Introduction: Interventional cardiovascular procedures are increasingly complex, raising concerns about heightened radiation exposure for both patients and healthcare professionals. This exposure can lead to serious complications, including skin injuries, cataracts, and cancer. A range of protective tools—such as lead aprons, thyroid collars and glasses, ceiling-mounted shields, and table skirts—are available to minimize occupational exposure. Effective radiation protection relies not only on equipment but also on procedural strategies such as improved beam collimation, reduced fluoroscopic pulse rates, fluoroscopy intensity and the number of cine acquisitions, and maintaining distance from the X-ray source. Staff education, ongoing training, and routine audits are essential to ensure adherence to radiation safety protocols. While interventional cardiology teams show general awareness and use of protective measures, significant gaps remain—particularly in the consistent use of eye protection, personal dosimeters, and standardized practices across cath labs. Strengthening these areas is critical to promoting a unified national approach to radiation safety and safeguarding the long-term health of Cath lab personnel.Objectives: This position paper aims to raise operator awareness and propose novel strategies for minimizing ionizing radiation doses, thus mitigating associated risks.Methods and results: This working group conducted a review of the scientific literature and the most recent international guidelines on radiation protection in cardiac cath labs. Based on this analysis, effective protective measures and best practices were identified and systematized, adapted to the Portuguese context.Conclusion: Minimizing radiation exposure in the cath lab requires a comprehensive, multidisciplinary approach that combines protective equipment, procedural adjustments, and collaborative safety protocols to safeguard both patients and healthcare providers without compromising clinical outcomes.

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements None. Background Pre-infarct angina (PIA) has been demonstrated to reduce infarct size and improve prognosis in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, the effects of ischemic preconditioning with aging are still controversial. Purpose We aimed at comparing the effect of pre-infarction angina (PIA) on infarct size between two age groups. Methods We retrospectively studied consecutive STEMI patients treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from January 2008 to December 2017. PIA was diagnosed if a patient had arm, jaw, or chest pain in the preceding eight days. Peak creatine kinase (CK) concentration was used as a surrogate of infarct size. Patients were divided into two groups, based on the median age: ≤62 years and >62 years. Multiple linear regression was used to identify independent predictors for infarct size that included total ischemic time and classic cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidaemia, and smoking). Interaction between age and PIA was evaluated by 2-way factorial ANOVA. Results From the 1131 patients included in the study, 590 (52,2%) had ≤62 years and 541 (47,8%) had >62 years. Older patients were more often women (17.2% vs 8.6%, p<0.001) and had longer total ischemic time [4.6(3.0-9.0) vs 3.5(2.3-6.0) hours, p<0.001]. They also had higher prevalence of hypertension (32.8% vs 22.8%, p<0.001), diabetes (30.7% vs 18.7%, p<0.001) and were less likely to be smokers (26.9% vs 71.4%, p<0.001). The prevalence of PIA was similar across age groups (≤62Y 31.2% vs >62Y 32.0%, p=0.668). In older patients, PIA was associated with smaller infarct size [1.29(0.72-2.33) vs. 1.76(0.97-2.91) U/Lx103, p<0.001]. This difference was not observed for younger patients [1.72(0.95-3.40) vs. 1.81(0.94-3.37) U/Lx103, p=0.392]. There was no significant interaction between the existence of PIA and age on peak CK (p=0.280 for interaction) (Figure 1). In multivariate analysis, overall, PIA was associated with reduced peak CK (β=-0,320, p=0.011). On subgroup group analysis, PIA was a predictor of infarct size only in the older patients (β=-0,459, p=0.005), but not in the younger group (β=-0,182, p=0.394). Conclusion Older patients with PIA had significantly lower infarct size compared to patients in the same age group without PIA. After adjustment for risk factors and total ischemic time, PIA was a predictor of lower infarct size only for the older patients. These results suggest that the effect of pre-ischemic conditioning is not blunted by age, indicating that older patients should not be excluded from clinical trials investigation of cardioprotective strategies in STEMI patients.

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements None. Background Women with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) have been reported to have higher short-term mortality than men, especially in younger patients. However, data on long-term outcomes did not corroborate this association. Purpose We aimed to evaluate if sex was an independent predictor of major adverse cardio-cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at 1-year follow-up. A sub-analysis across different age subgroups was performed. Methods We retrospectively studied consecutive STEMI patients treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from January 2008 to December 2017. Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify predictors of MACCE at 1-year follow-up (death, cerebrovascular accident, new myocardial infarction in any vessel, or target lesion revascularization). Patients were divided into four age groups, according to quartiles, for subgroup analysis (≤50, 51-60, 61-70, >71 years). Results Of the 1131 patients included in the study, 291 (25.7%) were women. Women were older [68.2 (±14.2) vs 60.6 (±12.2) years, p<0.001], more often non-smokers (21.5% vs 60.2%, p<0.001), and had a higher prevalence of diabetes (34,8% vs 20.9%, p<0.001) and hypertension (71.6% vs 50.2%, p<0.001). They also had lower haemoglobin [12.8 (±1.6) vs 14.5 (±1.7) g/dl, p<0.001] and lower creatinine clearance at admission [73.8 (±35.3) vs 92.6 (±35.2) ml/min, p<0.001], as well as longer door-to-balloon times [90 (60-166) vs 75(50-120) min, p=0.005]. However, total ischemic time was not significantly different between groups [250(175-480) vs 224(150-440) min, p=0.054]. Overall, women had a higher occurrence of MACCE (22.1% vs 15.4%; log-rank P = 0.008, Figure 1). On multivariate analysis, sex was not found to be an independent predictor of MACCE (HR 1.12; 95% CI, 0.77–1.65; P = 0.547). The risk of unfavourable outcomes was mainly driven by other comorbidities (namely, age, presence of peripheral arterial disease, lower haemoglobin concentration, lower systolic blood pressure on admission, a higher peak CK activity, and the utilization of a femoral approach). When MACCE was stratified by age, sex was not an independent predictor of MACCE in any age group (Figure 2). Conclusion Women with STEMI submitted to PCI had a higher rate of MACCE at 1-year follow-up compared with men, however, sex was not an independent predictor of these events on multivariate analysis, regardless of the age subgroups considered.

Calcified lesions are associated with higher rates of complications during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Balloon shaft fracture and entrapment is a rare, but potentially severe complication of PCI. The resulting debris might lead to vessel occlusion and/or form a pro-thrombotic nidus, potentially leading to distal embolization, acute myocardial infarction, ventricular dysrhythmia, and even death. We report a case of balloon fracture and entrapment, where rotational atherectomy was essential in modifying the entrapped material, allowing the crossing of an otherwise uncrossable “balloon-lesion complex”, subsequently treated with crushing and jailing by stenting, with good angiographic result and outcome.

A tri-leaflet mitral valve (MV) is an extremely rare phenomenon, often associated with significant mitral regurgitation (MR). It may represent a phenotypic expression of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM). We present the case of a 69-year-old woman with HOCM, a tri-leaflet MV, and systolic anterior motion (SAM)–induced severe MR. Despite receiving optimal medical therapy, her refractory symptoms and significant MR prompted surgical consideration. The patient underwent surgical myectomy, resulting in improvement of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, SAM-induced MR, and symptomatic relief. This case illustrates a unique presentation of HOCM with a tri-leaflet MV and significant MR, successfully managed with a tailored surgical myectomy.

Introduction and objectives: Concerns surrounding the consequences of ionizing radiation (IR) have increased in interventional cardiology (IC). Despite this, the ever-growing complexity of diseases as well as procedures can lead to greater exposure to radiation. The aim of this survey, led by Portuguese Association of Interventional Cardiology (APIC), was to evaluate the level of awareness and current practices on IR protection among its members. Methods: An online survey was emailed to all APIC members, between August and November 2021. The questionnaire consisted of 50 questions focusing on knowledge and measures of IR protection in the catheterization laboratory. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: From a response rate of 46.9%, the study obtained a total sample of 159 responses (156 selected for analysis). Most survey respondents (66.0%) were unaware of the radiation exposure category, and only 60.4% reported systematically using a dosimeter. A large majority (90.4%) employed techniques to minimize exposure to radiation. All participants used personal pro- tective equipment, despite eyewear protection only being used frequently by 49.2% of main operators. Ceiling suspended shields and table protectors were often used. Only two-thirds were familiar with the legally established limit on radiation doses for workers or the dose that should trigger patient follow-up. Most of the survey respondents had a non -certified training in IR procedures and only 32.0% had attended their yearly occupational health consultation. Conclusions: Safety methods and protective equipment are largely adopted among interven- tional cardiologists, who have shown some IR awareness. Despite this, there is room for improvement, especially concerning the use of eyewear protection, monitoring, and certifi- cation. (c) 2023 Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia. Published by Elsevier Espan a, S.L.U. This is an open access article under the CC BY -NC -ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by- nc-nd/4.0/).

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements None. Background Differences in women’s prognosis have been described for both ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and cardiogenic shock (CS). These might reflect asymmetries in clinical management, but also gender-specific comorbidities and pathologic mechanisms. Purpose We aimed to evaluate the risk of in-hospital complications and mid-term outcomes of women with CS following STEMI. Methods We retrospectively studied STEMI patients treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from 2008 to 2017 in a tertiary care centre, presenting or evolving in Killip class IV (defined as cardiogenic shock or hypotension and organ hypoperfusion). Clinical and demographic characteristics, as well as complications and outcomes, were collected. Major adverse cardio-cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at 1-year follow-up was a composite of death, cerebrovascular accident, new myocardial infarction in any vessel, or target lesion revascularization. Results Among 1131 patients presenting with STEMI, our study included 117 (10.3%) patients in CS, of which 40 (34.2%) were women. Women were older [71.8(±13.4) vs 64.6(±11.72) years, p=0.002] and less frequently smokers (25.0% vs 50.7%, p=0.008). Prevalence of classic cardiovascular risk factors, namely diabetes (34,1% vs 39.2%, p=0.860), hypertension (71.5% vs 60.8%, p=0.212), and dyslipidaemia (47.5% vs 70.0%, p=0.799), was the same for both groups. Body mass index was also similar [26.6(±5.2) vs 26.1(±3.4) kg/m2, p=0.539]. Women had lower haemoglobin [12.4(±1.9) vs 13.8(±1.9) g/dl, p&lt;0.001] and lower creatinine clearance at admission [52.4(±30.6) vs 67.3(±29.4) ml/min, p=0.017]. Door-to-balloon times [80(59-180) vs 68(48-105) min, p=0.302], total ischemic time [210(120-360) vs 203(120-476) min, p=0.302] and prevalence of anterior STEMI (35.0% vs 50.0%, p=0.123) were not significantly different between sexes. The prevalence of in-hospital complications was generally similar for both sexes (Table 1), except for the risk of advanced atrioventricular (AV) block that was higher in women (32.5% vs 10.7%, p=0.004). Also, haemoglobin nadir was lower in women [10.6(±2.1) vs 11.7(±2.1) g/dl, p=0.023]. In a 1-year follow-up, the occurrence of MACCE was similar for both sexes (60.0% vs 59.7%, log-rank P 0.734) (Figure 1). Conclusion Women with STEMI complicated by CS submitted to PCI had a similar prevalence of in-hospital complications as men. Also, mid-term outcomes, assessed by MACCE at 1 year, did not differ between groups.

AbstractAimsAcute myocardial infarction (AMI) resulting from unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) occlusion and subtotal occlusion is a life‐threatening condition. Although AMI management has improved in the past two decades, there is limited information on recent trends in patient characteristics, management, and outcomes for acute unprotected LMCA‐related AMI. This study aims to assess such trends over a 12 year period.Methods and resultsThis retrospective multicentre study includes patients with unprotected LMCA occlusion/subtotal occlusion admitted to three tertiary hospitals between 2008 and 2020. The patients were divided into two groups based on the chronology of presentation: a ‘past group’ (January 2008 to December 2014) and a ‘contemporary group’ (January 2015 to December 2020). The study compares clinical characteristics, management approaches, and outcomes between the two groups. The study includes 128 patients, with 51 (40%) in the ‘past group’ and 77 (60%) in the ‘contemporary group’. Baseline risk factors did not show statistically significant differences between the two groups, except for hypertension (49% vs. 74%; P = 0.005). Chest pain was more frequent in the ‘past group’ (98% vs. 89%; P = 0.014), and a trend towards more cardiac arrests was observed in the ‘contemporary group’ (18% vs. 31%; P = 0.087). Revascularization type did not differ significantly (P = 0.419), but manual thrombectomy was less frequently used (41% vs. 23%; P = 0.032) and stent implantation showed a trend towards higher rates (66% vs. 78%; P = 0.150) in the ‘contemporary cohort’. There was a gradual shift from bare‐metal to drug‐eluting stents, with a significantly higher percentage of ticagrelor/prasugrel loading in the ‘contemporary cohort’ (5% vs. 79%; P < 0.001). The use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS), although not statistically significant, was higher among patients in the ‘past group’ (67% vs. 51%; P = 0.073). The type of MCS differed significantly between groups, with a decrease in intra‐aortic balloon pump use (67% vs. 42%; P = 0.005) and an increase in veno‐arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (4% vs. 22%; P = 0.005) and Impella system (0% vs. 3%) over time. Survival analysis showed no significant differences (P = 0.599; log‐rank test) in all‐cause mortality between the different time groups, with the long‐term survival rate being approximately 30%.ConclusionsIn our real‐world population, despite the progressive use of newer drugs and more advanced devices over time, patients with unprotected LMCA occlusion/subtotal occlusion remain a subpopulation with poor prognosis.

Campinas, Andreia Filipa Oliveira; Brochado, Bruno F.; Santos, Raquel B.; Costa, Ricardo F.; de Frias, André D.; Alexandre, André M.; Couto, David S.; Gomes, Catarina P.; Luz, André C.; da Silveira, João B.; Torres, Severo B. Author Information

Background Atrial septal defect (ASD) can often remain asymptomatic until adulthood. It still remains unclear whether large ASD closure in senior people should be performed or not. Temporary ASD balloon occlusion test has been suggested as a tool to assess the risk of acute left ventricular heart failure post-ASD closure, and it allows to better distinguish responders from non-responders. Case presentation An 83-year-old man with a long-standing uncorrected secundum ASD was admitted for recently decompensated right-sided heart failure. During hospitalization, this patient was studied with trans-esophageal echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and right heart catheterization, showing high Qp:Qs ratio and favorable anatomical conditions for percutaneous closure. Because of patient’s increasing need for intravenous diuretics and worsening renal function, it was considered that transcatheter ASD closure could improve symptoms, hence it was performed an attempt of percutaneous closure of the ASD with a fenestrated device. Unfortunately, irrespective of ASD being hemodynamically significant, it was found a very significant increase in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure during the temporary balloon occlusion test, supporting the existence of concealed left ventricular diastolic dysfunction. As a result, it was decided to abandon the procedure and not to close the ASD. Conclusion This clinical case illustrates the value of temporary balloon occlusion test before permanent percutaneous closure of ASD in elderly patients, regardless of left ventricular (systolic or diastolic) dysfunction.

In this clinical image vignette, we illustrate the presentation and management of an extremely rare and lethal complica- tion of radial access percutaneous coronary intervention. We present a case of perforation of a small collateral branch of the brachiocephalic artery with subsequent mediastinal hematoma formation and stridor presentation. We suspect the perforation was probably caused by the hydrophilic-coated guidewire. After a multidisciplinary heart team discussion, a percutaneous approach was recommended. We performed the procedure with a single coil embolization of the collateral branch perforation, achieving complete resolution of the hemorrhage.

Introduction and Objectives: Acute total occlusion of the unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) is a dramatic event. There are limited data regarding this population. We aimed to describe the clinical presentation and outcomes of patients and to determine predictors of in-hospital mortality.Methods: This retrospective study included patients presenting with acute (<12 h) myocardial infarction due to total occlusion of the LMCA (TIMI flow 0) between January 2008 and December 2020 in three tertiary hospitals.Results: During this period, 11 036 emergent coronary angiographies were performed, 59 (0.5%) of which revealed acute total occlusion of the LMCA. Patients' mean age was 61.2 (SD & PLUSMN; 12.2) years and 73% were male. No patients had left dominance. At presentation, 73% were in cardiogenic shock, aborted cardiac arrest occurred in 27% and 97% underwent myocardial revas-cularization. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention was performed in 90% of cases and angiographic success was achieved in 56% of procedures, while 7% of patients underwent surgi-cal revascularization. In-hospital mortality was 58%. Among survivors, 92% and 67% were alive after one and five years, respectively. After multivariate analysis, only cardiogenic shock and angiographic success were independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. Use of mechanical circulatory support and presence of well-developed collateral circulation were not predictive of short-term prognosis. Conclusion: Acute total occlusion of the LMCA is associated with a dismal prognosis. Cardiogenic shock and angiographic success play a major role in predicting the prognosis of these patients. The effect of mechanical circulatory support on patient prognosis remains to be determined.& COPY; 2023 Published by Elsevier Espan & SIM;a, S.L.U. on behalf of Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background and purpose In ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (MVCAD), remote-vessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been associated with a reduction in the incidence of reinfarction when compared to a culprit-only revascularization strategy. Overall effects on long-term all-cause mortality are still unclear. Methods Between 2008 and 2013, a total of 584 consecutive patients were admitted with STEMI. 535 survived to discharge, from which 302 (56,5%) had MVCAD and were included in the analysis. We stratified the patients according to the revascularization strategy in two groups: culprit-lesion-only PCI and PCI of non-culprit vessels with angiographic significant stenosis. Patients were followed for 8 years. The primary endpoints were reinfarction in any vessel and all-cause death. Secondary endpoints included target vessel failure (TVF) (any repeat revascularization in the index culprit vessel), heart failure (HF) hospitalization and stroke. Results Of the 302 cases, 217 (74.2%) were men and the median age was 63 years. 150 (49.7%) had 2-vessel, 152 (50.3%) had 3-vessel disease and 104 (34.4%) underwent non-culprit vessel PCI. The mean follow-up time was 6.95 (± 2.29) years. Overall, the culprit-lesion-only group was older (median: 66 vs 59.5 years; p < 0.001) and had a lower proportion of smokers (41.9% vs 59.6%; p = 0.003). There were no significant differences between the groups’ other main comorbidities. The culprit-lesion-only group had a shorter hospital stay (median: 7.0 vs 7.5; p = 0.013), despite presenting at higher Killip class (24.4% vs 10.6% in Killip II-IV; p = 0.004). Regarding index PCI, no-reflow phenomenon was more common in the culprit-lesion-only group (7.1% vs 1.0%; p = 0.020), where the use of drug-eluted stents was more prevalent in the remote-vessel PCI group (69.2% vs 47.0%; p = 0.001). There was a higher risk of reinfarction (Adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 2.46; 95% CI [1.12 – 5.38]; p = 0.008) and TVF (Adjusted HR 2.37; 95% CI [1.02 – 5.48]; p = 0.044) in the culprit-lesion-only PCI group after relevant variable adjustment, with no significant differences in all-cause mortality. There were no significant differences in any of the remaining secondary outcomes. Conclusions Randomized trials and successive metanalysis have demonstrated benefit in complete revascularization after STEMI regarding the incidence of reinfarction and cardiovascular death. However, the long term impact on all-cause death is still unclear. This study corroborates the main findings in the literature, while suggesting lack of effect on overall mortality on a long-term follow-up.

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background and purpose Left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery occlusion has been associated with worse short-term outcomes and overall worse prognosis, there is still unclear data about the long-term risk of reinfarction in relation to the index culprit vessel. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, between 2008 and 2013, a total of 584 patients were admitted with STEMI and were subject to emergent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Of those, 535 (91.6%) were alive at hospital discharge, from which 532 were considered for the analysis, after excluding the missing cases. We stratified the individuals according to the culprit vessel in two groups: anterior myocardial infarction (MI) (LAD or left main stem (LM)), and non-anterior MI (circumflex (CX) or right coronary artery (RCA)). We followed the cases for a maximum of 8 years, censoring every event beyond. The primary endpoints were reinfarction and target vessel failure (TVF). Secondary endpoints included all-cause mortality, heart failure (HF) hospitalization and stroke. Mann-Whitney-U and Chi-square tests were used to compare baseline characteristics. Kaplan-Meyer survival analysis was used to obtain the survival curves. Univariate and multivariate analysis were done using Cox regression models. Results Of the 532 individuals included in the analysis, 395 (74.2%) were men and the median age was 61 (+/- 19.8) years. The most common culprit vessel was RCA (45.5%), followed by LAD (41.2%), CX (13.2%), and lastly LM (0.20%). The median follow-up time was 6.94 (+/- 2.38) years. Overall, the anterior MI group presented at a higher Killip class (20.0% vs 14.8% in Killip class II-IV; p = 0.046) and had higher peak plasma level of high-sensitivity troponin T (6.16 vs 3.66 ng/ml; p < 0.001), suggesting larger infarct area. Left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) at discharge was also lower in the anterior MI group (reduced in 78,3% vs 43.4%; p < 0.001). Multivessel disease was more common in the non-anterior MI group (49.5% vs 60.9%; p = 0.005), as was PCI of non-culprit vessels (15.5% vs 22.8%; p = 0.037) and the use of bare-metal stents (20.0 vs 51.6%; p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the groups regarding the main comorbidities, except for peripheral artery disease, more common in the non-anterior MI group (4.10 vs 10.0%; p = 0.011). There was a higher risk of reinfarction in the non-anterior MI group which persisted after relevant variable adjustment (Adjusted hazard ratio 1.96; 95% CI [1.08 – 3.67]; p = 0.027) (Figure 1). There were no significant differences regarding the risk of TVF or any of the secondary outcomes. Conclusions Although LAD/LM occlusion is thought to carry a worse short-term prognosis, non-anterior STEMI appears to be associated with a higher long-term risk of reinfarction. Despite higher rates of reinfarction, non-anterior STEMI patients have not been shown to have an excess mortality of HF hospitalizations in this cohort.

INTRODUCTION:Ticagrelor might reduce infarct size by exerting a more potent antiplatelet effect or by promoting a potential conditioning stimulus in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. Pre-infarction angina (PIA) is an effective preconditioning stimulus that reduces ischemia-reperfusion injury. Because little is known on the interaction of PIA in STEMI-patients loaded with ticagrelor, we sought to determine if patients loaded with ticagrelor had improved clinical outcomes as compared to clopidogrel and to study if it is modulated by the presence of PIA.METHODS:From 1272 STEMI patients submitted to primary percutaneous coronary intervention and treated with clopidogrel or ticagrelor from January 2008 to December 2018, 826 were analyzed after propensity score matching. Infarct size was estimated using peak creatine kinase (CK) and troponin T (TnT), and clinical impact was evaluated through cumulative major cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at 1-year follow-up. Matched patients and their interaction with PIA were analyzed.RESULTS:Patients loaded with ticagrelor had lower peak CK [1405.50 U/L (730.25-2491.00), P < .001] and TnT [3.58 ng/mL (1.73-6.59), P < .001)], regardless of PIA. The presence of PIA was associated with lower CK (P = .030), but not TnT (P = .097). There was no interaction between ticagrelor loading and PIA (P = .788 for TnT and P = .555 for CK). There was no difference in MACCE incidence between clopidogrel or ticagrelor loading (P = .129). Cumulative survival was also similar between clopidogrel or ticagrelor, regardless of PIA (P = .103).CONCLUSION:Ticagrelor reduced infarct sizes independently and without a synergic effect with PIA. Despite reducing infarct size, clinical outcomes were similar across both groups.

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Introduction Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) due to unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) occlusion is a potentially life-threatening disease. AMI management has evolved over the past two decades, and mortality has decreased considerably. Though, little information on patient characteristics, management, and mortality trends in the most recent years is available regarding acute unprotected LMCA occlusion. Purpose We aimed to assess trends in patient characteristics, management, and outcomes for acute myocardial infarction due to LMCA occlusion between 2008 and 2020. Methods We conducted a retrospective multicentre registry of patients with AMI with unprotected LMCA occlusion admitted in three tertiary hospitals between 2008 and 2020. Patients were divided according to timeline of presentation, and we sought to compare clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes between a past group (from January 2008 to December 2012) and a contemporary group (from January 2017 to December 2020). Results Of 128 patients with AMI from unprotected LMCA occlusion, 28 were included in the past group [from January 2008 to December 2012 (group 1)] and 48 were included in the contemporary group [from January 2017 to December 2020 (group 2)]. No statistically significant differences in baseline risk factors were found between the two groups, except for hypertension (50.0% in group 1 vs 75.0% in group 2, p=0.027). There was no difference regarding presentation with cardiogenic shock (57.1% vs 64.6%, p=0.520). Median symptom-to-balloon time was high but similar in both groups [180 min (120-300) vs 210 min (120-420), p=0.640]. Radial access was more frequent used in the contemporary group (33.0% vs 10.7%, p=0.028), as well as the administration of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (14.6% vs 12.0%, p=0.004) and the implantation of drug-eluting stents (100% vs 63.2%, p=0.010). The use of mechanical circulatory support device was surprisingly higher in group 1 (82% vs 46%, p=0.002), but the intra-aortic pump balloon (IABP) was the only device available in that group. In the contemporary group, the use of IABP, Impella device, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was 37.5%, 20.8%, and 2.1%, respectively. The second antiplatelet agent was also different between groups, with a higher percentage of ticagrelor loading in the contemporary group. In-hospital mortality (46.4% in group 1 vs. 54.2% in group 2, p=0.520) and 1-year cumulative mortality (60.7% vs 60.4%, p=0.741) were high in both groups, but no statistically significant difference was found in survival analysis (p=0.794; log-rank test). Conclusion In our real-world population, despite the use of newer drugs and more advanced devices being more common in the contemporary group, patients with AMI due to LMCA occlusion are still a subpopulation with poor prognosis. Innovative strategies are needed to make a difference.