BACKGROUND:On the basis of a previous meta-analysis, the International Adjuvant Lung Cancer Trial was designed to evaluate the effect of cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy on survival after complete resection of non-small-cell lung cancer.METHODS:We randomly assigned patients either to three or four cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy or to observation. Before randomization, each center determined the pathological stages to include, its policy for chemotherapy (the dose of cisplatin and the drug to be combined with cisplatin), and its postoperative radiotherapy policy. The main end point was overall survival.RESULTS:A total of 1867 patients underwent randomization; 36.5 percent had pathological stage I disease, 24.2 percent stage II, and 39.3 percent stage III. The drug allocated with cisplatin was etoposide in 56.5 percent of patients, vinorelbine in 26.8 percent, vinblastine in 11.0 percent, and vindesine in 5.8 percent. Of the 932 patients assigned to chemotherapy, 73.8 percent received at least 240 mg of cisplatin per square meter of body-surface area. The median duration of follow-up was 56 months. Patients assigned to chemotherapy had a significantly higher survival rate than those assigned to observation (44.5 percent vs. 40.4 percent at five years [469 deaths vs. 504]; hazard ratio for death, 0.86; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.76 to 0.98; P<0.03). Patients assigned to chemotherapy also had a significantly higher disease-free survival rate than those assigned to observation (39.4 percent vs. 34.3 percent at five years [518 events vs. 577]; hazard ratio, 0.83; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.74 to 0.94; P<0.003). There were no significant interactions with prespecified factors. Seven patients (0.8 percent) died of chemotherapy-induced toxic effects.CONCLUSIONS:Cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival among patients with completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE The study was designed to assess the toxicity and activity of high-dose ifosfamide (HDI) administered by continuous infusion at a dose of 4 g/m2/d over 3 days every 4 weeks in adult patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas (ASTS) pretreated with doxorubicin and/or a standard-dose ifosfamide (SDI)-containing regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between January 1991 and November 1993, 40 patients with progressive ASTS were entered onto the study. Twenty-eight patients had been pretreated with a multidrug regimen that contained SDI and were classified as follows: SDI-refractory (n = 21), SDI-resistant (n = 2), and indeterminate SDI-sensitive (n = 5). Patients were treated until progression or major toxicity. RESULTS One hundred forty-seven cycles of HDI were administered. Neutropenia was dose-limiting, with 100% of patients experiencing grade 3 to 4 toxicity and 12 admissions for febrile neutropenia (30% of patients). Neurotoxicity (17% of patients) was significantly associated with acute renal failure (n = 4) (P < .001), grade 4 thrombocytopenia (P < .01) and febrile neutropenia (P = .048). Chronic renal toxicity (n = 4) was significantly associated with retroperitoneal masses and/or prior nephrectomy (P = .008). Partial responses (PRs) were observed in 12 of 36 assessable patients (33%) and eight patients (22%) experienced disease stabilization. All but one response occurred in patients pretreated with SDI, with five PRs among SDI-refractory patients. Leiomyosarcomas appear resistant to HDI. The median response duration was 8 months (range, 6 to 13+) and the median overall survival time was 12 months. CONCLUSION The activity of HDI in these pretreated ASTS patients and the apparent circumvention of SDI resistance suggest a real dose-response relationship for ifosfamide and deserve further evaluation. Although toxic, this treatment appears feasible and manageable using routine clinical support. Since prophylaxis of ifosfamide-induced renal damage remains unknown, frequent monitoring of renal and tubular functions during therapy is highly recommended.

Background. Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) present variable aggressiveness and chemosensitivity. Because the glutathione (GSH) system and thymidylate synthase (TS) are involved in the resistance to the main drugs used in HNSCC (cisplatin and 5-FU), we studied these systems in tumors and normal mucosae.Methods. Tumor samples and normal adjacent mucosae were collected from 37 untreated HNSCC patients. GSH and glutathione S-transferase (GST) activity were assayed by spectrophotometry, whereas TS activity and folates were determined by radioassays.Results. Mean GSH levels were higher in tumors (15.2 +/-8.2 nmol/mg protein) than in mucosae (8.3 +/- 4.1 nmol/mg protein) (p = 0.005, paired t test). GST activity was also higher in tumors (394 +/- 194 nmol/min/mg protein) than in mucosae (261 +/- 132 nmol/min/mg protein) (p = 0.0003). TS activity was markedly higher in tumors (9.2 +/- 21.5 pmol/min/mg protein) (p = 0.0001). Folate levels in tumors and mucosae were similar (1.2 +/- 1.1 and 0.8 +/- 0.9 pmol/mg protein, respectively; p = 0.1, NS). In relation to clinical stage and tumor size, a statistical difference was found in GSH and GST values between tumors and mucosae for stage IV and T3/T4. The increase in tumor TS compared to that of mucosae was significant for all clinical stages, tumor sizes and nodal involvement.Conclusions. These data enhance our understanding of the enzymatic systems involved in cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) resistance in HNSCC and normal mucosae and may help to elucidate tumor behavior and interpatient differences in drug sensitivity.

PURPOSE:A phase I/II trial of vinorelbine (VRL) administered by continuous infusion (CIV) was conducted in advanced breast carcinoma (ABC) patients to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and to evaluate the toxicity pattern and antitumor activity of this alternative administration schedule to the currently recommended weekly short intravenous (IV) administration.PATIENTS AND METHODS:Between February 1990 and July 1991, 64 consecutive, eligible patients with ABC were treated; 33 had received one or two previous palliative chemotherapy combinations and 31 had not received chemotherapy for metastatic disease. VRL was administered, after an initial IV bolus of 8 mg/m2 on day 1, by a 4-day CIV at five different 24-hour dose levels (DLs) to be repeated every 21 or 28 days: DL1, 5.5 mg/m2; DL2, 7 mg/m2; DL3, 8 mg/m2, DL4, 9 mg/m2; and DL5, 10 mg/m2.RESULTS:The limiting noncumulative toxicity was neutropenia, with the MTD established at 8 mg/m2 bolus plus 10 mg/m2/d for 4 days (total dose per cycle, 48 mg/m2). At DL3 and DL4, we observed mucositis (14% of patients; five percent of cycles > grade 2), alopecia, and asthenia. By contrast, neurotoxicity was minor. The toxicity was otherwise predictable and manageable. Pharmacokinetic data obtained at DL1 and DL3 showed a mean VRL plasma concentration of 967 +/- 331 ng/mL after the initial 8 mg/m2 IV bolus dose, which declined rapidly thereafter to reach mean steady-state levels of 12 ng/mL (n = 5) for the 30-mg/m2 dose and 8 ng/mL (n = 2) for the 40-mg/m2 dose. These levels were maintained over the 96-hour CIV. The mean residence time (MRT) was 29 +/- 7 hours (terminal half-life [t1/2], 23 hours), the total-body clearance (CL) was 24 +/- 11 L/hr/m2, and the volume of distribution at steady-state (Vss) was high at 1,832 +/- 359 L/m2. Two patients achieved a complete response (CR) and 21 a partial response (PR), for an objective response rate of 36% (95% confidence interval [Cl], 23 to 49). The median duration of response was 6 months. The median survival duration was 24 months (range, 3 to 37). A relationship between given dose-intensity and objective response rate was found, with an overall response (OR) rate of 13.3% (two of 15) for 8 to 10 mg/m2/wk, 35.4% (11 of 31) for 10 to 12 mg/m2/wk, and 55.5% (10 of 18) for 12 to 14.5 mg/m2/wk.CONCLUSION:This trial, while confirming VRL activity in ABC, shows the feasability of a CIV administration schedule. A decrease of the administrated total dose per 3- to 4-week cycle to less than the weekly schedule with the same therapeutic activity suggests a better therapeutic index. The data are also suggestive of a dose-response relationship and a dose-intensity/activity correlation.

PURPOSE:To determine the value of contrast material-enhanced subtraction magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in assessment of response to chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer.MATERIALS AND METHODS:Eighteen women treated with chemotherapy because of locally advanced breast cancer underwent preoperative MR examination including both routine and dynamic MR sequences after injection of gadolinium tetraazacyclododecanetetraacetic acid. Any early contrast enhancement, concomitant with early vascular enhancement during the dynamic MR study, was considered pathologic.RESULTS:Dynamic MR studies showed early contrast enhancement in all women with residual tumor except one with nodular residual tumor. Histopathologic analysis and dynamic MR images of contrast-enhanced lesions correlated well, but in one patient, intraductal extension was not seen on MR images, and in another, additional isolated tumor cells were seen in the histologic specimen. Subtraction images always facilitated visualization of vascular and pathologic contrast enhancement.CONCLUSION:Dynamic MR contrast-enhanced subtraction studies are useful in assessment of residual tumor after chemotherapy.

To better understand the importance of drug-metabolizing enzymes in carcinogenesis and anticancer drug sensitivity of human non-small cell lung cancer, we studied the main drug-metabolizing enzyme systems in both lung tumors and their corresponding nontumoral lung tissues in 12 patients. The following enzymes were assayed by Western blot analysis: cytochromes P-450 (1A1/A2, 2B1/B2, 2C8-10, 2E1, 3A4); epoxide hydrolase; and glutathione S-transferase isoenzymes (GST-alpha, -mu, and -pi). The activity of the following enzymes or cofactor were determined by spectrophotometric or fluorometric assays: glutathione S-transferase (GST); total glutathione; UDP-glucuronosyltransferase; beta-glucuronidase; sulfotransferase; and sulfatase. Results showed the presence of cytochrome P-450 1A1/1A2 in both tumoral and nontumoral tissues. P-450 1A1/1A2 levels were 3-fold lower in tumors compared to corresponding nontumoral tissues (P < 0.05). None of the other probed cytochromes P-450 were detected in either tumoral or nontumoral lung tissues. For the glutathione system, no significant difference between tumoral and nontumoral tissues was observed (GST activity, glutathione content, GST-alpha, -mu, and -pi). A positive linear correlation was observed between GST activity and GST-alpha or GST-pi. No significant difference was observed for the glucuronide and the sulfate pathways and their corresponding hydrolytic enzymes. Epoxide hydrolase was significantly decreased in tumors compared to nontumoral lung tissues (P < 0.05). In conclusion, these results showed differences between non-small cell lung tumors and nontumoral tissues for cytochrome P-450 1A1/1A2 and epoxide hydrolase. These differences between tumors and peritumoral tissues with regard to these drug-metabolizing enzymes could reflect differences occurring after malignant transformation and may play a role in drug sensitivity to anticancer drugs.

In an attempt to better understand breast tumors sensitivity or resistance to anticancer drugs, the main drug-metabolizing enzyme systems were evaluated in both breast tumors and their corresponding peritumoral tissues in 12 patients. The following enzymes were assayed by Western blot: cytochromes P-450 (1A1/A2, 2B1/B2, 2C8-10, 2E1, 3A4); glutathione S-transferases (GST-alpha, -mu, and -pi); and epoxide hydrolase. The activity of the following enzymes or cofactor were determined by spectrophotometric or fluorometric assays: GST; total glutathione; UDP-glucuronosyltransferase; beta-glucuronidase; sulfotransferase; and sulfatase. Results showed the absence of all probed cytochromes P-450 in both tumoral and peritumoral tissues. GST activity was significantly (P < 0.05) higher in tumors (mean +/- SD, 399 +/- 362 nmol/min/mg) than in corresponding peritumoral tissues (86 +/- 67). The GST isoenzymes GST-mu and GST-pi (determined by immunoblotting) were also higher in tumors than in corresponding peritumoral tissues (3- and 5-fold, respectively). Both GST-mu and GST-pi levels were significantly correlated with GST activity. GST-alpha was not detected in either tumoral or peritumoral tissues. Glutathione levels in tumors (22 +/- 23 nmol/mg protein) were not statistically different from peritumoral tissues (11 +/- 12). Epoxide hydrolase was expressed at similar levels in tumors and peritumoral tissues. The glucuronide-forming enzyme UDP-glucuronosyltransferase was 5-fold lower in tumors (0.1 +/- 0.2 nmol/h/mg) than in peritumoral tissues (0.5 +/- 1), whereas the opposite was observed for the hydrolytic enzyme beta-glucuronidase, which was 6-fold higher in tumors (736 +/- 1392 nmol/h/mg) compared to peritumoral tissues (125 +/- 75). No difference was noted between tumoral and peritumoral tissues for sulfotransferase (1 +/- 2 nmol/h/mg), but the corresponding hydrolytic enzyme (sulfatase) was 2-fold higher in tumoral tissues (14 +/- 15 nmol/h/mg) than in peritumoral tissues (6 +/- 2). In conclusion, several differences were observed between human breast tumors and peritumoral tissues for many conjugating enzymes (GST-mu, GST-pi, and UDP-glucuronosyltransferase) and hydrolytic enzymes (sulfatase and beta-glucuronidase). These noteworthy differences between tumoral and peritumoral tissues with regard to their main drug-metabolizing enzymes could play a role in the relative drug sensitivity or insensitivity of human breast cancer tissues to chemotherapeutic agents and could be potential targets for chemotherapeutic interventions.

Thirty nine patients with metastatic breast cancer, all previously treated with chemotherapy including anthracycline, were given Elliptinium acetate (80 mg/m2/day) and a continous infusion of Vinblastine (2 mg/m2day) for 3 consecutive days every 4 weeks. Twenty nine patients had measurable metastatic disease. Nine (31%) achieved a partial response. No complete response was observed. Median duration of response was 6 months. The response rate was dependent on the number of metastatic sites and independent of the number of previous chemotherapy regimes. Side effects were dry mouth (27 patients), vomiting (9), neutropenia (3 patients with grade IV, 2 with grade III), muscle cramps (5) and thrombosis (3). Xerostomia and vomiting contributed to weight loss and fatigue (8 patients). We conclude that Elliptinium-Vinblastine combination has moderate activity as second line treatment in metastatic breast cancer. This combination causes xerostomia and fatigue with moderate myelosuppression.

The results of 2 chemotherapeutic regimens used in 170 cases of inflammatory breast cancer were compared with those obtained in 60 historical controls treated with radiotherapy and hormonal therapy. Inflammatory breast cancers could be divided into evolutive phase 2 with limited signs of inflammation and evolutive phase 3 where inflammation involved the whole breast. The 60 controls had been treated between 1967 and 1974 with radiotherapy (45 Gy plus an extra dose of 20 or 30 Gy); premenopausal patients underwent ovarian irradiation. The 91 patients treated with regimen A between 1976 and 1980 received a DVM-type induction chemotherapy (doxorubicin 40 mg/m2 on day 1, vincristin 1 mg/m2 on day 2, and methotrexate 6 mg/m2 on days 3, 4, 5) every 3 or 4 weeks, and a VCF-type maintenance chemotherapy (vincristin 1 mg/m2 on day 1, cyclophosphamide 200 mg/m2 on days 2, 3, 4 and 5-fluorouracil 300 mg/m2 on days 2, 3, 4) every 4 weeks. Premenopausal patients had their ovaries irradiated; postmenopausal patients received tamoxifen. The therapeutic sequence was: 3 DVM - 45 Gy - DVM - 15 Gy - 4 DVM - 4-12 VCF. The 79 patients treated between 1980 and 1982 with regimen B received a DVCMF-type induction therapy (doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 on day 1, vincristin 0.6 mg/m2 on day 2, 5-fluorouracil 300 mg/m2 on days 3, 4, 5, cyclophosphamide 200 mg/m2 on days 3, 4, 5 and methotrexate 10 mg/m2 on days 3, 4, 5) every 4 weeks. Hormonal therapy was the same as with regimen A. The sequence was 3 DVCMF - 45 Gy - DVM - 20-25 Gy - 4 DVM - 4-12 VCF. The survival rate at 3 years was 42% in controls, 53% in regimen A patients and 74% in regimen B patients (P less than 0.05). The relapse-free survival rates in these three groups at 3 years were 15%, 32% and 54% respectively (P less than 0.0008). These results suggest that a multidisciplinary approach and initial chemotherapy are useful in this type of breast cancer. The value of prolonged maintenance treatment is discussed.

Breast sarcoma are rare, representing 1% of all malignant breast tumours. This is a retrospective study of 25 patients with a breast sarcoma, treated at Institut Gustave Roussy from 1954 to 1981. Thirty six per cent of these arose in a cystosarcoma phyllodes. A variety of histologies were found, the main one being malignant fibrohistiocytoma (44%). Nodal involvement was rare (4%) and, as in other sarcoma, hematogenous spread of metastases was more usual. Local recurrence occurred in 44% of cases and distant metastases (usually pulmonary) in 24%. The 3 year disease-free survival was 60% and the major prognostic factor was the mitotic index. Surgery is the treatment of choice of these tumours, supplemented by local irradiation in those cases where only a tumorectomy has been performed. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy remains undefined.