BACKGROUND The IFM2009-02 trial studied pomalidomide (4 mg daily, 21/28 versus 28/28) and dexamethasone in very advanced relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). We observed that 40% of patients had a prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and subsequently overall survival (OS). We sought to analyze the characteristics of these patients and study the effect of long exposure to pomalidomide. DESIGN We separated the studied population into two groups: 3 months to 1 year (<1 year) and more than 1 year (≥1 year) of treatment with pomalidomide and dexamethasone based on clinical judgment and historical control studies. We then analyzed the characteristics of patients according to duration of treatment. RESULTS The overall response rate (ORR) for the <1-year group was 43%, the median PFS 4.6 months [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 3.8-6.4] with only 6% at 12 months, and the median OS was 15 months (11.7-20.3) and 40% at 18 months. For the ≥1-year group, the response rate and survival were strikingly different, ORR at 83%, median PFS 20.7 months (14.7-35.4), median OS not reached, and 91% at 18 months. CONCLUSION Pomalidomide and dexamethasone favored prolonged and safe exposure to treatment in 40% of heavily treated and end-stage RRMM, a paradigm shift in the natural history of RRMM characterized with a succession of shorter disease-free intervals and ultimately shorter survival. Although an optimization of pomalidomide-dexamethasone regimen is warranted in advanced RRMM, we claim that pomalidomide has proven once more to change the natural history of myeloma in this series, which should be confirmed in a larger study.

BACKGROUND Accurate quantification of immunoglobulin A (IgA) monoclonal immunoglobulins by serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) can be difficult and can impact the assessment of response among patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Therefore, there is a need to identify new assays that better reflect disease burden and response to treatment, and correlate with patient outcome. IgA Hevylite (HLC) measures IgA kappa and IgA lambda separately and provides precise quantitative measurements of the monoclonal IgA expression and polyclonal‐isotype matched suppression. In the current study, the authors assessed the usefulness of these assays in the diagnosis of IgA MM and sought to comment on the prognostic value of the assays. METHODS A study of 157 patients with IgA MM for whom diagnostic samples were available was performed. HLC measurements were performed on a nephelometer and the results were compared with those of electrophoresis. RESULTS All presentation sera (100 IgA kappa specimens and 57 IgA lambda specimens) were found to have abnormal IgA HLC ratios (IgA kappa median ratio: 336.2 [range, 8.2‐7353] and IgA lambda ratio: 0.011 [range, 0.0003‐0.45]). In comparison, SPEP bands were quantifiable in only 105 of 157 samples (67%) (median, 28.5 g/L [range, 2.2 g/L‐98 g/L]). Of the total of 157 patients, 12 patients (8%) presented with oligosecretory myeloma (<10 g/L; including 4 patients with nonquantifiable SPEP bands). HLC uniquely allows for the measurement of isotype paired suppression, which was found to be associated with shortened overall survival in the current study. CONCLUSIONS In the current study, IgA HLC ratios were found to be abnormal in all patients and the assay was able to produce quantifiable results in more MM sera than either SPEP or total IgA, potentially representing a solution to the issue of comigration and oligosecretory MM. These preliminary data require confirmation in larger prospective trials to validate the usefulness of IgA HLC. Cancer 2014;120:3952–3957. © 2014 American Cancer Society .

In patients with multiple myeloma (MM) not eligible for high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), the 2 following options are recommended as part of front-line treatment and approved based on data from randomized phase III trials: melphalan/prednisone/thalidomide (MPT), or

To determine whether isotype matched immunoglobulin (Ig; Ig′κ/Ig′λ) ratios had prognostic significance in patients with intact Ig multiple myeloma (MM). Novel immunoassays measuring serum concentrations of the Ig heavy chain/light chain (HLC) subsets IgGκ, IgGλ, IgAκ and IgAλ were compared with monoclonal protein (‘M-spike’) quantification by serum protein electrophoresis, β 2 -microglobulin (β 2 -M), albumin, serum free light chain (FLC) and cytogenetic markers in relation to outcome in 339 MM patients. Abnormal IgGκ/IgGλ and IgAκ/IgAλ ratios present in the respective tumor isotypes at clinical presentation were predictive of shorter progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio (HR) 1.9; P =0.0002), predominantly due to the suppression of the uninvolved (polyclonal) Ig of the same isotype as the tumor (HR 1.8; P =0.002). No significant associations were observed between PFS and M-spike concentrations, suppression of non-tumor Igs of different isotypes or FLC κ/λ ratios. β 2 -M and HLC ratios were independently prognostic ( P =0.045 and P =0.001). A staging system using β 2 -M and extreme HLC ratios (<0.01 or >200) had greater prognostic value than the widely used ISS staging system (HR 1.7; P =0.00002 vs HR 1.3; P =0.017). These results suggest that HLC ratios may have a role in clinical management of MM.

8014 Background: Bortezomib (V) plus dexamethasone (D) is a treatment of choice of RRMM. In small series, the addition of an alkylator was beneficial. Bendamustine (B) showed a high activity in advanced MM. The IFM 2009-01 trial evaluates the combination of B, V and D in elderly pts with MM progressive on or after 1 st line therapy. Methods: We conducted a phase 2 trial combining B 70 mg/m 2 D1-8, V 1.3 mg/m 2 D1-8-15-22 and D 20 mg D1-8-15-22 every 28 days. 4 cycles were administered. In responders (PR or better), 2 additional cycles were provided followed by a maintenance phase with 6 cycles given every 2 months. Inclusion criteria were progression on or after 1 prior line of therapy, measurable disease, PS ECOG <3, ANC > 1.5x10 9 /l, platelets > 100x10 9 /l, creatinine < 250 mcmol/l, AST and ALT < 3xULN. Pts with prior exposure to bortezomib were excluded. Response was evaluated according to IMWG criteria. Primary end point was response at end of cycle 4, secondary objectives overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity. Results: The present analysis was restricted to the first 4 cycles. From 03/2010 to 07/2011, 73 pts were included, median age 75.8 years (range 66-86). Median time from diagnosis to inclusion was 29 months. All pts received only 1 prior therapy: MP in 12, MP-thalidomide in 44, lenalidomide-dexamethasone (LD) in 14, other in 3. 42 pts (57.5%) were responders at end of cycle 4 [CR: 8 (10.9%), VGPR: 9 (12.3%), PR: 25 (34.2%), SD: 10 (13.6%), progression: 11 (15%), early discontinuation: 10 (13.6%)]. 6pts/10 were in PR and 1pt/10 in VGPR at time of discontinuation. ORR was 67.1% (49/73 pts). 11 pts died (MM: 6, sepsis: 4, renal failure: 1). Adverse events grade 3-4 were neutropenia: 16 pts, thrombocytopenia: 7 pts, sepsis: 12 pts, gastro-intestinal: 8 pts, anaphylaxis: 1 pt. 2 pts had DVT. Peripheral neuropathy grade>1 occurred in 9 pts, all grade 2. Treatment was stopped in 20 pts (lack of efficacy: 11, toxicity: 9). Conclusions: These results compare favorably with those achieved with VD or LD. The triplet BVD combination is very effective and tolerable in elderly pts with MM in 1 st progression.

BACKGROUND:Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are a prognostic marker in metastatic breast cancer, but comparisons with serum tumor markers (CA 15-3, carcinoembryonic antigen and lactate dehydrogenase) variations are needed.PATIENTS AND METHODS:CTCs were counted with CellSearch® at baseline, before cycle 2 (C2) and cycle 3 or 4 (C3/4) in 267 metastatic breast cancer patients on first-line chemotherapy with/without targeted therapy.RESULTS:Baseline CTC detection rate was 65% with ≥1 CTC/7.5 ml threshold and 44% with ≥5 CTC/7.5 ml and was independent of subtypes (luminal, triple negative, human epithelial growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)+). CTCs were associated with tumor markers, bone/liver involvement, tumor burden and performance status. CTC detection ≥1 CTC/7.5 ml was a strong prognostic factor for progression-free survival (PFS), P < 0.0001. Threshold of CTC ≥5 was statistically significant for PFS and overall survival (OS), P = 0.03 on multivariate analysis. Among patients with ≥5 CTC/7.5 ml at baseline, 50% had <5 CTC/7.5 ml at C2. Changes were correlated with both PFS and OS (P < 0.0001). All patients receiving anti-HER2 therapy had <5 CTC/7.5 ml after three cycles of treatment.CONCLUSION:This is the largest prospective series validating the prognostic value of CTC independently from serum tumor marker. Elevated CTCs before C2 are an early predictive marker of poor PFS and OS, which could be used to monitor treatment benefit. CTC decrease under treatment seems stronger with targeted therapy.

Purpose: Circulating tumors cells (CTC) have been recently proposed as a new dynamic blood marker whose positivity at baseline is a prognostic factor and whose changes under treatment are correlated with progression-free survival (PFS) in metastatic breast cancer patients. However, serum markers levels are also used for the same purpose, and no clear comparison as been reported to date. Patients and methods: The IC 2006–04 enrolled prospectively 267 metastatic breast cancer patients treated by first line chemotherapy and confirmed that CTC levels are an independent prognostic factor for PFS and Overall survival (OS). A pre-planned endpoint was to compare prospectively the positivity rates and the value of CTC (CellSearch®), of serum tumor markers (CEA, CA 15–3, CYFRA 21.1), and of serum non-tumor markers (LDH, ALP) at baseline and under treatment for PFS prediction, independently from the other known prognostic factors, using univariate analyses and concordance indexes. Results: Table 1 shows the incidence of each of the 6 blood markers. Assessing all the 6 markers retrieved 90% of patients with at least one elevated marker at baseline. Interestingly, a combination of two markers (CA 15–3 and CYFRA 21.1, often used in lung cancer) retrieved 86% of patients with at least one marker elevated at baseline. All 6 markers were correlated with poor performance status, high number of metastatic sites and with each other. Each marker was associated, when elevated at baseline, with a significantly shorter PFS in univariate anlaysis. Serum marker changes during treatment, assessed either between baseline and week 3 or between baseline and week 6–9, were significantly associated with PFS, as reported for CTC. Concordance indexes comparison showed no clear superiority of any of the serum marker or CTC for PFS prediction. Conclusion: In the largest prospective CTC study in metastatic breast breast cancer, we previously reported that CTC count, but not serum markers, is an independent prognostic factor for PFS and overall survival. However, for the purpose of PFS prediction by measuring blood marker changes during treatment, currently available blood-derived markers (CTC and serum markers) had globally similar performances. Besides CEA and CA 15–3, CYFRA 21.1 is commonly elevated in metastatic breast cancer and has a strong prognostic value. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-07-18.

Background CTC count before a new line of treatment and CTC count early changes under chemotherapy have been reported as an independent prognostic marker in metastatic breast cancer in a recent pooled analysis in 841 pts (Liu M. ASCO 2011). The aim of this study was to build a prognostic tool including CTC and other parameters to assesse its predictive value for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Methods : Data from the IC 2006–04 study were used. This prospective multicentre study included 267 metastatic breast cancer patients treated by first line chemotherapy with or without targeted therapy, in whom appropriate pre-treatment prognostic variables (age, performance status, number of metastatic sites, disease-free interval, ER, PR and HER2 status, tumor grade, LDH, serum markers, CTC count by CellSearch technique before treatment and before cycle 2) were available for statistical analysis. We constructed a multivariate Cox regression model for PFS and OS prediction. A stepwise selection process was applied to achieve the most informative and parsimonious models. Performance was measured with the C-index statistic. Internal validation was performed using leave-two-out technique. Results : Four nomograms have been obtained, in two clinical settings: at inclusion (before the start of any treatment) taking into account the initial CTC count, and during treatment (before cycle 2) taking into account CTC changes under treatment. Their accuracy was good for PFS and OS prediction, with C-index ranging from 0.72 to 0.88. Internal validations allow considering a good accuracy of the models in an external population. Conclusion : These clinically relevant nomograms are a simple tool for a personalized prognostic assessment including CTC assessment. Validation on independent series of patients are ongoing. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-07-04.

Abstract Background: We have previously demonstrated that circulating tumor cells (CTC) detection by the CellSearch system is strongly associated with metastatic outcome in non-metastatic breast cancer (BC) treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) [Pierga, Clin Cancer Res 2008]. Transcriptomic analysis of primary tumors may uncover molecular phenotypes associated with CTC detection.Methods: Both CTC detection in blood at diagnosis and transcriptomic analysis of the primary tumor have been performed prospectively in 58 non-metastatic BC patients (pts) treated by NACT in a phase II trial (REMAGUS02). We searched for an association between CTC detection and (i) intrinsic molecular subtypes, (ii) stemness signature, (iii) other published signatures, and (iv) expression of molecular markers involved in CTC detection. CTC-associated genes were also studied (v).Results: (i) CTC detection was not statistically associated with an intrinsic molecular subtype: 29% in basal-like (n=5/17pts), 33% in HER2+ (3/9pts), 13% in luminal A (2/13pts), 20% in luminal B (2/10pts) and 29% in normal-like (2/7pts) BC. (ii) No association was found between CTC detection and the stemness signature. (iv) CTC detection was also not related to the “stemness profile”; it was independent of EpCAM, CK8 and CK18 transcriptomic expression. Other results (iii, v) will be disclosed at the meeting.Conclusion: Our study is the first to compare tumor gene expression profiles and blood dissemination of cancer cells in early BC pts. In these pts, CTC detection by the CellSearch system does not depend on intrinsic molecular subtypes, contrary to a published report based on in vitro-grown cells lines [Sieuwerts, J Natl Cancer Inst 2009]. Being independent from molecular prognostic factors, CTC detection is likely to play a critical role in early BC management.Supported by PHRC AOM/2OO2/02117, Pfizer inc., Roche, sanofi-aventis.ISRCTN10059974 Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 3005.