Abstract Funding Acknowledgements None. Background Pre-infarct angina (PIA) has been demonstrated to reduce infarct size and improve prognosis in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, the effects of ischemic preconditioning with aging are still controversial. Purpose We aimed at comparing the effect of pre-infarction angina (PIA) on infarct size between two age groups. Methods We retrospectively studied consecutive STEMI patients treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from January 2008 to December 2017. PIA was diagnosed if a patient had arm, jaw, or chest pain in the preceding eight days. Peak creatine kinase (CK) concentration was used as a surrogate of infarct size. Patients were divided into two groups, based on the median age: ≤62 years and >62 years. Multiple linear regression was used to identify independent predictors for infarct size that included total ischemic time and classic cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidaemia, and smoking). Interaction between age and PIA was evaluated by 2-way factorial ANOVA. Results From the 1131 patients included in the study, 590 (52,2%) had ≤62 years and 541 (47,8%) had >62 years. Older patients were more often women (17.2% vs 8.6%, p<0.001) and had longer total ischemic time [4.6(3.0-9.0) vs 3.5(2.3-6.0) hours, p<0.001]. They also had higher prevalence of hypertension (32.8% vs 22.8%, p<0.001), diabetes (30.7% vs 18.7%, p<0.001) and were less likely to be smokers (26.9% vs 71.4%, p<0.001). The prevalence of PIA was similar across age groups (≤62Y 31.2% vs >62Y 32.0%, p=0.668). In older patients, PIA was associated with smaller infarct size [1.29(0.72-2.33) vs. 1.76(0.97-2.91) U/Lx103, p<0.001]. This difference was not observed for younger patients [1.72(0.95-3.40) vs. 1.81(0.94-3.37) U/Lx103, p=0.392]. There was no significant interaction between the existence of PIA and age on peak CK (p=0.280 for interaction) (Figure 1). In multivariate analysis, overall, PIA was associated with reduced peak CK (β=-0,320, p=0.011). On subgroup group analysis, PIA was a predictor of infarct size only in the older patients (β=-0,459, p=0.005), but not in the younger group (β=-0,182, p=0.394). Conclusion Older patients with PIA had significantly lower infarct size compared to patients in the same age group without PIA. After adjustment for risk factors and total ischemic time, PIA was a predictor of lower infarct size only for the older patients. These results suggest that the effect of pre-ischemic conditioning is not blunted by age, indicating that older patients should not be excluded from clinical trials investigation of cardioprotective strategies in STEMI patients.

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements None. Background Women with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) have been reported to have higher short-term mortality than men, especially in younger patients. However, data on long-term outcomes did not corroborate this association. Purpose We aimed to evaluate if sex was an independent predictor of major adverse cardio-cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at 1-year follow-up. A sub-analysis across different age subgroups was performed. Methods We retrospectively studied consecutive STEMI patients treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from January 2008 to December 2017. Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify predictors of MACCE at 1-year follow-up (death, cerebrovascular accident, new myocardial infarction in any vessel, or target lesion revascularization). Patients were divided into four age groups, according to quartiles, for subgroup analysis (≤50, 51-60, 61-70, >71 years). Results Of the 1131 patients included in the study, 291 (25.7%) were women. Women were older [68.2 (±14.2) vs 60.6 (±12.2) years, p<0.001], more often non-smokers (21.5% vs 60.2%, p<0.001), and had a higher prevalence of diabetes (34,8% vs 20.9%, p<0.001) and hypertension (71.6% vs 50.2%, p<0.001). They also had lower haemoglobin [12.8 (±1.6) vs 14.5 (±1.7) g/dl, p<0.001] and lower creatinine clearance at admission [73.8 (±35.3) vs 92.6 (±35.2) ml/min, p<0.001], as well as longer door-to-balloon times [90 (60-166) vs 75(50-120) min, p=0.005]. However, total ischemic time was not significantly different between groups [250(175-480) vs 224(150-440) min, p=0.054]. Overall, women had a higher occurrence of MACCE (22.1% vs 15.4%; log-rank P = 0.008, Figure 1). On multivariate analysis, sex was not found to be an independent predictor of MACCE (HR 1.12; 95% CI, 0.77–1.65; P = 0.547). The risk of unfavourable outcomes was mainly driven by other comorbidities (namely, age, presence of peripheral arterial disease, lower haemoglobin concentration, lower systolic blood pressure on admission, a higher peak CK activity, and the utilization of a femoral approach). When MACCE was stratified by age, sex was not an independent predictor of MACCE in any age group (Figure 2). Conclusion Women with STEMI submitted to PCI had a higher rate of MACCE at 1-year follow-up compared with men, however, sex was not an independent predictor of these events on multivariate analysis, regardless of the age subgroups considered.

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements None. Background Differences in women’s prognosis have been described for both ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and cardiogenic shock (CS). These might reflect asymmetries in clinical management, but also gender-specific comorbidities and pathologic mechanisms. Purpose We aimed to evaluate the risk of in-hospital complications and mid-term outcomes of women with CS following STEMI. Methods We retrospectively studied STEMI patients treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from 2008 to 2017 in a tertiary care centre, presenting or evolving in Killip class IV (defined as cardiogenic shock or hypotension and organ hypoperfusion). Clinical and demographic characteristics, as well as complications and outcomes, were collected. Major adverse cardio-cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at 1-year follow-up was a composite of death, cerebrovascular accident, new myocardial infarction in any vessel, or target lesion revascularization. Results Among 1131 patients presenting with STEMI, our study included 117 (10.3%) patients in CS, of which 40 (34.2%) were women. Women were older [71.8(±13.4) vs 64.6(±11.72) years, p=0.002] and less frequently smokers (25.0% vs 50.7%, p=0.008). Prevalence of classic cardiovascular risk factors, namely diabetes (34,1% vs 39.2%, p=0.860), hypertension (71.5% vs 60.8%, p=0.212), and dyslipidaemia (47.5% vs 70.0%, p=0.799), was the same for both groups. Body mass index was also similar [26.6(±5.2) vs 26.1(±3.4) kg/m2, p=0.539]. Women had lower haemoglobin [12.4(±1.9) vs 13.8(±1.9) g/dl, p&lt;0.001] and lower creatinine clearance at admission [52.4(±30.6) vs 67.3(±29.4) ml/min, p=0.017]. Door-to-balloon times [80(59-180) vs 68(48-105) min, p=0.302], total ischemic time [210(120-360) vs 203(120-476) min, p=0.302] and prevalence of anterior STEMI (35.0% vs 50.0%, p=0.123) were not significantly different between sexes. The prevalence of in-hospital complications was generally similar for both sexes (Table 1), except for the risk of advanced atrioventricular (AV) block that was higher in women (32.5% vs 10.7%, p=0.004). Also, haemoglobin nadir was lower in women [10.6(±2.1) vs 11.7(±2.1) g/dl, p=0.023]. In a 1-year follow-up, the occurrence of MACCE was similar for both sexes (60.0% vs 59.7%, log-rank P 0.734) (Figure 1). Conclusion Women with STEMI complicated by CS submitted to PCI had a similar prevalence of in-hospital complications as men. Also, mid-term outcomes, assessed by MACCE at 1 year, did not differ between groups.

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background and purpose In ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (MVCAD), remote-vessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been associated with a reduction in the incidence of reinfarction when compared to a culprit-only revascularization strategy. Overall effects on long-term all-cause mortality are still unclear. Methods Between 2008 and 2013, a total of 584 consecutive patients were admitted with STEMI. 535 survived to discharge, from which 302 (56,5%) had MVCAD and were included in the analysis. We stratified the patients according to the revascularization strategy in two groups: culprit-lesion-only PCI and PCI of non-culprit vessels with angiographic significant stenosis. Patients were followed for 8 years. The primary endpoints were reinfarction in any vessel and all-cause death. Secondary endpoints included target vessel failure (TVF) (any repeat revascularization in the index culprit vessel), heart failure (HF) hospitalization and stroke. Results Of the 302 cases, 217 (74.2%) were men and the median age was 63 years. 150 (49.7%) had 2-vessel, 152 (50.3%) had 3-vessel disease and 104 (34.4%) underwent non-culprit vessel PCI. The mean follow-up time was 6.95 (± 2.29) years. Overall, the culprit-lesion-only group was older (median: 66 vs 59.5 years; p < 0.001) and had a lower proportion of smokers (41.9% vs 59.6%; p = 0.003). There were no significant differences between the groups’ other main comorbidities. The culprit-lesion-only group had a shorter hospital stay (median: 7.0 vs 7.5; p = 0.013), despite presenting at higher Killip class (24.4% vs 10.6% in Killip II-IV; p = 0.004). Regarding index PCI, no-reflow phenomenon was more common in the culprit-lesion-only group (7.1% vs 1.0%; p = 0.020), where the use of drug-eluted stents was more prevalent in the remote-vessel PCI group (69.2% vs 47.0%; p = 0.001). There was a higher risk of reinfarction (Adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 2.46; 95% CI [1.12 – 5.38]; p = 0.008) and TVF (Adjusted HR 2.37; 95% CI [1.02 – 5.48]; p = 0.044) in the culprit-lesion-only PCI group after relevant variable adjustment, with no significant differences in all-cause mortality. There were no significant differences in any of the remaining secondary outcomes. Conclusions Randomized trials and successive metanalysis have demonstrated benefit in complete revascularization after STEMI regarding the incidence of reinfarction and cardiovascular death. However, the long term impact on all-cause death is still unclear. This study corroborates the main findings in the literature, while suggesting lack of effect on overall mortality on a long-term follow-up.

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background and purpose Left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery occlusion has been associated with worse short-term outcomes and overall worse prognosis, there is still unclear data about the long-term risk of reinfarction in relation to the index culprit vessel. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, between 2008 and 2013, a total of 584 patients were admitted with STEMI and were subject to emergent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Of those, 535 (91.6%) were alive at hospital discharge, from which 532 were considered for the analysis, after excluding the missing cases. We stratified the individuals according to the culprit vessel in two groups: anterior myocardial infarction (MI) (LAD or left main stem (LM)), and non-anterior MI (circumflex (CX) or right coronary artery (RCA)). We followed the cases for a maximum of 8 years, censoring every event beyond. The primary endpoints were reinfarction and target vessel failure (TVF). Secondary endpoints included all-cause mortality, heart failure (HF) hospitalization and stroke. Mann-Whitney-U and Chi-square tests were used to compare baseline characteristics. Kaplan-Meyer survival analysis was used to obtain the survival curves. Univariate and multivariate analysis were done using Cox regression models. Results Of the 532 individuals included in the analysis, 395 (74.2%) were men and the median age was 61 (+/- 19.8) years. The most common culprit vessel was RCA (45.5%), followed by LAD (41.2%), CX (13.2%), and lastly LM (0.20%). The median follow-up time was 6.94 (+/- 2.38) years. Overall, the anterior MI group presented at a higher Killip class (20.0% vs 14.8% in Killip class II-IV; p = 0.046) and had higher peak plasma level of high-sensitivity troponin T (6.16 vs 3.66 ng/ml; p < 0.001), suggesting larger infarct area. Left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) at discharge was also lower in the anterior MI group (reduced in 78,3% vs 43.4%; p < 0.001). Multivessel disease was more common in the non-anterior MI group (49.5% vs 60.9%; p = 0.005), as was PCI of non-culprit vessels (15.5% vs 22.8%; p = 0.037) and the use of bare-metal stents (20.0 vs 51.6%; p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the groups regarding the main comorbidities, except for peripheral artery disease, more common in the non-anterior MI group (4.10 vs 10.0%; p = 0.011). There was a higher risk of reinfarction in the non-anterior MI group which persisted after relevant variable adjustment (Adjusted hazard ratio 1.96; 95% CI [1.08 – 3.67]; p = 0.027) (Figure 1). There were no significant differences regarding the risk of TVF or any of the secondary outcomes. Conclusions Although LAD/LM occlusion is thought to carry a worse short-term prognosis, non-anterior STEMI appears to be associated with a higher long-term risk of reinfarction. Despite higher rates of reinfarction, non-anterior STEMI patients have not been shown to have an excess mortality of HF hospitalizations in this cohort.

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Introduction The optimal lead position for right ventricle (RV) pacing is still a matter of debate. Several studies compared 2D-echocardiography left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) and LV global longitudinal strain (LVGLS) by speckle-tracking imaging (STI). However, these parameters present limitations, such as load dependency. Recently, myocardial work (MW) has emerged as an alternative tool for myocardial systolic function assessment. Purpose To compare LV MW and LVGLS between patients with RV outflow tract/septum pacing (Group1) and RV apical pacing (Group2). Methods Prospective single-center study of patients with permanent pacemaker (PMK) followed at our cardiac device’s outpatient clinic between july and november of 2022. Patients were divided into two groups according to RV pacing site. Moderate/severe valvular disease, LVEF<50%, segmental wall-motion abnormalities, pulmonary hypertension, cardiomyopathies, or RV dysfunction were exclusion criteria. STI-based LVGLS analysis and MW parameters were obtained (GWI:Global Work Index; GCW:Global Constructive Work; GWW:Global Wasted Work; GWE:Global Work Efficiency). RV pacing was required at the moment of imaging. A 12-lead ECG was also performed. Blood pressure (BP) was simultaneously measured. Results Our cohort comprised 30 patients in group 1 and 25 patients in group 2. The 2 groups were well-matched, except for the median time since PMK implantation, which was significantly higher in Group2 (5.3years vs 0.9years, p<0.001). The QRS was significantly narrower in Group1 (Group1:129ms±9 vs Group2:165ms±15, p<0.001). LVEF was similar in both groups (Group1:58%±7.5 vs Group2:60%±7.5, p = NS). Likewise, both systolic and diastolic BP were comparable (p = NS), but LVGLS was significantly higher in Group1 (15±3.3 vs 13±3.7, p = 0.043). Except for GWI which was also significantly higher in Group1 (1553mmHg%±581 vs 1238mmHg%±516, p = 0.040), no significant differences were found in the other parameters of MW among the groups (all p = NS). Conclusion Our results point to LVGLS being significantly lower in the group of RV apical pacing. Despite most parameters of MW didn’t differ between groups, GWI also showed significant impairment. These findings should be regarded as preliminary and further larger studies are needed to ascertain the value of this new tool in understanding the impact of pacing depolarization site on LV mechanics.

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Introduction Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) due to unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) occlusion is a potentially life-threatening disease. AMI management has evolved over the past two decades, and mortality has decreased considerably. Though, little information on patient characteristics, management, and mortality trends in the most recent years is available regarding acute unprotected LMCA occlusion. Purpose We aimed to assess trends in patient characteristics, management, and outcomes for acute myocardial infarction due to LMCA occlusion between 2008 and 2020. Methods We conducted a retrospective multicentre registry of patients with AMI with unprotected LMCA occlusion admitted in three tertiary hospitals between 2008 and 2020. Patients were divided according to timeline of presentation, and we sought to compare clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes between a past group (from January 2008 to December 2012) and a contemporary group (from January 2017 to December 2020). Results Of 128 patients with AMI from unprotected LMCA occlusion, 28 were included in the past group [from January 2008 to December 2012 (group 1)] and 48 were included in the contemporary group [from January 2017 to December 2020 (group 2)]. No statistically significant differences in baseline risk factors were found between the two groups, except for hypertension (50.0% in group 1 vs 75.0% in group 2, p=0.027). There was no difference regarding presentation with cardiogenic shock (57.1% vs 64.6%, p=0.520). Median symptom-to-balloon time was high but similar in both groups [180 min (120-300) vs 210 min (120-420), p=0.640]. Radial access was more frequent used in the contemporary group (33.0% vs 10.7%, p=0.028), as well as the administration of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (14.6% vs 12.0%, p=0.004) and the implantation of drug-eluting stents (100% vs 63.2%, p=0.010). The use of mechanical circulatory support device was surprisingly higher in group 1 (82% vs 46%, p=0.002), but the intra-aortic pump balloon (IABP) was the only device available in that group. In the contemporary group, the use of IABP, Impella device, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was 37.5%, 20.8%, and 2.1%, respectively. The second antiplatelet agent was also different between groups, with a higher percentage of ticagrelor loading in the contemporary group. In-hospital mortality (46.4% in group 1 vs. 54.2% in group 2, p=0.520) and 1-year cumulative mortality (60.7% vs 60.4%, p=0.741) were high in both groups, but no statistically significant difference was found in survival analysis (p=0.794; log-rank test). Conclusion In our real-world population, despite the use of newer drugs and more advanced devices being more common in the contemporary group, patients with AMI due to LMCA occlusion are still a subpopulation with poor prognosis. Innovative strategies are needed to make a difference.