSION:The role of laparoscopic appendectomy isn't still established. After a critical review of the literature we can suggest that: 1) laparoscopic appendectomy increase operative time (63 vs 43 minutes: p < 0.0001); 2) laparoscopic approach can reduce the length of post-operative stay in hospital; 3) hospital bill is strongly reduced by open appendectomy (4,274 vs 7,923 USA dollars). On our experience the cost of the hospital for uncomplicated appendicitis is 2,500,000 IT liras (1,200 USA dollars). Otherwise it has been suggested that laparoscopic appendectomy has a better diagnostic accuracy respect to open appendectomy. Some Authors report a percentage of "negative" appendices of 16-50%. In Authors experience the percentage of "negative" appendices is 1.3% and so the diagnostic accuracy is 96% in women and 100% in men, probably because we systematically performed a preoperative abdomino-pelvic ultrasonography and, for the women, a gynecological evaluation. In conclusion, laparoscopic appendectomy should be done in case of suspected appendicitis in women. In the other cases, when there is a strong clinical suspect of appendicitis and, in particular, in case of suppurative appendicitis, the Authors recommend to perform an open appendectomy using the Stropeni approach. In case of perforated appendicitis with abdominal abscess they recommend to perform an open appendectomy using the right para-rectal approach or the median umbilical-pubis approach.

May one speak of precancerous lesion in the presence of perianal condyloma acuminata? In literature there are numerous reports of neoplastic transformation of anal condylomatosis to such an extent as these reports are comparable to extra-mammary Paget’s disease, to the giant condylomatosis of Buschke-Lowenstein and Bowen’s disease. Risk factors for malignant or premalignant change were: sexual orientation (homosexual or bisexual), HIV status and location above the dentate line. In our experience, in cases correlation between anal squamous carcinoma and condylomatosis has been established, it had occurred in 1 case, 18 months after local excision; another following radiotherapy cycle, a development at the same site of the surgical operation with metastasis in an inguinal lymph node. This latter case induces us to deem how necessary a meticulous follow-up in patients submitted to local excision of anal condylomas.

After investigation of the international literature on this subject, the authors describe a case report of adhesive-stenotic and retractile peritonitis, very likely caused bt a foreign body reaction (surgical stitches, gloves, rice powder, etc.?). This case-report is interesting both to remember the existence of this pathology and to limit its iatrogenic development. In conclusion, it is advisable to wash surgical gloves with sterile solutions and to limit enlarged bowel resections mostly in young people.

Pre-operative skin test response has been evaluated in 50 cases of colorectal carcinoma. Cellular defense's depression was correlated with tumoral staging (p = < 0.001). In B2 and C groups, a higher incidence of metastatic and local recurrences was registered in subjects with low response. These last are suitable for a randomized trial including immunotherapy.

The authors review nosologic problems related to the infarction of the greater omentum on the ground of two cases (one idiopathic, the other by torsion) recently observed. Omental infarction, far from being a real diagnostic or surgical problem, is an unusual cause of acute abdomen; resection of the affected omentum is curative in 100% of cases.

Blood flow of nine end to end and eight side to side arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) at distal forearm for maintenance hemodialysis, was measured by blood flowmeter inserted in the arterial line between the pump and the dialyzer. The mean flow of the end to end and the side to side fistulas was 386.6 +/- 69.6 ml/min and 345 +/- 45 ml/min (p 0.01) respectively. Since, in addition, the end to end flow seems to be better than the side to side flow as regards local and general effects, we advocate the use of end to end fistulas.

Transit times were evaluated in 23 obese subjects before and 1,4 and 12 months after biliopancreatic by-pass. A modified version of the method of Hinton et al. was used to determine emptying of the stomach and partial and total transit times. Emptying of the stomach was normal preoperatively. After surgery, it was almost immediate, except in two subjects with stomitis. Both transit times were virtually unchanged. Since the segment between the stomach and the ileocaecal valve is only half as long as in the normal subject, the results show that the by-pass leads to a slowing of transit that concerns the small intestine only, is quickly established, and does not change in the course of time. Evaluation of the altered anatomical and functional situation, and the absence of a correlation between the long-term behaviour of transit times on one hand and of lipid malabsorption and weight loss on the other-hand, suggest that a slower transit time must not be regarded as a compensation mechanism, except insofar as it restricts the degree of malabsorption set up immediately after surgery. Preliminary studies of enterohormonal changes following the by-pass indicate that increased glucagon and decreased motiline values are mainly responsible for slower transit times.