Ecosystem-based fisheries management strives to account for species interactions and ecosystem processes in natural resource management and conservation. In this context, ecosystem-wide caps on total fishery catches have been proposed as one tool to manage multispecies fisheries with an ecosystem approach. However, determining effective ecosystem caps is complicated because fish stock production is influenced by environmental conditions, species interactions, and fishing. Consequently, the implementation of ecosystem caps in fisheries management frameworks remains uncommon. We investigated whether ecosystem caps should account for climate variability and for predator-prey dynamics to achieve management objectives in complex marine ecosystems. We considered the example of the Gulf of Alaska (United States), a North Pacific large marine ecosystem where annual groundfish catches are managed using an "optimum yield" ecosystem cap of 800,000 t. We simulated multispecies yield of the 12 most abundant and commercially valuable groundfish stocks under selected climate and fishing scenarios using an end-to-end marine ecosystem model (Atlantis), which accounts for predator-prey and ecosystem dynamics. We found that total groundfish yield was never projected to exceed the 800,000 mt optimum yield cap across scenarios and fishing mortalities. Projected climate change led to decreased groundfish yield, and predation from the underexploited groundfish predator arrowtooth flounder (Atheresthes stomias) led to foregone catches. Groundfish removals had negative indirect effects on groundfish predators, despite total yield never exceeding the optimum yield cap, highlighting that an ineffective cap may not protect non-target species. These results suggest that the optimum yield cap currently used in the Gulf of Alaska may be too high to constrain groundfish catches under future climate change and low exploitation rates of predators. We propose that ecosystem caps should be reviewed when environmental conditions, stock productivity, or species interactions change.
Species distribution models (SDMs) are critical to the adaptive management of fisheries under climate change. While many approaches projecting marine species range shifts have incorporated the effects of temperature on movement, there is a need to incorporate a wider suite of ecologically relevant predictors as temperature-based SDMs can considerably under- or over-estimate the rate of species responses to climate shocks. As a subarctic ecosystem at the sea ice margin, the Eastern Bering Sea (EBS) is warming faster than much of the global ocean, resulting in the rapid redistribution of key fishery and subsistence resources. To support long-term planning and adaptation, we combine 40 years of scientific surveys with a high-resolution oceanographic model to examine the effects of bottom temperature, oxygen, pH and a regional climate index (the extent of the EBS 'cold pool') on range projections through the end of the century. We use multimodel inference to partition uncertainty among earth systems models, climate scenarios and distribution model parameterizations for several ecologically and economically important EBS groundfish and crabs. Covariate choice is the primary source of uncertainty for most species, with models that account for spatial responses to the cold pool performing better and suggesting more extensive northward movements than alternative models. Models suggest declines in the probability of occurrence at low pH and oxygen concentrations for most species. We project shifts that are directionally consistent with, yet larger than those previously estimated for most species, suggesting that accounting for large-scale climate variability in species distribution models may substantially alter range projections.
Accounting for marine stocks spatiotemporal complexity has become one of the most pressing improvements that should be added to the new generation of stock assessment. Disentangling persistent and dynamic population subcomponents and understanding their main drivers of variation are still stock-specific challenges. Here, we hypothesized that the spatiotemporal variability of density in two adjacent fish stocks is associated with spatially structured environmental processes across multiple spatiotemporal scales. To test this, we applied a generalized empirical orthogonal function and dynamic factor analysis to fishery-independent and -dependent data of red mullet, a highly commercial species, in the Western Mediterranean Sea. Areas with persistent and dynamic high aggregations were detected for both stock units. A large-scale climatic index and local open-ocean convection were associated with both stocks, while other variables exhibited stock-specific effects. We also revealed spatially structured density dynamics within the examined management units. This suggests a metapopulation structure and supports the future implementation of a spatial stock assessment. Considering the common—generally unrealistic—assumptions of panmictic structure and absence of connectivity with neighbouring stock units, our methodology can be applied to other species and systems with putative spatial complexity to inform more accurate population dynamics and structure.
Species distribution models (SDMs) are widely used to relate species occurrence and density to local environmental conditions, and often include a spatially correlated variable to account for spatial patterns in residuals. Ecologists have extended SDMs to include spatially varying coefficients (SVCs), where the response to a given covariate varies smoothly over space and time. However, SVCs see relatively little use perhaps because they remain less known relative to other SDM techniques. We therefore review ecological contexts where SVCs can improve the interpretability and descriptive power from SDMs, including local responses to regional indices that represent ecological teleconnections; density-dependent habitat selection; spatially varying detectability; and context-dependent covariate responses that represent interactions with unmeasured covariates. We then illustrate three additional examples in detail using the vector autoregressive spatio-temporal (VAST) model. First, a spatially varying decadal trends model identifies decadal trends for arrowtooth flounder Atheresthes stomias density in the Bering Sea from 1982 to 2019. Second, a trait-based joint SDM highlights the role of body size and temperature in spatial community assembly in the Gulf of Alaska. Third, an age-structured SDM for walleye pollock Gadus chalcogrammus in the Bering Sea contrasts cohorts with broad spatial distributions (1996 and 2009) and those that are more spatially constrained (2002 and 2015). We conclude that SVCs extend SDMs to address a wide variety of ecological contexts and can be used to better understand a range of ecological processes, e.g. density dependence, community assembly and population dynamics.
Although highly variable in time and space, predation remains the greatest source of mortality for juvenile and lower trophic-level fishes. As such, predation can have substantial and long-term effects on the dynamics of these prey. Gulf of Alaska walleye pollock (Gadus chalcogrammus) has shown considerable variability in biomass over the past four decades. During this same time, the demersal fish community transitioned from being dominated by pollock to a system comprised primarily of upper trophic-level predators. We estimated time-varying predation mortality to better understand its effects on the population dynamics of pollock in this currently “top heavy” system. Our index of predation accounted for spatiotemporal variation in predator biomass, bioenergetics-based rations, and age-specific proportions of pollock consumed (1990–2019). To evaluate population-level impacts of predation, we included an index of removals as part of the stock assessment model. This formulation allowed for non-annual data inputs and included a proportionality constant with which to scale predation. Age-specific natural mortality was allowed to vary according to a penalized random walk. We found that natural mortality ranged from 37% higher to 17% lower than the long-term mean. Resulting estimates of total pollock biomass differed by as much as 37% relative to a model without time-varying natural mortality, though the maximum difference for exploitable biomass was only 14%. Using an empirically-derived predation index to modify constant natural mortality allows stock assessment scientists to evaluate impacts of time-varying predation on assessed species. This approach provides a relatively simple way of incorporating ecological information into single-species stock assessments and may reduce bias compared to conventional models that do not account for changes in predation mortality. Notably, including predation mortality in single-species assessments may help identify inconsistencies in biomass estimates that warrant further consideration.
Projecting the future distributions of commercially and ecologically important species has become a critical approach for ecosystem managers to strategically anticipate change, but large uncertainties in projections limit climate adaptation planning. Although distribution projections are primarily used to understand the scope of potential change-rather than accurately predict specific outcomes-it is nonetheless essential to understand where and why projections can give implausible results and to identify which processes contribute to uncertainty. Here, we use a series of simulated species distributions, an ensemble of 252 species distribution models, and an ensemble of three regional ocean climate projections, to isolate the influences of uncertainty from earth system model spread and from ecological modeling. The simulations encompass marine species with different functional traits and ecological preferences to more broadly address resource manager and fishery stakeholder needs, and provide a simulated true state with which to evaluate projections. We present our results relative to the degree of environmental extrapolation from historical conditions, which helps facilitate interpretation by ecological modelers working in diverse systems. We found uncertainty associated with species distribution models can exceed uncertainty generated from diverging earth system models (up to 70% of total uncertainty by 2100), and that this result was consistent across species traits. Species distribution model uncertainty increased through time and was primarily related to the degree to which models extrapolated into novel environmental conditions but moderated by how well models captured the underlying dynamics driving species distributions. The predictive power of simulated species distribution models remained relatively high in the first 30 years of projections, in alignment with the time period in which stakeholders make strategic decisions based on climate information. By understanding sources of uncertainty, and how they change at different forecast horizons, we provide recommendations for projecting species distribution models under global climate change.
Although species distribution models (SDMs) are commonly used to hindcast fine‐scale population metrics, there remains a paucity of information about how well these models predict future responses to climate. Many conventional SDMs rely on spatially‐explicit but time‐invariant conditions to quantify species distributions and densities. We compared these status quo ‘static' models with more climate‐informed 'dynamic' SDMs to assess whether the addition of time‐varying processes would improve hindcast performance and/or forecast skill. Here, we present two groundfish case studies from the Bering Sea – a high latitude system that has recently undergone considerable warming. We relied on conventional statistics (R2, % deviance explained, UBRE or GCV) to evaluate hindcast performance for presence–absence, numerical abundance and biomass of arrowtooth flounder Atheresthes stomias and walleye pollock Gadus chalcogrammus. We then used retrospective skill testing to evaluate near‐term forecast skill. Retrospective skill testing enables direct comparisons between forecasts and observations through a process of fitting and forecasting nested submodels within a given time series. We found that the inclusion of time‐varying covariates improved hindcasts. However, dynamic models either did not improve or decreased forecast skill relative to static SDMs. This is likely a result of rapidly changing temperatures within the ecosystem, which required models to predict species responses to environmental conditions that were outside the range of observed values. Until additional model development allows for fully dynamic predictions, static model forecasts (or persistence forecasts from dynamic models) may serve as reliable placeholders, especially when anomalous conditions are anticipated. Nonetheless, our findings demonstrate support for the use of retrospective skill testing rather than selecting forecast models a priori based on their ability to quantify species–habitat associations in the past.
To minimize negative effects of competition, predators must divide resources along one or more niche dimensions. Trophic niche separation is a principal method of resource partitioning in marine environments and is often assessed by quantifying diets of fishes with similar lengths. Taxonomic differences in allometric growth, however, suggest that the degree of gape limitation at a given body size varies among species. We studied resource overlap between two potential competitors in Southeast Alaska: Pacific Halibut Hippoglossus stenolepis and Arrowtooth Flounder Atheresthes stomias. We quantified length-gape relationships and assessed effects of fork length (FL; cm), gape height (GH; mm), and gape width (GW; mm) on interpretations of trophic niche separation. Gape sizes for Arrowtooth Flounder were nearly twice those of Pacific Halibut at similar FLs. Predators with smaller gapes exhibited moderate to high dietary overlap (D96-115GH = 0.554; D96-115GW = 0.731), whereas those with larger gapes had lower dietary overlap and distinct diet compositions (D116-135GH = 0.421; D116-135GW = 0.265). These findings suggest that the greatest potential for food competition is among small-bodied Arrowtooth Flounder and relatively large-bodied Pacific Halibut, with trophic niche separation increasing as these predators progress throughout their ontogeny. When comparing resource use among predators with similar FLs, we found high dietary overlap but significantly different diet compositions (D60-69FL = 0.657). Thus, we postulate that GW is more appropriate than FL when quantifying trophic niche separation among sympatric fishes, especially when disparate length-gape relationships are detected. Studies of resource partitioning would benefit from examining multiple size metrics and explicitly considering differences in allometric growth, thereby addressing potential mechanisms for resource overlap among hypothesized competitors.
Attributing variability in fish demographic processes to environmental conditions is helpful when assessing population status and forecasting changes in ecosystem function. Empirical orthogonal function (EOF) analysis has long been used to explore variability in physical processes, but has been only recently employed to study variability in biological processes. EOF analysis estimates dominant modes of variability (indices) and produces maps representing the spatial response for the dependent variable to each of these indices. In the eastern Bering Sea (EBS), research has linked demographic processes to the spatial extent of bottom temperatures less than or equal to 2 degrees C (the "cold-pool extent" or "CPE"), but has generally not compared effects among different demographic processes. We applied EOF analysis to four types of data measuring the outcome of demographic processes for EBS walleye pollock (Gadus chalcogrammus) over the period 1982-2019: numerical density (outcome of movement), morphometric condition (outcome of bioenergetics), length-at-age (outcome of growth), and prey-biomass-per-predator-mass (a proxy for stomach contents; outcome of consumption). We first designed exploratory factor analysis (EFA) models that did not include a CPE effect. We then applied confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), which differed from EFA by attributing observed patterns to a spatially varying response of demographic processes to CPE. We inferred that CPE was a proxy for demographic variability when there was a strong correlation between (1) the first or second mode of variability in the EFA and CPE or (2) the spatial map associated with the positive phase of the first or second mode of variability from the EFA model and the spatially varying response of CPE from the CFA model. Results showed that prey-biomass-per-predator-mass had the strongest correlation with CPE, numerical density and morphometric condition were also strongly correlated with CPE, and length-at-age was moderately correlated with CPE. The models also identified several anomalous years: 1999 and 2010, which were characterized by a very large CPE and high indices for variables related to demographic processes; and 2016-2019, which were characterized by a small CPE and low indices for variables related to demographic processes. We conclude that demographic processes for EBS walleye pollock show the finger-print of bottom-up environmental variation. Future research can employ CPE projections to forecast spatio-temporal changes in variables related to demographic processes, thereby informing estimates such as weight-at-age that are used in stock assessment models.
Abstract Predation can have substantial and long‐term effects on the population dynamics of ecologically important prey. Diverse predator assemblages, however, may produce stabilizing (i.e., portfolio) effects on prey mortality when consumption varies asynchronously among predators. We calculated spatiotemporal variation in predation on a dominant forage species to quantify synchrony and portfolio effects in a food web context and better understand diversity–stability relationships in a large marine ecosystem that has undergone considerable changes in community composition. We selected Walleye Pollock (Gadus chalcogrammus) as our case study because they support some of the largest, most valuable commercial fisheries in the world and serve as essential prey for an array of economically and culturally important species. Thus, there are sufficient data for Pollock with which to test ecological theories in an empirical setting. Spatially explicit predation indices accounted for annual variation in predator biomass, bioenergetics‐based rations, and age‐specific proportions of Pollock consumed by a suite of groundfishes in the Gulf of Alaska (1990–2015). We found that Arrowtooth Flounder (Atheresthes stomias) was, by far, the dominant Pollock predator (proportional consumption: 0.74 ± 0.14). We also found synchronous trends in consumption among predator species, indicating a lack of portfolio effects at the basin scale. This combination of a single dominant predator and synchronous consumption dynamics suggests strong top‐down control over Pollock in the Gulf of Alaska, though the degree of synchrony was highly variable at all spatial scales. Whereas synchrony generally increased in the western subregion, consumption in the central Gulf of Alaska became less synchronous through time. This suggests diminished trophic stability in one area and increased stability in another, thereby emphasizing the importance of spatiotemporal heterogeneity in maintaining food web structure and function. Finally, total Pollock consumption was highly variable (ranging from 1.87 to 7.63 Tg) and often exceeded assessment‐based estimates of productivity. We assert that using our holistic and empirically derived predation index as a modifier of assumed constant natural mortality would provide a practical method for incorporating ecological information into single‐species stock assessments.
Pacific Halibut (Hippoglossus stenolepis) support culturally and economically important fisheries in the Gulf of Alaska, though recent decreases in mean size-at-age have substantially reduced fishery yields, generating concerns among stakeholders and resource managers. Among the prevailing hypotheses for reduced size-at-age is intensified competition with Arrowtooth Flounder (Atheresthes stomias), a groundfish predator that exhibited nearly five-fold increases in biomass between the 1960s and mid-2010s. To assess the potential for competition between Pacific Halibut and Arrowtooth Flounder, we evaluated their degree of spatiotemporal and dietary overlap in the Gulf of Alaska using bottom trawl survey and food habits data provided by the Alaska Fisheries Science Center (NOAA; 1990 to 2017). We restricted analyses to fish measuring 30 to 69 cm fork length and used a delta modeling approach to quantify species-specific presence-absence and catch-per-unit-effort as a function of survey year, tow location, depth, and bottom temperature. We then calculated an index of spatial overlap across a uniform grid by multiplying standardized predictions of species' abundance. Dietary overlap was calculated across the same uniform grid using Schoener's similarity index. Finally, we assessed the relationship between spatial and dietary overlap as a measure of resource partitioning. We found increases in spatial overlap, moving from east to west in the Gulf of Alaska (eastern: 0.13 ± 0.20; central: 0.21 ± 0.11; western: 0.31 ± 0.13 SD). Dietary overlap was low throughout the study area (0.13 ± 0.20 SD). There was no correlation between spatial and dietary overlap, suggesting an absence of resource partitioning along the niche dimensions examined. This finding provides little indication that competition with Arrowtooth Flounder was responsible for changes in Pacific Halibut alHHsize-at-age in the Gulf of Alaska; however, it does not rule out competitive interactions that may have affected resource use prior to standardized data collection or at different spatiotemporal scales.
Baseline reproductive information is crucial to identifying species responses to spatiotemporal variation and changing environmental conditions. We collected 205 central California halibut (2012 and 2013) to better understand the reproductive tactics of a batch spawner with indeterminate fecundity. We used histology to identify subphases of actively spawning fish, approximated spawning duration based on weekly proportions of reproductive females, calculated daily spawning fractions to estimate interspawning intervals, and quantified batch fecundity using the hydrated oocyte method. The spawning season lasted approximately 10 weeks. Interspawning intervals were 1.3 to 2.7 d, depending upon the spawning marker (i.e., hydrated oocytes or POFs) used. Mean batch fecundity for fish in the late hydration subphase of spawning was 597,445 +/- 318,419 eggs, resulting in annual fecundities that ranged from 5.2 x 10(6) to 8.1 x 10(7) eggs per fish.These findings provide a preliminary assessment of reproductive output for California halibut and foundation data for future spatiotemporal analyses.
Estimates of lengthand age-at-maturity for California halibut (Paralichthys californicus) have been reported for southern California, but not central California. To provide new estimates of lengthand age-at-maturity for central California halibut, we macroscopically examined gonads from 635 fish caught between 2012 and 2014 and additionally examined ovaries histologically. We developed a detailed description of the reproductive phases and spawning states for California halibut, and assigned sex-specific lengthand age-at-maturity to each individual. Males (n=333) ranged from 19.1 to 95.9 cm fork length (FL) and 1 to 16 yr of age and females (n=302) ranged from 18.6 to 111.0 cm FL and 1 to 19 yr of age. Males matured at younger ages and shorter lengths than females. The smallest mature male was measured at 25.7 cm (1 yr), 50% of males were mature by 27.0 cm (1.1 yr), and 100% were mature by 29.0 cm (3 yr). The smallest mature female was measured at 46.6 cm (2 yr), 50% of females were mature by 47.3 cm (2.6 yr), and 100% were mature by 51.3 cm (4 yr), according to histological criteria. Therefore, all California halibut examined were mature before reaching the commercial and recreational minimum legal size limit of 55.9 cm (22 in). When comparing central California maturity data with information from southern California, we found that central California halibut matured at larger sizes (both sexes) and older ages (females only) than southern California halibut, according to macroscopic criteria.
Differences in key biological processes, such as growth and reproduction, can greatly influence localized population dynamics. Thus, it is important to characterize spatial variation in life history traits of harvested species to develop management plans that maximize fishery sustainability. We estimated sexand region-specific growth, total mortality, and reproductive seasonality to assess biogeographic differences in California Halibut life history. We found that central California Halibut grew faster but attained smaller maximum sizes than those from southern California. Catch curve analysis illustrated no difference in total mortality by sex or region, though females lived longer than males. Year-class frequency distributions suggested greater recruitment variability in central California, where abiotic factors (e.g., upwelling strength, sea surface temperature) are likely drivers. Reproductive data indicated that summer spawning seasons peak earliest in Mexico, followed by southern and central California. These results demonstrate a need to assess and manage California Halibut at the regional scale. INTRODUCTION Biogeographic differences in growth, mortality, and reproduction can result in disproportionate effects of fishing (Rice et al. 2005). However, fisheries are often managed at relatively broad (e.g., statewide/nationwide) spatial scales. Although averaging the condition of a species across its range simplifies resource management, spatiotemporal changes in key biological processes can result in localized overor under-utilization of the resource (Prince 2010). This is because many fish stocks consist of metapopulations (i.e., groups of individuals that are interconnected through larval dispersal, yet exhibit distinct population dynamics), which are differentially affected by fishing pressure (Levins 1969; Adams 1980; Orensanz et al. 2005; Pascoe et al. 2009). Thus, it is important to understand spatial variation in the life history traits of harvested species, especially those that exhibit widespread distributions spanning multiple biogeographic regions. California Halibut, Paralichthys californicus (family Paralichthyidae), is an economically important species that can be found as far north as the Quillayute River in Washington and as far south as Magdalena Bay in Baja California Sur, Mexico (Allen 1990). However, most individuals in U.S. waters are encountered between Bodega Bay, California and the US-Mexico border. After a short larval duration of 20 to 29 d, juveniles settle into bays, estuaries, and shallow waters of the open coast (Allen 1988; Kramer 1990). Adults are primarily found nearshore (typically less than 60 m water depth) over sandy habitats that are adjacent to hard substrate or biogenic structures (e.g., sand dollar, Dendraster excentricus, beds) (Allen 1988; Allen 1990). Female California Halibut grow faster and mature later than male conspecifics (Haaker 1975; MacNair et al. 2001). Males reach sexual maturity between 19 and 32 cm (1 to 3 yr), whereas females mature between 36 and 59 cm (2 to 7 yr) (Love and Brooks 1990). California Halibut are multiple, broadcast spawners that have been noted as living to 30 yr, though recent data have demonstrated a lifespan of only 23 yr (CDFW unpublished data [2007 to 2014]). In 2011, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW, formerly California Department of Fish and Game) conducted its first comprehensive stock assessment for California Halibut to determine population size and the effectiveness of existing management actions (Maunder et al. 2011). As part of the assessment, fishery-independent and -dependent data were synthesized and incorporated into statistical models developed for two separate stocks, one north and one south of Point Conception (a well-known biogeographic boundary between central and southern California). Although substantial amounts of biological information were made available during the assessment, life history data pertained primarily to fish collected off southern California (e.g., Allen 1988; Allen and Herbinson 1990; Allen et al. 1990; Kramer 1990; Domeier and Chun 1995; Valle et al. 1998; MacNair et al. 2001). This forced assessment scientists to parameterize both stock models based primarily on the southern California population. To assess the effect of biogeography on California Halibut life history characteristics, we estimated sex-specific growth and instantaneous total mortality for fish collected both north and south of Point Conception. We also compared BARNES ET AL.: GROWTH, MORTALITY, AND REPRODUCTIVE SEASONALITY OF CALIFORNIA HALIBUT (PARALICHTHYS CALIFORNICUS) CalCOFI Rep., Vol. 56, 2015CalCOFI Rep., Vol. 56, 2015 2 ity of fish from southern California were obtained from commercial fisheries (table 1). Date, location, fishery (i.e., commercial or recreational), gear type, sex, fork length (mm), and wet body weight (kg) were recorded in the field. The majority of fork lengths were obtained from whole fish sampled at shore-based facilities. However, a number of California Halibut were received from recreational fishers as filleted carcasses. Fork lengths for filleted fish were recorded and converted to pre-fillet lengths using the relationship y = 1.37 + 0.99x (R2 = 0.999, p < 0.001), where x represents post-fillet fork length (mm) and y represents prefillet fork length (mm). In the laboratory, sagittal otoliths were extracted and thin-sectioned according to procedures outlined by the Committee of Age Reading Experts (CARE 2006). Because eyed-side otoliths tended to exhibit distorted patterns of growth, blind-side otoliths were selected for ageing whenever possible. Without prior knowledge of size or sex, two or three readers independently aged each fish to the nearest year. Rounding decisions were based upon the amount of marginal growth relative to immediately adjacent annuli (i.e., otoliths with a margin representing greater than half the distance between neighboring annuli were rounded up and margins representing less than half the distance between neighboring annuli were rounded down). From 2007 to 2011 and again in 2014, two CDFW staff independently read each otolith until a minimum of two identical (withinreader) age estimates were made. If age determinations by the two readers did not agree, a digital image of the thin section was prepared and both readers discussed the various aspects of the otolith until a final age was agreed upon or they decided to exclude the otolith from analyses due to issues associated with poor readability. In 2012 and 2013, one CDFW and one MLML reader followed the same procedures detailed above. However, if reader-specific age determinations conflicted with one another during these years, a third (CDFW) reader was introduced to settle the disagreement. If the third reader did not agree with either of the other two readers, a digital image of the thin section was prepared and all readers either came to a unanimous agreement or region-specific estimates of reproductive seasonality by evaluating temporal changes in gonadosomatic index for females collected off central California and corrected larval density data obtained by California Cooperative Oceanic Fisheries Investigations (CalCOFI) surveys along southern California and Mexico. MATERIALS AND METHODS California Halibut were collected between San Francisco Bay, CA and the US–Mexico border from 2007 to 2014 (fig. 1). Fish were collected using both fisheryindependent and fishery-dependent sampling methods. A diversity of gear types (i.e., hook and line, trawl, gill net, seine, and spear) was used to collect fishes of both sexes and from various size classes. Although fisheryindependent methods were used, we (CDFW [2007 to 2014] and Moss Landing Marine Laboratories [MLML, 2012 and 2013]) procured most specimens from commercial and recreational fisheries using a combination of stratified random and opportunistic sampling designs (CDFW 2013; Barnes 2015). Fish from central California were collected in nearly equal proportions from commercial and recreational fisheries, whereas the majorMoss Landing Monterey Santa Cruz San Francisco
Differences in key biological processes, such as growth and reproduction, can greatly influence localized population dynamics. Thus, it is important to characterize spatial variation in life history traits of harvested species to develop management plans that maximize fishery sustainability. We estimated sex-and region-specific growth, total mortality, and reproductive seasonality to assess biogeographic differences in California Halibut life history. We found that central California Halibut grew faster but attained smaller maximum sizes than those from southern California. Catch curve analysis illustrated no difference in total mortality by sex or region, though females lived longer than males. Year-class frequency distributions suggested greater recruitment variability in central California, where abiotic factors (e.g., upwelling strength, sea surface temperature) are likely drivers. Reproductive data indicated that summer spawning seasons peak earliest in Mexico, followed by southern and central California. These results demonstrate a need to assess and manage California Halibut at the regional scale.
Meta-analyses of field studies have shown that biomass, density, species richness, and size of organisms protected by no-take marine reserves generally increase over time. The magnitude and timing of changes in these response variables, however, vary greatly and depend upon the taxonomic groups protected, size and type of reserve, oceanographic regime, and time since the reserve was implemented. We conducted collaborative, fishery-independent surveys of fishes for seven years in and near newly created marine protected areas (MPAs) in central California, USA. Results showed that initially most MPAs contained more and larger fishes than associated reference sites, likely due to differences in habitat quality. The differences between MPAs and reference sites did not greatly change over the seven years of our study, indicating that reserve benefits will be slow to accumulate in California's temperate eastern boundary current. Fishes in an older reserve that has been closed to fishing since 1973, however, were significantly more abundant and larger than those in associated reference sites. This indicates that reserve benefits are likely to accrue in the California Current ecosystem, but that 20 years or more may be needed to detect significant changes in response variables that are due to MPA implementation. Because of the high spatial and temporal variability of fish recruitment patterns, long-term monitoring is needed to identify positive responses of fishes to protection in the diverse set of habitats in a dynamic eastern boundary current. Qualitative estimates of response variables, such as would be obtained from an expert opinion process, are unlikely to provide an accurate description of MPA performance. Similarly, using one species or one MPA as an indicator is unlikely to provide sufficient resolution to accurately describe the performance of multiple MPAs.
The deepwater faunas of oceanic islands and seamounts of the Eastern Tropical Pacific are poorly known. From 11-22 September 2009, we conducted an exploration of the deepwater areas around Isla del Coco National Park and Las Gemelas Seamount, located about 50km southwest of Isla del Coco, Costa Rica using a manned submersible to survey the seafloor habitats. The goal of the exploration was to characterize the habitats and biota, and conduct quantitative surveys of the deepwater portions of Isla del Coco National Park and Las Gemelas. We completed a total of 22 successful submersible dives, spanning more than 80hr underwater, and collected a total of 36hr of video. With respect to invertebrates, our objectives were to gather quantitative information on species composition, density, distribution and habitat associations as well as to compare the invertebrate communities between the two sites. A total of 7172 invertebrates were counted from analysis of the video collected on this project. Larger organisms were counted and placed into 27 taxonomic groups to characterize the deepwater invertebrate fauna of Las Gemelas Seamount and Isla del Coco National Park. The Shannon-Weiner Index for biodiversity (H’) was calculated to be 0.14 ± 0.02 for Isla del Coco and 0.07 ± 0.03 for Las Gemelas surveys. Although richness was fairly equal between the two sites, evenness was greater at Isla del Coco (J = 0.04 ± 0.006) when compared to Las Gemelas (J = 0.02 ± 0.01). This lower level of evenness in the community at Las Gemelas was a result of high densities of a few dominant species groups, specifically sea urchins and black corals. We also evaluated invertebrate percent cover at both Isla del Coco and Las Gemelas Seamount with respect to habitat type, slope and rugosity. Results indicated that highly rugose habitats contained the highest frequencies of all invertebrates at both sites, with the exception of glass sponges and polychaetes at Isla del Coco, which were found in greater quantities at intermediate levels of rugosity. Information obtained from these submersible surveys indicate that seamounts in the tropical eastern Pacific Ocean may be an important source of biodiversity and that more quantitative surveys are needed to characterize the fauna of the region. Citation: Starr, R.M., J. Cortés, C.L. Barnes, K. Green & O. Breedy. 2012. Characterization of deepwater invertebrates at Isla del Coco National Park and Las Gemelas Seamounts, Costa Rica. Rev. Biol. Trop. 60 (Suppl. 3): 303-319. Epub 2012 Dec 01.