4E-Transporter binds eIF4E via its consensus sequence YXXXXLΦ, shared with eIF4G, and is a nucleocytoplasmic shuttling protein found enriched in P-(rocessing) bodies. 4E-T inhibits general protein synthesis by reducing available eIF4E levels. Recently, we showed that 4E-T bound to mRNA however represses its translation in an eIF4E-independent manner, and contributes to silencing of mRNAs targeted by miRNAs. Here, we address further the mechanism of translational repression by 4E-T by first identifying and delineating the interacting sites of its major partners by mass spectrometry and western blotting, including DDX6, UNR, unrip, PAT1B, LSM14A and CNOT4. Furthermore, we document novel binding between 4E-T partners including UNR-CNOT4 and unrip-LSM14A, altogether suggesting 4E-T nucleates a complex network of RNA-binding protein interactions. In functional assays, we demonstrate that joint deletion of two short conserved motifs that bind UNR and DDX6 relieves repression of 4E-T-bound mRNA, in part reliant on the 4E-T-DDX6-CNOT1 axis. We also show that the DDX6-4E-T interaction mediates miRNA-dependent translational repression and de novo P-body assembly, implying that translational repression and formation of new P-bodies are coupled processes. Altogether these findings considerably extend our understanding of the role of 4E-T in gene regulation, important in development and neurogenesis.

The localization of mRNA to defined cytoplasmic sites in eukaryotic cells not only allows localized protein production but also determines the fate of mRNAs. For instance, translationally repressed mRNAs localize to P-bodies and stress granules where their decay and storage, respectively, are directed. Here, we find that several mRNAs are localized to granules in unstressed, actively growing cells. These granules play a key role in the stress-dependent formation of P-bodies. Specific glycolytic mRNAs are colocalized in multiple granules per cell, which aggregate during P-body formation. Such aggregation is still observed under conditions or in mutants where P-bodies do not form. In unstressed cells, the mRNA granules appear associated with active translation; this might enable a coregulation of protein expression from the same pathways or complexes. Parallels can be drawn between this coregulation and the advantage of operons in prokaryotic systems.

The cap-binding translation initiation factor eIF4E (eukaryotic initiation factor 4E) is central to protein synthesis in eukaryotes. As an integral component of eIF4F, a complex also containing the large bridging factor eIF4G and eIF4A RNA helicase, eIF4E enables the recruitment of the small ribosomal subunit to the 5′ end of mRNAs. The interaction between eIF4E and eIF4G via a YXXXXLϕ motif is regulated by small eIF4E-binding proteins, 4E-BPs, which use the same sequence to competitively bind eIF4E thereby inhibiting cap-dependent translation. Additional eIF4E-binding proteins have been identified in the last 10–15 years, characterized by the YXXXXLϕ motif, and by interactions (many of which remain to be detailed) with RNA-binding proteins, or other factors in complexes that recognize the specific mRNAs. In the present article, we focus on the metazoan 4E-T (4E-transporter)/Cup family of eIF4E-binding proteins, and also discuss very recent examples in yeast, fruitflies and humans, some of which predictably inhibit translation, while others may result in mRNA decay or even enhance translation; altogether considerably expanding our understanding of the roles of eIF4E-binding proteins in gene expression regulation.

ABSTRACT The relocalization of translationally repressed mRNAs to mRNA processing bodies Pbodies is a key consequence of cellular stress across many systems. Pbodies harbor mRNA degradation components and are implicated in mRNA decay, but the relative timing and control of mRNA relocalization to Pbodies is poorly understood. We used the MS2GFP system to follow the movement of specific endogenous mRNAs in live Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells after nutritional stress. It appears that the relocalization of mRNA to Pbodies after stress is biphasic some mRNAs are present early, whereas others are recruited much later concomitant with recruitment of translation initiation factors, such as eIF4E. We also find that Bfr1p is a latephaselocalizing Pbody protein that is important for the delayed entry of certain mRNAS to Pbodies. Therefore, for the mRNAs tested, relocalization to Pbodies varies both in terms of the kinetics and factor requirements. This work highlights a potential new regulatory juncture in gene expression that would facilitate the overall rationalization of protein content required for adaptation to stress.

The relocalization of translationally repressed mRNAs to mRNA processing bodies (P-bodies) is a key consequence of cellular stress across many systems. P-bodies harbor mRNA degradation components and are implicated in mRNA decay, but the relative timing and control of mRNA relocalization to P-bodies is poorly understood. We used the MS2-GFP system to follow the movement of specific endogenous mRNAs in live Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells after nutritional stress. It appears that the relocalization of mRNA to P-bodies after stress is bi-phasic: some mRNAs are present early, whereas others are recruited much later concomitant with recruitment of translation initiation factors, such as eIF4E. We also find that Bfr1p is a late-phase-localizing P-body protein that is important for the delayed entry of certain mRNAS to P-bodies. Therefore, for the mRNAs tested, relocalization to P-bodies varies both in terms of the kinetics and factor requirements. This work highlights a potential new regulatory juncture in gene expression that would facilitate the overall rationalization of protein content required for adaptation to stress.

A variety of stress conditions induce mRNA and protein aggregation into mRNA silencing foci, but the signalling pathways mediating these responses are still elusive. Previously we demonstrated that PKA catalytic isoforms Tpk2 and Tpk3 localise with processing and stress bodies in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Here, we show that Tpk2 and Tpk3 are associated with translation initiation factors Pab1 and Rps3 in exponentially growing cells. Glucose starvation promotes the loss of interaction between Tpk and initiation factors followed by their accumulation into processing bodies. Analysis of mutants of the individual PKA isoform genes has revealed that the TPK3 or TPK2 deletion affects the capacity of the cells to form granules and arrest translation properly in response to glucose starvation or stationary phase. Moreover, we demonstrate that PKA controls Rpg1 and eIF4G(1) protein abundance, possibly controlling cap-dependent translation. Taken together, our data suggest that the PKA pathway coordinates multiple stages in the fate of mRNAs in association with nutritional environment and growth status of the cell.

For most eukaryotic organisms, including Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the rapid inhibition of protein synthesis forms part of a response to stress. In order to balance the changing conditions, precise stress-specific alterations to the cell's proteome are required. Therefore, in the background of a global down-regulation in protein synthesis, specific proteins are induced. Given the level of plasticity required to enable stress-specific alterations of this kind, it is surprising that the mechanisms of translational regulation are not more diverse. In the present review, we summarize the impact of stress on translation initiation, highlighting both the similarities and distinctions between various stress responses. Finally, we speculate as to how yeast cells generate stress-responsive programmes of protein production when regulation is focused on the same steps in the translation pathway.

The entry of carbon from sucrose into cellular metabolism in plants can potentially be catalyzed by either sucrose synthase (SUS) or invertase (INV). These 2 routes have different implications for cellular metabolism in general and for the production of key metabolites, including the cell-wall precursor UDPglucose. To examine the importance of these 2 routes of sucrose catabolism in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.), we generated mutant plants that lack 4 of the 6 isoforms of SUS. These mutants ( sus1/sus2/sus3/sus4 mutants) lack SUS activity in all cell types except the phloem. Surprisingly, the mutant plants are normal with respect to starch and sugar content, seed weight and lipid content, cellulose content, and cell-wall structure. Plants lacking the remaining 2 isoforms of SUS ( sus5/sus6 mutants), which are expressed specifically in the phloem, have reduced amounts of callose in the sieve plates of the sieve elements. To discover whether sucrose catabolism in Arabidopsis requires INVs rather than SUSs, we further generated plants deficient in 2 closely related isoforms of neutral INV predicted to be the main cytosolic forms in the root ( cinv1/cinv2 mutants). The mutant plants have severely reduced growth rates. We discuss the implications of these findings for our understanding of carbon supply to the nonphotosynthetic cells of plants.

Plasmodesmata (Pds) traverse the cell wall to establish a symplastic continuum through most of the plant. Rapid and reversible deposition of callose in the cell wall surrounding the Pd apertures is proposed to provide a regulatory process through physical constriction of the symplastic channel. We identified members within a larger family of X8 domain–containing proteins that targeted to Pds. This subgroup of proteins contains signal sequences for a glycosylphosphatidylinositol linkage to the extracellular face of the plasma membrane. We focused our attention on three closely related members of this family, two of which specifically bind to 1,3-β-glucans (callose) in vitro. We named this family of proteins Pd callose binding proteins (PDCBs). Yellow fluorescent protein-PDCB1 was found to localize to the neck region of Pds with potential to provide a structural anchor between the plasma membrane component of Pds and the cell wall. PDCB1, PDCB2, and PDCB3 had overlapping and widespread patterns of expression, but neither single nor combined insertional mutants for PDCB2 and PDCB3 showed any visible phenotype. However, increased expression of PDCB1 led to an increase in callose accumulation and a reduction of green fluorescent protein (GFP) movement in a GFP diffusion assay, identifying a potential association between PDCB-mediated callose deposition and plant cell-to-cell communication.

The Chlamydomonas reinhardtii chloroplast genome possesses thousands of small dispersed repeats (SDRs), which are of unknown function. Here, we used the petA gene as a model to investigate the role of SDRs in mRNA 3′ end formation. In wild-type cells, petA mRNA accumulated as a major 1.3-kb transcript, whose 3′ end was mapped to the distal end of a predicted stem-loop structure. To determine whether this stem-loop was required for petA mRNA stability, a series of deletions was constructed. These deletion strains accumulated a variety of petA mRNAs, for which approximate 3′ ends were deduced. These 3′ ends were found to flank stem-loop structures, many of which were formed partially or completely from inverted copies of SDRs. All strains accumulated wild-type levels of cytochrome f, demonstrating that alternative 3′ termini are compatible with efficient translation. The ability to form alternative mRNA termini using SDRs lends additional flexibility to the chloroplast gene expression apparatus and thus could confer an evolutionary advantage.

RNA processing in chloroplasts includes mRNA 5′- and 3′-end processing, intron splicing, and intercistronic cleavages of polycistronic messages, as well as typical tRNA and rRNA processing. The molecular genetics of chloroplast RNA metabolism has been primarily elaborated in three model systems: Chlamydomonas, maize, and Arabidopsis. These analyses have been complemented by in vitro assays in Chlamydomonas as well as in spinach and tobacco. From a genomics point of view, Chlamydomonas is the only genetically tractable system in which both the nuclear and chloroplast genomes can be routinely transformed. Although this limitation is being overcome in vascular plants, the workload will still be far less in Chlamydomonas. A number of selectable marker and reporter gene options are available and progress in using antisense technology has been reported. Because posttranscriptional mechanisms are so important in chloroplasts, many methods have been developed or adapted to increase the understanding of them. For Chlamydomonas, genetic, and transformation methods are well established, whereas biochemical approaches have been reported only more recently.