Dense retrieval models exhibit positional bias: retrieval effectiveness degrades when relevant information appears later in a passage (Zeng et al., 2025). We ask whether this bias can be reduced at inference time, without retraining and without sacrificing overall retrieval effectiveness. To this end, we adapt inference-time attention calibration (Schuhmacher et al., 2026) to downstream retrieval and extend it with a strength coefficient lambda that interpolates between the original and fully calibrated attention distributions. Across three embedding models on SQuAD-PosQ and FineWeb-PosQ, we examine how basket size, calibrated layer set, and strength affect the trade-off between positional fairness and retrieval effectiveness, finding that partial calibration frequently outperforms full calibration. A single configuration (B=128, lambda=0.5, 50

HIPE-2026 is a CLEF evaluation lab dedicated to person-place relation extraction from noisy, multilingual historical texts. Building on the HIPE-2020 and HIPE-2022 campaigns, it extends the series toward semantic relation extraction by targeting the task of identifying person–place associations in multiple languages and time periods. Systems are asked to classify relations of two types - at ("Has the person ever been at this place?") and isAt ("Is the person located at this place around publication time?") - requiring reasoning over temporal and geographical cues. The lab introduces a three-fold evaluation profile that jointly assesses accuracy, computational efficiency, and domain generalization. By linking relation extraction to large-scale historical data processing, HIPE-2026 aims to support downstream applications in knowledge-graph construction, historical biography reconstruction, and spatial analysis in digital humanities.

Text embeddings are standard for semantic similarity tasks, yet their evaluation remains an open challenge. Current benchmarks are static, cover only a limited set of languages, are often domain-specific, susceptible to overfitting, and poorly representative of low-resource languages. To address these limitations, we introduce ALEE, a framework that extends Sentence Smith (Li et al., 2025) to the cross-lingual and paragraph level. ALEE uses Abstract Meaning Representations (AMR) to generate English minimal pairs with controlled, fine-grained semantic shifts, which are paired with translations in target languages. This approach enables targeted diagnostics for models in any language with English parallel data. We conduct a large-scale empirical study across a diverse set of embedding models and 275+ languages spanning three parallel datasets. On ALEE, performance varies substantially across languages, text lengths, and linguistic phenomena, exposing persistent gaps in cross-lingual semantic representation that track language prevalence in training resources and subword tokenization. We release ALEE at https://github.com/Andrian0s/any-lang-embed-eval

To be discoverable in an embedding-based search process, each part of a document should be reflected in its embedding representation. To quantify any potential reflection biases, we introduce a permutation-based evaluation framework. With this, we observe that state-of-the-art embedding models exhibit systematic positional and language biases when documents are longer and consist of multiple segments. Specifically, early segments and segments in higher-resource languages like English are over-represented, while later segments and segments in lower-resource languages are marginalized. In our further analysis, we find that the positional bias stems from front-loaded attention distributions in pooling-token embeddings, where early tokens receive more attention. To mitigate this issue, we introduce an inference-time attention calibration method that redistributes attention more evenly across document positions, increasing discoverabiltiy of later segments. Our evaluation framework and attention calibration is available at https://github.com/impresso/fair-sentence-transformers

Was this person ever at that place, and if so, when? Answering such questions from noisy, multilingual historical documents is the central challenge of HIPE-2026, the third edition of the HIPE evaluation series. Moving from named entity recognition and linking (HIPE-2020, HIPE-2022) to reasoning about relationships between entities, HIPE-2026 targets two temporally grounded relation types: at, indicating that a person was present at a location at some point prior to a document's publication date, and isAt, indicating presence contemporaneous with that date. This paper presents the results of the evaluation campaign, which confronted 17 participating teams with the challenges of historical language variation, OCR noise, and indirect contextual cues across three languages: French, German, and English. The datasets include historical newspaper text from the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, as well as a surprise-domain generalization set drawn from early modern French literary texts. A distinctive feature of HIPE-2026 is its three-fold evaluation framework, which assesses predictive accuracy, computational efficiency, and cross-domain generalization, reflecting the practical demands of large-scale historical document processing in the cultural heritage domain. Across more than 40 submitted runs, results reveal a wide range of strategies, from state-of-the-art large language models to lightweight task-specific classifiers, and highlight the trade-offs between accuracy, efficiency, and robustness inherent to historical relation extraction at corpus scale. System descriptions, datasets, and findings are presented and discussed, offering a detailed picture of the current state of temporally grounded relation extraction for historical documents.

We present the results of HIPE-OCRepair-2026, an ICDAR competition on LLM-assisted OCR post-correction of historical documents. OCR post-correction remains a long-standing challenge in digital heritage: large-scale collections of digitized documents are affected by legacy OCR errors, while re-digitization at scale remains impractical. Large language models (LLMs) offer a major opportunity to revisit this challenge, yet their effectiveness across languages, document types, and noise conditions—and their tendency to hallucinate—remains insufficiently understood. HIPE-OCRepair-2026 pursues two objectives: (i) to evaluate the capabilities of modern OCR post-correction systems, and (ii) to provide a reproducible evaluation framework anchored in the HIPE-OCRepair-2026 dataset, a harmonized multilingual resource consolidating existing and newly curated historical datasets. Participants were tasked with correcting noisy OCR transcripts from historical newspapers and printed works in English, French, and German (17th–20th century), working at the level of coherent transcription units (paragraphs or articles) without access to source images. The evaluation adopts a retrieval-oriented rather than diplomatic scoring approach, reflecting the practical use case of search and access over digitized collections. Four teams submitted systems ranging from zero-shot prompting to continued pre-training and fine-tuning, offering insights into the merits of different adaptation strategies. Results show that modern LLM-assisted systems can significantly improve OCR quality, but performance varies across datasets, languages, and noise levels. Overcorrection on low-noise inputs emerges as a recurring challenge, highlighting the importance of evaluation beyond character error reduction. The dataset, scorer, and evaluation pipeline are publicly released to support future research.

These guidelines outline the participation rules for HIPE-2026, a CLEF evaluation lab focused on extracting person–place relations from noisy, multilingual historical texts. They define the task, describe the data, explain the evaluation setup, and detail the submission instructions.

Economists and geographers describe world cities not only as major urban centres but also as influential hubs of economic, cultural, geographic, and technological innovation. Building on this idea, several scholars argue that world cities constitute autonomous ecosystems increasingly detached from their national contexts. This paper investigates whether such an ecosystem can be detected through patterns of information behaviour, thereby challenging geography as the only explanatory factor. We analyse a multilingual dataset of eight newspapers headquartered in a sample of Western world cities: seven newspapers of record (The Times, The Irish Times, Le Figaro, Die Welt, NZZ, La Stampa, El País) and one suburban newspaper: Chicago Daily Herald—covering the years 1999–2018. We treat the suburban newspaper as an exploratory study case, to be expanded in future work. Then, in dialogue with Franzosi’s concept of narrative units, we extract and quantify unique Subject–Verb–Object (SVO) triplets per token per year as a proxy for information density. The analysis reveals a consistent increase in unique SVO triplets across the seven newspapers of record, suggesting a convergent pattern of information density among these outlets. By contrast, the Chicago Daily Herald shows a declining trend despite its geographic location within a world city. This divergence challenges the assumption that location alone explains informational homogeneity. The results also extend research on the Theory of Social Acceleration, indicating that newspapers of record reflect increasing informational activity, whereas our suburban outlet does not. We discuss possible confounding factors such as editorial policies, content scope, and media materiality.

The growing volume of digitized historical texts requires effective semantic search using text embeddings. However, pre-trained multilingual models face challenges with historical content due to OCR noise and outdated spellings. This study examines multilingual embeddings for cross-lingual semantic search in historical Luxembourgish (LB), a low-resource language. We collect historical Luxembourgish news articles from various periods and use GPT-4o for sentence segmentation and translation, generating 20,000 parallel training sentences per language pair. Additionally, we create a semantic search (Historical LB Bitext Mining) evaluation set and find that existing models perform poorly on cross-lingual search for historical Luxembourgish. Using our historical and additional modern parallel training data, we adapt several multilingual embedding models through contrastive learning or knowledge distillation and increase accuracy significantly for all models. We release our adapted models and historical Luxembourgish-German/French/English bitexts to support further research.

Text embeddings are a fundamental component in many NLP tasks, including classification, regression, clustering, and semantic search. However, despite their ubiquitous application, challenges persist in interpreting embeddings and explaining similarities between them.In this work, we provide a structured overview of methods specializing in inherently interpretable text embeddings and text similarity explanation, an underexplored research area. We characterize the main ideas, approaches, and trade-offs. We compare means of evaluation, discuss overarching lessons learned and finally identify opportunities and open challenges for future research.

Controllable and transparent text generation has been a long-standing goal in NLP. Almost as long-standing is a general idea for addressing this challenge: Parsing text to a symbolic representation, and generating from it. However, earlier approaches were hindered by parsing and generation insufficiencies. Using modern parsers and a safety supervision mechanism, we show how close current methods come to this goal. Concretely, we propose the framework for English, which has three steps: 1. Parsing a sentence into a semantic graph. 2. Applying human-designed semantic manipulation rules. 3. Generating text from the manipulated graph. A final entailment check (4.) verifies the validity of the applied transformation. To demonstrate our framework’s utility, we use it to induce hard negative text pairs that challenge text embedding models. Since the controllable generation makes it possible to clearly isolate different types of semantic shifts, we can evaluate text embedding models in a fine-grained way, also addressing an issue in current benchmarking where linguistic phenomena remain opaque. Human validation confirms that our transparent generation process produces texts of good quality. Notably, our way of generation is very resource-efficient, since it relies only on smaller neural networks.

The evaluation of cross-lingual semantic search models is often limited to existing datasets from tasks such as information retrieval and semantic textual similarity. We introduce Cross-Lingual Semantic Discrimination (CLSD), a lightweight evaluation task that requires only parallel sentences and a Large Language Model (LLM) to generate adversarial distractors. CLSD measures an embedding model’s ability to rank the true parallel sentence above semantically misleading but lexically similar alternatives. As a case study, we construct CLSD datasets for German–French in the news domain. Our experiments show that models fine-tuned for retrieval tasks benefit from pivoting through English, whereas bitext mining models perform best in direct cross-lingual settings. A fine-grained similarity analysis further reveals that embedding models differ in their sensitivity to linguistic perturbations.

Text embeddings and text embedding models are a backbone of many AI and NLP systems, particularly those involving search. However, interpretability challenges persist, especially in explaining obtained similarity scores, which is crucial for applications requiring transparency. In this paper, we give a structured overview of interpretability methods specializing in explaining those similarity scores, an emerging research area. We study the methods' individual ideas and techniques, evaluating their potential for improving interpretability of text embeddings and explaining predicted similarities.